Conceptual model for individual safety information force and its action mechanism

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.11.002

Abstract

Abstract: In order to perfect the theoretical system of safety information cognition, this paper was aimed at building a conceptual model of individual safety information force and studying its action mechanism. Firstly, the concepts of individual capacity and individual safety capacity were discriminated, and then, based on engineering psychology and cognitive psychology, by using the inductive approach, a concept of individual safety information force was put forward, its connation and characteristics were analyzed. Secondly, the conceptual model of individual safety information force was built, which consists of safety informationacquisition ability, safety information analysis ability and safety information utilizing ability. Lastly, the relationship between individual safety information force and individual behavior was analyzed, based on this, the action mechanism of individual safety information force was argued from three aspects, which are the size, direction and function point of individualsafety information force. Research results show that the essence of individual safety capacity is individual safety information force, the construction of individual safety information force conceptual model and the analysis of its action mechanism can reflect the essence of individual safety capability.

Key words: safety information force, information cognition, safe behavior, behavior model, conceptual model

CLC Number:

X913.2

HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing. Conceptual model for individual safety information force and its action mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(11): 7-12.

References

[1] PERROW C. Normal accidents-living with high risk technologies[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011: 2-9.
[2] 王盼盼, 李启明, 邓小鹏. 施工人员安全能力模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(8): 40-45.
WANG Panpan, LI Qiming, DENG Xiaopeng. Study on safety competency model of construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(8): 40-45.
[3] 李启明, 王盼盼, 邓小鹏, 等. 地铁盾构坍塌事故中施工人员安全能力分析[J]. 灾害学, 2010, 25(4): 73-77.
LI Qiming, WANG Panpan, DENG Xiaopeng, et al. Safety capability of constructers in collapses of subway construction by shield tunneling[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2010, 25(4): 73-77.
[4] 王旭峰, 邱坤南, 阳富强, 等. 建筑工人个体安全能力影响因素效用量化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(3): 133-139.
WANG Xufeng, QIU Kunnan, YANG Fuqiang, et al. Research on quantizing utility of factors influencing on individual safety competence of construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(3): 133-139.
[5] 赵伟峰, 卢明银, 汪伟忠. 考虑多因素涌现的车间作业人员安全能力模型[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(2): 168-173.
ZHAO Weifeng, LU Mingyin, WANG Weizhong. Safety capability model of workshop operators considering multiple factors emergence[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(2): 168-173.
[6] 陈芳, 罗云. 管制员安全能力模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(1): 17-23.
CHEN Fang, LUO Yun. Study on safety capability model of air traffic controllers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(1): 17-23.
[7] NEISSER U. Cognitive psychology[M]. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967: 17-87.
[8] WICKENS C, HOLLANDS J. Engineering psychology and human performance[M]. Prentice Hall:Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000: 30-54.
[9] DZINKOWSKI R. The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction[J]. Management Accounting, 2000, 78(2): 32-36.
[10] HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing, et al. A new paradigm for accident investigation and analysis in the era of big data [J/OL]. Process Safety Progress, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prs.11898.
[11] RASMUSSEN J. Information processing and human–machine interaction[M].North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1986: 137-185.
[12] 吴超. 安全信息认知通用模型及其启示[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
WU Chao. Construction of a general safety information cognitive model and its implications[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
[13] 黄浪, 吴超. 风险感知偏差机理概念模型构建研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(1): 60-66.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao. Conceptual modeling of risk perception deviation mechanism[J]. Journal of Natural Hazards, 2017, 26(1): 60-66.
[14] 李建斌. 从势科学视角论信息势和信息力的数学定义[J]. 系统科学学报, 2016, 24(1): 58-60.
LI Jianbin. Research on the mathematical definition information potential and information power from potential science perspective[J]. Journal of Systems Science, 2016, 24(1): 58-60.
[15] SHIPPMANNJ S, ASHR A, BATJTSTA M, et al. The practice of competency modeling[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2000, 53(3): 703-740.
[16] 黄浪, 吴超, 贾楠. 安全理论模型构建的方法论研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(12): 1-6.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, JIA Nan. Study on methodology of safety theoretical model construction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(12): 1-6.
[17] RASMUSSEN J. Skills, rules, and knowledge, signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Man & Cybernetics, 1983, 13(3): 257-266.
[18] SAURIN T A, GUIMARAES L B D M, COSTELLA M F, et al. An algorithm for classifying error types of front-line workers based on the SRK framework[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2008, 38(11): 1 067-1 077.
[19] LEVESON N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237-270.
[20] LI Weijun, ZHANG Laibin, LIANG Wei. An accident causation analysis and taxonomy (ACAT) model of complex industrial system from both system safety and control theory perspectives[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 92: 94-103.
[21] 赵潮锋, 周西华. 安全信息缺失事故致因理论的初步研究[J]. 世界科技研究与城展, 2012, 34(1): 6-9.
ZHAO Chaofeng, ZHOU Xihua. Preliminary study of accident-causing based on safety information missing[J]. World Science Technology Research and Development, 2012, 34(1): 6-9.