Safety evaluation of high-speed railway passenger station

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.S2.025

Abstract

Abstract: For the sake of scientific and effective safety evaluation of high-speed railway passenger stations, factors which have impact on itssafety were analyzed considering its characteristics ofcrowded and fast moving passengers and complex safety management. Then an index system of safety evaluation was established and fuzzycomprehensiveevaluation method was put forward. Finally, it was applied to a high-speed railway passenger station in northeast Chinafor safety evaluation. The results show that fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is suitable for evaluation featured with multiple objectives and qualitative indicators,andit is reliable and practical in safety evaluation of high-speed railway passenger stations.

Key words: high-speed railway passenger station, safety factors, safety evaluation, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, analytic hierarchy process

CLC Number:

X913.4

LI Chengrui, ZHAO Ming, YIN Panpan, LIU Meichi, MA Letao. Safety evaluation of high-speed railway passenger station[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(S2): 149-153.

References 10

[1]	王雷.高铁站综合体复合功能的一体化设计研究[D].北京: 北京交通大学,2013.WANG Lei.Research on integrated design of complex functions of high-speed rail station[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2013.
[2]	蓝善民.高铁站应急疏散研究[D].成都: 西南交通大学,2014.LAN Shanmin.Research on emergency evacuation forhigh-speed railway stations[D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University,2014.
[3]	张瑜.铁路客运站旅客安全预警管理系统研究[D].北京: 北京交通大学,2008.ZHANG Yu.Research on passenger safety early warning management system of railway passenger station[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2008.
[4]	郑丽媛,高宁波,胡启洲,等.基于集成法的高速铁路运营安全综合评价[J].交通信息与安全,2015,33(3):65-70,86.ZHENG Liyuan,GAO Ningbo, HU Qizhou,et al.A comprehensive evaluation of high-speed railway operation safety based on an integrated method[J].Traffic Information and Safety,2015,33(3):65-70,86.
[5]	李忠源,荣文竽,陈滋顶.基于可变模糊集理论的铁路行包运输安全评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(增1):186-190.LI Zhongyuan, RONG Wenyu, CHEN Ziding. Railway package transportation safety evaluation based on variable fuzzy set theory[J].China Safety Science Journal,2008,28(S1):186-190.
[6]	冯运卿,李雪梅,李学伟.基于熵权法与灰色关联分析的铁路安全综合评价[J].安全与环境学报,2014,14(2):73-79.FENG Yunqing,LI Xuemei,LI Xuewei.Comprehensive evaluation of railway safety based on entropy weight method and grey correlation analysis[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2014,14(2):73-79.
[7]	游岳.铁路客运站行车安全评价研究[D].成都: 西南交通大学,2010.YOU Yue.Study on traffic safety evaluation of railway passenger station[D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University,2010.
[8]	卢剑波.铁路站段安全管理研究[D].成都: 西南交通大学,2009.LU Jianbo.Research on railway section safety management[D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University,2009.
[9]	HIROSHI F.Uncertainty analysis in railway safety [J].Quarterly Report of the Railway Technical Research Institute,1999,40(1):37-42.
[10]	曲微.基于事故案例分析的铁路行车安全评价[D].大连: 大连交通大学,2014.QU Wei.Railway traffic safety evaluation based on accident case analysis[D].Dalian:Dalian Jiaotong University,2014.

[1]	HUANG Jie, ZHANG Xianfeng. Risk assessment of regional violent terrorist attacks in southern Xinjiang [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[2]	WANG Xinglong, CHEN Ziyan, LIU Yan. Research on monitoring information quality of ATC based on combination weighting [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 41-50.
[3]	WANG Gang, SHANG Luozhen, LIU Xuelin, TANG Li, CHENG Qian. Study on causes of poisoning and asphyxiation in roadway opening by AHP-entropy weight method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 187-192.
[4]	ZHANG Qi, WANG Yuefeng, LI Jianchun, ZHANG Bin, XU Jiang. Evaluation method for safety of subway tunnels adjacent to deep foundation pits [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(4): 95-104.
[5]	LIU Dashan, CHEN Xiaochun, DUO Yingquan, SHI Lichen. Rapid risk assessment method for chemical industry park earthquake Na-Tech event [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[6]	YANG Tianzi, WANG Tieli, PENG Hengming, DUAN Hailin. Evaluation on emergency response vulnerability for work safety accidents in small and micro enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[7]	WU Yaonan, LIN Lei, REN Xinwen, WANG Longting, LIU Zhihui, LIU Zengkai. An improved FMEA method based on logical structure number [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[8]	WU Renbiao, HE Yuxiang, JIA Yunfei. Key personnel risk assessment method based on improved AHP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 112-118.
[9]	LIU Xiaoben, WANG Baodong, ZHANG Dong, ZHANG Hong. Safety evaluation of gas pipelines with defects under surface load [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 127-135.
[10]	NIE Xingxin, MA Yijie, AI Weixi, SUN Hao. Impact situation assessment of multiple connection number on miners' physical and mental safety [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 189-195.
[11]	JIANG Tao, ZHANG Yulong, LI Shibo, LI Zheng, QIU Hailiang. Research on comprehensive performance evaluation system of large multi-functional rescue attachments [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(1): 102-108.
[12]	ZHU Guanji, LIU Di, SUN Qiang, ZHOU Zichao. Evaluation on occupational safety adaptability of railway locomotive drivers [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 64-70.
[13]	JIA Baofeng, YAN Meihao. Research on safety early warning system of railway express freight [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 121-127.
[14]	ZHENG Xiaobo. Research on risk evaluation index system of railway information system based on AHP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 139-145.
[15]	ZHOU Xue, ZUO Zhongyi, CHENG Wei. Safety evaluation of railway passenger transportation based on combined weighting cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 158-164.