Research on influence mechanism of PR on behavior based safety of workers

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.003

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore relationship between different PR and workers' behavior based safety, eight typical risk factors were selected from individual and organizational levels, path relationship hypotheses were proposed and an impact mechanism model was put forward. Then, these hypotheses were tested and the model was verified with construction industry as an example. The results show that PR exert positive and negative influence on workers' behavior based safety indirectly by affecting their occupational psychology which generally includes work burnout and work engagement. At individual level, work stress and role conflicts lead to work burnout, and weakens work engagement which is also weakened by role ambiguity but promoted by self motivation. At organizational level, social support reduces work burnout and enhances work engagement while interpersonal conflict does the opposite by causing work burnout and reducing work engagement. Work burnout goes against workers' behavior based safety while work engagement contributes to maintaining their safe behaviors.

Key words: psychosocial risk(PR), behavior based safety, work burnout, work engagement, Meta-analysis

CLC Number:

X911

TONG Ruipeng, WANG Lulu, YANG Xiaoyi, GUO Zimeng, AN Yu. Research on influence mechanism of PR on behavior based safety of workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(8): 18-24.

References

[1] TOM C, AMANDA G. Commentary III: monitoring the changing organization of work: a commentary[J]. Sozial-und Pr Ventivmedizin, 2003, 48(6):354-355.
[2] PIKHART H, PIKHARTOVA J. The relationship between psychosocial risk factors and health outcomes of chronic diseases: a review of the evidence for cancer and cardiovascular diseases[M]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015: 156-162.
[3] 姜兰, 刘雅琴, 孙佳. 机场安检员工作压力与不安全行为关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 13-18.
JIANG Lan, LIU Yaqin, SUN Jia. Research on relationship between work stress and unsafe behaviors of airport security staff[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 13-18.
[4] 杨校毅, 佟瑞鹏. 基于Meta分析的矿工不安全行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12): 71-76.
YANG Xiaoyi, TONG Ruipeng. Research on JD-R model of miners' unsafe behavior based on Meta-analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(12): 71-76.
[5] MICHELLE K T, NERINA L J, JANE E J. Role stressors in Australian transport and logistics workers: psychosocial implications[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109: 12-19.
[6] MIRZA M Z, ISHA A S N, MEMON M A, et al. Psychosocial safety climate, safety compliance and safety participation: the mediating role of psychological distress[J]. Journal of Management & Organization, 2019,35: 1-16.
[7] SCHMIDT F L, HUNTER J E. Methods of Meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings[J]. Evaluation & Program Planning, 2006, 29(3): 236-237.
[8] JOHNSON J V, HALL E M. Dialectic between conceptual and causal inquiry in psychosocial work-environment research[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996, 1(4):362-374.
[9] BERNAL D, CAMPOS-SEMA J, TOBIAS A, et al. Work-related psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in hospital nurses and nursing aides: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2015, 52(2): 635-648.
[10] 余善法.关注工作场所社会心理危险因素及其预防控制[J].环境与职业医学, 2020, 37(3): 218-224.
YU Shanfa. Focus on psychosocial hazards in the workplace and relevant prevention and control[J]. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2020, 37(3): 218-224.
[11] STAMATOGIANNI E, ANYFANTIS I D, DIMOPOULOS C, et al. Validating the accuracy of ESENER-II in assessing psychosocial risks for the case of micro firms in Cyprus[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 120: 783-797.
[12] LEUNG M Y, S. THOMAS N G, SKITMORE M, et al. Critical stressors influencing construction estimators in Hong Kong[J]. Construction Management & Economics, 2005, 23(1): 33-44.
[13] CARNES A M. Bringing work stress home: the impact of role conflict and role overload on spousal marital satisfaction[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2017, 90(2): 153-176.
[14] KAHN R L, WOLFE D M, QUINN R P, et al. Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1965, 10(1):DOI:10.2307/2091375.
[15] CHEN Yuting. Factors affecting safety performance of construction workers: safety climate, interpersonal conflicts at work, and resilience[D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2017.
[16] NAHRGANG J D, MORGESON F P, HOFMANN D A. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2011, 96(1): 71-94.
[17] LEUNG M, ZHANG Hong, SKITMORE M. Effects of organizational supports on the stress of construction estimation participants[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, 134(2): 84-93.
[18] KALLIATH T, KALLIATH P, ALBRECHT S L. The influence of job, team and organizational level resources on employee well-being, engagement, commitment and extra-role performance[J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2012, 33(7): 840-853.
[19] SCHMIDT F L, HUNTER J E. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings[M]. California: Sage Publications, 2014: 3-32.