Experimental study on soil surface CO2 fluxes in goaf area of Haizhou open-pit mines

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study status of spontaneous combustion in Dongbang abandoned goaf in Haizhou open-pit mine, based on characteristics of spontaneous combustion and gas diffusion theory of residual coal in goaf, Intelligent Soil Gas Flux Monitoring System was used to continuously (monthly) monitor soil surface CO₂ fluxes at measuring points in Dongbang goaf. According to distribution characteristics of surface CO₂ fluxes and soil temperature in the experimental region, emission range and variation of CO₂ released from underground fire area were explored. At the same time, CO₂ emission in the area was calculated and its variation with time was analyzed. The results show that soil surface CO₂ fluxes are positively correlated with soil temperature. The area of high CO₂ fluxes in the experimental region shows a trend of monthly expansion and increase. Moreover, CO₂ emission gradually increases every month, and the annual emission in the experimental region is about 3.6×10⁶ m³.

Key words: Haizhou open-pit mine, goaf, soil surface CO₂ fluxes, spontaneous combustion of residual coal, soil temperature

ZHANG Xiaoming, LIU Xiaoying, DONG Wei, ZHANG Hemeng, WANG Yongjun, SASAKI Kyuro. Experimental study on soil surface CO₂ fluxes in goaf area of Haizhou open-pit mines[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 66-73.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Fig.3

Tab.2

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.3

References 25

[1]	GLENN B S, TAMMY P T. Coal fires burning out of control around the world: thermodynamic recipe for environmental catastrophe[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2003, 59(1): 7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2003.03.002
[2]	DENIS N P, KIM A A, GLENN B S, et al. The spontaneous combustion of coal and its by products in the witbank and sasolburg coalfields of south africa[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2007, 72(2): 124-140. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2007.01.001
[3]	JENNIFER M K, HENKE K R, HOWER J C, et al. CO₂, CO, and Hg emissions from the Truman Shepherd and Ruth Mullins coal fires, Eastern Kentucky, USA[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(7): 1628-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.005
[4]	齐庆杰, 赵尤信, 贾新雷, 等. 深部煤层抽采钻孔自然发火原因分析与防治[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 37-42. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.007
	QI Qingjie, ZHAO Youxin, JIA Xinlei, et al. Cause analysis and prevention of spontaneous combustion in deep coal seam drilling[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(1): 37-42. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.007
[5]	黄福昌, 崔洪义, 王振平, 等. 兖州矿区矿井通风安全技术[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2001:3-4.
[6]	陈晓坤, 程方明, 邓军, 等. 煤矿采空区自然发火多参数监测系统研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2012, 43(增1): 22-25.
	CHEN Xiaokun, CHENG Fangming, DENG Jun, et al. Study on multi-parameter monitoring system of spontaneous combustion in coal mine goaf[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(S1): 22-25.
[7]	甘建. 复杂采空区气体检测与温度传感双重融合煤自燃探测技术[J]. 内蒙古煤炭经济, 2018(1): 15-16.
[8]	邵振鲁. 煤田火灾磁、电异常演变特征及综合探测方法研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2017.
	SHAO Zhenlu. Magnetic and electrical signature of coal fires and comprehensive detection methodology[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2017.
[9]	李源辉, 刘鸿福, 张新军, 等. 活性炭测氡法在浅埋煤层火区探测中的应用研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2016, 35(10): 237-239.
	LI Yuanhui, LIU Hongfu, ZHANG Xinjun, et al. Application research of Rn measurement with active carbon in fire detection of shallow coal seam[J]. Coal Technology, 2016, 35(10): 237-239.
[10]	ENGLE M A, RADKE L F, HEFFERN E L, et al. Gas emissions, minerals, and tars associated with three coal fires,Powder River Basin,USA[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 420: 146-159. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.037
[11]	张晓明, 刘礼龙, 王永军, 等. 露天矿遗煤区地表CO₂通量变化规律测试分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(6): 90-96.
	ZHANG Xiaoming, LIU Lilong, WANG Yongjun, et al. Test and analysis of surface CO₂ flux variation in opencast coal mining area[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(6): 90-96.
[12]	WANG Yongjun, ZHANG Xiaoming, YUICHI S, et al. Field study on correlation between CO₂ concentration and surface soil CO₂ flux in closed coal mine goaf[J]. ACS Omega, 2019, 4(7): 12 136-12 145.
[13]	谭波, 胡瑞丽, 高鹏, 等. 煤自燃灾害气体指标的阶段特征试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(2): 51-57.
	TAN Bo, HU Ruili, GAO Peng, et al. Temperature-programmed experimental study on stage characteristics of coal spontaneous combustion disaster gas indicators[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(2): 51-57.
[14]	李璐. 煤中常见化学键的解离及分子结构的量子化学理论研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2016.
	LI Lu. A quantum chemical study on dissociation behaviour of typical bonds and molecular structural of coal[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2016.
[15]	邓存宝, 王继仁, 张俭, 等. 煤自燃生成乙烯反应机理[J]. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(3): 299-303.
	DENG Cunbao, WANG Jiren, ZHANG Jian, et al. Reaction mechanism of ethylene production during spontaneous combustion of coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(3): 299-303.
[16]	张晓明, 王永军, 张河猛, 等. 基于F-K理论的大体积煤堆自燃特性试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 57-63. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.02.010
	ZHANG Xiaoming, WANG Yongjun, ZHANG Hemeng, et al. Experimental study on spontaneous combustion characteristics of big pile of coal based F-K theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(2): 57-63. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.02.010
[17]	陈琛. 煤自燃过程中温室气体排放的量化实验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2016.
	CHEN Chen. The quantitative study of GHG emissions by coal spontaneous combustion[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), 2016.
[18]	王俊峰. 煤地下自燃时覆岩中氡气运移规律及应用研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2010.
	WANG Junfeng. Radon migration in overlying strata during spontaneous combustion of coal underground and its application[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2010.
[19]	刘洪福, 白春明, 舒祥泽, 等. 用测氡技术探测煤矿地下火区的研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 1997, 22(4): 68-71.
	LIU Hongfu, BAI Chunming, SHU Xiangze, et al. A study of detecting underground fire zone applying radon measuring technology[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1997, 22(4): 68-71.
[20]	鄢姗姗. 煤矿地下开采中冒落带演变过程模拟方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2016.
	YAN Shanshan. Numerical simulation method of the evolution of caving zone during underground mining[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2016.
[21]	高英旭, 刘红民, 刘阳, 等. 海州露天矿排土场不同林分土壤理化性质对植被生物量的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(1): 78-83.
	GAO Yingxu, LIU Hongmin, LIU Yang, et al. Effects of different forest soil physicochemical properties on vegetation biomass at refuse dump of Haizhou open-pit mine[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(1): 78-83.
[22]	卫万顺, 郑桂森, 栾英波, 等. 常温层温度特征及浅层地温能成因机理研究[J]. 城市地质, 2012, 7(2): 1-5.
	WEI Wanshun, ZHENG Guisen, LUAN Yingbo, et al. Temperature characteristics of the room temperature zone and genetic mechanism of the shallow geothermal energy[J]. Urban Geology, 2012, 7(2): 1-5.
[23]	陈殿强, 张维正, 郝喆, 等. 海州露天矿矿山地质环境治理理论与技术[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016:21-23.
[24]	唐芙蓉. 煤炭地下气化燃空区覆岩裂隙演化及破断规律研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2013.
	TANG Furong. Fracture evolution and breakage of overlying strata of combustion space area in underground coal gasification[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2013.
[25]	关笑坤. 二氧化碳在土壤包气带中的运移规律及对环境影响研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2014.
	GUAN Xiaokun. Carbon dioxide transport in the unsaturated soil and its environment impact[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2014.

标号	CO₂体积分数/10^-6	温度/℃	湿度/%
Ⅰ	137 010	63.0	100
Ⅱ	107 016	68.0	100
Ⅲ	115 640	68.2	100

位置	昼夜温度/℃	CO₂通量值/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)
自燃采空区(26号)	28.2~38.6	11.4~12.8
非采空区	16.0~24.0	0.26~0.47

日期	裂缝标号	CO₂体积分数 C/10^-6	裂缝截面积 S_f/m²	涌出速度v/ (m·s^-1)	CO₂涌出量Q₂/ (m³·月^-1)	合计/ (m³·月^-1)
2019年10月	Ⅰ	201 612	0.13	0.80	39 484.69	265 943.87
	Ⅱ	114 660	0.62	1.30	166 663.26
	Ⅲ	115 934	0.22	1.30	59 795.92
2019年11月	Ⅰ	111 230	0.13	1.21	31 581.63	258 959.18
	Ⅱ	110 544	0.62	1.21	149 683.67
	Ⅲ	107 800	0.22	1.82	77 693.88
2019年12月	Ⅰ	112 406	0.13	1.71	45 132.65	332 617.35
	Ⅱ	111 524	0.62	1.71	213 566.33
	Ⅲ	108 780	0.22	1.71	73 918.37
2020年1月	Ⅰ	122 794	0.13	1.21	34 948.98	266 770.41
	Ⅱ	91 336	0.62	1.22	123 066.33
	Ⅲ	130 046	0.22	2.09	108 755.10

Experimental study on soil surface CO₂ fluxes in goaf area of Haizhou open-pit mines

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 25

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Min, LUO Ouwen, LU Yi, SHI Shiliang, LI He, LIN Zhijun. Research on spatial distribution pattern of coal spontaneous combustion hazardous zone under condition of regenerated roof [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 129-136.
[2]	WANG Yongjun, ZHENG Qian, ZHANG Hemeng, DONG Wei, ZHANG Xiaoming, SASAKI Kyuro. Correlation analysis between combustion of underground residual coal and surface carbon flux in goaf [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 161-167.
[3]	DONG Jianjun, ZHANG Ying, LI Xin, MEI Yuan. InSAR deformation monitoring and safety and stability evaluation on surface of coal mine goaf [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 140-149.
[4]	WANG Wei, CUI Xinchao, QI Yun, LIANG Ran, JIA Baoshan, XUE Kailong. Regression analysis model of coal spontaneous combustion temperature in goaf based on SSA-RF [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 136-141.
[5]	WANG Wei, LIANG Ran, QI Yun, JIA Baoshan, WU Zewei. Prediction model of coal spontaneous combustion risk based on PSO-BPNN [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 127-132.
[6]	KE Lihua, MENG Yaoyao, YAO Nan, WANG Qihu, TANG Huaqian. Evaluation of goaf stability based on fuzzy statistical method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 59-67.
[7]	ZHAO Pengxiang, CHANG Zechen, LI Shugang, ZHUO Risheng, LIN Haifei, JIN Shikui. Research and application of directional drilling sub area extraction in thick coal seam goaf [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 70-79.
[8]	SUN Changbin. Low oxygen treatment of return air corners in fully mechanized coal mining face under thin bedrock with shallow burial depth [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S2): 136-141.
[9]	GUO Jun, LIU Hua, JIN Yan, CAI Guobin, LIU Yin, YANG Panpan. Summary of underground hidden coal spontaneous combustion fire source detection methods and prospect of new technologies [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 111-119.
[10]	SHI Quanlin, YANG Hongqi, LI Hongbiao. Research on preparation of film-forming colloidal foam and its fire extinguishing and cooling characteristics [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(10): 121-126.
[11]	ZHANG Lianhui, CHEN Shiqiang, ZHAO Liqun, WANG Jun, LU Yi. Experiment and calculation of pressure loss of minimum flow unit in goaf [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 78-84.
[12]	CHU Tingxiang, HAN Xuefeng, YU Minggao. Low-temperature oxidation characteristics of compacted broken coal and macroscopic cause analysis [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 77-83.
[13]	NIAN Jun, GAO Wei, LI Runzhi, WANG Wei. Simulation and experimental study on space between boreholes for gas drainage instead of roadway [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 117-123.
[14]	QI Qingjie, QI Yun, ZHOU Xinhua. Dynamic effects of air supply volume on spontaneous combustion in goafs and fire prevention and extinguishing technology [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 120-126.
[15]	WANG Lijie, WANG Jiren, ZHANG Xun, GUO Xiaoyang. Study on slurry diffusion law of high level drilling grouting fire prevention and control in goaf [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(10): 71-77.