Analysis of information transmission characteristics of large-scale sports event organizations: taking

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.10.0299

Abstract

Abstract:

To deeply analyze the information transmission characteristics of large-scale sports events organizations, the effects of various organizations during the information transmission process were analyzed taking "5·22" cross-country race accident in Gansu Baiyin as an example. Firstly, an event organization information transmission model was proposed based on STAMP model. Moreover, the transmission process was divided into four stages: preparation, incident occurrence, emergency response, and post-incident handling, and analyzed from three levels: individual, enterprise, and government. Then, CN theory was used to develop an organizational information transmission network structure and identify key information nodes and paths. Finally, the entropy weight method was used to propose the information edge weight calculation model. The results indicated that the key information nodes were mainly concentrated at the individual and government levels, especially in the preparation stage when the information load of transmission paths was relatively high. However, enterprises showed insufficient responsibility at this stage, particularly in the acquisition and transmission of weather information, leading to impaired decision-making and actions at critical moments.

Key words: large-scale sporting events, organizational information transfer, system theoretic accident modeling and processes (STAMP) model, complex network (CN) theory, entropy weight method

CLC Number:

X928.02事故处理

LI Hua, MI Xinyi, WU Lizhou. Analysis of information transmission characteristics of large-scale sports event organizations: taking "5·22" cross-country race accident in Gansu Baiyin as an example[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(10): 183-189.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 2

Table 3

References 11

[1]	晏鸿, 杨明, 李佳琪, 等. 我国越野跑赛事发展的回顾反思与展望:兼论甘肃白银黄河石林越野赛事件的赛事组织[J]. 南京体育学院学报, 2021, 20(7): 61-70.
	YAN Hong, YANG Ming, LI Jiaqi, et al. Review, reflection and prospect of cross country race development in China:on the event organization of Gansu Baiyin Huanghe Shilin cross country event[J]. Press of NanJing Sport Institute, 2021, 20(7): 61-70.
[2]	EMERY P. Past, present, future major sport event management practice: the practitioner perspective[J]. Sport Management Review, 2010, 13(2): 158-170.
[3]	席永涛, 张靓, 付姗姗, 等. 基于SFN-SD的北极冰区船舶航行风险传递路径研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 52-60. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.0840
	XI Yongtao, ZHANG Liang, FU Shanshan, et al. Research on risk transfer path of ship navigation in Arctic waters based on SFN and SD[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 52-60. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.0840
[4]	ZHANG Yuexia, PAN Daiwei. Layered SIRS model of information spread in complex networks[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2021, 411: DOI:10.1016/j.amc.2021.126524.
[5]	杨琳, 周炬诺. 复杂工程项目风险传递机理[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(16): 209-217.
	YANG Lin, ZHOU Junuo. Risk transfer mechanism of complex engineering projects[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(16): 209-217.
[6]	LEVESON N G. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events[J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49(1): 55-64.
[7]	吴海涛, 黎双喜. 高铁应急调度STAMP/STPA安全性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 113-120. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.015
	WU Haitao, LI Shuangxi. High-speed railway emergency dispatching safety analysis based on STAMP/STPA[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(6): 113-120. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.015
[8]	LI Chunguang, LIAO Xiaofeng, WU Zhongfu, et al. Complex functional networks[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001, 57(6): 355-365.
[9]	曾小康, 冯阳, 赖文庆, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的城市燃气管道风险评价[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2021, 17(5): 130-135.
	ZENG Xiaokang, FENG Yang, LAI Wenqing, et al. Risk assessment of urban gas pipeline based on AHP and entropy weight method[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2021, 17(5): 130-135.
[10]	李华, 郭皓杰, 谢辉, 等. 基于信息熵的森林火灾应急指挥信息传递分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 80-87. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.2359
	LI Hua, GUO Haojie, XIE Hui, et al. Information transmission analysis of forest fire emergency command based on information entropy[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 80-87. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.2359
[11]	徐曼, 鲁富荣, 马国帅, 等. 基于信息传播影响因素的边重要性度量方法[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2020, 42(1): 55-63.
	XU Man, LU Furong, MA Guoshuai, et al. An edge importance measurement method based on information dissemination characteristics[J]. Computer Engineering and Science, 2020, 42(1): 55-63.

节点编号	节点名称	节点编号	节点名称
V₁	市委、市政府	V₁₂	应急部门
V₂	县委、县政府	V₁₃	公安部门
V₃	景区管理方	V₁₄	工信部门
V₄	融媒体中心	V₁₅	武警部门
V₅	文广旅中心	V₁₆	消防部门
V₆	体育部门	V₁₇	专业救援队
V₇	气象部门	V₁₈	石林公司
V₈	财政部门	V₁₉	晟景公司
V₉	宣传部门	V₂₀	参赛人员
V₁₀	交通部门	V₂₁	现场村民
V₁₁	卫生健康委

路径	重要度	路径	重要度	路径	重要度
V₁—V₂	0.05	V₆—V₁₀	0.05	V₁₂—V₁₇	0.06
V₁—V₄	0.02	V₇—V₁₀	0.03	V₁₃—V₁₅	0.02
V₁—V₉	0.09	V₇—V₁₂	0.09	V₁₃—V₁₆	0.02
V₁—V₁₁	0.09	V₇—V₁₄	0.05	V₁₃—V₂₀	0.05
V₂—V₃	0.07	V₉—V₁₈	0.09	V₁₃—V₂₁	0.06
V₂—V₄	0.04	V₁₀—V₁₄	0.06	V₁₄—V₂₀	0.5
V₃—V₅	0.05	V₁₀—V₁₇	0.07	V₁₄—V₂₁	0.05
V₃—V₁₀	0.08	V₁₁—V₁₂	0.05	V₁₅—V₁₆	0.01
V₄—V₁₁	0.07	V₁₁—V₁₃	0.05	V₁₇—V₁₉	0.05
V₅—V₆	0.03	V₁₁—V₁₅	0.03	V₁₇—V₂₀	0.02
V₅—V₇	0.08	V₁₁—V₁₆	0.03	V₁₈—V₁₉	0.07
V₅—V₈	0.06	V₁₂—V₁₃	0.04	V₁₈—V₂₁	0.08
V₅—V₉	0.09	V₁₂—V₁₄	0.05	V₁₉—V₂₀	0.06
V₆—V₇	0.05	V₁₂—V₁₅	0.04	V₁₉—V₂₁	0.03
V₆—V₈	0.04	V₁₂—V₁₆	0.04	V₂₀—V₂₁	0.02

信息	重要度	信息	重要段	信息	重要度
V₁—V₂	4.21	V₆—V₁₀	7.36	V₁₂—V₁₇	4.80
V₁—V₄	4.03	V₇—V₁₀	8.37	V₁₃—V₁₅	4.19
V₁—V₉	3.62	V₇—V₁₂	7.18	V₁₃—V₁₆	4.18
V₁—V₁₁	3.62	V₇—V₁₄	8.01	V₁₃—V₂₀	7.99
V₂—V₃	4.63	V₉—V₁₈	8.19	V₁₃—V₂₁	8.19
V₂—V₄	5.02	V₁₀—V₁₄	6.99	V₁₄—V₂₀	7.56
V₃—V₅	8.23	V₁₀—V₁₇	4.40	V₁₄—V₂₁	7.38
V₃—V₁₀	6.60	V₁₁—V₁₂	4.61	V₁₅—V₁₆	4.56
V₄—V₁₁	4.81	V₁₁—V₁₃	3.40	V₁₇—V₁₉	4.96
V₅—V₆	7.98	V₁₁—V₁₅	3.40	V₁₇—V₂₀	4.96
V₅—V₇	8.62	V₁₁—V₁₆	3.61	V₁₈—V₁₉	7.21
V₅—V₈	4.42	V₁₂—V₁₃	4.24	V₁₈—V₂₁	7.39
V₅—V₉	7.15	V₁₂—V₁₄	6.23	V₁₉—V₂₀	8.99
V₆—V₇	6.97	V₁₂—V₁₅	5.40	V₁₉—V₂₁	7.76
V₆—V₈	4.23	V₁₂—V₁₆	5.19	V₂₀—V₂₁	7.19

[1]	WANG Dan, GAO Wenwen. Emergency supply chain reliability evaluation based on combined empowerment-bias order set [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 231-237.
[2]	SONG Yinghua, HAN Baoshuai, GUO Chen. Location selection model of emergency shelter considering risk of flood disaster in county [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 191-198.
[3]	ZHOU Haiyi, BAO Quangui, YE Mao, ZHU Shengwen, LIN Yingdian. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban bridge reliability based on combination weighting method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 156-161.
[4]	WANG Zhenyu, XIANG Zerui, ZOU Rui, DING Tiecheng, ZHI Jinyi. Appearance design of LHDs based on lattice topology optimization method and EWM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 215-221.
[5]	LI Feng, ZHANG Laibin, DONG Shaohua, CHEN Lin, ZHANG Hang. Research on sealing failure risk assessment of station flange system based on EWM-AHP-cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 150-156.
[6]	GU Yingkui, WANG Yuanjin, SHI Changwu. Remaining useful life prediction method of rolling bearing based on EWM and SVR [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 49-55.
[7]	MO Junwen, WANG Ruirui, TENG Cangguo. Assessment of unsafe behavior of construction personnel in high-altitude railway projects [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 30-38.
[8]	WEI Lin, LI Lihua, QIN Liqiang, XIAO Yanhui, TANG Yuguang. Comprehensive evaluation of emergency response capability of urban subway terrorist attacks [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 213-221.
[9]	MA Tianxing, LIN Yun, ZHOU Xiaobin, WEI Peirong, LI Renzong, SU Jiayu. Entropy weight-normal cloud model for water inrush risk prediction of coal seam floor [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S1): 171-177.
[10]	WANG Jianguang. POE assessment on rail traffic environment for barrier-free travels [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 151-156.
[11]	HUANG Jie, ZHANG Xianfeng. Risk assessment of regional violent terrorist attacks in southern Xinjiang [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[12]	WANG Xinglong, CHEN Ziyan, LIU Yan. Research on monitoring information quality of ATC based on combination weighting [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 41-50.
[13]	YAN Hongqiao, CHEN Yiyue, TIAN Kun, HU Jinqiu, MAO Yaming, ZHOU Jingtong. Research on key index system and risk evaluation model of enterprise work safety [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 21-28.
[14]	WANG Gang, SHANG Luozhen, LIU Xuelin, TANG Li, CHENG Qian. Study on causes of poisoning and asphyxiation in roadway opening by AHP-entropy weight method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 187-192.
[15]	JIANG Fuchuan, ZHOU Shi, WU Zengtong, ZHONG Jichao, ZHANG Shuhao, ZHANG Xuefang. Analysis of coal mine safety investment decision based on entropy weight-TOPSIS method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 24-29.