China Safety Science Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 127-135.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.02.1577
• Safety Technology and Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Zuo1,2(
), TONG Ruipeng1, QI Qingjie2, LIU Yingjie2,3,**(
), GAN Yixiong2,3, MENG Cheng2
Received:2025-10-08
Revised:2025-12-24
Online:2026-02-28
Published:2026-08-28
Contact:
LIU Yingjie
CLC Number:
SUN Zuo, TONG Ruipeng, QI Qingjie, LIU Yingjie, GAN Yixiong, MENG Cheng. Deformation and failure mechanisms of open-pit mine rock slopes under water level fluctuations[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 127-135.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.02.1577
Table 1
Level of orthogonal design for similar materials
| 编号 | 水泥掺 量/% | 重晶石 砂/g | 重晶石 粉/g | 水泥/ g | 水/ g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0 | 1 810 | 1 000.5 | 40 | 240 |
| 2 | 1.2 | 1 810 | 1 000.5 | 48 | 250 |
| 3 | 1.4 | 1 810 | 1 000.5 | 56 | 255 |
| 4 | 1.6 | 1 810 | 1 000.5 | 64 | 260 |
| 5 | 1.8 | 1 810 | 1 000.5 | 72 | 265 |
| 6 | 1.0 | 3 300 | 564 | 40 | 240 |
| 7 | 1.2 | 3 300 | 564 | 48 | 250 |
| 8 | 1.4 | 3 300 | 564 | 56 | 255 |
| 9 | 1.6 | 3 300 | 564 | 64 | 260 |
| 10 | 1.8 | 3 300 | 564 | 72 | 265 |
Table 2
Measurement results of mechanical parameters for similar materials
| 编 号 | 抗压强 度/MPa | 密度/ (g·cm-3) | 弹性模 量/MPa | 渗透系数/ (m·h-1) | 泊松 比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.24 | 2.437 | 29.31 | 5.884×10-8 | 0.28 |
| 2 | 0.268 5 | 2.520 | 27.15 | 5.54×10-8 | 0.33 |
| 3 | 0.324 4 | 2.543 | 28.27 | 5.652×10-8 | 0.32 |
| 4 | 0.37 | 2.587 | 31.44 | 4.987×10-8 | 0.28 |
| 5 | 0.13 | 2.349 | 35.75 | 6.130×10-8 | 0.29 |
| 6 | 0.17 | 2.373 | 36.66 | 5.927×10-8 | 0.26 |
| 7 | 0.33 | 2.392 | 35.42 | 6.429×10-8 | 0.23 |
| 8 | 0.37 | 2.406 | 38.95 | 6.698×10-8 | 0.27 |
Table 4
Physical and mechanical response caused by water level rise and fall
| 物理力学响应 | 试验分析 | 水岩相互作用机制 |
|---|---|---|
| 材料软化与强度衰减 | 经过4次循环后,坡体表面岩土体的抗剪强度有所衰减,其中,黏聚力下降更为明显 | 水分入渗使岩土体颗粒间的胶结物质溶解、迁移,导致黏聚力下降;同时水分在矿物表面形成水膜,降低内摩擦角 |
| 渗透压力作用 | 当排水速率达到蓄水速率的8倍时(Vd=8Vs),坡脚处最大位移量达到0.66 mm,表明渗透压力对坡体稳定性影响显著 | 水位上升阶段,形成指向坡内的渗透压力,推动坡体向前位移;水位下降阶段,坡体内外形成水头差,产生指向坡外的渗透压力(动水压力) |
| 孔隙水压力变化与有效应力原理 | 在高速排水工况下(n=12),孔隙水压力下降幅度最大达0.09 kPa,且消散缓慢 | 水位上升时,孔隙水压力增大,岩土体有效应力减小,抗剪强度降低;水位下降时,孔隙水压力消散滞后于外部水位变化,导致坡体内仍保持较高孔隙水压力 |
| 润滑与渗流侵蚀作用 | 循环作用促进坡体内微裂隙的扩展与连通,从而改变其渗流特性,加速水岩相互作用的进程 | 水分在岩体裂隙中流动,不仅起润滑作用降低滑面抗滑力,还对细小颗粒进行迁移和冲刷,逐渐扩大渗流通道,改变岩体渗透特性 |
Table 5
Law of deformation accumulation and crack development
| 发展阶段 | 试验分析 | 变形累积与裂纹发展规律 |
|---|---|---|
| 初始均匀变形阶段 | 循环次数较少(1~2次)或水位变化速率较低(n=2)时,该阶段位移-时间曲线呈可恢复性波动,坡体处于弹性变形阶段 | 位移、孔隙水压力等参数变化微弱,边坡整体稳定性良好。此时岩土体以压缩变形为主,无明显裂纹产生 |
| 局部损伤与裂纹萌生阶段 | 当排水速率提高至4倍蓄水速率时,坡脚处出现长度约2 cm的剪切裂缝,坡顶出现细长张拉裂纹 | 随循环次数增加或水位变化速率提高,应力集中区域开始出现微裂纹。裂纹主要沿岩层分界面和节理面扩展,表现出明显的方向性 |
| 裂纹贯通与变形局部化阶段 | D2位置(坡腰)位移量在高水位变化速率作用下,从0.25 mm快速增至0.521 mm,表明变形由均匀分布向局部集中转变 | 在多次干湿循环或高水位变化速率作用下,微裂纹逐渐扩展并相互连接,形成贯通的潜在滑面。边坡进入塑性变形阶段,整体稳定性显著降低 |
| [1] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.08.001 |
| [2] |
李长冬, 龙晶晶, 姜茜慧, 等. 水库滑坡成因机制研究进展与展望[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(1): 67-77.
|
|
|
|
| [3] |
闫国强, 黄波林, 殷跃平, 等. 三峡库区岸坡消落带岩体劣化分形特征与演化预测研究[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(7): 2399-2407.
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
殷跃平, 黄波林, 李滨, 等. 三峡库区消落带溶蚀岩体劣化指标研究[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(8): 2590-2600.
|
|
|
|
| [5] |
刘新荣, 郭雪岩, 许彬, 等. 含消落带劣化岩体的危岩边坡动力累积损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 637-648.
|
|
|
|
| [6] |
雷卫佳, 刘伟煌, 郭生根, 等. 水位升降对库坡渗流场及稳定性影响[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2020, 37(4): 27-32, 40.
|
|
|
|
| [7] |
刘新荣, 王, 许彬, 等. 消落带劣化下含锯齿状结构面岩质边坡动力响应机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(12): 2377-2388.
|
|
|
|
| [8] |
汪发武, 宋琨. 库水位涨落条件下不同结构边坡的变形破坏机制分析:以千将坪滑坡和树坪滑坡为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(3): 575-582.
|
|
|
|
| [9] |
黄波林, 王健, 殷跃平, 等. 基于裂隙网络的消落带岩体劣化区域分布研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(6): 1901-1908.
|
|
|
|
| [10] |
刘新荣, 景瑞, 缪露莉, 等. 巫山段消落带岸坡库岸再造模式及典型案例分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(7): 1321-1332.
|
|
|
|
| [11] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.009 |
| [12] |
doi: 10.1007/s11431-018-9387-2 |
| [13] |
doi: 10.1007/s12665-020-09327-2 |
| [14] |
杨忠平, 李绪勇, 赵茜, 等. 关键影响因子作用下三峡库区堆积层滑坡分布规律及变形破坏响应特征[J]. 工程地质学报, 2021, 29(3): 617-627.
|
|
|
|
| [15] |
doi: 10.1007/s10346-020-01496-2 |
| [16] |
曾浩, 唐朝生, 刘昌黎, 等. 膨胀土干燥过程中收缩应力的测试与分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(4): 717-725.
|
|
|
|
| [17] |
doi: 10.1007/s11440-019-00894-8 |
| [18] |
doi: 10.1007/s10064-020-01838-3 |
| [19] |
刘永莉, 周文佐, 郭斌, 等. 相似模型实验中泥灰岩相似材料研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(增1): 2795-2803.
|
|
|
|
| [20] |
赵立春, 刘永杰, 宗赫, 等. 同一边坡角下不同边坡形态及稳定性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(增1): 140-144.
|
|
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.S1.0837 |
|
| [21] |
程刚, 张昊宇, 王晔, 等. 土钉支护边坡物理模型试验研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 111-121.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.1134 |
|
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.1134 |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
陈帆, 王迎超, 郑顺华. 地铁隧道涌水涌砂诱发地面塌陷的大型模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(11): 174-183.
|
|
|
|
| [24] |
冷先伦, 王川, 盛谦, 等. 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1283-1294,1 308.
|
|
|
|
| [25] |
安彩龙, 王亮清, 田建林, 等. 水库型岩质边坡模型试验固-液两相相似材料研制与应用[J]. 地球科学, 2025, 50(6): 2372-2386.
|
|
|
| [1] | ZHENG Bin, WANG Haochen, REN Yi, GAO Yongtao, ZHOU Yu. Research on in-situ dewatering and drainage design and engineering application of sludges in open-pit mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 139-146. |
| [2] | XU Hongjian, JIANG Xutong, YU Zhengxing, ZHANG Yihai, CHEN Caixian. Stability analysis of a certain open-pit mine's waste dump and simulation of evolution process of induced debris flow [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 168-174. |
| [3] | DU Wenxiu, YAN Lu. Stability of open-pit mining slope: a case study of Barun mine [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 196-202. |
| [4] | CAI Boyuan, YU Zhengxing, REN Yi, ZHANG Yihai, MA Haitao, WANG Yidan. Surface deformation prediction of open-pit mine slopes based on CNN-LSTM model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 231-238. |
| [5] | CHANG Shengshan, PANG Yibo. Stability analysis of multi-working condition slopes in a certain open-pit mine stope based on limit equilibrium methods [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 87-94. |
| [6] | CAO Weiping, XIAO Hannan, LUO Longping, LYU Pin, ZHAO Ming. On bracing mechanism and stability of two-row inclined-vertical retaining piles [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(6): 60-69. |
| [7] | YANG Fengzhan, GU Qinghua, LI Shaobo, YANG Jianchun. Multimodal fusion-based obstacle detection in low-visibility open-pit mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 195-203. |
| [8] | LIU Guangwei, ZHANG Haobo, LEI Jian, HUANG Yunlong, REN Chonghui. Obstacle detection model for unmanned mining trucks during driving in open-pit mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(11): 49-55. |
| [9] | GU Qinghua, YIN Shutan, WANG Dan, LI Xuexian, YIN Huimin. Mining truck driver fatigue driving detection based on improved YOLOv8 [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(1): 60-66. |
| [10] | YU Haicheng, TIAN Yu, LI Qingjian, LI Xinpeng, XUE Guoqing, ZHANG Yuhua. Fire detection technology in open-pit mines based on infrared images and target detection [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(S1): 212-218. |
| [11] | WEI Dezhi, DU Zhiyong, TENG Chunyang, XIN Wutian, LI Zekun. Study on safety monitoring technology for chain fracture in crushing station of open-pit mine [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S2): 170-175. |
| [12] | TIAN Feng, TANG Xiaoqian, QIAO Dongqing. Open-pit truck scheduling optimization method based on SA-CSA [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S2): 176-181. |
| [13] | ZHAO Zhongqi, YU Haicheng, BAI Baoshan, XIE Miao. Research on automatic identification and location technology of water filling nozzle used in open-pit mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S2): 216-221. |
| [14] | WANG Guilin, ZHAO Changhai, SONG Delin. Research on influencing factors of air pollution in open-pit mines based on environmental safety improvement [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S2): 77-84. |
| [15] | LI Guanghe, HU Zihuan, WANG Dong, WANG Laigui, ZHOU Zhiwei, DING Chunjian. Study on instability criterion of rib pillars in open-pit during highwall mining [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 122-128. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||