China Safety Science Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 91-101.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.06.0393
• Safety Technology and Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhang Jiahua1,2(
), Wei Yunjun2, Yuan Xiaomeng2,3, He Jin2
Received:2026-01-14
Revised:2026-04-10
Online:2026-06-28
Published:2026-12-28
CLC Number:
Zhang Jiahua, Wei Yunjun, Yuan Xiaomeng, He Jin. Stability of 3D reinforced slopes subjected to seismic horizontal dynamic amplification effect[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(6): 91-101.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.06.0393
Table 1
Comparison of stability coefficients under different conditions
| B/ H | β/ (°) | Ns | Δ1/ % | Δ2/ % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 文献[24] | 文献[14] | 文中模型 | ||||
| 1 | 45 | 54.07 | 54.19 | 54.41 | 0.63 | 0.41 |
| 2 | 45 | 42.60 | 42.63 | 43.11 | 1.20 | 1.13 |
| 3 | 45 | 39.85 | 39.89 | 40.58 | 1.83 | 1.73 |
| 5 | 45 | 37.97 | 37.97 | 38.62 | 1.71 | 1.71 |
| 10 | 45 | 36.70 | 36.70 | 37.32 | 1.69 | 1.69 |
| 1 | 60 | 23.40 | 23.41 | 23.59 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| 2 | 60 | 18.94 | 18.94 | 18.94 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 60 | 17.82 | 17.83 | 17.85 | 0.17 | 0.11 |
| 5 | 60 | 17.05 | 17.05 | 17.09 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| 10 | 60 | 16.52 | 16.52 | 16.58 | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| 1 | 75 | 14.63 | 14.46 | 14.72 | 0.62 | 1.80 |
| 2 | 75 | 11.84 | 11.84 | 11.86 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| 3 | 75 | 11.12 | 11.12 | 11.12 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 75 | 10.61 | 10.61 | 10.61 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 75 | 10.26 | 10.26 | 10.26 | 0 | 0 |
Table 2
Comparison of Ns under different B/H and seismic conditions (k0/c=0, β=45°, ru=0)
| 地震烈度 | B/H | 忽略qε | 考虑qε | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ns | Δ3/% | Ns | Δ4/% | ||
| 7度 | 100 | 11.22 | — | 8.86 | — |
| 50 | 11.26 | 0.36 | 8.89 | 0.34 | |
| 10 | 11.6 | 3.39 | 9.17 | 3.50 | |
| 9 | 11.65 | 3.83 | 9.21 | 3.95 | |
| 8 | 11.72 | 4.46 | 9.26 | 4.51 | |
| 7 | 11.79 | 5.08 | 9.33 | 5.30 | |
| 6 | 11.9 | 6.06 | 9.42 | 6.32 | |
| 5 | 12.06 | 7.49 | 9.56 | 7.90 | |
| 4 | 12.32 | 9.80 | 9.77 | 10.27 | |
| 3 | 12.77 | 13.81 | 10.15 | 14.56 | |
| 2 | 13.81 | 23.09 | 11.04 | 24.60 | |
| 1 | 17.76 | 58.29 | 14.43 | 62.87 | |
| 0.8 | 20.71 | 84.58 | 16.95 | 91.31 | |
| 8度 | 100 | 8.42 | — | 6.18 | — |
| 50 | 8.46 | 0.48 | 6.2 | 0.32 | |
| 10 | 8.73 | 3.68 | 6.43 | 4.05 | |
| 9 | 8.77 | 4.16 | 6.47 | 4.69 | |
| 8 | 8.82 | 4.75 | 6.51 | 5.34 | |
| 7 | 8.89 | 5.58 | 6.57 | 6.31 | |
| 6 | 8.98 | 6.65 | 6.64 | 7.44 | |
| 5 | 9.11 | 8.19 | 6.76 | 9.39 | |
| 4 | 9.32 | 10.69 | 6.92 | 11.97 | |
| 3 | 9.66 | 14.73 | 7.21 | 16.67 | |
| 2 | 10.44 | 23.99 | 7.9 | 27.83 | |
| 1 | 13.69 | 62.59 | 10.63 | 72.01 | |
| 0.8 | 16.12 | 91.45 | 12.66 | 104.8 | |
| 9度 | 100 | 5.44 | — | 3.93 | — |
| 50 | 5.47 | 0.55 | 3.95 | 0.51 | |
| 10 | 5.68 | 4.41 | 4.12 | 4.83 | |
| 9 | 5.71 | 4.96 | 4.14 | 5.34 | |
| 8 | 5.74 | 5.51 | 4.17 | 6.12 | |
| 7 | 5.79 | 6.43 | 4.21 | 7.12 | |
| 6 | 5.85 | 7.54 | 4.27 | 8.65 | |
| 5 | 5.94 | 9.19 | 4.34 | 10.43 | |
| 4 | 6.1 | 12.13 | 4.47 | 13.74 | |
| 3 | 6.36 | 16.91 | 4.7 | 19.59 | |
| 2 | 6.91 | 27.02 | 5.19 | 32.06 | |
| 1 | 9.29 | 70.77 | 7.24 | 84.22 | |
| 0.8 | 11.02 | 102.57% | 8.82 | 124.4 | |
Table 3
Stability coefficient of 3D slopes under different reinforcement patterns and seismic intensity
| β/ (°) | qmax | kv=kh | 布筋 方式 | Ns | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B/H=1 | Δ5/% | B/H=100 | Δ6/% | |||||||||||
| 90 | 3 | 0.1 | J | 8.28 | — | 4.26 | — | |||||||
| 3 | 0.1 | D | 9.72 | 17.39 | 4.54 | 6.57 | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | J | 7.18 | — | 3.41 | — | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | D | 8.40 | 17.00 | 3.66 | 7.33 | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | J | 5.76 | — | 2.49 | — | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | D | 6.75 | 17.19 | 2.70 | 8.43 | ||||||||
| 75 | 3 | 0.1 | J | 8.75 | — | 5.29 | — | |||||||
| 3 | 0.1 | D | 10.10 | 15.43 | 5.66 | 6.99 | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | J | 7.42 | — | 4.09 | — | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | D | 8.57 | 15.50 | 4.41 | 7.82 | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | J | 5.83 | — | 2.90 | — | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | D | 6.73 | 15.44 | 3.13 | 7.93 | ||||||||
| 60 | 3 | 0.1 | J | 10.39 | — | 6.72 | — | |||||||
| 3 | 0.1 | D | 11.92 | 14.73 | 7.16 | 6.55 | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | J | 8.63 | — | 4.96 | — | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | D | 9.90 | 14.72 | 5.32 | 7.26 | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | J | 6.63 | — | 3.37 | — | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | D | 7.61 | 14.78 | 3.63 | 7.72 | ||||||||
| 45 | 3 | 0.1 | J | 12.05 | — | 8.80 | — | |||||||
| 3 | 0.1 | D | 13.38 | 11.04 | 9.49 | 7.84 | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | J | 9.74 | — | 6.13 | — | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | D | 10.81 | 10.99 | 6.61 | 7.83 | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | J | 7.27 | — | 3.96 | — | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | D | 8.07 | 11.00 | 4.37 | 10.35 | ||||||||
| 30 | 3 | 0.1 | J | 16.57 | — | 11.54 | — | |||||||
| 3 | 0.1 | D | 19.04 | 14.91 | 13.32 | 15.42 | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | J | 12.67 | — | 7.56 | — | ||||||||
| 2.5 | 0.2 | D | 14.55 | 14.84 | 8.50 | 12.43 | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | J | 9.01 | — | 4.75 | — | ||||||||
| 2 | 0.4 | D | 10.35 | 14.87 | 5.35 | 12.63 | ||||||||
Table 4
Comparison of stability coefficient of 3D slopes under different reinforcement density
| 工况 | k0/c | Ns | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B/H=1 | Δ7/% | B/H=100 | Δ8/% | ||
| 自然工况 (ru=0;kh= kv=0) | 0 | 18.72 | — | 12.12 | — |
| 1 | 21.32 | 13.89 | 17.81 | 46.95 | |
| 2 | 23.48 | 25.43 | 20.27 | 67.24 | |
| 3 | 25.64 | 36.97 | 22.01 | 81.60 | |
| 4 | 27.80 | 48.50 | 23.61 | 94.80 | |
| 地震烈度 7度(ru=0; kh=kv=0.1) | 0 | 11.74 | — | 7.14 | — |
| 1 | 13.66 | 16.35 | 9.26 | 29.69 | |
| 2 | 15.04 | 28.11 | 10.07 | 41.04 | |
| 3 | 16.42 | 39.86 | 10.70 | 49.86 | |
| 4 | 17.81 | 51.70 | 11.23 | 57.28 | |
| 地震烈度 7度+孔隙 水(ru=0.2; kh=kv=0.1) | 0 | 8.29 | — | 5.68 | — |
| 1 | 9.38 | 13.15 | 7.45 | 31.16 | |
| 2 | 10.33 | 24.61 | 8.08 | 42.25 | |
| 3 | 11.28 | 36.07 | 8.52 | 50.00 | |
| 4 | 12.23 | 47.53 | 8.94 | 57.39 | |
Table 5
Stability coefficient of step slopes under different reinforcement density
| 工况 | k0/c | B/H=10 | B/H=1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 忽略qε | 考虑qε | 忽略qε | 考虑qε | |||
| 自然 工况 | 0 | 31.56 | — | 49.94 | — | |
| 1 | 47.93 | — | 69.04 | — | ||
| 2 | 57.67 | — | 84.99 | — | ||
| 3 | 66.81 | — | 99.93 | — | ||
| 4 | 73.47 | — | 112.7 | — | ||
| 烈度 7度+ 孔隙水 (ru=0.1) | 0 | 9.87 | 8.04 | 13.99 | 12.03 | |
| 1 | 14.52 | 10.91 | 16.38 | 14.32 | ||
| 2 | 16.75 | 12.11 | 18.58 | 16.25 | ||
| 3 | 18.03 | 12.94 | 20.79 | 18.17 | ||
| 4 | 19.06 | 13.68 | 22.99 | 20.10 | ||
| [1] |
程刚, 张昊宇, 王晔, 等. 土钉支护边坡物理模型试验研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 111-121.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.1134 |
|
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.1134 |
|
| [2] |
源小梦. 地震水平动态放大效应下富水加筋边坡抗震稳定性分析[D]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2024.
|
|
|
|
| [3] |
范宣梅, 王欣, 戴岚欣, 等. 2022年Ms6.8级泸定地震诱发地质灾害特征与空间分布规律研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2022, 30(5): 1504-1516.
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
张波, 王爱国, 冯紫微, 等. 2023年甘肃积石山Ms6.2地震发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2025, 47(6): 1586-1605.
|
|
|
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
易健翔, 王宸琛, 邹金锋. 基于修正拟动力法的岩质边坡三维稳定性分析方法及应用[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2024, 21(6): 2295-2304.
|
|
|
|
| [8] |
王振, 孙志彬, 杨胜宇, 等. 三维加筋边坡抗震稳定性的拟动力上限分析[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 47(9): 1288-1296.
|
|
|
|
| [9] |
doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.004 |
| [10] |
doi: 10.1680/geot.8.P.136 |
| [11] |
聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 等. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
|
|
|
|
| [12] |
doi: 10.1002/gj.v58.6 |
| [13] |
doi: 10.1007/s11440-023-02167-x |
| [14] |
doi: 10.1680/geot.12.T.004 |
| [15] |
GB50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S].
|
|
GB50011-2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S].
|
|
| [16] |
doi: 10.1680/geot.1967.17.1.11 |
| [17] |
董建华, 朱彦鹏. 地震作用下土钉支护边坡永久位移计算方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(10): 101-110.
|
|
|
|
| [18] |
GB50330—2013 建筑边坡工程技术规范[S].
|
|
GB50330-2013 Construction slope engineering technical code[S].
|
|
| [19] |
doi: 10.1007/s11771-019-4132-5 |
| [20] |
崔新壮, 姚占勇, 商庆森, 等. 加筋土坡临界高度的极限分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2007, 20(1): 1-6.
|
|
|
|
| [21] |
侯超群, 邓欣, 孙志彬, 等. 非线性准则下三维加筋边坡稳定性的上限分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(2): 124-132.
|
|
|
|
| [22] |
JTG B02—2013 公路工程抗震规范[S].
|
|
JTG B02-2013 Code for seismic resistance of highway engineering[S].
|
|
| [23] |
张标, 瞿凡, 蒋毅. 饱水软化效应下砂质泥岩边坡三维稳定性上限分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2025, 58(4): 108-123.
|
|
|
|
| [24] |
doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.03.001 |
| [1] | WEN Jinglin, YIN Yongming, YU Zhengxing, WANG Yifan, LU Xin'ai. Force deformation and destructive features of mine slopes under varied conditions [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 66-72. |
| [2] | HUI Yubo, YU Zhengxing, WANG Nuo, LI Xiteng. Study on dynamic response of moisture content and stability evolution under rainfall infiltration using SEEP/W-SLOPE/W coupling [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 223-230. |
| [3] | LU Sen, XU Shuai, WANG Shunqiang, CUN Senbuer, WANG Jianlong. Mechanical properties of rock mass and slope stability under freeze-thaw cycles [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 210-215. |
| [4] | DU Wenxiu, YAN Lu. Stability of open-pit mining slope: a case study of Barun mine [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 196-202. |
| [5] | CHANG Shengshan, PANG Yibo. Stability analysis of multi-working condition slopes in a certain open-pit mine stope based on limit equilibrium methods [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 87-94. |
| [6] | QI Yun, BAI Chenhao, QIN Kai, DUAN Hongfei, LI Xuping, WANG Wei. Slope stability prediction based on HEOA-XGBoost combined model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 137-144. |
| [7] | CHEN Qinglin, BAO Lilin, WANG Xiaojun, DAI Zeyu, ZHANG Chao, WANG Guangjin. Sedimentation law of fine tailings and characteristics of slurry flow by flume model test [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 135-144. |
| [8] | QI Yun, XUE Kailong, LI Xuping, WANG Wei, BAI Chenhao, JI Zhunze. Slope stability prediction model based on multi-strategy improved SSA for optimizing KELM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(3): 92-98. |
| [9] | WANG Tuanhui, WANG Chao, WU Shunchuan, WANG Qiwei, XU Jianhui. Slope stability prediction and application based on MISSA-SVM model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 135-144. |
| [10] | ZHANG Daobing, ZHU Yuanlei, YIN Huadong, HU Aping, TANG Yu. Stability analysis and failure mechanism of deep-buried chamber under pore water [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(10): 62-70. |
| [11] | ZHAO Lichun, LIU Yongjie, ZONG He, XU Yongchao, WANG Bo, QI Limin. Study on different slope shapes and stability under same slope angle [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S1): 140-144. |
| [12] | ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Ke. Prediction study on slope stability based on LightGBM algorithm [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 113-120. |
| [13] | LIU Lijie, LIU Zhichao, NIE Zhongye. Optimization of steep-end slope mining plan in open-pit coal mines based on Vissim simulation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(S1): 114-120. |
| [14] | XIAO Xiaochun, TANG Qian, XU Jun, LYU Xiangfeng. Characteristics of surface settlement induced by excavation disturbance and rainfall infiltration [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2): 133-139. |
| [15] | WANG Dong,LI Guanghe,CAO Lanzhu,XU Xiaohui,ZHANG Liguo. Research on method for calculating three-dimensional stability of slope with inclined weak-layers [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(3): 95-101. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||