Safety leadership dimensions of enterprise managers: a Meta-analysis

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.1493

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem that the dimensions of enterprise managers' safety leadership behavior were inconsistent, meta-analysis method was used in this paper to study the dimensions of managers' safety leadership behavior systematically. It was found that safety concern, safety control, safety coaching and safety incentive strongly correlated with employees' safety behavior or enterprise safety performance. Their correlation coefficients were 0.667, 0.564, 0.556 and 0.354 respectively. The relationship between safety policy and safety behavior or safety performance was weak, and the correlation coefficient was 0.148. The relationship between safety vision and safety behavior or safety performance was 0.09. Finally, it is determined that the dimensions of managers' safety leadership behavior are safety concern, safety control, safety guidance and safety incentive.

Key words: manager, safety leadership behavior dimensions, meta-analysis, safety behavior, safety control

GONG Yunhua. Safety leadership dimensions of enterprise managers: a Meta-analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 23-28.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Overall effect size calculation procedure parameters and results of safety control dimension

作者及出版年份	固定效应模型				随机效应模型			Z_r	r
作者及出版年份	w_i	w_i/%	w_iZ_r	w_i $Z r 2$	$w i 2$	w_r	w_r/%	Z_r	r
WU Tsungchih等,2011^[13]	457.705	0.269	310.470	210.598	209 493.684	95.650	0.165	0.675	0.588
毕默,2012^[14]	127.140	0.075	70.021	38.564	16 164.656	61.976	0.107
秦臻,2014^[15]	95.262	0.056	60.712	38.692	9 074.821	53.284	0.092
李鹏飞,2017^[16]	100.532	0.059	164.785	270.103	10 106.686	54.894	0.095
纪源,2017^[17]	206.077	0.121	99.191	47.744	42 467.720	76.205	0.132
李广利,2017^[]6	329.801	0.194	242.906	178.906	108 769.011	88.479	0.153
刘颖,2018^[18]	172.343	0.101	67.653	26.557	29 702.056	71.061	0.123
徐志鹏,2020^[19]	211.330	0.124	104.316	51.493	44 660.417	76.912	0.133
合计	1 700.190	1.000	1 120.055	862.656	470 439.051	578.459	1.000

Tab.4

Tab.5

References 21

[1]	李乃文. 高危岗位员工安全内驱力缺失分析与对策[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(12):1-6.
	LI Naiwen. Analysis and countermeasures on lacking of inner safety impetus of employee in high-risk post[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(12):1-6.
[2]	SHARON C, TAYLOR I. Reducing workplace accidents through the use of leadership interventions: a quasi-experimental field study[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2018, 121:314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.010
[3]	PILBEAM C, DOHERTY N, DAVIDSON R, et al. Safety leadership practices for organizational safety compliance: developing a research agenda from a review of the literature[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 86:110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.015
[4]	MULLEN J E, KELLOWAY E K. Safety leadership: a longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 82(2):253-272. doi: 10.1348/096317908X325313
[5]	WU Tsungchih. The validity and reliability of safety leadership scale in universities of Taiwan[J]. International Journal of Technology and Engineering Education, 2005, 2(1):27-42.
[6]	李广利. 煤矿高层管理者安全领导力及对险兆事件影响机制的研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2017.
	LI Guangli. Research on the safety leadership of senior managers and the mechanism for its influence on near-miss in coal mine[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2017.
[7]	宫运华, 朱亚威. 安全领导力国内外研究现状分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(11):167-175.
	GONG Yunhua, ZHU Yawei. Analysis on current status of research on safety leadership at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(11):167-175.
[8]	王琦玮, 梅强, 刘素霞, 等. 基于员工安全行为视角的企业安全生产影响元分析[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(3):226-237.
	WANG Qiwei, MEI Qiang, LIU Suxia, et al. Factors that affect enterprise safety production: a meta-analysis based on view of employee's safety behavior[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(3):226-237.
[9]	杨校毅, 佟瑞鹏. 基于Meta分析的矿工不安全行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(12):71-76. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.12.012
	YANG Xiaoyi, TONG Ruipeng. Research on JD-R model of miners' unsafe behavior based on Meta-analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(12):71-76. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.12.012
[10]	张鸿莹, 王袆, 孙宁昊. 基于Meta分析的高校教师职业压力失范行为JD-R模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5):174-180. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.026
	ZHANG Hongying, WANG Yi, SUN Ninghao. JD-R model for university teachers' misbehavior caused by occupational stress based on Meta-analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(5):174-180. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.026
[11]	ALRUQI W M, HALLOWELL M R, TECHERA U. Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: a meta-analytic review[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.019
[12]	LU Chinshan, YANG Chungshan. Safety leadership and safety behavior in container terminal operations[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(2):123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.05.003
[13]	WU Tsungchih, CHANG Shuhsuan, SHU Chimin, et al. Safety leadership and safety performance in petrochemical industries: the mediating role of safety climate[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2011, 24(6):716-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.04.007
[14]	毕默. 建筑企业安全氛围与安全领导力,安全行为的关系研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2012.
	BI Mo. Research on the relationship among safety climate, safety leadership and safety behavior in construction industry[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2012.
[15]	秦臻. 企业班组长安全领导力与员工安全行为关系研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2014.
	QIN Zhen. Research on the relationship between supervisor's safety leadership and employees' safety behavior in the enterprise[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2014.
[16]	李鹏飞. 不同管理层安全领导力与安全绩效关系研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017.
	LI Pengfei. Research on the relationship between safety leadership and safety performance at different levels[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2017.
[17]	纪源. 石油企业班组安全领导力、安全氛围与员工安全行为的关系研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017.
[18]	刘颖. 班组长安全领导对工人安全行为的影响研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018.
	LIU Ying. Research on the influence of team leaders safety leadership on workers' safety behavior[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2018.
[19]	徐志鹏. 建筑施工基层安全领导力对安全绩效影响研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2020.
	XU Zhipeng. Research on the impact of grassroots safety leadership on safety performance in building construction[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[20]	XUE Yujingyang, FAN Yunxiao, XIE Xuecai. Relation between senior managers' safety leadership and safety behavior in the Chinese petrochemical industry[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 65:1-15.
[21]	HUNTER J E, SCHMIDT F L. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings[M]. California: Sage Publications, 2014: 3-32.

作者及发表年份	样本量	安全领导行为维度	因变量
LU Chinshan等,2010^[12]	336	安全激励、安全政策、安全关心	安全行为
WU Tsungchih等,2011^[13]	521	安全关心、安全指导、安全控制	安全绩效
毕默,2012^[14]	150	安全激励、安全关心、安全控制	安全行为
作者及发表年份	样本量	安全领导行为维度	因变量
秦臻,2014^[15]	100	安全指导、安全关心、安全控制	安全行为
李鹏飞,2017^[16]	207	安全激励、安全政策、安全愿景、安全指导、安全关心、安全控制	安全绩效
纪源,2017^[17]	262	安全指导、安全关心、安全控制	安全行为
李广利,2017^[6]	451	安全素养、安全关照(安全关心)、安全指导、安全动机、安全控制	安全绩效
刘颖,2018^[18]	287	安全指导、安全关心、安全控制	安全行为
徐志鹏,2020^[19]	229	安全关怀(安全关心)、安全控制、安全技能、安全激励	安全绩效
薛宇敬阳,2020^[20]	155	安全激励、安全政策、安全奖惩、安全关心、安全愿景、个人特质	安全行为

维度	文献数量	样本总量	平均可靠度
安全关心	10	2 698	0.873
安全控制	8	2 207	0.882
安全指导	6	1 828	0.845
安全激励	4	848	0.874
安全愿景	2	362	0.836
安全政策	2	362	0.836

作者及发表年份	N	r	Cronbach's α	r_c	Z_r	SE_zr	SE_rc
WU Tsungchih等, 2011^[13]	521	0.555	0.94	0.590	0.678	0.044	0.047
毕默,2012^[14]	150	0.466	0.93	0.501	0.551	0.082	0.089
秦臻,2014^[15]	100	0.558	0.991	0.563	0.637	0.102	0.102
李鹏飞,2017^[16]	207	0.651	0.702	0.927	1.639	0.070	0.100
纪源,2017^[17]	262	0.399	0.892	0.447	0.481	0.062	0.070

作者及发表年份	N	r	Cronbach's α	r_c	Z_r	SE_zr	SE_rc
李广利,2017^[6]	451	0.538	0.858	0.627	0.737	0.047	0.055
刘颖,2018^[18]	287	0.291	0.779	0.374	0.393	0.059	0.076
徐志鹏,2020^[19]	229	0.442	0.967	0.457	0.494	0.067	0.069

安全领导行为维度	k	N	未修正			修正后
安全领导行为维度	k	N	r	95%置信区间		r_c	95%置信区间
安全关心	10	2 698	0.492	0.454	0.530	0.564	0.526	0.602
安全控制	8	2 207	0.588	0.546	0.630	0.667	0.709	0.625
安全指导	6	1 828	0.47	0.424	0.516	0.556	0.510	0.602
安全激励	4	848	0.309	0.242	0.376	0.354	0.287	0.421
安全愿景	2	362	0.09	-0.013	0.193	0.108	0.005	0.211
安全政策	2	362	0.124	0.021	0.227	0.148	0.045	0.251