Development and application of SCAP

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.1918

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to assess and develop safety culture in a better way, research status of safety culture evaluation tools was reviewed by briefly introducing evolution of safety culture and the role it played, and SCAP was designed and developed. Based on 24Model theoretically, SCAP was developed with a scale set according to 32 elements of safety culture and using Internet technology. Two login methods, web browser and wechat mini program, were provided by the system, which could be applied to any enterprise, university or individual who wanted to learn about state of security culture. After the assessment, basic information of evaluators could be clearly displayed, and results be output according to requirements of overall level, different types of employees, various safety culture elements, individual evaluation personnel. Finally, countermeasures and suggestions report could be generated through comparison with previous evaluation results. The application results show that SCAP is suitable for the whole industry, evaluation results, analysis and feedback can be immediately obtained after online questionnaire measurement, which could serve the development of safety culture.

Key words: safety culture analysis program (SCAP), 24Model, safety culture elements, system function, accident prevention

SHI Zhao, FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, TONG Wenqing, YUAN Chenhui, CHEN Yiran. Development and application of SCAP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 29-36.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Tab.2

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 25

[1]	傅贵, 何冬云, 张苏, 等. 再论安全文化的定义及建设水平评估指标[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(4):140-145.
	FU Gui, HE Dongyun, ZHANG Su, et al. Further discussion on definition of safety culture and its assessment indicators[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(4):140-145.
[2]	ZANIN L M, LUNING P A, CUNHA D T D, et al. Influence of educational actions on transitioning of food safety culture in a food service context: part 1-triangulation and data interpretation of food safety culture elements[J]. Food Control, 2021, 119: DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107447. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107447
[3]	MCKENZIE L, SHAW L, JOANNE E, et al. Factors influencing the implementation of a hospital-wide intervention to promote professionalism and build a safety culture: a qualitative study[J]. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2019, 45(10):694-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.07.005
[4]	ZWETSLOOT G, KAMPEN J V, STEIJN W, et al. Ranking of process safety cultures for risk-based inspections using indicative safety culture assessments[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 64: DOI : 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104065. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104065
[5]	何昌原, 张鹏, 李驰原, 等. 中国安全文化学研究热点与演进:基于2010—2019年中国知网数据库的知识图谱分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5):152-159. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.023
	HE Changyuan, ZHANG Peng, LI Chiyuan, et al. Research hotspot and evolution of safety culturology in China: knowledge mapping analysis based on CNKI database from 2010 to 2019[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(5):152-159. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.023
[6]	王秉, 吴超. 安全文化学的研究进展及其科学发展模式[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6):25-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.005
	WANG Bing, WU Chao. Research progress and scientific development model of safety culturology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(6):25-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.005
[7]	OSTROM L, WILHELMSEN C, KAPLAN B. Assessing safety culture[J]. Nuclear Safety, 1993, 34(2):163-172.
[8]	COX S, COX T. The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example[J]. Work & Stress, 1991, 5(2):93-106. doi: 10.1080/02678379108257007
[9]	READER T W, NOORT M C, SHORROCK S, et al. Safety sans frontieres: an international safety culture model[J]. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(5):770-789. doi: 10.1111/risa.12327
[10]	傅贵. 安全管理学:事故预防的行为控制方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013:133-135.
[11]	JIANG Wei, FU Gui, LIANG Chunyang, et al. Study on quantitative measurement result of safety culture[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 128: DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104751. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104751
[12]	ATTWOOD D, KHAN F, VEITCH B. Occupational accident models: where have we been and where are we going?[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19: 664-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.02.001
[13]	FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, JIA Qingsong, et al. The development history of accident causation models in the past 100 years: 24Model, a more modern accident causation model[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 134:47-82. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.027
[14]	付净, 傅贵, 张江石, 等. 基于24Model的煤矿企业安全文化缺欠表征研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(6):2033-2040.
	FU Jing, FU Gui, ZHANG Jiangshi, et al. Approach to the production safety culture deficiencies in the coal mine enterprises based on the 24Model[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19(6):2033-2040.
[15]	傅贵, 索晓, 王春雪. 24Model的系统特性研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(1):263-272. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2018)01-0263-10
	FU Gui, SUO Xiao, WANG Chunxue. Study on the systematic characteristics of 24Model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(1):263-272.
[16]	SCHWATKA N V, HECKER S, GOLDENHAR L M. Defining and measuring safety climate: a review of the construction industry literature[J]. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 2016, 60(5):537-550. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew020
[17]	THADEN T, GIBBONS A. The safety culture indicator scale measurement system (SCISMS): NRC-000029[R]. Office of Aviation Research and Development, 2008.
[18]	SCHöBEL M, KLOSTERMAN A, LASSALLE R, et al. Digging deeper! Insights from a multi-method assessment of safety culture in nuclear power plants based on Schein’s culture model[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 95: 38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.012
[19]	PROBST T M, GOLDENHAR L M, GYRD J L, et al. The safety climate assessment tool(S-CAT): a rubric-based approach to measuring construction safety climate[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2019, 69:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.004
[20]	郭俊琦. 安全文化定量分析系统的设计研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2007.
	GUO Junqi. The development and application of the safety culture analysis system[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), 2007.
[21]	王祥尧. 安全文化定量测量的理论与实证研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2011.
	WANG Xiangyao. Theoretical and empirical research of safety culture quantitative measurement[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), 2011.
[22]	马跃. 企业安全文化建设方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2017.
	MA Yue. Study on the construction method of enterprise safety culture[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), 2017.
[23]	陈松明, 邓宇宏, 王晶鑫, 等. 高校安全文化水平测量与分析:以某工科院校为例[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(10):39-45.
	CHEN Songming, DENG Hongyu, WANG Jingxin, et al. Measurement and analysis of safety culture level in colleges and universities taking a polytechnic college for example[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(10):39-45.
[24]	胡典顺, 朱展霖. 基于SPSS与AMOS的问卷信度效度检验:以数学焦虑、数学态度和数学效能的关系研究为例[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2020(11):3-7.
	HU Dianshun, ZHU Zhanlin. The Reliability and validity test of the questionnaire based on SPSS and AMOS: a case study on the relationship among mathematical anxiety, mathematical attitude and mathematical self-efficiency[J]. Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2020(11):3-7.
[25]	童文清, 傅贵, 解学才, 等. 我国煤矿安全文化建设现状研究:来自60家煤矿的证据[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(12):85-91.
	TONG Wenqing, FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, et al. Research on construction status of coal mine safety culture in China: evidence from 60 coal mines[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(12):85-91.

KMO取样适切性量数	0.704
Bartlett球形度检验	近似卡方	1 121.723
	自由度	496
	显著性	0.000

序号	试验名称	试验目的	试验设备	试验基本过程
1	安全文化概念	安全文化概念发展进程及相关概念的学习	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	学生点开小程序首页,点击按钮“安全文化”进行学习
2	个体测量	加强对安全文化的认知	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序	学生点开小程序首页,点击按钮“个人测量”进行自主测量
3	团体测量	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.教师从客户端进入,新建问卷; 2.学生从小程序进入,扫码答题
4	组织测量	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.教师从客户端进入,圈定组织; 2.学生从小程序进入,选择组织答题
5	角色转换	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.教师从客户端进入,设定不同角色; 2.学生从小程序进入,选择角色答题
6	安全文化元素	增强对安全文化元素学习	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.学生自主学习32个安全文化元素; 2.教师从客户端进入,随机新建问卷; 3.学生从小程序进入,识别对应元素
7	试验课程效果检验	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序	1.学生从小程序进入,自主进行测评; 2.本次结果与以往测量作对比; 3.分析自身安全文化水平变化原因