China Safety Science Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 231-237.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.0700
• Emergency technology and management • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-11-14
Revised:
2024-02-18
Online:
2024-05-28
Published:
2024-11-28
Contact:
GAO Wenwen
CLC Number:
WANG Dan, GAO Wenwen. Emergency supply chain reliability evaluation based on combined empowerment-bias order set[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 231-237.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.0700
Table 1
Emergency supply chain reliability evaluation index system
目标层 | 准则层 | 指标层 | 数据类型 |
---|---|---|---|
应急供 应链可 靠性U | 组织保障 可靠性U1 | 指挥决策机制水平U11 | 语言评价值 |
储备中心辐射范围U12 | 数值 | ||
人财物协调能力U13 | 语言评价值 | ||
法律保障能力U14 | 语言评价值 | ||
资金保障能力U15 | 数值 | ||
基础设施建设水平U16 | 语言评价值 | ||
系统制度 可靠性U2 | 预案机制建设水平U21 | 语言评价值 | |
响应机制建设水平U22 | 语言评价值 | ||
经济通道机制 建设水平U23 | 语言评价值 | ||
评估系统建设水平U24 | 语言评价值 | ||
应急物资筹备率和 监管能力U25 | 区间数 | ||
运作流程 可靠性U3 | 信息传递及时性和 准确性U31 | 区间数 | |
实时信息发布共 享能力U32 | 语言评价值 | ||
信息协同能力U33 | 语言评价值 | ||
应急物资运输及时性以 及完好率U34 | 区间数 | ||
运输网络管理能力以及 安全性U35 | 语言评价值 | ||
配送路径优化能力U36 | 语言评价值 |
Table 2
Evaluation of raw data for indicators
指标层 指标 | 样本1 | 样本2 | 样本3 | 样本4 | 样本5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
U11 | V3 | V4 | V3 | V5 | V2 |
U12 | 0.444 | 0.389 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 0.556 |
U13 | V4 | V1 | V5 | V3 | V0 |
U14 | V1 | V4 | V3 | V2 | V5 |
U15 | 0.524 | 0.489 | 0.447 | 0.419 | 0.581 |
U16 | V2 | V5 | V6 | V4 | V3 |
U21 | V3 | V0 | V5 | V4 | V1 |
U22 | V3 | V4 | V3 | V6 | V2 |
U23 | V3 | V3 | V5 | V6 | V1 |
U24 | [0.875, 1.000] | [0.533, 0.875] | [0.533, 0.667] | [0.600, 0.800] | [0.625, 0.870] |
U25 | V4 | V0 | V6 | V3 | V1 |
U31 | [0.733, 0.933] | [0.333, 0.533] | [0.800, 0.867] | [0.467, 0.533] | [0.400, 0.467] |
U32 | V1 | V4 | V6 | V2 | V5 |
U33 | V2 | V5 | V6 | V4 | V2 |
U34 | [0.875, 1.000] | [0.533, 0.875] | [0.533, 0.667] | [0.600, 0.800] | [0.625, 0.870] |
U35 | V3 | V2 | V6 | V4 | V1 |
U36 | V2 | V4 | V6 | V5 | V0 |
Table 3
Influence degree and ranking of each factor in indicator layer
目标层 | 权重 | 准则层 | 指标层 | 权重 | 影响程度 | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U | 0.62 | U1 | U11 | 0.18 | 0.117 | 1 |
U12 | 0.18 | 0.117 | 2 | |||
U13 | 0.18 | 0.117 | 3 | |||
U14 | 0.15 | 0.090 | 5 | |||
U15 | 0.18 | 0.117 | 4 | |||
U16 | 0.13 | 0.062 | 7 | |||
0.22 | U2 | U21 | 0.31 | 0.068 | 6 | |
U22 | 0.18 | 0.039 | 10 | |||
U23 | 0.24 | 0.053 | 8 | |||
U24 | 0.13 | 0.029 | 12 | |||
U25 | 0.14 | 0.031 | 11 | |||
0.16 | U3 | U31 | 0.13 | 0.021 | 17 | |
U32 | 0.14 | 0.022 | 15 | |||
U33 | 0.16 | 0.026 | 13 | |||
U34 | 0.16 | 0.026 | 14 | |||
U35 | 0.14 | 0.022 | 16 | |||
U36 | 0.27 | 0.043 | 9 |
Table 4
Scoring of emergency supply chain reliability indicators
地区 编号 | 各指标评分的算术平均数 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U11 | U12 | U13 | U15 | U14 | U21 | U16 | U23 | U36 | U22 | U25 | U24 | U33 | U34 | U32 | U35 | U31 | ||
01 | 54.0 | 61.5 | 55.5 | 53.6 | 54.0 | 59.6 | 60.5 | 53.9 | 59.0 | 61.4 | 54.2 | 53.7 | 60.4 | 57.6 | 54.2 | 52.2 | 57.1 | |
02 | 81.9 | 74.8 | 81.9 | 77.6 | 79.7 | 78.4 | 74.9 | 81.5 | 79.1 | 72.4 | 74.8 | 73.8 | 78.0 | 73.3 | 74.4 | 78.0 | 77.5 | |
03 | 83.6 | 84.3 | 80.7 | 77.9 | 86.4 | 82.8 | 78.6 | 83.3 | 83.4 | 80.6 | 82.4 | 80.2 | 81.3 | 81.5 | 78.0 | 78.7 | 77.5 | |
04 | 76.7 | 82.0 | 74.0 | 72.5 | 92.5 | 57.6 | 62.6 | 84.0 | 89.7 | 59.6 | 74.9 | 48.9 | 51.9 | 67.7 | 66.9 | 63.4 | 51.8 | |
05 | 68.8 | 55.9 | 84.0 | 85.8 | 61.1 | 83.1 | 67.3 | 92.0 | 78.7 | 54.6 | 87.1 | 79.8 | 79.1 | 58.6 | 68.5 | 91.6 | 92.9 |
[1] |
钱存华, 陈海滨, 周骏贵. 灾害背景下提升应急供应链韧性影响因素研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(5):1474-1481.
|
|
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
孙莹, 刘慧萍, 颜瑞, 等. 基于韧性和社会福利的应急医疗物资供应链均衡优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31 (8): 132-141.
|
|
|
[4] |
陈伟炯, 董雯玉, 李咪静, 等. 基于马尔科夫链-多目标模型的应急供应链决策优化研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2022, 18(7):19-25.
|
|
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
梁瑾璠, 赵晗萍, 张家乐. 应急物资供应链快速构建模式[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4):135-140.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.04.020 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.04.020 |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
李学工, 李芳. 重大突发事件下应急冷链供应链协同化评价模型及策略研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2021, 17(10):18-24.
|
|
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
周英豪, 王文杰, 卢西洲, 等. 岩爆灾害博弈论组合赋权预测模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7):105-112.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.0620 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.0620 |
|
[16] |
刘晶珩. 基于三角模糊层次分析法的应急供应链可靠性研究[J]. 经贸实践, 2017(19):39-40,42.
|
|
|
[17] |
岳立柱, 张志杰, 闫艳. 蕴含权重的偏序集多准则决策法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(2):26-31.
doi: 10.12005/orms.2018.0031 |
doi: 10.12005/orms.2018.0031 |
|
[18] |
岳立柱, 李良琼. 应用偏序集表示权重难以获知的TOPSIS模型[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2017, 31(4):167-174.
|
|
|
[19] |
范懿. 一个有关哈斯图的解析方法[J]. 上海第二工业大学学报, 2003, 20(1):17-22.
|
|
[1] | CHEN Weijiong, SU Ziwei, QIN Tingrong, HAN Weijia, WANG Kan, KANG Yutao. Evaluation of comprehensive emergency response capability for port ship oil spill with cloud gravity center evaluation method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 183-190. |
[2] | SONG Yinghua, HAN Baoshuai, GUO Chen. Location selection model of emergency shelter considering risk of flood disaster in county [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 191-198. |
[3] | ZHOU Haiyi, BAO Quangui, YE Mao, ZHU Shengwen, LIN Yingdian. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban bridge reliability based on combination weighting method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 156-161. |
[4] | WANG Zhenyu, XIANG Zerui, ZOU Rui, DING Tiecheng, ZHI Jinyi. Appearance design of LHDs based on lattice topology optimization method and EWM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 215-221. |
[5] | LI Feng, ZHANG Laibin, DONG Shaohua, CHEN Lin, ZHANG Hang. Research on sealing failure risk assessment of station flange system based on EWM-AHP-cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 150-156. |
[6] | MA Tianxing, LIN Yun, ZHOU Xiaobin, WEI Peirong, LI Renzong, SU Jiayu. Entropy weight-normal cloud model for water inrush risk prediction of coal seam floor [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(S1): 171-177. |
[7] | WANG Jianguang. POE assessment on rail traffic environment for barrier-free travels [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 151-156. |
[8] | HUANG Jie, ZHANG Xianfeng. Risk assessment of regional violent terrorist attacks in southern Xinjiang [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 192-199. |
[9] | WANG Peng. Mutual application of risk assessment and hidden danger investigation in railway enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(S1): 80-85. |
[10] | WANG Gang, SHANG Luozhen, LIU Xuelin, TANG Li, CHENG Qian. Study on causes of poisoning and asphyxiation in roadway opening by AHP-entropy weight method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 187-192. |
[11] | YANG Tianzi, WANG Tieli, PENG Hengming, DUAN Hailin. Evaluation on emergency response vulnerability for work safety accidents in small and micro enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 176-183. |
[12] | WU Yaonan, LIN Lei, REN Xinwen, WANG Longting, LIU Zhihui, LIU Zengkai. An improved FMEA method based on logical structure number [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 97-104. |
[13] | WU Renbiao, HE Yuxiang, JIA Yunfei. Key personnel risk assessment method based on improved AHP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 112-118. |
[14] | ZHU Guanji, LIU Di, SUN Qiang, ZHOU Zichao. Evaluation on occupational safety adaptability of railway locomotive drivers [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 64-70. |
[15] | ZHOU Xue, ZUO Zhongyi, CHENG Wei. Safety evaluation of railway passenger transportation based on combined weighting cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(S1): 158-164. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||