China Safety Science Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 10-19.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.06.0091
• Safety social science and safety management • Previous Articles Next Articles
TONG Ruipeng(), LIANG Fanjie(
), MENG Ziyao, WANG Yiyan
Received:
2023-12-14
Revised:
2024-03-18
Online:
2024-06-28
Published:
2024-12-28
CLC Number:
TONG Ruipeng, LIANG Fanjie, MENG Ziyao, WANG Yiyan. Risk zoo (VI): metaphorical traceability, evolution process and research outlook of black swans[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(6): 10-19.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.06.0091
[1] |
孙毅, 林攀龙. 概念隐喻理论发凡40年述评:现状与前瞻[J]. 广州大学学报:社会科学版, 2023, 22(5):122-134.
|
|
|
[2] |
佟瑞鹏, 胡向阳, 和杰花, 等. 风险动物园(I):基于隐喻理论的风险图谱构成与表征[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(6):27-34.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.06.0530 |
|
|
[3] |
褚吉瑞. 转型期单位预防“黑天鹅”与“灰犀牛”风险的重难点把控策略[J]. 领导科学, 2021(21):51-53.
|
[4] |
黄轲, 陈瑶雯, 刘曙华, 等. “黑天鹅”事件与中国金融市场波动传递的动态网络[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2021, 36(5):31-47.
|
|
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
房红梅, 严世清. 概念整合运作的认知理据[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2004(4):9-12.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
陈霄, 王微. 后奥运时代刘翔的危机[J]. 销售与市场, 2008(32):22-24.
|
[10] |
邓祝仁. 阳朔现象的内涵、启示与警醒[J]. 旅游论坛, 2009, 2(2):214-219.
|
|
|
[11] |
龙江. 供应链危机全球效应对跨国公司的影响与应对策略:以“3·11”日本地震为视角[J]. 国际贸易, 2011(9):46-52.
|
[12] |
史智才, 肖诗顺. 基于小概率事件的方法论[J]. 统计与决策, 2012(1):89-91.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
人民日报评论员. 有效防范金融风险:二论做好当前金融工作[N]. 人民日报,2017-07-17(1).
|
[22] |
佟瑞鹏, 谢贝贝, 安宇. 黑天鹅事件定义及分类的探讨[J]. 中国公共安全:学术版, 2017(2):44-48.
|
|
|
[23] |
曾继城, 张家榕, 叶鹰. 天鹅展翅:高品质论文的引文模式探析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 37(2):83-87,112.
|
|
|
[24] |
刘东斌, 吴雁平. 档案利用与“黑天鹅事件”:论档案利用的小概率及不可预测[J]. 档案管理, 2019(3):55-57.
|
[25] |
王维国, 王蕊. 经济不确定性与中国经济增长:基于FAVAR-SV模型和新C-D生产函数[J]. 商业研究, 2019(2):25-34.
|
|
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0881 pmid: 29220884 |
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611525114 pmid: 28270622 |
[51] |
doi: 10.1111/gwat.12180 pmid: 24665974 |
[52] |
佟瑞鹏, 孙大力, 郭子萌. 基于“隐喻”的风险事件分类模型及其转化关系[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(7):8-15.
|
|
|
[53] |
佟瑞鹏, 胡向阳, 尹雪晨, 等. 风险动物园(Ⅱ):风险隐喻理论的溯源、演进与前景[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(10):8-15.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.10.1039 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.10.1039 |
|
[54] |
佟瑞鹏, 胡向阳, 袁嘉淙, 等. 风险动物园(Ⅲ):基于动物意象的风险隐喻认知机制与作用路径[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(12):1-7.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.12.1309 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.12.1309 |
|
[55] |
黄俊维. 应对“黑天鹅”的尺度错位原则[J]. 福建论坛:人文社会科学版, 2022(3):174-182.
|
[56] |
刘馨营. 民航黑天鹅事件判定及分析方法研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2021.
|
|
|
[57] |
檀润华, 许波. 产品创新设计中的黑天鹅事件预测与规避方法[J]. 机械设计, 2023, 40(3):1-6.
|
|
|
[58] |
邢变变, 王坤. 再论档案利用与“黑天鹅事件”:兼与刘东斌、吴雁平二位作者商榷[J]. 档案管理, 2020(1):63-65.
|
[59] |
梁艳丽. 也谈档案利用与“黑天鹅事件”:兼与刘东斌、邢变变等四位作者商榷[J]. 档案管理, 2020(4):47-49.
|
[60] |
张慧, 叶鹰. 优质论文中的“天鹅群”及其“伴随睡美人”探析[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40 (6):603-609.
|
|
|
[61] |
史昱. 科研不端行为的联合调查与处理:《肿瘤生物学》撤稿事件的启示[J]. 科学与社会, 2020, 10(4):102-112.
|
|
|
[62] |
谭林. 警惕“绿天鹅”[J]. 中国金融, 2020(12):72-73.
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
doi: 10.1093/af/vfaa046 pmid: 33575104 |
[70] |
姜照华, 刘则渊, 王贤文, 等. 科技知识增长的动力及其周期特征[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(12):102-106.
|
|
[1] | TONG Ruipeng, HU Xiangyang, YIN Xuechen, YANG Angbin. Risk zoo (V): practice and reflection on theory of risk metaphors based on cultural identity [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 10-16. |
[2] | TONG Ruipeng, HU Xiangyang, WANG Leyao, HAN Jixiang. Risk zoo (Ⅳ): risk metaphor event identification and evaluation based on complex system thinking [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 53-59. |
[3] | WEI Miling, WANG Wei, RONG Qingwen, LIU Xiaoran, LIU Chaofeng. Risk assessment model of compound disaster evacuation considering uncertainty [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 203-212. |
[4] | TONG Ruipeng, HU Xiangyang, HE Jiehua, SUN Ninghao. Risk zoo(Ⅰ): composition and characterization of risk mapping based on metaphor theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(6): 27-34. |
[5] | TONG Ruipeng, HU Xiangyang, YUAN Jiacong, WANG Denghui. Risk zoo (III): cognitive mechanisms and paths of risk metaphors based on animal imagery [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(12): 1-7. |
[6] | TONG Ruipeng, HU Xiangyang, YIN Xuechen, GUO Yu. Risk zoo(II): origin, evolution and prospects of risk metaphor theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(10): 8-15. |
[7] | ZHANG Ge. Pneumoconiosis risk assessment method based on cumulative dust exposure [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 200-206. |
[8] | CUI Tiejun, LI Shasha. Study on target event state and occurrence probability of system fault evolution process [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 1-7. |
[9] | CAI Mei, WANG Qiuhan. Review of hazard bearing bodies' vulnerability assessment methods in Natech risk management [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 9-17. |
[10] | JIN Zhixin, LIU Qian, DENG Cunbao, WANG Yansheng. Stochastic fuzzy coupled risk measurement for production safety events [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(1): 1-7. |
[11] | JIANG Shuihua, ZENG Shaohui, HUANG Jinsong, YAO Chi. Sequential probabilistic back analysis on hydraulic conductivity of tailings materials [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 158-165. |
[12] | LI Wenlong, LI Huimin, PEI Xingwang, LIU Yijun. Vulnerability assessment of mountainous road system based on multiple-factor coupling [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 165-170. |
[13] | WEI Dan, JIANG Juncheng, NI Lei, SHEN Saili, FU Gang. Uncertainty measurement theory based evaluation of inherent safety of chemical process [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(5): 117-122. |
[14] | TONG Ruipeng, CHENG Mengzhao, MA Xiaofei, XU Surui. Evaluation method of coal dust occupational health damage under uncertainty condition and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(4): 139-144. |
[15] | MU Nengye, QIU Ge. Construction of a risk assessment model based on linguistic ELECTRI-TRI method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(1): 44-49. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||