China Safety Science Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1-10.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2742
• Safety social science and safety management • Next Articles
LIU Yi(), QIAN Jing, FAN Weicheng
Received:
2022-03-14
Revised:
2022-07-11
Online:
2022-10-19
Published:
2023-03-28
LIU Yi, QIAN Jing, FAN Weicheng. Rise of precision: a review of emergency risk analysis methodology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 1-10.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2742
Tab.1
Detailed topic distribution in literature research
研究类型 | 研究主题 | 文献数量 |
---|---|---|
自然灾害 | 洪水 | |
山体滑坡 | ||
地震 | ||
风暴潮 | ||
台风 | ||
暴雨内涝 | ||
蝗灾 | ||
风蚀 | ||
干旱 | ||
海底滑坡 | ||
落石 | ||
泥石流 | ||
森林火灾 | ||
土壤流失 | ||
土壤迁移 | ||
土壤侵蚀 | ||
土壤液化 | ||
雪崩 | ||
事故灾难 | 建筑物风险暴露 | |
海洋石油泄漏 | ||
化工厂事故 | ||
煤矿灾害 | ||
隧道突水 | ||
尾矿溃坝 | ||
公共卫生 | 传染病 | |
受灾人群 | 个体风险 | |
多灾种混合 | 综合风险 | |
灾害管理 | 灾难恢复 | |
风险决策 | ||
研究方法 | 数据的不确定性 | |
评估方法的不确定性 |
Tab.2
Data sources
数据采集机构 | 网址 |
---|---|
国际地震中心(International Seismological Center,ISC) | http://www.isc.ac.uk/standards/ datacollection/ |
全球地震网(Global Seismographic Network,IRIS) | http://www.iris.edu/ |
全球火山计划(The Smithsonian Institution's Global Volcanism Program,GVP) | https://volcano.si.edu/gvp_about.cfm |
火山数据库(World Organization of Volcano Observatories,WOVOdat) | http://www.wovodat.org/ |
CRED | https://www.emdat.be |
商业遥感空间(Commercial Remote Sensing Space Policy,CRSSP) | http://crssp.usgs.gov/ |
欧洲安全、可靠性与数据协会(European Safety,Reliability and Data Association,ESReDA) | https://www.esreda.org/ |
社交媒体分析(Social Media Analytic,SMA) | http://www.datalabs.com.au/ |
美国地质调查局(United State Geological Survey,USGS) | http://www.usgs.gov/ |
美国联邦政府数据资源库(A repository of federal enterprise data resource,DATAGOV) | https://catalog.data.gov/ dataset/global |
美国国家环境信息中心(National Centers for Environmental Information,NCEI) | https://www.ncei.noaa.gov |
NTSB | https://www.ntsb.gov/Pages/ home.aspx/ |
美国航空航天局(National Aeronautics and Space Administration,NASA) | https://www.nasa.gov |
日本国家地球科学和抗灾研究所(the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience,NIED) | https://www.bosai.go.jp/e/ research/database/ |
日本气象厅(Japan Meteorological Agency,JMA) | http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/ Activities/earthquake.html |
新西兰地质灾害信息网(Geological hazard information for New Zealand,GeoNet) | https://www.geonet.org.nz/volcano |
印度国家遥感中心(National Remote Sensing Center,NRSC) | http://www.nrsc.gov.in |
中国国家气象科学数据中心(China Meteorological Data Service Centre,CMDSC) | http://data.cma.cn/share/subject.html |
中国国家地震科学数据中心(National Earthquake Data Center,NEDC) | https://data.earthquake.cn/index.html |
Tab.3
Data types and sources of data related to disaster
灾害类型 | 数据分类 | 数据格式 | 数据说明 | 机构 |
---|---|---|---|---|
地震、海啸 | 地震数据 | 里氏震级和EXCEL数据表 | 1∶5 000 000至1∶50 000尺度的小尺度(区域)地震带区划,以及1∶50—25 000 ~1∶10 000尺度的大尺度(局部)地震区划 | ISC, IRIS, NIED, USGS, CRED, NEDC |
海啸、洪水、 干旱 | 水文数据 | 谷歌地球图像 | 水位、水压和水密度等 | CRED,NIED,NCEI |
滑坡 | 地质数据 | 不同设备包含不同数据存储格式 | 降雨、湿度、孔隙压力、倾斜、振动等 | USGS, NIED, GeoNet |
洪水、海啸 | 无线传感网络数据 | 通过无线发射器和接收器发送和接收数据 | 模拟警告信号(需要模数转换器) | NIED |
火山爆发 | 地质和地震数据 | 里氏震级和MySQL和XML格式 | 空间、时间和主题数据(如角度、电火花、全球定位系统、雷达图像图像、重力、磁场等) | WOVOdat, JMA, DATAGOV, USGS. |
全类型灾害 | 遥感数据 | 图像格式数据 | 空间、时间和专题数据(卫星数据) | CRSSP, NASA, NRSC,CMDSC |
全类型灾害 | 谷歌地图数据 | 表单和文本格式 | 空间、时间和专题数据(洪水和洪水前的雷达图像) | NASA,CMDSC |
航空、高速公路、海洋、管道和铁路 | 事故数据 | 文本格式 | 时间、地点、伤亡、损失、事故原因、环境、设备、人员情况 | NTSB |
全类型灾害 | 气象数据、遥感数据、地图数据、海洋数据 | 表单、图像、文本、脚本等多种数据格式 | 气象、海洋、卫星、雷达、自然灾害、地质、海岸线等专题数据 | NCEI,CMDSC |
台风 | 地图数据 | 图像和文本格式数据 | 时间、空间、气象专题数据 | NIED,CMDSC |
全类型灾害 | 地质、水文、事故数据等 | EXCEL数据表 | 时间、地点、经度、纬度、受灾面积、地震区划、震级、风速等 | CRED |
全类型灾害 | 可靠性数据 | 文本、表单多种数据格式 | 多个行业的产品和过程的安全和可靠性研究信息、数据和成果 | ESReDA |
[1] |
陈玉和, 姜秀娟. 风险评价[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009:67-72.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
doi: 10.1007/s11069-019-03677-2 |
[4] |
|
[5] |
巴鲁克·费斯科霍夫, 莎拉·利希藤斯坦, 保罗·斯诺维克, 等 [英]. 人类可接受风险[M].王红漫,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009:45-48.
|
|
|
[6] |
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x |
[7] |
郝红岩. 风险思维: 理论及应用[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2019:67-71.
|
[8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2016.01.012 |
[9] |
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102367 |
[10] |
doi: 10.1080/17565529.2020.1772705 |
[11] |
doi: 10.1007/s11069-019-03632-1 |
[12] |
|
[13] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815 |
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
doi: 10.3390/rs12132068 |
[17] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231 |
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-2985-x |
[21] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.041 |
[22] |
|
[23] |
doi: 10.1007/s10346-017-0851-6 |
[24] |
|
[25] |
doi: 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2021.107869 |
[26] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.06.001 |
[27] |
doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-3124-8 |
[28] |
doi: S0301-4797(17)31092-7 pmid: 29154012 |
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103136 |
[33] |
|
[34] |
doi: 10.1007/s10518-021-01161-6 |
[35] |
doi: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1602150 |
[36] |
|
[37] |
doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-2861-z |
[38] |
doi: 10.1111/risa.13337 |
[39] |
doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00320-8 |
[40] |
doi: 10.1111/cts.12178 pmid: 25043853 |
[41] |
|
[42] |
doi: 10.1080/10095020.2018.1560056 |
[43] |
|
[44] |
doi: 10.1007/s11069-018-3427-4 |
[45] |
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.034 |
[46] |
|
[1] | LIN Zhiyang, LIU Zheng, FANG Zhiming, LIU Jialin, ZHANG Peng, JIANG Rui. Review of pedestrian and traffic evacuation simulation software [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 100-110. |
[2] | LI Haichen, FENG Wenwen, ZHANG Shaokai, WANG Chao, ZHANG Peng, LEI Xiaohui. Review on application of cutting-edge information technology in urban flood prevention system [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 137-143. |
[3] | LI Mengjie, LIU Delin. Spatial-temporal evolution and obstacle factors of urban disaster resilience in Zhongyuan urban agglomeration [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 144-151. |
[4] | WEI Lianjiang, ZHOU Fubao, XIA Tongqiang, WANG Kai, JIANG Heguo, WANG Jian. Mine intelligent ventilation and disaster emergency decision platform [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 158-167. |
[5] | CHEN Bin, WANG Xianghan, YANG Mei, QIU Xiaogang. Review on development of simulation software technologies for emergency rescue in complex disaster scenarios [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 168-175. |
[6] | WANG Zhiying, FU Hanxue, NIE Huifang, CHANG Zhipeng. Emergency material distribution and transportation optimization model considering altruistic behavior of disaster victims [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 176-181. |
[7] | JIANG Wenyu, WANG Fei, SU Guofeng, LI Xin, MENG Qingxiang, WANG Guanning. Key technologies of emergency management informatization for forest fires [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 182-191. |
[8] | LI Xiteng, WANG Lin, QIN Hongnan, WANG Baoqing, LI Xin. Construction of emergency supplies dispatch mode based on block chain Fabric [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 192-199. |
[9] | CHANG Dingyi, SHI Juan, QU Lili, ZHENG Peng. Smart emergency management system in wind farms and its application: 5G technology empowerment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 57-67. |
[10] | ZHOU Yong, YANG Bo, TANG Wei, LI Yue'an, WANG Yuedong, LI Zechun. Overview of development of public safety-oriented meteorological monitoring, forecasting and early warning software [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 76-85. |
[11] | QIAN Hongwei, LI Xin, LI Xiteng, WANG Yan. Research on communication efficiency of resident emergency knowledge embedded in social network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 154-160. |
[12] | YU Qiang, HUANG Yicheng, SHA Ce. Influence analysis on typhoon characteristic parameters on probability calculation of disaster chain [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 168-175. |
[13] | YUN Xiaopeng. Research progress and prospect of emergency management based on CNKI and CiteSpace [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 185-193. |
[14] | WANG Lixiao, HAO Minxi, SUN Xiaohui. Simulation study of subway emergency evacuation considering psychological latent variables of pedestrians [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 67-75. |
[15] | XIE Qimiao, WANG Tao, WANG Weili. An evacuation model considering panic psychology [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 180-187. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||