Preparation and properties of CuCl-CeO2 composite CO scavenger

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.08.1592

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to avoid the accident of CO poisoning in coal mines, according to the principle of adsorption catalysis, CuCl-CeO₂, a composite CO scavenger with both adsorption and catalytic properties, was prepared by thermal dispersion method using rare earth oxide CeO₂ as catalyst carrier and CuCl as adsorbent. The CO elimination performance of CuCl, CeO₂ and CuCl-CeO₂ was studied by cone calorimeter. At the same time, the peak pressure of gas explosion and the CO elimination effect of CuCl-CeO₂ were studied by a 20 L explosion ball-gas chromatography system. The results show that the CuCl-CeO₂ composite scavenger can effectively reduce the release rate of CO during the whole heating process, and its elimination performance is better than that of CuCl or CeO₂ alone. When the mass fraction of CuCl is 50 %, the CO elimination rate of CuCl-CeO₂ is the highest, reaching 88.0 %. With the increase of CuCl-CeO₂ mass concentration, the peak pressure of gas explosion gradually decreases, the time to reach the peak pressure of explosion is significantly delayed, and the amount of CO released is also decreasing. When the mass concentration of CuCl-CeO₂ is 1.00 g/L, the effect of explosion suppression and CO elimination is the best. The peak pressure of gas explosion is reduced from 0.508 MPa to 0.387 MPa, the time to reach the peak pressure of explosion is delayed from 237.6 ms to 483.2 ms, and the volume fraction of CO is reduced from 0.879 7% to 0.108 9%, which effectively reduces the peak pressure of gas explosion and CO release.

Key words: cuprous chloride(CuCl)-cerium dioxide(CeO₂), composite CO scavenger, elimination performance, explosion peak pressure, CO release

CLC Number:

YU Yong, ZHANG Leilin. Preparation and properties of CuCl-CeO₂ composite CO scavenger[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(8): 186-194.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 23

[1]	胡宝翠, 韦丽琴, 戴纪强, 等. 我国大气污染物一氧化碳短期暴露对人群死亡影响的Meta分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(12):2 144-2 148,2 162.
	HU Baocui, WEI Liqin, DAI Jiqiang, et al. Meta-analysis on the influence of short-term exposure of carbon monoxide on mortality in China[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2019, 46(12): 2 144-2 148, 2 162.
[2]	马砺, 魏泽, 邹立, 等. 煤层开采过程中CO气体来源实验测试与分析[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(2):214-219.
	MA Li, WEI Ze, ZOU Li, et al. Experimental test and analysis of CO gas source during coal seam mining[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2021, 50(2): 214-219.
[3]	田臣, 周海丰. 基于涌现性特点的采空区氧化升温带高浓度CO治理技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(7):163-170.
	TIAN Chen, ZHOU Haifeng. High-concentration CO treatment technology based on the characteristics of emergence in the goaf oxidation temperature rise zone[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2022, 50(7): 163-170.
[4]	杨应柳, 晋良海, 邵波, 等. 基于复杂网络的煤矿火灾爆炸致因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1):145-151. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0601
	YANG Yingliu, JIN Lianghai, SHAO Bo, et al. Research on the causes of coal mine fire and explosion based on complex network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 145-151. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0601
[5]	霍小泉, 寇义民, 闫振国, 等. CO对瓦斯爆炸反应影响机理研究[J]. 工矿自动化, 2022, 48(2):77-82.
	HUO Xiaoquan, Kou Yimin, Yan Zhenguo, et al. Study on the effect mechanism of CO on gas explosion reaction[J]. Industry and Mine Automation, 2022, 48(2): 77-82.
[6]	LI Jia, SHEN Zhiyuan, WANG Tao, et al. A novel approach for active and synchronous removal of fire-generated CO based on Co-La0.1 catalyst: from lab-scale to full-scale tests[J]. Fuel, 2023, 350:DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128830.
[7]	PENG Linlin, SHI Mingzhen, PAN Yi, et al. Ultrahigh carbon monoxide capture by novel protic cuprous-functionalized dicationic ionic liquids through complexation interactions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 451(2): DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2022.138519.
[8]	翟小伟, 胡冕, 马博昊, 等. 氯盐阻化剂吸附CO性能的实验研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2021, 41(5):772-778.
	ZHAI Xiaowei, HU Mian, MA Bohao, et al. Experimental study on the adsorption performance of chloride inhibitors for CO[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2021, 41(5): 772-778.
[9]	DAVID O C, ZARCA G, GORRI D, et al. On the improved absorption of carbon monoxide in the ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chlorocuprate[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 97(SI): DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.015.
[10]	ZHANG Rongbin, LU Kun, ZONG Lijuan, et al. Gold supported on ceria nanotubes for CO oxidation[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 416(15): 183-190.
[11]	ZHANG Chengmin, CUI Xinjiang, YANG Huimin, et al. A way to realize controllable preparation of active nickel oxide supported nano-Au catalyst for CO oxidation[J]. Applied Catalysis A-General, 2014, 473: 7-12.
[12]	金奇杰, 陶兴军, 沈建宇, 等. Ce-Cu/Ti-Al-OX催化氧化CO的性能研究[J]. 化工新型材料, 2019, 47(9):182-186.
	JIN Qijie, TAO Xingjun, SHEN Jianyu, et al. Study on performance of Ce-Cu/Ti-Al-OX for catalytic oxidation of CO[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2019, 47(9): 182-186.
[13]	DONG Duan, HAO Chunxi, WANG Liqun, et al. Rod-like nanoporous CeO₂ modified by PdO nanoparticles for CO oxidation and methane combustion with high catalytic activity and water resistance[J]. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2019, 14: DOI:10.1186/s11671-019-3029-4.
[14]	MA Jinghong, LI Li, REN Jin, et al. CO adsorption on activated carbon-supported Cu-based adsorbent prepared by a facile route[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, 76(1): 89-93.
[15]	周玉梅, 刘晓勤, 姚虎卿. π络合吸附分离技术的研究进展[J]. 石油化工, 2005, 34(10):1 004-1 009.
	ZHOU Yumei, LIU Xiaoqin, YAO Huqing. Review of adsorption separation via π-complexation[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2005, 34(10): 1 004-1 009.
[16]	孙富丽, 张炜, 俞一帆, 等. 二氧化铈负载型催化剂的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(3):87-98.
	SUN Fuli, ZHANG Wei, YU Yifan, et al. Research progress of cerium dioxide supported catalyst[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(3): 87-98.
[17]	郝敏彤, 孙维, 张超, 等. CO催化氧化催化剂的研究进展[J]. 石油化工, 2022, 51(11):1 335-1 341.
	HAO Mintong, SUN Wei, ZHANG Chao, et al. Research progress of catalysts for CO catalytic oxidation[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2022, 51(11): 1 335-1 341.
[18]	王羽, 蒋骏骢, 朱月香, 等. 有机物单层分散在相关材料制备中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(10):2 327-2 335.
	WANG Yu, JIANG Juncong, ZHU Yuexiang, et al. Application of monolayer dispersion of organic matter in the preparation of related materials[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2012, 28(10): 2 327-2 335.
[19]	刘晓勤, 陈代传, 姚虎卿. 混合气组分对CO在稀土复合吸附剂上吸附的影响[J]. 南京工业大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 25(1):1-4.
	LIU Xiaoqin, CHEN Daichuan, YAO Huqing. Effect of gas mixture adsorption on the rare earth complexed adsorbent for CO separation by pressure swing adsorption[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2003, 25(1): 1-4.
[20]	李芸卓, 季淮君, 苏贺涛. 瓦斯爆炸冲击波扰动后毒害气体云团运移特性[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(4):667-675.
	LI Yunzhuo, JI Huaijun, SU Hetao. Study of the migration characteristics of noxious gas cloud after shock wave disturbance of a gas explosion[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2021, 50(4): 667-675.
[21]	STELZNER B, WEIS C, HABISREUTHER P, et al. Super-adiabatic flame temperatures in premixed methane flames: a comparison between oxy-fuel and conventional air combustion[J]. Fuel, 2017, 201: 148-155.
[22]	SAHA D, COMROE M, KRISHNA R. Synthesis of Cu(I) doped mesoporous carbon for selective capture of ethylene from reaction products of oxidative coupling of methane (OCM)[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2021, 328: DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111488.
[23]	黄子超, 司荣军. 粉体云幕对瓦斯煤尘爆炸隔爆效果的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3):74-81. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.012
	HUANG Zichao, SI Rongjun. Experimental study on suppression of gas and coal dust explosion by powder clouds[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3): 74-81. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.012

试验材料	化学式	性状
亚硫酸钠	Na₂SO₃	白色晶体性粉末
浓盐酸	HCl	无色溶液 (工业级,质量分数为37%)
氯化亚铜	CuCl	黄绿色粉末 (分析纯,纯度≥97.0%)
二氧化铈	CeO₂	黄色球形粉末 (分析纯,纯度≥99.9%)

Preparation and properties of CuCl-CeO₂ composite CO scavenger

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Li Cong, Xu Wenbo, Niu Liting, Song Changpeng, Wu Jiansong. Study on combustion characteristics of pool fire under different initial temperatures [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 159-164.
[2]	Lu Ye, Ding Yuqi, Wang Zhijian, Lyu Qilin, Li Zhichao, Cao Bingyang. Analysis of explosion resistance of composite floating roofs under implosion loads [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 174-181.
[3]	Tan Luyao, Yao Yongzheng, Pan Aolan, Hu Maowei. Numerical simulation of hydrogen diffusion from hydrogen dispenser leakage [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 224-233.
[4]	Xi Peng, Sun Fengling, Fan Xiaoping, Tang Xiaoyu, Zhuo Qiming, Ji Hongbing. Experimental study on effect of phosphorus-based flame retardants with different valence states on lithium-ion batteries performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 73-82.
[5]	Sun Xuxu, Yang Yiwei, Liu Yongjiang, Yao Jiaxin, Wang Jun, Li Guochun. Mechanism of detonation failure and re-ignition of acetylene-oxygen mixture [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 83-88.
[6]	TAO Rundong, BAO Zhiming, HU Cheng, XU Xiaonan, HAO Tianzi, LI Jingjing. Study on dual-stage exothermic characteristics and critical spontaneous combustion temperature of silicon sludge [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 162-170.
[7]	WANG Jiyun, WANG Zichao, ZONG Ruowen, LIU Xuanya. Study on hazard characteristics and onset time of hazard escalation of leakage fires in diesel road tankers [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 194-202.
[8]	QIN Weihao, LIU Quanyi, AI Hongzhou, LIU Jihao, ZHU Pei. Optimization model of forest fire spread based on cellular automata [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 203-211.
[9]	WANG Shuxian, YANG Yi, SHI Yulian, SHEN Yaxi. Prediction model of blasting fragmentation based on GA-QLightGBM quantile regression [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 163-171.
[10]	ZHAO Tenglong, WANG Fengxiao, LI Zihao, YIN Xiaotong. Study on inhibition effect of active composite powder for methane explosions [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 180-188.
[11]	QIU Dongyang, CHEN Xianfeng, LIU Lijuan, HUANG Chuyuan, WANG Jun, SUN Xuxu. Effects of particle morphology on transient dispersion and explosion flame propagation of aluminum powder [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 189-198.
[12]	LI Zhihan, ZHANG Guowei, WANG Jiangxue, YU Longfei, LI Junyi. Characteristics of temperature field on fire-unexposed surface of window glass under varying fire locations [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 209-217.
[13]	YANG Juan, LIANG Xue, BAO Fangwei, ZHANG Qingsong. Experimental study on explosion risk assessment of thermal runaway gas from aviation lithium batteries [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 93-101.
[14]	LI Shengnan, YU Dingqi, GAO Ke. Study on explosion characteristics of mixture of methane/ammonia/air in tunneling roadways [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(1): 121-129.
[15]	LIU Jiqing, PANG Lei, JIN Longzhe, ZHONG Shengjun, YUAN Chunmiao, WANG Yafei. Experimental study on reaction kinetics of stacked aluminum powder with water [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(1): 138-145.