Analysis of influencing factors on urban residents' emergency evacuation capacity during flood disasters: an example from Jiaozuo city

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.09.0771

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper aims to understand the current situation of residents' flood EEC in Jiaozuo city, identify its influencing factors, and to improve their flood EEC. Firstly, a comprehensive index method was adopted to construct an index of residents' flood EEC from four dimensions: knowledge, skills, willingness and behavior. Then, based on literature analysis, ten key factors influencing residents' flood EEC were identified and analyzed. Finally, according to the conclusion, countermeasures and suggestions for improving residents' flood EEC were proposed. The results show that the flood EEC of urban residents in Jiaozuo city is at a medium to low level. The evacuation willingness score is the highest, the evacuation skills score is the lowest, and the evacuation knowledge and behavior scores are in the middle. From the perspective of influencing factors, male respondents, young people, those with higher education, higher income, more flood experience, large family members, more mobility-impaired family members, more children under 12 years old, those living in bungalows, and those living in flood-prone areas have higher flood EEC.

Key words: flood disasters, urban residents, emergency evacuation capacity(EEC), influence factors, index weight, evacuation intention

CLC Number:

X915.5

LIU Delin, CHANG Xiaole. Analysis of influencing factors on urban residents' emergency evacuation capacity during flood disasters: an example from Jiaozuo city[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 212-219.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 30

[1]	Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management. 2022 global natural disaster assessment report[R], 2023.
[2]	公报编写组. 2023年中国水旱灾害及其防御成效综述[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34 (12): 35-40.
	Compilation Group of Bulletin. Overview of water and drought disasters and defense effectiveness in China in 2023[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2024, 34 (12): 35-40.
[3]	李慧, 滕五晓. 场域理论视角下民众应急准备能力建设路径探索[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2022 (4): 78-83.
[4]	张小趁, 陈红旗. 突发地质灾害应急响应:避险模式研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11 (9): 57-62.
	ZHANG Xiaochen, CHEN Hongqi. Study on refuge mode of emergency response in geological hazard[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11 (9): 57-62.
[5]	费文君, 高祥飞. 我国城市绿地防灾避险功能研究综述[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 44 (4): 222-230.
	FEI Wenjun, GAO Xiangfei. A review on disaster prevention and reduction function of urban green spacein China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2020, 44 (4): 222-230.
[6]	王海飙, 陈海超, 李蕊, 等. 城市应急避难场所管理体系构建与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31 (12): 153-159. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.020
	WANG Haibiao, CHEN Haichao, LI Rui, et al. Construction and application of olive-shaped management system of urbanemergency shelters[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31 (12): 153-159. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.020
[7]	耿劭卿, 侯汉平, 周洲. 基于文献计量分析的应急避难所救援系统综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33 (3): 195-203. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.0676
	GENG Shaoqing, HOU Hanping, ZHOU Zhou. A review of emergency shelter rescue system based on bibliometric analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33 (3): 195-203. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.0676
[8]	张永领. 公众洪灾应急避险模式和避险体系研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2013, 22 (4): 227-233.
	ZHANG Yongling. Study on public flood emergency avoidance model and system[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2013, 22 (4): 227-233.
[9]	CHEN Peng, ZHANG Shuo, BAO Jianhua, et al. Evaluation of evacuation difficulty of urban resident during storm water-logging based on walking experiment[J]. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2022, 15 (4): DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12850.
[10]	HEATH S E, KASS P H, BECK A M, et al. Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2001, 153 (7): 659-665. pmid: 11282793
[11]	王强. 南京中学生应对突发事件的应急避险能力的现状调查[J]. 科技信息, 2010 (32): 24-25.
[12]	王瑶, 万玉秋, 钱新, 等. 水库下游居民避险能力指标体系构建及其实证研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2009(1): 26-29, 32.
	WANG Yao, WAN Yuqiu, QIAN Xin, et al. Construction and empirical analysis of evaluating index system of risk avoiding ability of residents in downstream reservoirs[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2009 (1): 26-29, 32.
[13]	THISTLETHWAITE J, HENSTRA D, BROWN C, et al. How flood experience and risk perception influences protective actions and behaviours among canadian homeowners[J]. Environmental Management, 2018, 61 (2): 197-208. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0969-2 pmid: 29234832
[14]	HAN Ziqiang, WANG Hong, DU Qingyue, et al. Natural hazards preparedness in Taiwan: a comparison between households with and without disabled members[J]. Health Security, 2017, 15 (6): 575-581. doi: 10.1089/hs.2017.0025 pmid: 29178814
[15]	陈鹏, 赵洪阳, 张硕, 等. 城市暴雨内涝灾害居民避难行为规律研究[J]. 吉林师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 41 (2): 134-140.
	CHEN Peng, ZHAO Hongyang, ZHANG Shuo, et al. Study on the shelter behavior of residents in urban rainstorm and waterlogging disaster[J]. Journal of Jilin Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2020, 41 (2): 134-140.
[16]	薛澜, 周海雷, 陶鹏. 我国公众应急能力影响因素及培育路径研究[J]. 中国应急管理, 2014 (5): 9-15.
[17]	YAMANE T. Statistics: an introductory analysis:third ed[M]. New York: Harper and Row, 1973: 165.
[18]	LIU Delin, LI Mengjie, LI Yue, et al. Assessment of public flood risk perception and influencing factors: an example of Jiaozuo city, China[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (15): DOI: 10.3390/su14159475.
[19]	CHEN Chienhsiung, ZHANG Wenzhi, ZHANG Wente. Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29 (2): 220-226.
[20]	CVETKOVIĆ V M, RODER G, ÖCAL A, et al. The role of gender in preparedness and response behaviors towards flood risk in Serbia[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15 (12): DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15122761.
[21]	BATEMAN J M, EDWARDS B. Gender and evacuation: a closer look at why women are more likely to evacuate for hurricanes[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2002, 3 (3): 107-117.
[22]	CHEN Na, ZHAO Ming, GAO Kun, et al. Experimental study on the evaluation and influencing factors on individual's emergency escape capability in subway fire[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18 (19): DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910203.
[23]	POUSSIN J K, BOTZEN W J, AERTS J. Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2014, 40: 69-77.
[24]	PRASETYO Y T, SENORO D B, GERMAN J D, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of vulnerability to natural hazards: a household vulnerability assessment in marinduque island, Philippines[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 50: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101831.
[25]	HO M C, SHAW D, LIN S Y, et al. How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception?[J]. Risk Analysis, 2008, 28 (3): 635-643.
[26]	CAHYANTO I, PENNINGTON-GRAY L, THAPA B, et al. An empirical evaluation of the determinants of tourist's hurricane evacuation decision making[J]. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 2014, 2 (4): 253-265.
[27]	YIN Qi, NTIM-AMO G, XU Dingde, et al. Flood disaster risk perception and evacuation willingness of urban households: the case of Accra, Ghana[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 78: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103126.
[28]	LIM M B B, LIM H R, PIANTANAKULCHAI M, et al. A household-level flood evacuation decision model in Quezon city, Philippines[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80 (3): 1539-1561.
[29]	CHAN Yongyi, YUE Juan, LE Fuyi, et al. Socio-demographic predictors for urban community disaster health risk perception and household based preparedness in a chinese urban city[J]. PLoS Currents, 2016, 27 (8):1-17.
[30]	BOTZEN W J, AERTS J C, VAN DEN BERGH J C. Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors[J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45 (10): DOI:10.1029/2009WR007743.

变量	问题设计	赋值	权重
避险知识	您对暴雨预警等级信息的了解程度	非常不了解→ 非常了解 1~5	0.061
	您对暴雨预警后采取的行动的了解程度		0.056
	您对离家最近的应急避难场所的了解程度		0.070
	您对救生衣/圈等救生设备如何使用的了解程度		0.049
避险技能	您能制定一个有效的洪灾家庭转移避险计划	非常不符合→ 非常符合 1~5	0.120
	您会心肺复苏术、止血包扎等急救技能		0.079
	您会使用救生衣/圈等救生设备		0.131
避险意愿	您愿意参加相关培训	非常不符合→ 非常符合 1~5	0.063
	您愿意参加防汛应急演练		0.054
	您会和亲人、朋友、邻居在汛期达成互助承诺		0.074
避险行为	您会准备相关应急物资	非常不符合→ 非常符合 1~5	0.083
	您会购买洪水灾害保险		0.074
	接到政府指令时,您会立即转移至安全区域		0.086

类别	因素	选项
个体特征	性别	男性;女性
	年龄/岁	<18;18~25;26~50;51~70;>70
	受教育程度	初中及以下;高中或中专;本科或大专;硕士及以上
	洪灾经历	0次;1次;2次;3次及以上
家庭特征	家庭人均年收入/万元	<1;1~3;3~8;>8
	家庭规模/人	≤3;4;5;>5
	行动不便人数	0;1;2;≥3
	≤12岁儿童人数	0;1;2;≥3
居住特征	住宅楼层	平房;1楼;2楼;3楼及以上
居住特征	是否居住在洪水易发区	是;否

指标			分类样本数	避险知识	避险技能	避险意愿	避险行为	避险能力
个体特征	性别	男	100	0.92	1.17	0.75	0.90	3.74
	性别	女	95	0.90	1.10	0.74	0.87	3.61
	年龄/岁	<18	23	0.93	1.15	0.78	0.91	3.77
		18~25	41	0.92	1.13	0.71	0.85	3.61
		26~50	67	0.92	1.19	0.78	0.91	3.80
		51~70	42	0.91	1.04	0.72	0.89	3.56
		>70	22	0.86	1.11	0.71	0.84	3.52
	教育程度	初中及以下	26	0.86	1.05	0.75	0.85	3.51
		高中或中专	88	0.91	1.13	0.74	0.88	3.66
		本科或大专	71	0.93	1.14	0.76	0.90	3.73
		硕士及以上	10	0.90	1.27	0.69	0.92	3.78
	洪灾经历/次	0	61	0.87	1.15	0.73	0.91	3.66
		1	95	0.94	1.08	0.74	0.84	3.60
		2	28	0.93	1.19	0.77	0.94	3.83
		3	7	0.87	1.25	0.79	0.94	3.85
		≥4	4	0.95	1.49	0.89	1.11	4.44

指标			分类样本数	避险知识	避险技能	避险意愿	避险行为	避险能力
家庭特征	家庭规模/人	≤3	48	0.93	1.15	0.74	0.93	3.75
		4	68	0.91	1.06	0.69	0.83	3.49
		5	54	0.89	1.12	0.79	0.86	3.66
		>5	25	0.91	1.32	0.79	1.01	4.03
	家庭人均年收入/ 万元	<1	48	0.91	1.15	0.74	0.93	3.73
		1~3	96	0.92	1.09	0.73	0.83	3.57
		3~8	44	0.90	1.16	0.78	0.92	3.76
		>8	7	0.78	1.46	0.83	1.07	4.14
	行动不便人数	0	153	0.93	1.11	0.73	0.87	3.64
		1	35	0.85	1.17	0.78	0.93	3.73
		2	5	0.93	1.44	0.79	1.10	4.26
		3及以上	2	0.85	1.49	0.93	1.01	4.28
	≤12岁儿童人数	0	111	0.92	1.10	0.71	0.87	3.60
		1	69	0.88	1.15	0.78	0.89	3.70
		2	15	1.02	1.30	0.83	1.01	4.16

指标			分类样本数	避险知识	避险技能	避险意愿	避险行为	避险能力
居住特征	住宅楼层	平房	32	0.95	1.15	0.77	0.94	3.81
		1楼	29	0.84	1.16	0.68	0.89	3.57
		2楼	26	0.86	0.96	0.69	0.76	3.27
		3楼及以上	108	0.93	1.16	0.77	0.90	3.76
	是否居住在洪水易发区	是	43	0.93	1.13	0.74	0.93	3.73
	是否居住在洪水易发区	否	152	0.90	1.13	0.75	0.87	3.65