China Safety Science Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 256-262.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.09.0265
• Occupational Health • Previous Articles Next Articles
Guan Haosen(
), Zheng Xin, Wang Huan
Received:2026-05-18
Revised:2026-07-22
Online:2026-10-20
Published:2027-03-28
CLC Number:
Guan Haosen, Zheng Xin, Wang Huan. Analysis of firefighters' physical fatigue based on fusion of multimodal physiological indicators[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(9): 256-262.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.09.0265
Table 2
Paired t-test power analysis
| 指标 | d值 | 统计功效/% | 所需样本量 | 指标 | d值 | 统计功效/% | 所需样本量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SampleEn-RR | 1.83 | 99 | 5 | AEMG | 1.05 | 95 | 9 |
| SampleEn-HR | 1.45 | 99 | 5 | SCL | 0.8 | 88 | 12 |
| LFnorm | 0.75 | 85 | 13 | SCR Amplitude | 0.77 | 86 | 13 |
| HFnorm | 0.8 | 88 | 12 | B-- | 0.75 | 85 | 13 |
| LF/HF | 1.36 | 99 | 5 | 瞳孔直径 | 0.95 | 93 | 10 |
| iEMG | 0.7 | 82 | 14 | 注视时间 | 0.7 | 82 | 14 |
| RMS | 1.05 | 95 | 8 | 眨眼频率 | 0.77 | 86 | 13 |
Table 3
Wilcoxon signed-rank test power analysis
| 指标 | Cliff's Delta 效应量 | 当前功 效/% | 所需样 本量 | 指标 | Cliff's Delta 效应量 | 当前 功效/% | 所需样 本量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 0.76 | 95 | 10 | PNN50 | 0.72 | 91 | 11 |
| RR | 0.68 | 84 | 15 | CV | 0.71 | 89 | 12 |
| SDNN | 0.71 | 89 | 12 | SD1 | 0.72 | 91 | 11 |
| RMSSD | 0.67 | 82 | 17 | SD2 | 0.70 | 88 | 13 |
| LF | 0.69 | 85 | 14 | HF | 0.83 | 99 | 6 |
| SDSD | 0.68 | 84 | 15 | A++ | 0.68 | 84 | 15 |
Table 4
Results of paired t-tests and BH correction for physiological indicators pre- and post-fatigue
| 类型 | 指标 | t | p | 排名 | BH临界值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 眼动指标 | 瞳孔直径(BT)-瞳孔直径(AT) | -3.800 | 0.003* | 5 | 0.018 |
| 注视时间(BT)-注视时间(AT) | 0.243 | 0.812 | 14 | 0.050 | |
| 眨眼频率(BT)-眨眼频率(AT) | 0.424 | 0.680 | 13 | 0.046 | |
| 皮电指标 | SCL(BT)- SCL(AT) | -2.732 | 0.014* | 7 | 0.025 |
| SCR Amplitude(BT)- SCR Amplitude(AT) | -4.535 | 0.000* | 1 | 0.004 | |
| HRV 指标 | LFnorm(BT)-LFnorm(AT) | 1.751 | 0.098 | 10 | 0.036 |
| LF/HF(BT)-LF/HF(AT) | -2.427 | 0.027* | 9 | 0.032 | |
| HFnorm(BT)-HFnorm(AT) | 1.751 | 0.098 | 11 | 0.039 | |
| B--(BT)-B--(AT) | 1.697 | 0.108 | 12 | 0.043 | |
| SampleEn-RR(BT)- SampleEn-RR(AT) | 7.780 | 0.000* | 2 | 0.007 | |
| SampleEn-HR(BT)- SampleEn-HR(AT) | 6.161 | 0.000* | 3 | 0.011 | |
| 类型 | 指标 | t | p | 排名 | BH临界值 |
| 肌电指标 | iEMG(BT)-iEMG(AT) | 2.447 | 0.026* | 8 | 0.029 |
| RMS(BT)-RMS(AT) | 2.836 | 0.011* | 6 | 0.021 | |
| AEMG(BT)-AEMG(AT) | 4.240 | 0.001* | 4 | 0.014 |
Table 5
Results of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and BH correction for physiological indicators pre- and post-physical fatigue
| 指标 | 静息状态中位数 (下四分位数,上四分位数) | 体力疲劳中位数 (下四分位数,上四分位数) | 统计量z | p | 排名 | BH临界值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | 0.731(0.646,0.836) | 0.525(0.509,0.627) | 3.724 | 0.000* | 1 | 0.004 |
| HR | 82.312(71.785,91.013) | 105.562(93.996,113.999) | -3.549 | 0.000* | 2 | 0.008 |
| SDNN | 73.316(40.689,127.817) | 44.127(12.102,91.710) | -1.982 | 0.018* | 6 | 0.025 |
| RMSSD | 106.388(39.907,279.900) | 54.350(27.065,358.620) | -0.109 | 0.913 | 12 | 0.050 |
| PNN50 | 22.253(6.309,34.778) | 8.239(3.911,18.253) | -2.199 | 0.021* | 5 | 0.022 |
| SDSD | 105.124(39.099,277.027) | 54.034(26.992,308.525) | -0.240 | 0.811 | 11 | 0.046 |
| CV | 9.961(6.678,18.467) | 7.300(2.294,17.291) | -1.198 | 0.231 | 9 | 0.038 |
| LF | 2.804×10-4(7.878×10-5, 0.125×10-2) | 3.668×10-5 (7.133×10-6,4.876×10-4) | -1.241 | 0.215 | 8 | 0.033 |
| HF | 0.337×10-3 (2.887×10-5,1.348×10-3) | 0.121×10-3 (8.065×10-7,7.024×10-4) | -1.111 | 0.267 | 10 | 0.042 |
| SD1 | 0.074(0.018,0.161) | 0.015(0.002,0.064) | -3.724 | 0.000* | 4 | 0.017 |
| SD2 | 0.113(0.056,0.166) | 0.034(0.013,0.068) | -3.724 | 0.000* | 3 | 0.013 |
| A++ | 42.72(37.00,48.00) | 39.00(33.00,45.25) | -1.962 | 0.049* | 7 | 0.029 |
Table 7
Machine learning results of various modalities for physical fatigue
| 模态 | 编号 | 指标 | Logit 准确率 | RF 准确率 | KNN 准确率 | SVM 准确率 | AB 准确率 | 平均 准确率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单模态 | A | 肌电 | 0.686 | 0.714 | 0.657 | 0.714 | 0.771 | 0.708 |
| B | 皮电 | 0.708 | 0.715 | 0.771 | 0.629 | 0.612 | 0.687 | |
| C | HRV | 0.758 | 0.781 | 0.721 | 0.686 | 0.773 | 0.744 | |
| D | 眼动 | 0.612 | 0.543 | 0.400 | 0.512 | 0.584 | 0.530 | |
| 双模态 | E | 眼动+肌电 | 0.714 | 0.706 | 0.685 | 0.721 | 0.657 | 0.697 |
| F | 眼动+皮电 | 0.800 | 0.714 | 0.721 | 0.657 | 0.731 | 0.725 | |
| G | 眼动+HRV | 0.812 | 0.786 | 0.818 | 0.774 | 0.795 | 0.797 | |
| H | 皮电+HRV | 0.861 | 0.836 | 0.814 | 0.831 | 0.822 | 0.832 | |
| I | 肌电+HRV | 0.812 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.822 | 0.785 | 0.809 | |
| J | 肌电+皮电 | 0.803 | 0.686 | 0.629 | 0.741 | 0.679 | 0.708 | |
| 三模态 | K | 肌电+皮电+眼动 | 0.798 | 0.836 | 0.778 | 0.781 | 0.795 | 0.797 |
| L | 皮电+HRV+眼动 | 0.853 | 0.857 | 0.853 | 0.861 | 0.861 | 0.844 | |
| M | 皮电+HRV+肌电 | 0.871 | 0.853 | 0.815 | 0.857 | 0.853 | 0.850 | |
| N | 肌电+HRV+眼动 | 0.914 | 0.882 | 0.903 | 0.886 | 0.882 | 0.887 | |
| 四模态 | O | 皮电+肌电+HRV+眼动 | 0.851 | 0.861 | 0.886 | 0.818 | 0.803 | 0.844 |
Table 8
Machine learning results for physical fatigue recognition using optimal multimodal combinations
| 模态组合 | 模型 | ACC | SN | SP | F1 | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRV | Logit | 0.758 | 0.765 | 0.879 | 0.713 | 0.842 |
| RF | 0.781 | 0.782 | 0.889 | 0.782 | 0.850 | |
| KNN | 0.721 | 0.745 | 0.944 | 0.739 | 0.836 | |
| SVM | 0.686 | 0.780 | 0.722 | 0.708 | 0.796 | |
| AB | 0.773 | 0.772 | 0.778 | 0.733 | 0.839 | |
| 皮电+HRV | Logit | 0.861 | 0.911 | 0.833 | 0.879 | 0.918 |
| RF | 0.836 | 0.882 | 0.833 | 0.857 | 0.908 | |
| KNN | 0.814 | 0.765 | 0.889 | 0.813 | 0.903 | |
| SVM | 0.831 | 0.873 | 0.778 | 0.865 | 0.913 | |
| AB | 0.822 | 0.882 | 0.869 | 0.872 | 0.887 | |
| 肌电+HRV+眼动 | Logit | 0.914 | 0.941 | 0.944 | 0.914 | 0.954 |
| RF | 0.882 | 0.911 | 0.889 | 0.914 | 0.946 | |
| KNN | 0.903 | 0.911 | 0.892 | 0.909 | 0.944 | |
| SVM | 0.886 | 0.911 | 0.937 | 0.909 | 0.918 | |
| AB | 0.882 | 0.932 | 0.833 | 0.879 | 0.899 | |
| 皮电+肌电+ HRV+眼动 | Logit | 0.851 | 0.911 | 0.859 | 0.914 | 0.918 |
| RF | 0.861 | 0.824 | 0.859 | 0.872 | 0.908 | |
| KNN | 0.886 | 0.921 | 0.886 | 0.918 | 0.946 | |
| SVM | 0.818 | 0.824 | 0.841 | 0.848 | 0.876 | |
| AB | 0.803 | 0.824 | 0.872 | 0.879 | 0.879 |
| [1] |
程金新, 杨冀韬. 消防员训练损伤问卷调查与分析[J]. 武警学院学报, 2018, 34(2): 75-80.
|
|
|
|
| [2] |
徐艺园, 王凯, 王佳音, 等. 疲劳产生相关机制研究进展[J]. 科学技术创新, 2019(23): 50-51.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
郭永彩, 李文涛, 高潮. 基于PERCLOS的驾驶员疲劳检测算法[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2009, 18(8): 54-57.
|
|
|
|
| [5] |
张勉, 易灿南, 蒋复量, 等. 疲劳对操纵员监视行为影响机制的脑电试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(9): 50-58.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.09.0997 |
|
|
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
任建新, 许锋, 多特征融合的驾驶员疲劳程度量化方法研究[J]. 电子测量技术, 2023, 46(20): 16-23.
|
|
|
|
| [8] |
doi: 10.1080/15459620903455722 pmid: 20017053 |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.11.001 pmid: 28593075 |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
陈娜, 胡毅彤, 袁英峰, 等. 基于博弈论组合赋权-云模型的消防员训练损伤风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 232-238.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.04.1247 |
|
|
|
| [13] |
doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x |
| [14] |
doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2024.3453590 |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
李慧卿. 基于深度学习的多模态融合情感识别研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2024.
|
|
|
| [1] | Wang Jianhua, Zhao Kaigong, Jia Shuyi, Meng Ting, Ren Yanming, Gao Xin. Research on factors associated with locomotive crew operational performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(S1): 177-182. |
| [2] | Zhang Qingfeng, Cao Yufei, Zhou Yue, Fu Chuanyun. Identification and analysis of fatal accidents of training aircraft under uneven distribution of accident types [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(8): 124-132. |
| [3] | Zhang Zhichao, Li Yanchao, Zhang Kai. Research on predicting lower explosion limits of hydrogen-based fuels using machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(8): 179-186. |
| [4] | Yu Hao, Wang Chao, He Ziwang, Liu Yu, Jin Zijun, Qi Shuai. Machine learning-based calibration of PBM meso-parameters and numerical simulation of unloading rockburst [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(8): 260-268. |
| [5] | Xie Yanlei, Yang Jie. Variation characteristics of air gaps under different clothing parts during firefighters' stair ascent and descent gait cycle [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(7): 268-276. |
| [6] | WU Fan, LAI Mimi, LI Mingyang. Influence mechanism of career resilience on safety performance of civil aviation pilots [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 1-8. |
| [7] | DAI Mengfan, LI Lingzhi, QIAN Yuxin, YUAN Jingfeng, HAN Xiaojian, ZHAO Changhao. Decision-support model for safety evaluation of existing civil buildings and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 193-201. |
| [8] | LIU Yadong, LIU Xian, HU Hesong, CHEN Hang, QIAO Shengfang. Analysis of feature importance to retaining wall deformation of excavation using interpretable machine learning model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 110-119. |
| [9] | LU Jiale, ZHANG Nian, NIU Mengmeng, WAN Fei. Hazard prediction model of tunnel water inrush based on stacking ensemble learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 137-144. |
| [10] | LI Miao, LI Lingbo, ZUO Zhiheng, ZHANG Li, JIANG Luxin, SU Huai. Machine learning-based recognition for recognizing operating conditions of multi-product pipelines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(6): 127-135. |
| [11] | ZHAO Shulei, SUN Bing, CHEN Wengan, XU Yinfeng, WANG Junfeng, GUO Chun. Physiological indicators and labor intensity of tunnel construction workers at ultra-high altitude [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 239-246. |
| [12] | WANG Wenchao, HE Jian, SONG Baisheng, WANG Lei. Prediction model of pilot maneuver stability based on LSTM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(12): 48-55. |
| [13] | HU Xiaofeng, HUANG Ling. Heat stress prediction model for outdoor policeman based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(11): 220-228. |
| [14] | XIAO Guosong, LIU Jiachen, ZHANG Yuanshan, DONG Lei, CHEN Xi. Explainable prediction for hard landing of civil aircraft based on LightGBM-SHAP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(10): 134-142. |
| [15] | NIU Tianhui, GENG Dianqiao, YUAN Yi, ZHAO Liang, DONG Hui, WANG Bai. Research status and prospect of fire origin determination based on fire traces [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 238-246. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||