China Safety Science Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 1-8.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.03.0771
• Safety Science Theories and Methods • Next Articles
WU Fan1(
), LAI Mimi1, LI Mingyang2
Received:2025-10-14
Revised:2026-01-05
Online:2026-03-31
Published:2026-09-28
CLC Number:
WU Fan, LAI Mimi, LI Mingyang. Influence mechanism of career resilience on safety performance of civil aviation pilots[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 1-8.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.03.0771
Table 1
Summary of sample characteristics (N=229)
| 特征 | 类别 | 数量 | 占比/% | 特征 | 类别 | 数量 | 占比/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 男 | 229 | 100 | 最高学历毕 业院校 | 重点院校 | 34 | 14.84 |
| 女 | 0 | 0 | 非重点院校 | 195 | 85.16 | ||
| 年龄/岁 | 20~30 | 186 | 81.22 | 飞行阶段 | 飞行学员 | 9 | 3.93 |
| 31~40 | 30 | 13.10 | 副驾驶 | 186 | 81.22 | ||
| 41~50 | 11 | 4.80 | 机长 | 24 | 10.48 | ||
| 51及以上 | 2 | 0.88 | 飞行教员 | 10 | 4.37 | ||
| 婚姻状况 | 未婚 | 120 | 52.40 | 成长经历 | 养成生 | 169 | 73.80 |
| 已婚未育 | 49 | 21.40 | 大毕改 | 40 | 17.47 | ||
| 已婚已育 | 59 | 25.76 | 大改驾 | 19 | 8.30 | ||
| 离异 | 1 | 0.44 | 军转民 | 1 | 0.44 | ||
| 最高学历 | 专科以下 | 0 | 0 | 飞行经历 时间/h | 0~3 000 | 188 | 82.10 |
| 本科 | 225 | 98.25 | 3 001~7 000 | 26 | 11.35 | ||
| 硕士及以上 | 4 | 1.75 | 7 000及以上 | 15 | 6.55 |
Table 2
Variable calibration and descriptive statistics (N=229)
| 变量 | 数据校准 | 描述性统计 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 完全隶属 | 交叉点 | 完全不隶属 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最大值 | 最小值 | |||
| 条件变量 | 情感 | 职业热情 | 2.67 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.80 | 0.60 | 5.00 | 1.00 |
| 合作意识 | 2.75 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.83 | 0.58 | 3.75 | 1.00 | ||
| 行为 | 长期导向 | 2.90 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.93 | 0.56 | 3.75 | 1.00 | |
| 学习意愿 | 2.60 | 1.83 | 1.00 | 1.78 | 0.51 | 3.50 | 1.00 | ||
| 认知 | 适应能力 | 2.90 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.97 | 0.57 | 3.75 | 1.00 | |
| 自我效能 | 2.75 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.83 | 0.53 | 3.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 结果变量 | — | 安全绩效 | 2.67 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.87 | 0.53 | 4.33 | 1.00 |
Table 3
Necessity analysis of conditional variables
| 条件变量 | 高安全绩效 | 非高安全绩效 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一致性 | 覆盖度 | 一致性 | 覆盖度 | |
| 职业热情 | 0.719 | 0.785 | 0.497 | 0.638 |
| ~职业热情 | 0.669 | 0.531 | 0.832 | 0.777 |
| 合作意识 | 0.753 | 0.805 | 0.498 | 0.627 |
| ~合作意识 | 0.637 | 0.525 | 0.845 | 0.801 |
| 长期导向 | 0.808 | 0.780 | 0.582 | 0.661 |
| ~长期导向 | 0.648 | 0.568 | 0.806 | 0.831 |
| 学习意愿 | 0.823 | 0.781 | 0.526 | 0.588 |
| ~学习意愿 | 0.566 | 0.504 | 0.803 | 0.842 |
| 适应能力 | 0.818 | 0.746 | 0.604 | 0.649 |
| ~适应能力 | 0.615 | 0.569 | 0.763 | 0.831 |
| 自我效能 | 0.744 | 0.788 | 0.528 | 0.657 |
| ~自我效能 | 0.676 | 0.549 | 0.829 | 0.792 |
Table 4
Configurational analysis results
| 条件变量 | 高安全绩效组态 | 非高安全绩效组态 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 情感赋能- 行为导向型 | 弹性协同- 行为主导型 | 效能激发- 内在驱动型 | 行为萎缩型 | 孤立适应型 | ||||
| 组态1 | 组态2 | 组态3 | 组态4 | 组态5 | 组态6 | 组态7 | ||
| 情感 | 职业热情 | ● | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ | $\bigotimes$ | ||
| 合作意识 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ⊗ | $\bigotimes$ | ||
| 行为 | 长期导向 | • | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ | $\bigotimes$ | ||
| 学习意愿 | ● | ● | ● | ● | • | $\bigotimes$ | $\bigotimes$ | |
| 认知 | 适应能力 | • | ● | $\bigotimes$ | ● | |||
| 自我效能 | ● | ● | $\bigotimes$ | $\bigotimes$ | ||||
| 一致性 | 0.944 | 0.944 | 0.932 | 0.934 | 0.953 | 0.953 | 0.940 | |
| 覆盖度 | 0.552 | 0.557 | 0.560 | 0.580 | 0.371 | 0.598 | 0.341 | |
| 唯一覆盖度 | 0.004 | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.022 | 0.280 | 0.022 | |
| 解的一致性 | 0.915 | 0.953 | ||||||
| 解的覆盖度 | 0.669 | 0.620 | ||||||
| [1] |
doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.3.347 pmid: 10912498 |
| [2] |
廖中举. 企业安全绩效研究:内涵、测量及影响因素[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(11):139-144.
|
|
|
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
杜红兵, 杨剑涛. 民航飞行员心理资本与安全绩效的关系研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(9):39-45.
|
|
|
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.01.007 pmid: 38858039 |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
田利军, 陈学功, 姚丽霞, 等. 安全投入、内部控制与安全绩效:来自中国航空业的证据[J]. 会计之友, 2024(17):65-70.
|
| [22] |
王世明, 李怡霏, 郭灏男, 等. 组织伦理氛围对煤矿工人安全绩效的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(11):35-42.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.11.1881 |
|
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.11.1881 |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
陈志军, 徐飞雄. 乡村民宿旅游地游客忠诚度影响因素及作用机制:基于ABC态度模型视角的实证分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(5):232-240.
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.05.025 |
|
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.05.025 |
|
| [25] |
朱洪涛, 柯青, 李欣颖. 在线健康社区用户健康信息态度的形成机理研究[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(3):59-69.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2024.03.006 |
|
|
|
| [26] |
国航, 侯晓丽, 任敬, 等. 基于ABC态度模型的器官捐献意愿影响因素分析[J]. 器官移植, 2022, 13(3):378-384.
|
|
|
|
| [27] |
宋国学. 职业生涯韧性的结构维度:本土化研究[J]. 经济管理, 2011, 33(11):184-193.
|
|
|
| [1] | DAI Mengfan, LI Lingzhi, QIAN Yuxin, YUAN Jingfeng, HAN Xiaojian, ZHAO Changhao. Decision-support model for safety evaluation of existing civil buildings and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 193-201. |
| [2] | LIU Yadong, LIU Xian, HU Hesong, CHEN Hang, QIAO Shengfang. Analysis of feature importance to retaining wall deformation of excavation using interpretable machine learning model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 110-119. |
| [3] | LU Jiale, ZHANG Nian, NIU Mengmeng, WAN Fei. Hazard prediction model of tunnel water inrush based on stacking ensemble learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 137-144. |
| [4] | LI Miao, LI Lingbo, ZUO Zhiheng, ZHANG Li, JIANG Luxin, SU Huai. Machine learning-based recognition for recognizing operating conditions of multi-product pipelines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(6): 127-135. |
| [5] | WANG Wenchao, HE Jian, SONG Baisheng, WANG Lei. Prediction model of pilot maneuver stability based on LSTM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(12): 48-55. |
| [6] | HU Xiaofeng, HUANG Ling. Heat stress prediction model for outdoor policeman based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(11): 220-228. |
| [7] | WANG Shiming, LI Yifei, GUO Haonan, LUO Jinbao. Research on influence of organizational ethical climwate on coal miners' safety performance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(11): 35-42. |
| [8] | XIAO Guosong, LIU Jiachen, ZHANG Yuanshan, DONG Lei, CHEN Xi. Explainable prediction for hard landing of civil aircraft based on LightGBM-SHAP [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(10): 134-142. |
| [9] | SHEN Xia. Research on disaster and accident trans-regional collaborative governance community based on fsQCA [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(10): 205-213. |
| [10] | NIU Tianhui, GENG Dianqiao, YUAN Yi, ZHAO Liang, DONG Hui, WANG Bai. Research status and prospect of fire origin determination based on fire traces [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 238-246. |
| [11] | WEN Huiying, HUANG Kunhuo, ZHAO Sheng. Prediction of rear-end collision risk of freeway trucks based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 173-180. |
| [12] | JIN Chunling, JI Zhaotai, GONG Li, AN Xiang, ZHOU Yi. Evaluation model of rockburst intensity of diversion tunnel based on WOA-SVM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 41-48. |
| [13] | TONG Ruipeng, WANG Biao, SUN Ninghao, HU Xiangyang, WANG Qian. Theoretical construction and application of accident-cause-training method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(8): 24-29. |
| [14] | DUAN Zaipeng, LI Fan, GUO Jin, LI Jiong. Integrated warning model for structural safety of buildings in urban waterlogged area [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 173-180. |
| [15] | ZHAO Wei, LI Shuquan. Prediction model of safety competency of construction workers based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 51-57. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||