China Safety Science Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 173-180.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.0759
• Public safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
DUAN Zaipeng1,2(), LI Fan3, GUO Jin3, LI Jiong3
Received:
2023-02-15
Revised:
2023-05-11
Online:
2023-07-28
Published:
2024-01-28
DUAN Zaipeng, LI Fan, GUO Jin, LI Jiong. Integrated warning model for structural safety of buildings in urban waterlogged area[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 173-180.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.0759
Tab.1
Statistical table of building purpose
房屋用途 | 数量 | 占比/% |
---|---|---|
餐馆、五小店 | 21 | 0.95 |
厂房 | 170 | 7.67 |
大中小学校、幼儿园、培训机构 | 36 | 1.63 |
非星级酒店、招待所 | 11 | 0.50 |
交通运输场所 | 2 | 0.09 |
民间信仰场所 | 18 | 0.81 |
商住综合楼 | 67 | 3.02 |
商业场所 | 50 | 2.26 |
文化旅游场所 | 1 | 0.05 |
星级酒店 | 1 | 0.05 |
行政机关办公楼 | 9 | 0.41 |
养老、托老机构场所、儿童福利院 | 1 | 0.05 |
一般办公楼、商业综合楼 | 40 | 1.81 |
医疗卫生场所 | 3 | 0.14 |
娱乐场所 | 1 | 0.05 |
住宅 | 1 543 | 69.66 |
其他 | 241 | 10.88 |
Tab.2
Introduction to experimental data attributes
序号 | 指标 | 说明 | 示例 | 获取方法 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 房屋安全现状 | 存在/暂无安全隐患 | 暂无安全隐患 | 综合评估 |
2 | 区域 | 易涝区所属县(市) | 宁德市福安市 | 现场观测 |
3 | 房屋种类 | 农村房屋/城市房屋 | 农村房屋 | 房屋档案 |
4 | 土地类型 | 国有土地/集体土地 | 国有土地 | 房屋档案 |
5 | 年份 | 1949—2020 | 2000 | 房屋档案 |
6 | 面积/m2 | 1~210 000 | 1 000 | 房屋档案+现场观测 |
7 | 地上层数 | 1~46 | 10 | 现场核查 |
8 | 地下层数 | 0~2 | 2 | 现场核查 |
9 | 基础类型 | 桩基础、独立基础、条形基础、其他类型 | 桩基础 | 房屋档案+现场观测 |
10 | 改造情况 | 建成后经/未经改造 | 建成后未经改造 | 房屋档案+现场观测 |
11 | 房屋设计 | 是(正规)/否(不正规) | 是 | 房屋档案+现场观测 |
12 | 施工草图 | 有/无 | 有 | 房屋档案 |
13 | 房屋审批 | 是(经过审批)/否(未审批) | 是 | 房屋档案 |
14 | 降雨量/mm | 地区年降雨量 | 628 | 政府气象数据 |
15 | 海拔/m | 地区平均海拔 | 27 | 地理观测数据 |
16 | 是否沿海 | 是否与海相邻 | 是 | 利用地图判断 |
17 | 施工队伍 | 有(专业队伍)/无(非专业队伍) | 有 | 房屋档案 |
18 | 房屋用途 | 住宅、酒店、厂房等17类 | 住宅 | 现场核查 |
19 | 结构类型 | 砖混结构、土木结构、钢结构、钢筋 混凝土结构、底部框架-上部砖混结 构、木结构、石结构、其他类型 | 钢结构 | 房屋档案+现场观测 |
20 | 重点房屋 | 非重点房屋/所属的重点房屋类型 | 非重点房屋 | 房屋档案+现场观测 |
21 | 是否贫困 | 是(贫困户)/否(非贫困户) | 否 | 现场核查 |
Tab.6
Summary of evaluation indexes
分类器 | 指标 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
准确率 | F1值 | 精确率 | 召回率 | AP | AUC | ||||||||
袋装法 | 第1次试验 | 0.924 2 | 0.928 4 | 0.846 2 | 0.933 0 | 0.997 5 | 0.988 0 | ||||||
第2次试验 | 0.930 4 | 0.933 4 | 0.857 1 | 0.923 3 | 0.996 7 | 0.996 3 | |||||||
均值 | 0.927 3 | 0.930 9 | 0.851 7 | 0.928 2 | 0.997 1 | 0.992 2 | |||||||
堆叠法 | 第1次试验 | 0.971 1 | 0.971 3 | 0.943 4 | 0.954 8 | 0.999 3 | 0.974 7 | ||||||
第2次试验 | 0.961 2 | 0.961 4 | 0.925 8 | 0.935 1 | 0.998 9 | 0.989 2 | |||||||
均值 | 0.966 2 | 0.966 4 | 0.934 6 | 0.945 0 | 0.999 1* | 0.982 0* | |||||||
投票法 | 第1次试验 | 0.925 1 | 0.927 8 | 0.852 0 | 0.907 8 | 0.994 3 | 0.984 2 | ||||||
第2次试验 | 0.933 2 | 0.935 6 | 0.863 1 | 0.920 5 | 0.994 7 | 0.994 4 | |||||||
均值 | 0.929 2 | 0.931 7 | 0.857 6 | 0.914 2 | 0.994 5 | 0.989 3 | |||||||
提升法 | 第1次试验 | 0.992 8 | 0.992 8 | 0.985 1 | 0.989 2 | 0.995 8 | 0.975 8 | ||||||
第2次试验 | 0.989 2 | 0.989 2 | 0.978 4 | 0.982 6 | 0.993 4 | 0.982 6 | |||||||
均值 | 0.991 0* | 0.991 0* | 0.981 8* | 0.985 9 * | 0.994 6 | 0.979 2 |
[1] |
周倩倩, 许小文, 苏炯恒. GIS几何分析法在易涝区识别和空域构建中的应用[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018, 34(19): 114-117,123.
|
|
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04688-8 |
[4] |
doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.477 pmid: 33201855 |
[5] |
郭桂祯, 赵飞, 王丹丹. 基于脆弱性曲线的台风-洪涝灾害链房屋倒损评估方法研究[J]. 灾害学, 2017, 32(4): 94-97.
|
|
|
[6] |
林森, 郭桂祯, 刘蓓蓓. 基于梯度提升决策树(GBDT)算法的南方洪涝灾害房屋倒损评估模型[J]. 灾害学, 2020, 35(1): 109-112,130.
|
|
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.01.003 |
[9] |
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.006 |
[11] |
冯波, 陈明涛, 岳冬冬, 等. 基于两种插值算法的三维地质建模对比[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2019, 49(4): 1200-1208.
|
|
|
[12] |
doi: 10.3390/cli11010021 |
[13] |
何俊鹏, 罗蕾, 肖堃, 等. 基于特征值分布和人工智能的网络入侵检测系统的研究与实现[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2021, 38(9): 2746-2751.
|
|
|
[14] |
doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2019.10.029 |
[15] |
doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 |
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.1080/17445760.2019.1650039 |
[18] |
doi: 10.1007/s42979-022-01425-1 |
[1] | YANG Xiangqian, ZHANG Pingru, WU Shengnan, ZHANG Laibin, LI Zhong, FENG Huanzhi. Early prediction and warning of offshore drilling overflow based on data model collaboration [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 93-100. |
[2] | NIU Tianhui, GENG Dianqiao, YUAN Yi, ZHAO Liang, DONG Hui, WANG Bai. Research status and prospect of fire origin determination based on fire traces [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 238-246. |
[3] | JIN Chunling, JI Zhaotai, GONG Li, AN Xiang, ZHOU Yi. Evaluation model of rockburst intensity of diversion tunnel based on WOA-SVM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 41-48. |
[4] | WEN Huiying, HUANG Kunhuo, ZHAO Sheng. Prediction of rear-end collision risk of freeway trucks based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 173-180. |
[5] | ZHAO Wei, LI Shuquan. Prediction model of safety competency of construction workers based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 51-57. |
[6] | ZHANG Xiliang, JIAO Haokai, LI Erbao. Prediction of vibration velocity of deep blasting based on transfer learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(6): 64-72. |
[7] | DUAN Zaipeng, LI Jiong, LI Fan, LIU Biqiang. Structural safety early warning model of rural reconstruction houses [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 100-106. |
[8] | ZHU Tong, QIN Dan, WEI Wen, REN Jie, FENG Yidong. Research on accident risk identification and influencing factors of bus drivers based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 23-30. |
[9] | HE Shubo, XIANG Wei, SHI Zhongmiao. Risk early warning of electric vehicle battery system based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 159-165. |
[10] | GUO Zhen, JIA Xiaoyan, LI Fumin, HU Yan, YAN Qiuyan. Fast prediction for building fire spread based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(11): 117-125. |
[11] | ZHU Xin, LI Jianwei, GUO Wei, BI Sheng, WU Yuefei. Forest fire risk prediction model based on machine learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 152-157. |
[12] | CHEN Yongqiang, WU Zhipeng, YANG Xiangjuan, CHEN Pu, SUN Shuli. Review on regional seismic analysis software [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 126-136. |
[13] | ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Ke. Prediction study on slope stability based on LightGBM algorithm [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 113-120. |
[14] | LIU Kun, JIAO Yubo, ZHANG Xiaoming, CHEN Xiaoyu, JIANG Chaozhe. Test of railway train drivers' stress by using ECG signal [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 31-37. |
[15] | YANG Wenchen, ZHOU Yanning, TIAN Bijiang, GUO Fengxiang, HU Chengyu. Traffic accident severity prediction for secondary highways based on cluster analysis and SVM model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 163-169. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||