考虑空间效应的出租车超速行为道路因素分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.023

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 162-170.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.023

考虑空间效应的出租车超速行为道路因素分析

周悦¹, 付川云^**1,2,3 讲师, 江欣国^1,2,3 教授, 毛程远⁴讲师, 刘海玥¹

1 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川成都 611756;
2 西南交通大学综合交通运输智能化国家地方联合工程实验室,四川成都 611756;
3 西南交通大学综合交通大数据应用技术国家工程实验室,四川成都 611756;
4 浙江师范大学工学院,浙江金华 321004

收稿日期:2020-12-02 修回日期:2021-02-01 出版日期:2021-03-28 发布日期:2021-12-20
通讯作者: **付川云(1985—),男,四川资阳人,博士,讲师,主要从事道路交通安全方面的研究。E-mail: fuchuanyun@swjtu.edu.cn。
作者简介:周悦 (1992—),男,四川成都人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为道路交通安全分析、驾驶行为时空特征分析和统计建模。E-mail: 415958144@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71801182,71771191);四川省科技创新人才基金资助(2019JDRC0023);浙江省自然科学基金资助(LY18G030021)。

Road factor analysis of taxi speeding behavior considering spatial effect

ZHOU Yue¹, FU Chuanyun^1,2,3, JIANG Xinguo^1,2,3, MAO Chengyuan⁴, LIU Haiyue¹

1 School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 611756, China;
2 National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 611756, China;
3 National Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Transportation Big Data Application Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 611756, China;
4 College of Engineering, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua Zhejiang 321004, China

Received:2020-12-02 Revised:2021-02-01 Online:2021-03-28 Published:2021-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为充分利用道路特征干预出租车超速行为,搜集成都市区内出租车全球定位系统(GPS)轨迹数据,识别其超速行为,并采集道路特征数据,以各道路的出租车超速频数及平均超速严重度为超速特征,应用全局莫兰指数和4类空间回归模型,分别确定超速特征及道路因素的空间自相关性和显著影响出租车超速特征的道路因素。研究结果表明:出租车超速行为和道路特征均存在明显的空间自相关性;空间自相关模型(SAC)对超速频数的拟合效果最好,空间杜宾模型(SDM)对平均超速严重度的拟合效果最佳;路段的相接道路数、出入口数及车道数明显增加超速频数;道路长度和车道数显著增大平均超速严重度;施工区和单行道均与超速特征无关。

关键词: 出租车超速行为, 道路特征, 全球定位系统(GPS)轨迹数据, 超速频数, 超速严重度, 空间回归模型, 空间自相关性

Abstract: In order to prevent taxi speeding by utilizing road characteristics, GPS trajectory data of taxis in Chengdu city area were gathered to identify their speeding behavior, and road characteristics were extracted as well. Then, with speeding frequency and average speeding severity of each road as speeding characteristics, global Moran's I and four kinds of spatial regression models were adopted to analyze spatial autocorrelation of speeding characteristics and road factors and to explore significant influencing factors of the former. The results reveal that obvious spatial autocorrelation exists between taxi speeding and road characteristics. Spatial Autocorrelation Model (SAC) and Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) are the best for fitting of speeding frequency and average speeding severity estimation, respectively. Number of connected road, access number and lane number evidently increase taxi speeding frequency while road length and lane number significantly increase average speeding severity. Whereas, work zone and one-way roads are unrelated with speeding characteristics.

Key words: taxi speeding behavior, road characteristics, global position system (GPS) trajectory data, speeding frequency, speeding severity, spatial regression model, spatial autocorrelation

中图分类号:

X951

周悦, 付川云, 江欣国, 毛程远, 刘海玥. 考虑空间效应的出租车超速行为道路因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 162-170.

ZHOU Yue, FU Chuanyun, JIANG Xinguo, MAO Chengyuan, LIU Haiyue. Road factor analysis of taxi speeding behavior considering spatial effect[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(3): 162-170.

参考文献

[1] CHENG A S K, TING K H, LIU K P Y, et al. Impulsivity and risky decision making among taxi drivers in Hong Kong: an event-related potential study[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2016, 95: 387-394.
[2] WU Jiawei, YAN Xuedong, RADWAN E. Discrepancy analysis of driving performance of taxi drivers and non-professional drivers for red-light running violation and crash avoidance at intersections[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2016, 91: 1-9.
[3] JOHNSON N J, SORLIE P D, BACKLUND E. The Impact of specific occupation on mortality in the U.S. national longitudinal mortality study[J]. Demography, 1999, 36(3): 355-367.
[4] TSENG C M. Operating styles, working time and daily driving distance in relation to a taxi driver's speeding offenses in Taiwan[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013, 52: 1-8.
[5] CHIN Hoongchor, HUANG Helai. Safety assessment of taxi drivers in Singapore[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2114: 47-56.
[6] LA Q N, LEE A H, MEULENERS L B, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with road traffic crash among taxi drivers in Hanoi, Vietnam[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013, 50: 451-455.
[7] LAM L T. Environmental factors associated with crash-related mortality and injury among taxi drivers in New South Wales, Australia[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2004, 36(5): 905-908.
[8] CORFITSEN M T. Tiredness and visual reaction time among nighttime cab drivers: a roadside survey[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1993, 25(6): 667-673.
[9] DALZIEL J R, JOB R F S. Motor vehicle accidents, fatigue and optimism bias in taxi drivers[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1997, 29(4): 489-494.
[10] MAAG U, VANASSE C, DIONNE G, et al. Taxi drivers' accidents: how binocular vision problems are related to their rate and severity in terms of the number of victims[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1997, 29(2): 217-224.
[11] ROSENBLOOM T, SHAHAR A. Differences between taxi and nonprofessional male drivers in attitudes towards traffic-violation penalties[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2007, 10(5): 428-435.
[12] BURNS P C, WILDE G J S. Risk taking in male taxi drivers: relationships among personality, observational data and driver records[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 1995, 18(2): 267-278.
[13] SHI Jing, TAO Li, LI Xiaoyue, et al. A survey of taxi drivers' aberrant driving behavior in Beijing[J]. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 2014, 6(1): 34-43.
[14] PELTZER K, RENNER W. Superstition, risk-taking and risk perception of accidents among South African taxi drivers[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2003, 35(4): 619-623.
[15] ROUTLEY V, OZANNE-SMITH J, QIN Y, et al. Taxi driver seat belt wearing in Nanjing, China[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2009, 40(6): 449-454.
[16] MANI K, MUN S W, HAYATI K. Speeding among taxi drivers in Selangor, Malaysia[J]. Injury Prevention, 2010, 16(S1): DOI:10.1136/IP.2010.029215.49.
[17] NEWNAM S, MAMO W G, TULU G S. Exploring differences in driving behaviour across age and years of education of taxi drivers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 68: 1-5.
[18] YEH M S, TSENG C M, LIU H H, et al. The factors of female taxi drivers' speeding offenses in Taiwan[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 32: 35-45.
[19] HUANG Yizhe, SUN Jian, TANG Juanyu. Taxi driver speeding: who, when, where and how? a comparative study between Shanghai and New York city[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2018, 19(3): 311-316.
[20] ALLSOP R. The effectiveness of speed cameras: a review of evidence[R]. The Royal Automobile Club Foundation, 2010.
[21] GAINS A, HEYDECKER B, SHREWSBURY J, et al. The national safety camera programme-three year evaluation report[R]. PA Consulting Group, 2004.
[22] ZHANG Guangnan, YAUB K K W, GONG Xiangpu. Traffic violations in Guangdong province of China: speeding and drunk driving[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 64: 30-40.
[23] PAUW E D, DANIELS S, BRIJS T, et al. Behavioral effects of fixed speed cameras on motorways: overall improved speed compliance or kangaroo jumps?[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 73: 132-140.
[24] SOOLE D W, WATSON B C, FLEITER J J. Effects of average speed enforcement on speed compliance and crashes: a review of the literature[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013, 54: 46-56.
[25] GARBER N J, PATEL S T. Effectiveness of changeable message signs in controlling vehicle speeds in work zones[R]. Virginia Transportation Research Council, 1994.
[26] 王雪松,陈铭,邓滨. 城市主干道交通运行状况分析与影响因素研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报,2012, 32 (增1): 129-133.
WANG Xuesong, CHEN Ming, DENG Bin. Analyses of traffic operational condition and impact factors on urban arterials[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2012, 32(S1): 129-133.
[27] 王雪松,刘浩冰. 基于浮动车数据的上海市主干道车速特征分析[C]. 第七届中国智能交通年会优秀论文集. 北京:电子工业出版社,2012: 104-111.
WANG Xuesong, LIU Haobing. Analyze speed features for Shanghai urban arterials using floating car data[C]. The Proceedings of Excellent Papers of the 7th China Intelligent Transportation Annual Conference. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2012: 104-111.
[28] VAHEDI J, MOHAYMANY A S, TABIBI Z. Aberrant driving behaviour, risk involvement, and their related factors among taxi drivers[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(8): 1-17.
[29] MORAN P A P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena[J]. Biometrika, 1950, 37: 17-23.
[30] YU Jihai, JONG R D, LEE L F. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and t are large[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 146(1): 118-134.
[31] DORMANN C F, MCPHERSON J M, ARAU'JO M B, et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review[J]. Ecography, 2007, 30(5): 609-628.
[32] 刘通,付锐,张名芳,等. 融合K-means与高斯混合模型的驾驶风格聚类研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2019,29(12): 40-45.
LIU Tong, FU Rui, ZHANG Mingfang, et al. Study on driving style clustering based on K-means and Gaussian mixture model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(12): 40-45.
[33] 付川云,李雅洁,胡钟予. 重复超速违法行为罚款模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2019,29(3): 14-20.
FU Chuanyun, LI Yajie, HU Zhongyu. Fine modes of repeat speeding behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(3): 14-20.
[34] 江欣国,刘海玥,周悦,等. 超速行为干预措施研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国公路学报,2020,33(3): 1-31.
JIANG Xinguo, LIU Haiyue, ZHOU Yue, et al.. Systematic review on anti-speeding countermeasure research[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(3): 1-31.

考虑空间效应的出租车超速行为道路因素分析

Road factor analysis of taxi speeding behavior considering spatial effect

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨文臣, 周燕宁, 田毕江, 郭凤香, 胡澄宇. 基于聚类分析和SVM的二级公路交通事故严重度预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 163-169.
[2]	李英帅, 闫琦若, 甄云竹, 王卫杰. 铰链车右转内轮差区域范围确定方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 103-108.
[3]	鲁义, 伍江乐, 邵淑珍, 施式亮, 周荣义, 王伟. 基于贝叶斯网络的危化品道路运输事故推理模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 174-182.
[4]	陈圣迪, 葛晓婉, 赵晓晨, 陆键, 邢莹莹. 山区二级公路运营期常态交通风险评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 176-183.
[5]	丘积, 王红, 蒋若曦, 肖文彬, 常红光, 朱顺应. 高速公路转换区严重冲突识别与分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 184-191.
[6]	李杰, 曾叙砜, 孙领, 刘伟, 李平. 全国道路交通安全水平的时空布局演化研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 136-143.
[7]	李浩然, 王子恒, 杨起帆, 张亚君, 欧阳作林. 复杂网络下地铁灾害链演化模型与风险分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 141-147.
[8]	姚志洪, 金玉婷, 王思琛, 胡路, 蒋阳升. 混入智能网联汽车的交通流稳定性与安全性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 136-143.
[9]	胡甚平, 李圣媛, 赵睿, 李帅召, 王新雅. LNG动力船应急响应系统流程GSPN-MC仿真模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 174-181.
[10]	岳仁田, 韩蒙. 基于四诊法的管制席安全运行状态诊断^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 52-59.
[11]	于萍. 邮轮应急疏散过程建模、模拟与布局优化分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 142-149.
[12]	王嘉文, 游权, 周溪召. 城市道路信号控制交叉口两难区研究综述^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 125-131.
[13]	路庆昌, 崔欣, 徐标, 刘鹏, 王琰. 公交接驳场景下轨道交通网络脆弱性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 141-146.
[14]	朱伟, 王亚飞, 张鹏, 林天埜. 突发事件下多路径行人通行行为模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 151-156.
[15]	贾飞, 孟学雷, 贾宝通, 李涛, 张杨. 突发公共卫生事件下高速铁路客流分配研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 153-160.