中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 133-141.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.11.2158

• 公共安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

城镇街巷空间人群通行疏散及碰撞风险定量模拟

刘晓芳1(), 吝涛2, 于琪1, 曹馨2,3   

  1. 1 华侨大学 建筑学院,福建 厦门 361021
    2 中国科学院 城市环境研究所,福建 厦门 361021
    3 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-14 修回日期:2023-08-18 出版日期:2023-11-28
  • 作者简介:

    刘晓芳 (1980—),女,福建福州人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事城市健康与安全等方面的研究。E-mail:

    吝涛 研究员

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(42271299)

Quantitative simulation of pedestrian evacuation and collision risk in urban street space

LIU Xiaofang1(), LIN Tao2, YU Qi1, CAO Xin2,3   

  1. 1 School of Architecture, Huaqiao University, Xiamen Fujian 361021, China
    2 Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen Fujian 361021, China
    3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2023-05-14 Revised:2023-08-18 Published:2023-11-28

摘要:

为合理规划城镇街巷空间布局,定量化研究城镇街巷空间人群通行安全风险,组织实地场景人群通行活动的模拟试验。设计瓶颈式街巷空间布局试验、窄径式街巷空间布局试验、窄径式街巷阻碍物布局试验、速度试验4种实地模拟试验,量化分析通行时间、碰撞隔断设施次数、街巷宽度、街巷长度、阻碍物布局及通行速度等变量间的关系,探索城镇街巷空间布局及人群通行速度与人群疏散及碰撞风险的定量化关系。研究结果表明:瓶颈式街巷宽度与人群疏散及碰撞风险存在显著负相关,街巷宽度为1.5 m时出现安全风险拐点;窄径式街巷前的空间限定能起到较好引导组织人流的作用,减少人群疏散及碰撞风险;街巷空间内阻碍物集中设置在中间且变化频率大的布局对通行影响最大,增加人群疏散风险;狭窄街巷中快速行走未必能达到减少通行时间的效果。

关键词: 街巷空间, 人群通行疏散, 碰撞风险, 瓶颈式街巷, 窄径式街巷

Abstract:

In order to reasonably do the spatial layout planning of urban streets and quantitatively study the passing safety risks of people in urban street space, simulation experiments of crowd activities in field scenarios were organized, and four types of field simulation experiments were designed, including bottleneck street space layout experiments, narrow-path street layout experiments, obstacle layout experiments in narrow-path street, and speed experiments. The quantitative relationships between the spatial layout of urban streets and crowd passing speed and pedestrian evacuation and collision risk were explored by quantitatively analyzing the relationships between passing time, collision partition number, street width, street length, obstacle layout and passing speed. The results show that the width of bottleneck street is significantly negatively correlated with the pedestrian evacuation and collision risk, and risk turning point occurs when the street width is 1.5 m, and the space limitation in front of narrow-path street can play a better role in guiding and organizing the flow of people to reduce the pedestrian evacuation and collision risk, and the layouts in which the obstacles are concentrated in the middle and change frequently in the street space have the greatest impact on crowd passing and increase the evacuation risk; and that in narrow-path street fast walking may not be able to reduce the passing time.

Key words: street space, pedestrian evacuation, collision risk, bottleneck street, narrow-path street