行为流视域下的个体不安全行为分类及责任认定

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.09.004

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 20-26.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.09.004

行为流视域下的个体不安全行为分类及责任认定

黄浪¹, 吴超^2,3 教授, 马剑¹

1 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川成都 610031;
2 中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南长沙 410083;
3 中南大学安全理论创新与促进研究中心,湖南长沙 410083

收稿日期:2019-06-07 修回日期:2019-08-06 出版日期:2019-09-28 发布日期:2020-10-30
作者简介:黄浪 (1990—),男,四川泸州人,博士,主要研究方向为安全科学基础理论。E-mail:18971185983@189.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(51534008)。

Classification and responsibility identification of individual unsafe behaviors based on behavior flow

HUANG Lang¹, WU Chao^2,3, MA Jian¹

1 School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610031, China;
2 School of Resources & Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China;
3 Safety & Security Theory Innovation and Promotion Center, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China

Received:2019-06-07 Revised:2019-08-06 Online:2019-09-28 Published:2020-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为完善行为安全管理理论和安全信息认知理论,首先,采用理论思辨和文献归纳的方法,在信息流和认知流的基础上,提出行为流概念,解析其内涵;然后,分析不同行为模式涉及的行为流模块和对应的偏差模式;最后,构建基于行为流和行为模式的不安全行为责任认定程序。结果表明:个体行为流包括安全信息获取行为、分析行为和利用行为;个体不安全行为分类基本框架包括忽略、时间偏差、顺序偏差、目标偏差和单个动作执行偏差;个体不安全行为责任认定程序可概括为 5类;基于行为流的个体不安全行为分类模式和责任认定程序具有可行性和有效性。

关键词: 行为安全, 信息认知, 责任认定, 信息流, 认知流, 行为流

Abstract: In order to perfect the theoretical system of behavior-based safety management and safety information cognition, the classification and responsibility identification procedures of unsafe behaviors were developed. Firstly, the concept of behavior flow was put forward and its connation was analyzed based on the concepts of information flow and cognition flow. Secondly, the behavior modules and deviation model related to different behavior patterns were analyzed. Lastly, the responsibility identification procedures of unsafe behaviors were constructed based on behavior flow and behaviors pattern. The results show that the individual behavior flow consists of safety information acquisition, analysis and utilization, that the classification framework including ignoring, time deviation, sequence deviation, target deviation, and action deviation, that the responsibility identification procedures of individual unsafe behaviors can be summarized to five categories, and that the proposed classification and responsibility identification procedures are feasible and effective.

Key words: behavioral safety, information cognition, responsibility identification, information flow, cognition flow, behavior flow

中图分类号:

X910

黄浪, 吴超, 马剑. 行为流视域下的个体不安全行为分类及责任认定[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 20-26.

HUANG Lang, WU Chao, MA Jian. Classification and responsibility identification of individual unsafe behaviors based on behavior flow[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 20-26.

参考文献

[1] PERROW C. Normal accidents-living with high risk technologies[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011: 34-39.
[2] HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing, et al. An unsafe behaviour formation mechanism based on risk perception[J]. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 2019, 29: 109-117.
[3] REASON J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents[M]. Ashgate: Burlington, 1997: 54-61.
[4] SANDERS E. Human factors in engineering and design[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993: 78-86.
[5] 孙志强, 史秀建, 李欣欣, 等. 基于认知模型的人为差错分类方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2008, 30(1): 73-77.
SUN Zhiqiang, SHI Xiujian, LI Xinxin, et al. A framework for classifying human errors based on cognitive model[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2008, 30(1): 73-77.
[6] 陈芳, 罗云. 管制员安全能力模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(1): 17-23.
CHEN Fang, LUO Yun. Study on safety capability model of air traffic controllers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012,22(1): 17-23.
[7] 杜红兵, 刘明, 靳慧斌. 基于信息加工模型的飞行员差错分析与分类[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2013, 39(2): 90-93.
DU Hongbing, LIU Ming, JIN Huibin. Classification and analysis of pilots errors based on information processing model[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2013, 39(2): 90-93.
[8] 叶贵, 陈梦莉, 汪红霞. 建筑安全事故人为因素分类研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(4): 131-137.
YE Gui, CHEN Mengli, WANG Hongxia. Study on classification of human factors in construction safety accidents[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(4): 131-137.
[9] 马跃, 傅贵, 杨卓明. 矿工不安全行为分类及控制对策研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2014, 45(9): 235-237.
MA Yue, FU Gui, YANG Zhuoming. Classification and control countermeasure of miner unsafe behavior[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(9): 235-237.
[10] 张力, 杨大新, 王以群. 数字化控制室信息显示对人因可靠性的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(9): 81-85.
ZHANG Li, YANG Daxin, WANG Yiqun. The effect of information display on human reliability in a digital control room[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(9): 81-85.
[11] 黄浪, 吴超, 王秉. 个体安全信息力的概念模型及其作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11): 7-12.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao, WANG Bing. Conceptual model for individual safety information force and its action mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(11): 7-12.
[12] 吴超. 安全信息认知通用模型及其启示[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
WU Chao. Construction of a general safety information cognitive model and its implications[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(3): 5-11.
[13] RASMUSSEN J. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models[J]. Systems Man & Cybernetics IEEE Transactions on, 1983, 13(3): 257-266.
[14] 黄浪, 吴超. 风险感知偏差机理概念模型构建研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(1): 60-66.
HUANG Lang, WU Chao. Conceptual modelling of risk perception deviation mechanism[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2017, 26(1): 60-66.
[15] SAURIN T A, GUIMARÃES L B D M, COSTELLA M F, et al. An algorithm for classifying error types of front-line workers based on the SRK framework[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2008, 38(11/12): 1 067-1 077.
[16] 天津港“8.12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL]. (2018-02-05). http:/ /www.china-safety.gov.cn/newpage/newfiles/201600812baogao.pdf.

行为流视域下的个体不安全行为分类及责任认定

Classification and responsibility identification of individual unsafe behaviors based on behavior flow

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵挺生, 冯楚璇, 蒋灵, 张伟. 基于AcciMap模型的施工升降机安全风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 79-84.
[2]	龙丹冰, 魏君豪, 杨成. 知识图谱改进的施工行为安全风险与危险位置识别算法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 10-16.
[3]	刘文龙. 由一起诉讼案件谈对《铁路交通事故认定书》的认识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 43-47.
[4]	佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 杨校毅, 郭子萌, 安宇. 社会心理风险因素对工人行为安全影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 18-24.
[5]	孙世梅, 高小迪, 孙赫, 傅贵. 天然气管道施工事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 8-13.
[6]	陈沅江, 成霜怡, 冯伟, 段琳陵, 蒋志强. 安全信息反馈及其失效机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 30-36.
[7]	孙世梅, 赵金坤, 傅贵. 基于“2-4”模型的高处坠落事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 23-28.
[8]	黄浪, 吴超, 王秉. “流”视域下的系统安全协同理论模型构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 50-55.
[9]	佟瑞鹏, 杨校毅. JD-R模型、理论在行为安全研究中的应用及述评[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 42-47.
[10]	韩豫, 刘嘉伦, 张泾杰, 冯志达. 建筑工人危险认知结果的差异特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 20-26.
[11]	佟瑞鹏, 崔鹏程. 基于深度学习的不安全因素识别和交互分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 49-54.
[12]	黄浪, 吴超教授, 王秉. 个体安全信息力的概念模型及其作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11): 7-12.
[13]	罗通元, 吴超. SIC思维下的事故致因模型构建与实证分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 1-6.
[14]	傅贵，张苏，董继业，高上飞. 行为安全的理论实质与效果讨论[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 150-.
[15]	钱洪伟，尹香菊，申霞，吴继园. 企业安全文化管理技术体系理论与实践探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(6): 143-.