塔吊安全事故致因网络模型构建与分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.001

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1-7.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.001

• 安全科学理论与安全系统科学 • 下一篇

塔吊安全事故致因网络模型构建与分析

张伟副教授, 张潇^**, 薛楠楠, 赵挺生教授

华中科技大学土木工程与力学学院,湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2020-09-23 修回日期:2020-11-02 出版日期:2020-12-28
作者简介:张伟 (1980—),男,湖北松滋人,博士,副教授,主要从事基于系统方法的工程项目管理、施工安全安全管理等方面的研究。E-mail: zhang_wei98@hust.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0805500); 国家自然科学基金资助(51308240)。

Network model establishment and analysis of tower crane safety accident causes

ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Xiao, XUE Nannan, ZHAO Tingsheng

School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430074, China

Received:2020-09-23 Revised:2020-11-02 Published:2020-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为识别导致建筑工程塔吊安全事故的关键致因和链路,提出一种基于复杂网络的塔吊安全事故致因分析方法。首先,依据塔吊安全管理法律法规、标准规范,结合文献研究成果和系统思维,将塔吊安全事故致因归纳为6个子系统和34项致因;在此基础上,以我国有关管理部门发布的194份塔吊安全事故调查报告为实证数据,以致因为节点,以致因关联为边,构建塔吊安全事故致因网络模型;计算和分析网络模型的度、强度和最短路径等统计指标,确定导致塔吊安全事故的9项关键致因、 3组强关联致因和3条关键致因链路。这些关键致因和链路可以作为实践中塔吊安全管控的重点。

关键词: 塔吊, 安全事故致因, 网络模型, 关键致因, 关键链路

Abstract: In order to identify critical causes and paths of tower crane accidents in construction engineering, a causation analysis method was proposed based on complex network. Firstly, accident causes were classified into 6 subsystems and 34 factors based on literature review and system thinking according to relevant laws, regulations and standards about tower crane safety. Then, with empirical data of 194 tower crane accident reports from relevant department in China, an accident causation network model of tower crane was established with causes as nodes and correlations among them as edges. Finally, statistical indicators of the model, such as degree, strength and shortest path, were calculated and analyzed, and nine critical causes, three pairs of strongly related causes and three key causation paths were identified. All these causes and paths can be taken as priorities during practice of tower crane safety control.

Key words: tower crane, safety accident cause, network model, critical cause, critical path

中图分类号:

X952

张伟, 张潇, 薛楠楠, 赵挺生. 塔吊安全事故致因网络模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 1-7.

ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Xiao, XUE Nannan, ZHAO Tingsheng. Network model establishment and analysis of tower crane safety accident causes[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12): 1-7.

参考文献

[1] LI Heng, CHAN G, SKITMORE M. Multiuser virtual safety training system for tower crane dismantlement[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2012, 26 (5): 638-647.
[2] 中华人民共和国住房与城乡建设部. 关于2018年房屋市政工程生产安全事故和建筑施工安全专项治理行动情况的通报[EB/OL]. [2019-03-22]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201903/t20190326_239913.html.
[3] 张潇, 张伟. 塔式起重机安全事故统计分析[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2019, 45(9): 24-29.
ZHANG Xiao, ZHANG Wei. Statistical analysis of tower crane safety accidents[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 45(9): 24-29.
[4] 汉中市人民政府. 四川标升建设工程有限公司汉中圣桦国际城项目部“12·10”塔式起重机坍塌较大事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2019-05-06]. http://www.hanzhong.gov.cn/xxgk/gkml/ggfw/jzqx/201906/t20190620_587251.html.
[5] 岳阳市应急管理局. 华容县华容明珠三期工程项目“1·23”较大塔式起重机坍塌事故调查报告[EB/OL]. [2019-08-30]. http://ajj.yueyang.gov.cn/6029/content_1583216.html.
[6] SHAPIRA A, LYACHIN B. Identification and analysis of factors affecting safety on construction sites with tower cranes[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009, 135(1): 24-33.
[7] TAM V W Y, FUNG I W H. Tower crane safety in the construction industry: a Hong Kong study[J]. Safety Science, 2011, 49(2): 208-215.
[8] SHIN I J. Factors that affect safety of tower crane installation/dismantling in construction industry[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 72: 379-390.
[9] 赵挺生, 周炜, 徐凯, 等. 复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 153-159.
ZHAO Tingsheng, ZHOU Wei, XU Kai, et al. Thinking about tower crane safety from an angle of complex sociotechnical system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(6): 153-159.
[10] 傅贵, 索晓, 贾清淞, 等. 10种事故致因模型的对比研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(2): 58-63.
FU Gui, SUO Xiao, JIA Qingsong, et al. Comparative study on ten accident causation models[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(2): 58-63.
[11] RASMUSSEN J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem[J]. Safety Science, 1997, 27(2): 183-213.
[12] ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Xiao, LUO Xiaowei, et al. Reliability model and critical factors identification of construction safety management based on system thinking[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2019, 25(4): 362-379.
[13] SERTYESILISIK B, TUNSTALL A, MCLOUGLIN J. An investigation of lifting operations on UK construction sites[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(1): 72-79.
[14] HÄKKINEN K. Crane accidents and their prevention revisited[J]. Safety Science, 1993, 16(3/4): 267-277.
[15] NEITZEL R L, SEIXAS N S, REN K K. A review of crane safety in the construction industry[J]. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2001, 16(12): 1 106-1 117.
[16] BEAVERS J E, MOORE J R, RINEHART R, et al. Crane-related fatalities in the construction industry[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132(9): 901-910.
[17] MARQUEZ A A, VENTURINO P, OTEGUI J L. Common root causes in recent failures of cranes[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 39: 55-64.
[18] SHEPHERD G W, KAHLER R J, CROSS J. Crane fatalities:a taxonomic analysis[J]. Safety Science,2000, 36(2): 83-93.
[19] KANG S C, CHI H L, MIRANDA E. Three-dimensional simulation and visualization of crane assisted construction erection processes[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2009, 23(6): 363-371.
[20] ZHOU Zhipeng, IRIZARRY J, LI Qiming. Using network theory to explore the complexity of subway construction accident network (SCAN) for promoting safety management[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 64: 127-136.
[21] 花玲玲, 郑伟. 基于复杂网络理论的铁路事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(增1): 114-119.
HUA Lingling, ZHENG Wei. Research on causation of railway accidents based on complex network theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(S1): 114-119.
[22] 姚尊强, 尚可可, 许小可. 加权网络的常用统计量[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2012, 34(1): 18-26.
YAO Zunqiang, SHANG Keke, XU Xiaoke. Fundamental statistics of weighted networks[J]. Journal University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2012, 34(1): 18-26.

塔吊安全事故致因网络模型构建与分析

Network model establishment and analysis of tower crane safety accident causes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王海英, 楚林, 许建. 融合N-K模型的复杂网络架桥机施工安全风险因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 10-17.
[2]	郑时求, 周荣义, 杨璧帆, 李丽, 鲁义. 危化品槽罐车运输事故关键致因及传递路径研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 172-178.
[3]	刘丹, 朱卫昌, 李墨潇, 金青松, SAIDAH Saad. 利益相关者视角下化工安全关键致因网络分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(11): 59-66.
[4]	赵楚凡, 米传民, 周志鹏, 方晶. 基于组合关联分析模型的电力人身事故关键致因链筛选[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 99-106.
[5]	柯丽华, 陈魁香, 胡南燕, 谭铭, 张光权, 孟欢欢. 基于SNA的露天矿爆破安全风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 48-56.
[6]	朱伟, 王亚飞, 张鹏, 林天埜. 突发事件下多路径行人通行行为模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 151-156.
[7]	赵挺生, 胡俊杰, 师玉栋, 姜雯茜. 塔吊安装与拆卸作业安全性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 32-38.
[8]	宋高峰, 张延兵, 孙培培, 沈硕勋, 王志荣. 大型储罐声发射技术下的安全评价方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 60-66.
[9]	郭文亚, 周志鹏. 地铁工程建设安全事故致因网络模型构建与解析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 155-161.
[10]	花玲玲, 郑伟. 基于复杂网络理论的铁路事故致因分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 114-119.
[11]	张伟, 朱双娜, 张潇, 赵挺生. 建筑施工安全事故致因系统模型与实证分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 56-62.
[12]	蒋代, 华敏, 潘旭海, 蒋军成. 化工园区储罐多米诺效应的脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 177-182.
[13]	孙玉岭, 孟超, 王景春, 刘向东. 铁路建设管理行为与安全事故致因关联性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S1): 71-76.
[14]	赵挺生, 周炜, 徐凯, 贺凌云. 复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 153-159.
[15]	肖雪梅，王艳辉，贾利民. 基于复杂网络和熵的城轨路网运营安全评价模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(11): 41-.