基于FRAM的铁路危险品运输事故演化机制研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.027

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 171-176.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.027

基于FRAM的铁路危险品运输事故演化机制研究

张玥, 帅斌^** 教授, 黄文成, 张锐, 雷渝, 许旻昊

西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川成都 611756

收稿日期:2019-11-01 修回日期:2020-01-03 出版日期:2020-02-28 发布日期:2021-01-25
通讯作者: **帅斌(1967—),男,四川乐山人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事危险品运输路网建模与规划、危险品运输系统评价等方面的研究。E-mail:shuaibin@home.swjtu.edu.cn。
作者简介:张玥(1996―),女,四川乐山人,硕士研究生,研究方向为交通运输工程。E-mail:75949096@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家铁路局科技计划项目(KF2013-020,KF2014-041);西南交通大学研究生创新实验实践项目(YC201507103),西南交通大学研究生学术培养提升计划(跨学科创新培育)专题项目(2018KXK04)。

Accident evolution mechanism of railway dangerous goods transportation based on FRAM

ZHANG Yue, SHUAI Bin, HUANG Wencheng, ZHANG Rui, LEI Yu, XU Minhao

School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 611756, China

Received:2019-11-01 Revised:2020-01-03 Online:2020-02-28 Published:2021-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为预防铁路危险品运输事故,基于功能共振分析法(FRAM)分析铁路危险品运输系统风险-事故演化机制,进而研究对应控制方法。在建立铁路危险品运输系统风险-事故演化层级网络的基础上,将影响FRAM中输入、前提等属性的风险因素分为人、设施设备、货物、环境和管理5大类;以华东某站氰化钠泄漏事故为例进行研究,结果表明:匿报危险品种类、违规包装和检查人员失职3个功能模块导致各自功能模块内部变化,并引起功能模块的不正常振荡,通过非线性、动态性耦合作用和功能连接传递,使功能模块间发生非线性耦合共振,导致运输危险品与卸载危险品2个模块之间的连接断裂并超越系统风险-事故临界阈值,宏观层级结构发生阶跃式突变,最终导致事故。

关键词: 铁路运输, 危险品, 风险-事故演化机制, 演化层级网络, 功能共振分析法(FRAM)

Abstract: In order to prevent safety accidents in railway dangerous goods transportation system, risk-accident evolution mechanism of it was analyzed and corresponding control methods were studied based on FRAM. A hierarchical risk-accident evolution network was established, and risk elements that influenced input and premise of FRAM were categorized into five aspects, personnel, equipment, goods, environment and management. Finally, odium cyanide leakage accident of a station in eastern China was analyzed for case study. The results show that three functional modules, including concealment of dangerous goods types, illegal packing and malpractice of inspectors, cause internal changes of respective modules as well as abnormal oscillations which are transmitted through non-linear and dynamic coupling effects and functional connections, further leading to non-linear coupled resonance among these functional modules. The connection between dangerous good transportation and unloading functional modules is broken and exceeds system risk-accident critical threshold, and macro-level structure sees a step mutation, resulting in an accident.

Key words: railway transportation, dangerous goods, system risk-accident evolution mechanism, hierarchical evolution network, functional resonance analysis method (FRAM)

中图分类号:

X951

张玥, 帅斌, 黄文成, 张锐, 雷渝, 许旻昊. 基于FRAM的铁路危险品运输事故演化机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 171-176.

ZHANG Yue, SHUAI Bin, HUANG Wencheng, ZHANG Rui, LEI Yu, XU Minhao. Accident evolution mechanism of railway dangerous goods transportation based on FRAM[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2): 171-176.

参考文献 14

[1]	黄文成, 帅斌, 孙妍. 基于N-K模型的铁路危险品运输系统耦合风险形成机理研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(5):1-9.HUANG Wencheng, SHUAI Bin, SUN Yan. Study on coupling risk formation mechanism of railway dangerous goods transportation system based on N-K model[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(5):1-9.
[2]	黄文成, 帅斌, 孙妍, 等. 熵-TOPSIS-耦合协调模型评价铁路危险品运输系统风险[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2):134-138.HUANG Wenheng, SHUAI Bin, SUN Yan, et al. Evaluation of risk in railway dangerous goods transportation system by integrated entropy-TOPSIS-coupling coordination method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(2):134-138.
[3]	黄文成, 帅斌, 张光亚. 基于改进的WBS-RBS识别铁路危险品运输风险[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(8):93-99.HUANG Wencheng, SHUAI Bin, ZHANG Guangya. Improved WBS-RBS based identification of risks in railway transportation of dangerous goods[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(8):93-99.
[4]	LI Jun, ZHANG Hong, HAN Yinshan, et al. Study on failure of third-party damage for urban gas pipeline based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(11): e0166472.
[5]	HONG E S, LEE I M. Quantitative risk evaluation based on event tree analysis technique: application to the design of shield TBM[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 25(24):269-277.
[6]	CHEN Xiaokun, ZHU Hailong, CHEN Jianqiang. Hazard identification and control in the pre-blasting process[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering, 2011, 17(3):331-335.
[7]	LEHTO M, SALVENDY G. Models of accident causation and their application: review and reappraisal[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1991, 8:173-205.
[8]	ALLISON C K, REVELL K M, SEARS R, et al. Systems theoretic accident model and process (stamp) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 98:159-166.
[9]	HUANG Wencheng, SHUAI Bin, ZUO Borui, et al. A systematic railway dangerous goods transportation system risk analysis approach: the 24 model[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 61:94-103.
[10]	HOLLNAGEL E, ORJAN G. The functional resonance accident model[C]. Proceedings of Cognitive System Engineering in Process Plant 2004 (CSEPC 2004), 2004: 155-161.
[11]	黄文成, 帅斌, 张玥, 等. 基于叠加-触发原理的铁路危险品运输系统风险场形成机理研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(6):144-150.HUANG Wencheng, SHUAI Bin, ZHANG Yue, et al. Study on the formation mechanism of railway dangerous goods transportation system risk field based on the stacking-triggering principle[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(6):144-150.
[12]	张津嘉, 许开立, 王贝贝, 等. 瓦斯爆炸事故风险耦合演化机理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(3):81-85.ZHANG Jinjia, XU Kaili, WANG Beibei, et al. Study on risk coupling evolution mechanism of gas explosion accident[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(3):81-85.
[13]	中国铁道企业管理协会运输委员会. 铁路危险货物运输事故案例[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2009:38-43.
[14]	乔万冠, 李新春, 刘全龙. 基于改进FRAM模型的煤矿重大事故致因分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(2):249-252.QIAO Wanguan, LI Xinchun, LIU Quanlong. Analysis of major accidents in coal mines based on improved FRAM model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(2):249-252.

[1]	邝雨婕, 赵佳虹. 连续时变风险下危险品储运选址-选线问题[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 185-191.
[2]	连奇巍. 铁路危险货物运输安全监管体系的思考与建议[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 1-5.
[3]	孔博, 赵刚. 新冠肺炎常态化下铁路防控要点及措施探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 16-20.
[4]	李林卿, 黄文成, 韩兆洋, 赵然, 赵春竹, 吴凡. 铁路危险货物运输安全监管SWOT分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 59-63.
[5]	尹德志, 帅斌, 黄文成, 张玥, 张锐, 左博睿. Tropos-FRAM法在道路客运事故分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 151-157.
[6]	闫旭, 彭其渊, 殷勇, 李文新. 区域铁路运输安全态势表征与评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 33-40.
[7]	王伟, 王晓楠, 丁黎黎, 张文思, 张辉. 多部门协作下危险品运输监管的演化博弈[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 69-74.
[8]	程希. 安全经济学在铁路运输生产方面应用的探讨^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 5-10.
[9]	杨婷, 帅斌, 黄文成. 基于N-K模型的道路危险品运输系统耦合风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 132-137.
[10]	彭建华. 我国4种运输方式安全生产水平比较研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 135-140.
[11]	吴华稳. 铁路行业运输与安全统计指标体系构建^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 124-128.
[12]	韩兆洋, 孙膑. 铁路货运安全监测指标筛选方案研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 161-165.
[13]	孔博, 赵刚. 机车乘务员职业健康预警系统研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 176-179.
[14]	杨晓明, 郑凯, 罗丹, 孙膑, 李姝辰, 汝宜红. 高速铁路客运安全调研分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S1): 117-124.
[15]	黄文成, 帅斌, 张光亚. 基于改进的WBS-RBS识别铁路危险品运输风险[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(8): 93-99.

基于FRAM的铁路危险品运输事故演化机制研究

Accident evolution mechanism of railway dangerous goods transportation based on FRAM

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 14

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价