航空用气胀式救生衣的穿戴时间测试

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.02.023

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 167-172.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.02.023

航空用气胀式救生衣的穿戴时间测试

陆杰欢, 杨爱慧副教授, 杨瑞梁^** 副教授, 吴子江

天津工业大学天津市现代机电装备技术重点实验室,天津 300387

收稿日期:2020-11-27 修回日期:2021-01-16 出版日期:2021-02-28 发布日期:2021-08-18
通讯作者: ** 杨瑞梁(1977—),男,河南南阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事飞机运维新材料新工艺及其检测理论与技术等方向的研究。E-mail: yangruiliang2001@sina.com。
作者简介:陆杰欢 (1995—),女,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为飞机运维新材料新工艺及其检测理论与技术。E-mail:463916682@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(U1933111)。

Experiment on donning time of inflatable aviation life preservers

LU Jiehuan, YANG Aihui, YANG Ruiliang, WU Zijiang

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Modern Electromechanical Equipment Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2020-11-27 Revised:2021-01-16 Online:2021-02-28 Published:2021-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究航空用气胀式救生衣穿戴性能,首先,搭建航空座椅试验平台,选择113个大学生和42个成年村民作为对比性测试对象,采用国内各大航空公司均配备的标准救生衣作为穿戴对象开展试验;然后,分析试验结果满足国家标准《航空用气胀式救生衣》(GB/T 36508—2018)中穿戴要求的情况,并采用T检验分析不同性别、年龄、演示水平下穿戴时间的差别是否显著。结果表明:测试的航空用气胀式救生衣穿戴时间无法满足国家标准的要求,且性别、年龄对救生衣穿戴时间无显著性影响,但不同演示水平下穿戴时间的差别十分显著;国家标准中穿戴时间要求、测试对象选择、演示水平等方面与文中研究结论有较大差异,建议更多研究人员通过更详细、更深入的试验,来深入探讨GB/T 36508—2018中这3方面的内容。

关键词: 航空用气胀式救生衣, 航空座椅试验平台, 穿戴时间, 演示水平, 显著性影响

Abstract: In order to study donning performance of inflatable aviation life preservers, a donning test was carried out. Firstly, an experiment platform of aviation seat was built, 113 college students and 42 adult villagers were chosen as subject, and standard life preservers used by major domestic airlines were selected as donning subject. Then, experiment results were analyzed to see whether they satisfy requirements set in standard for Inflatable Life Preservers for Aviation (GB/T 36508-2018), and T test was adopted to analyze whether different genders, ages and demonstration levels have a significant influence on donning time. The results show that donning time obtained from test cannot meet requirements of national standards, and gender and ages don't have while demonstration levels have significant impact on it. And there is a big gap between results of this paper and GB/T 36508-2018 on donning time requirements, subject and demonstration level. Thus, more researchers are encouraged to study these three aspects of GB /T 36508-2018 through more detailed and in-depth experiments.

Key words: inflatable aviation life preservers, experiment platform of aviation seat, donning time, demonstration level, significant difference

中图分类号:

X949

陆杰欢, 杨爱慧, 杨瑞梁, 吴子江. 航空用气胀式救生衣的穿戴时间测试[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 167-172.

LU Jiehuan, YANG Aihui, YANG Ruiliang, WU Zijiang. Experiment on donning time of inflatable aviation life preservers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(2): 167-172.

参考文献

[1] YANG Ruiliang, WANG Lijing, ZHOU Chi, et al. Life preservers: concepts, progress, and challenges[J]. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology,2020: DOI:10.1080/24721840.2020.1742123.
[2] Transportation Safety Board (TSB) of Canda. Loss of control and collision with water [R], 2012.
[3] National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson river [R],2012.
[4] CORBETT C L, WEED D B, RUPPEL D J, et al. Inflatable emergency equipment I: evaluation of individual inflatable aviation life preserver donning tests [R]. Federal Aviation Administaration, 2014.
[5] TSO-C13f,Life preservers[S]. 1992.
[6] TSO-C13g,Life preservers[S]. 2017.
[7] GB/T 10000—1988,中国成年人人体尺寸[S].
GB/T 10000-1988,Human dimensions of chinese adults[S].
[8] GB/T 36508—2018,航空用气胀式救生衣[S].
GB/T 36508-2018,Inflatable life preservers for aviation[S].
[9] 张硕,黄榕,余强.大型客车乘客疏散特性与制约因素试验研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(9): 181-187.
ZHANG Shuo, HUANG Rong, YU Qiang. Experimental study on passenger evacuation characteristics and constraints of large bus [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29 (9): 181-187
[10] 李乃文,刘孟潇,牛莉霞.矿工心智游移特点的思维取样研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(10): 6-11.
LI Naiwen, LIU Mengxiao, NIU Lixia. A thought sampling study of characteristics of miners＇mind wandering [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29 (10): 6-11.
[11] AC121-24D,Passenger safety information briefing and briefing cards[S]. 2019.
[12] CORBETT C L, MCLEAN G A, COSPER D K. Effective presentation media for passenger safety I: comprehension of briefing card pictorials and pictograms [R]. Federal Aviation Administaration, 2008.
[13] LEE C, WANG S W, HSU M K, et al. Air passenger's perception toward pre-flight safety briefing videos: does it matter[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018, 72: 20-31.
[14] MOLESWORTH B R C. Examining the effectiveness of pre-flight cabin safety announcements in commercial aviation[J]. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2014, 24(4): 300-314.
[15] CHITTARO L A. comparative study of aviation safety briefing media: card, video, and video with interactive controls[J]. Transportation Research, Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 85: 415-428.
[16] CHANG Yuhen, LIAO Mengyuan. The effect of aviation safety education on passenger cabin safety awareness [J]. Safety Science, 2009, 47: 1 337-1 345.
[17] CHITTARO L, CORBETT C L, MCLEAN G A, et al. Safety knowledge transfer through mobile virtual reality: a study of aviation life preserver donning [J]. Safety Science, 2018, 102: 159-168.
[18] BUTTUSSI F, CHITTARO L. Effects of different types of virtual reality display on presence and learning in a safety training scenario[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization& Computer Graphics, 2018, 24(2): 1 063-1 076.
[19] SENEVIRATNE D, MOLESWORTH B R C. Employing humour and celebrities to manipulate passengers'attention to pre-flight safety briefing videos in commercial aviation[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 75: 130-135.
[20] CHITTARO L. Designing serious games for safety education:"learn to brace" versus traditional pictorials for aircraft passengers[J].IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics,2016,22(5): 1 527-1 539.
[21] CHITTARO L, BUTTUSSI F. Assessing knowledge retention of an immersive serious game vs. a traditional education method in aviation safety [J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics,2015,21(4): 529-537.

航空用气胀式救生衣的穿戴时间测试

Experiment on donning time of inflatable aviation life preservers

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何昕, 马义龙. 基于计算流体力学的配对进近尾流安全间隔研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 77-83.
[2]	岳仁田, 张知波. 脆弱性多因素耦合作用下空管亚安全态识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 8-14.
[3]	孙瑞山, 陈毅, 孙立斌. 基于CFF的管制员疲劳评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 192-197.
[4]	吕旭飞, 姚尚宏, 权家乐. 基于STPA法的空中加油软管甩鞭安全性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 152-157.
[5]	王兴隆, 陈仔燕, 刘岩. 基于组合赋权法的空管监视信息质量评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 41-50.
[6]	韩鹏, 王军, 王启, 赵嶷飞. 基于飞行剖面的航空器试飞活动空管风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 149-156.
[7]	焦卫东, 姚军强, 王瑞冬. 基于凸包围盒的飞行冲突检测算法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 32-38.
[8]	白鹏, 陈霖峰, 王玺, 龚宇, 蒋淞榕, 周勍琪. 基于点融合的进场程序优化与航空器排序研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 45-52.
[9]	曹惠玲, 胡彦杰. 适航指令设计制造缺陷案例关联分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 54-63.
[10]	魏志强, 李晓晨. 飞机高空尾涡安全评估模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 78-84.
[11]	杨晓强, 林湘漪, 蒋澜. 使用困难报告数据驱动的民用航空器安全状态评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 85-92.
[12]	康瑞, 杨凯. 航空器逆向滑行冲突风险评估模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 39-45.
[13]	吴仁彪, 何宇翔, 贾云飞. 基于改进层次分析法的重点人员风险评价方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 112-118.
[14]	冯文刚. 基于深度长短记忆模型的民航安保事件分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 1-7.
[15]	肖国松, 刘嘉琛, 董磊, 孙紫荆, 赵长啸. 面向IMA通用系统管理的STPA安全性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 8-14.