心理社会安全氛围对矿工不安全行为的影响

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.1357

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明确心理社会安全氛围(PSC)对矿工不安全行为的影响机制,在文献梳理与实地调研的基础上,分析PSC、工作家庭冲突、工作倦怠和不安全行为之间的关系,构建PSC情境下矿工不安全行为发生的假设模型;采用问卷形式,在山西省30座煤矿不同班组的1 200名一线矿工中开展调查;采用多层线性分析法验证假设模型。结果表明:PSC跨层次负向影响工作家庭冲突、工作倦怠和不安全行为;工作家庭冲突通过工作倦怠中介作用对不安全行为产生影响;PSC通过工作家庭冲突的中介作用对工作倦怠产生影响,同时,PSC通过工作倦怠的中介作用对不安全行为产生影响。PSC能够缓解矿工的工作家庭冲突和工作倦怠问题,降低不安全行为发生。

关键词: 心理社会安全氛围(PSC), 工作家庭冲突, 工作倦怠, 矿工, 不安全行为

Abstract:

In order to clarify influence mechanism of PSC on unsafe behaviors of miners, based on literature research and field investigation, relationship between PSC, work-family conflicts, job burnout and unsafe behaviors was analyzed, and a hypothetical model of miners' unsafe behaviors in the context of PSC was established. Then, a survey was conducted among 1,200 front-line miners in different teams of 30 coal mines in Shanxi Province. Finally, multi-level linear analysis method was used to verify the model. The results show that PSC negatively affects work-family conflicts, job burnout and unsafe behaviors in a cross-level way. Work-family conflicts have an impact on unsafe behavior through the mediating role of job burnout, while PSC exerts an impact on job burnout through that of work-family conflicts, and exerts its impact on unsafe behaviors through that of job burnout. PSC can alleviate miners' work-family conflicts and job burnout, effectively reducing unsafe behaviors.

Key words: psychosocial safety climate (PSC), work-family conflict, job burnout, miner, unsafe behavior

禹敏, 栗继祖, 秦文静. 心理社会安全氛围对矿工不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 34-40.

YU Min, LI Jizu, QIN Wenjing. Influence of PSC on miners' unsafe behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 34-40.

图/表 4

图1

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 28

[1]	LIU Quanlong, LI Xinchun, HASSALL M E. Evolutionary game analysis and stability control scenarios of coal mine safety inspection system in China based on system dynamics[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 80:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.005
[2]	陈梅, 祁神军, 牛达钰, 等. 主观社会支持对建筑工人心理及不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1):30-37. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.005
	CHEN Mei, QI Shenjun, NIU Dayu, et al. Impact of subjective social support on psychological state and unsafe behavior of construction workers[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(1): 30-37. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.005
[3]	李乃文, 刘健, 牛莉霞. 工作倦怠对安全绩效的影响:负性情绪和心智游移的链式中介作用[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(10):71-74.
	LI Naiwen, LIU Jian, NIU Lixia. Effects of job burnout on safety performance:the chained mediation of negative emotion and mind wandering[J]. Soft Science, 2018, 32(10):71-74.
[4]	YU Min, LI Jizu. Work-family conflict and mental health among Chinese underground coal miners: the moderating role of psychological capital[J]. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 2020, 25(1): 1-9.
[5]	周帆, 刘大伟. 工作要求-资源模型新视角:基于心理社会安全氛围的分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(3):539-547.
	ZHOU Fan, LIU Dawei. New perspectives in job demand-resource model research: based on the analysis of psychosocial safety climate[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3):539-547. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00539
[6]	WU Guangdong, HU Zhibin, ZHENG Junwei. Role stress, job burnout, and job performance in construction project managers: the moderating role of career calling[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(13): 2394-2413. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132394
[7]	PRAPANJAROENSIN A, PATRICIAN P A, VANCE D E. Conservation of resources theory in nurse burnout and patient safety[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2017, 73(11):2558-2565. doi: 10.1111/jan.13348
[8]	SMITH T D, HUGHES K, DEJOY D M, et al. Assessment of relationships between work stress, work-family conflict, burnout and firefighter safety behavior outcomes[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 103:287-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.005
[9]	GREENHAUS J H, BEUTELL N J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(1):76-88. doi: 10.2307/258214
[10]	林忠, 鞠蕾, 陈丽. 工作-家庭冲突研究与中国议题:视角、内容和设计[J]. 管理世界, 2013(9):154-171.
	LIN Zhong, JU Lei, CHEN Li. Work-family conflict studies and China issues: perspectives, content and design[J]. Management World, 2013(9):154-171.
[11]	HAO Junhui, WU Di, LIU Li, et al. Association between work-family conflict and depressive symptoms among chinese female nurses: the mediating and moderating role of psychological capital[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2015, 12(6):6682-6699.
[12]	WANG Yang, CHANG Ying, FU Jialiang, et al. Work-family conflict and burnout among chinese female nurses: the mediating effect of psychological capital[J]. Bmc Public Health, 2012, 12(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1
[13]	佟瑞鹏, 杨校毅. 行为安全损耗和激励双路径管理理论研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(9):8-14.
	TONG Ruipeng, YANG Xiaoyi. Dual path management theory of behavior-based safety impairment and motivation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(9):8-14.
[14]	高伟明, 曹庆仁, 许正权. 伦理型领导对员工安全绩效的影响:安全氛围和心理资本的跨层中介作用[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(11):116-128.
	GAO Weiming, CAO Qingren, XU Zhengquan. The impact of ethical leadership on employee safety performance:the cross-level mediating effect of safety climate and psychological capital[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29(11):116-128.
[15]	BRONDINO M, SILVA S A, PASINI M. Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: co-workers as the missing link[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(9):1847-1856. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.010
[16]	DOLLARD M F, BAKKER A B. Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement[J]. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 2011, 83(3):579-599.
[17]	LOH M Y, IDRIS M A, DOLLARD M F, et al. Psychosocial safety climate as a moderator of the moderators: contextualizing JDR models and emotional demands effects[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2018, 91(3): 620-644. doi: 10.1111/joop.12211
[18]	MANSOUR S, TREMBLAY D G. Psychosocial safety climate as resource passageways to alleviate work-family conflict: a study in the health sector in Quebec[J]. Personnel Review, 2018, 47(2):474-493. doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2016-0281
[19]	IDRIS M A, DOLLARD M F. Psychosocial safety climate, emotional demands, burnout, and depression: a longitudinal multilevel study in the Malaysian private sector[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2014, 19(3):291-302. doi: 10.1037/a0036599
[20]	TEOH K B, KEE D M H. Psychosocial safety climate and burnout among academicians: the mediating role of work engagement[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 2020, 12(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1504/IJSSS.2020.106946
[21]	BRONKHORST B. Behaving safely under pressure: the effect of job demands, resources, and safety climate on employee physical and psychosocial safety behavior[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2015, 55:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.09.002
[22]	BRUNETTO Y, SAHELI N, DICK T, et al. Psychosocial safety climate, psychological capital, healthcare slbs' wellbeing and innovative behaviour during the COVID 19 pandemic[J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2021, 16(3): 1-22.
[23]	HAll G B, DOLLARD M F, COWARD J. Psychosocial safety climate: development of the PSC-12[J]. International Journal of Stress Management, 2010, 17(4):353-383. doi: 10.1037/a0021320
[24]	CARLSON D S, KACMAR K M, WILLIAMS L J. Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2000, 56(2):249-276. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713
[25]	MASLACH C, JACKSON S E. The measurement of experienced burnout[J]. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1981, 2(2):99-113. doi: 10.1002/job.4030020205
[26]	LI Jizu, ZHANG Yaping, WANG Xiaojia, et al. Relationship Research between subjective well-being and unsafe behavior of coal miners[J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 2017, 13(11):7215-7221.
[27]	AGUINIS H, GOTTFREDSON R K, CULPEPPER S A. Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(6):1490-1528. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188
[28]	MACKINNON D P, LOCKWOOD C M, WILLIAMS J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004, 39(1):99-128. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

293

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	6	0	0	287

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	58	235
比例	20%	80%

摘要

387

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	387

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	205	182
比例	53%	47%

序号	变量	均值	标准差	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	年龄	2.97	0.42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2	教育水平	3.35	0.55	0.42^*	—	—	—	—	—
3	PSC γ₀₁	3.14	0.35	0.25	0.18	(0.94)	—	—	—
4	工作家庭冲突γ₂₀	2.42	0.61	-0.09	-0.24	-0.32^**	(0.91)	—	—
5	工作倦怠γ₈₀	3.17	0.73	-0.12	-0.15	-0.26^**	0.35^**	(0.82)	—
6	不安全行为	3.21	0.59	-0.21	-0.08	-0.12^*	0.17^**	0.23^**	(0.87)

效应	变量	不安全行为
效应	变量	零模型	模型1a	模型1b	模型1c	模型1d	模型1e
低层效应	γ₀₀	0.01(0.05)	0.01(0.07)	0.01(0.05)	0.01(0.07)	0.01(0.06)	0.01(0.06)
	γ₁₀	—	0.23(0.04)^**	—	0.19(0.06)^**	—	0.19(0.06)^**
	γ₂₀	—	—	0.14(0.05)^**	0.08(0.04)	—	—
跨层效应	γ₀₁	—	—	—	—	-0.09(0.03)^*	—
	σ²	0.79	0.71	0.83	0.73	0.85	0.76
	τ₀₀	0.11	0.15	0.14	0.12	0.11	0.14
	斜率(L2)方差τ₁₁	—	0.007	0.072	0.009	—	0.009
	ICC	0.12	—	—	—	—	—
	FIML	1211	1137	1148	1182	1125	1167
	参数估计个数	3	6	6	10	4	7
	Pseudo R²	0	0.08	0.12	0.15	0.02	0.08

效应	变量	工作倦怠				工作家庭冲突
效应	变量	零模型	模型2a	模型2b	模型2c	零模型	模型3
低层效应	γ₀₀	0.01(0.06)	0.01(0.07)	0.01(0.05)	0.01(0.07)	0.01(0.08)	0.01(0.08)
	γ₁₀	—	—	—	—	—	—
	γ₂₀	—	0.31(0.04)^**	—	0.26(0.03)^**	—	—
跨层效应	γ₀₁	—	—	-0.21(0.07)^**	-0.14(0.07)^**	—	-0.29(0.05)^**
	σ²	0.91	0.83	0.85	0.79	0.92	0.86
	τ₀₀	0.13	0.09	0.05	0.07	0.11	0.05
	τ₁₁	—	0.015	—	0.009	—	—
	ICC	0.11	—	—	—	0.05	—
	FIML	1136	1175	1121	1164	1217	1184
	参数估计个数	3	6	4	7	3	4
	Pseudo R²	0	0.06	0.01	0.08	0	0.02