中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 277-286.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.07.0505

• 智能安全 • 上一篇    

面向复杂火灾场景的AI驱动无人化消防救援体系综述

王佩1,2(), 何昌原3,**(), 尹燕博2, 王建伟2, 黄思聪2, 王港1   

  1. 1 北京师范大学 未来技术学院, 广东 珠海 519087
    2 中国消防救援学院 消防指挥系, 北京 102202
    3 中国民航管理干部学院 机场管理系, 北京 100102
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-24 修回日期:2026-05-27 出版日期:2026-07-28
  • 通信作者:
    **何昌原(1996—),男,吉林长春人,博士,讲师,主要从事低空安全、无人机应急救援等方面的研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    王 佩 (1991—),男,山西曲沃人,博士研究生,讲师,主要研究方向为消防指挥、应急救援技术。E-mail:

    尹燕博,讲师;

    王建伟, 讲师;

    王港, 副研究员

  • 基金资助:
    国家消防救援局科技计划项目(2024XFCX42); 中国消防救援学院院级项目(XFKYB202509); 中国民航管理干部学院青年教师科研启动基金资助(25QN03); 中国博士后科学基金特别资助(2025T180861)

A review of AI-driven unmanned rescue framework for complex fire scenarios

Wang Pei1,2(), He Changyuan3,**(), Yin Yanbo2, Wang Jianwei2, Huang Sicong2, Wang Gang1   

  1. 1 School of Future Technology, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai Guangdong 519087, China
    2 Department of Fire Command, China Fire and Rescue Institute, Beijing 102202, China
    3 Department of Airport Management, Civil Aviation Management Institute of China, Beijing 100102, China
  • Received:2026-03-24 Revised:2026-05-27 Published:2026-07-28

摘要:

为提高消防安全,针对复杂火场面临的感知滞后、近身作业风险高与异构装备协同弱等救援瓶颈,以及通用人工智能(AI)向消防场景迁移时存在的环境适配差、动态调度弱与人机协同机制不清等阻碍,综合采用文献计量分析、综述等方法,剖析2016—2025年通用AI无人化技术领域与消防无人化领域相关研究的演进差异。结果表明:通用AI无人化技术领域相关年发文总量远超消防细分领域,两者研究成熟度存在明显的技术剪刀差;复杂火场救援的关键约束已由单一平台性能不足,转向多目标优化、断续通信条件下的协同控制以及可信决策治理。基于系统工程视角,提出面向复杂火场的“五层八步”无人化体系架构,从终端执行、边缘智能、协同控制、通信网络和指挥孪生5个层级,构建感知-理解-决策-传输-执行-评估-学习-优化的业务闭环,该架构在局部安全保护、任务连续性与链路恢复后重调度方面显著优于传统云-端架构。在此基础上,凝练出多模态抗干扰感知与受限算力下的边缘推理等4项技术方向,以及资源配置与动态调度耦合等3类前沿科学问题。

关键词: 复杂火灾场景, 消防救援, 人工智能(AI)驱动, 无人化体系, 数字孪生

Abstract:

To enhance fire safety, the rescue bottlenecks in complex fire scenes were addressed, including perception lag, high risks of close-range operations, and weak coordination among heterogeneous equipment. The obstacles to migrating general AI into firefighting scenarios were also considered, such as poor environmental adaptability, deficient dynamic scheduling, and ambiguous human-machine collaboration. Bibliometric analysis and systematic review were jointly employed. The evolutionary divergence between the general field of AI-enabled unmanned technologies and research related to unmanned firefighting from 2016 to 2025 was thereby characterized. The results showed that the annual publication volume in the general AI-enabled unmanned technology domain far exceeded that in the firefighting subdomain. A significant gap in technological maturity was observed between the two. The critical constraints of complex fire rescue had shifted from single-platform performance limitations toward multi-objective optimization, collaborative control under intermittent communication, and trustworthy decision governance. From a systems engineering perspective, a five-layer eight-step unmanned architecture for complex fire scenes was proposed. Five layers were defined, namely terminal execution, edge intelligence, collaborative control, communication network, and command digital twin. An operational closed-loop process was constructed across these layers, covering perception, understanding, decision, transmission, execution, evaluation, learning, and optimization. The proposed architecture markedly outperformed the conventional cloud-terminal paradigm in local safety protection, task continuity, and post-recovery rescheduling. On this basis, four technical directions, including multimodal anti-interference perception and edge inference under constrained computing resources, together with three categories of emerging research questions, such as the coupling of resource allocation and dynamic scheduling, were further distilled.

Key words: complex fire scenarios, fire rescue, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven, unmanned rescue framework, digital twin

中图分类号: