基于动态可靠性评价的区域铁路网规划优化:以成渝城市群为例

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.05.017

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 97-104.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.05.017

基于动态可靠性评价的区域铁路网规划优化:以成渝城市群为例

王亚风¹, 黄勇^**2,3 教授

1 武汉市规划设计有限公司,湖北武汉 430014;
2 重庆大学建筑城规学院,重庆 400030;
3 重庆大学山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400030

收稿日期:2019-02-27 修回日期:2019-04-17 发布日期:2020-11-02
通讯作者: **黄勇(1976—),男,湖南益阳人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事城市规划与设计、复杂网络等方面的研究。E-mail:cqhy2001@126.com。
作者简介:王亚风(1991—),男,湖北潜江人,硕士,主要从事城市规划与设计、复杂网络等方面的研究。E-mail:724151972@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1100804)。

Regional railway network planning optimization based on dynamic reliability evaluation: a case study on Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration

WANG Yafeng¹, HUANG Yong^2,3

1 Wuhan Planning and Design Co. Ltd., Wuhan Hubei 430014, China;
2 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China;
3 Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400300, China

Received:2019-02-27 Revised:2019-04-17 Published:2020-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为保障区域铁路运输的安全性,提升铁路网系统灾时应急响应水平,运用复杂网络理论,以成渝城市群为例,构建无向无权铁路物理网和无向加权铁路车流网2种模型,选取最大连通子图的相对大小、网络鲁棒性、网络全局效率指标,从节点故障和边故障2个方面评价铁路网动态可靠性,并提出铁路网安全运营规划优化建议。研究表明:成渝城市群铁路网面对随机攻击具有鲁棒性,面对选择攻击具有脆弱性;网络故障条件下攻击的方式不同,网络的连通性能和信息传递效率分异显著;重庆北站、重庆站、成都东站、成都站、合川站、达州站,成都站-彭山站、新津站-新津南站、新津南站-彭山北站为影响网络可靠性的关键核心站点和路段。

关键词: 区域铁路网, 动态可靠性, 复杂网络, 规划建议, 成渝城市群

Abstract: In order to ensure the safety of regional railway transportation and improve emergency response effectiveness of railway network system in disasters, taking Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration as an example, two models of undirected and unweighted railway physical network and undirected weighted railway traffic network were constructed by using complex network theory. Relative size of maximum connected subgraph, network robustness and overall network efficiency were selected to evaluate the dynamic reliability of railway network from two aspects of node failure and side failure. Based on this, a proposal for railway network safe operation planning optimization was put forward. The research shows that the railway network of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration is robust to random attack and vulnerable to selective attack, and the network connectivity and information transmission efficiency vary significantly under different attacks in the case of network failure. It is also found that Chongqing North Station, Chongqing Station, Chengdu East Station, Chengdu Station, Hechuan Station, Dazhou Station, Chengdu Station-Pengshan Station, Xinjin Station-Xinjin South Station and Xinjin South Station-Pengshan North Station are the key stations and road sections that affect the reliability of the network.

Key words: regional railway network, dynamic reliability, complex network, planning suggestion, Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration

中图分类号:

X913.4

王亚风, 黄勇. 基于动态可靠性评价的区域铁路网规划优化:以成渝城市群为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 97-104.

WANG Yafeng, HUANG Yong. Regional railway network planning optimization based on dynamic reliability evaluation: a case study on Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 97-104.

参考文献

[1] SEN P, DASGUPTA S, CHATTERJEE A, et al. Small-world properties of the Indian railway network[J]. Physical Review E, 2003, 67(3):036106.
[2] KURANT M, THIRAN P. Extraction and analysis of traffic and topologies of transportation networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2006, 74(3):036114.
[3] 雷中林. 铁路网系统运输能力可靠性理论研究[J]. 铁道学报,2008,30(4): 84-88.
LEI Zhonglin. Study on the theory of carrying capacity reliability of railway networks [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2008, 30(4): 84-88.
[4] 董雪. 铁路网系统运输能力及可靠性研究[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2013.
DONG Xue. Study on the theory of carrying capacity and reliability of railway networks [D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2013.
[5] 叶婷婷. 基于复杂网络的全国铁路网络连通可靠性分析[D].北京:北京交通大学,2009.
YE Tingting. Research on reliability of countrywide railway network based on complex network [D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2009.
[6] 王伟. 铁路网抗毁性分析与研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2011.
WANG Wei. Analysis and study on the survivability of railway network [D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.
[7] 江永超. 基于复杂网络理论的铁路网可靠性研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2011.
JIANG Yongchao. Study on reliability of railway network based on complex network theory [D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011.
[8] 方创琳. 科学选择与分级培育适应新常态发展的中国城市群[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(2): 127-136.
FANG Chuanglin. Scientific selection and grading cultivation of China's urban agglomeration adaptive to the new normal in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015, 30 (2): 127-136.
[9] 吴建军,高自友,孙会军,等. 城市交通系统复杂性:复杂网络方法及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:46.
[10] 王亚风. 成渝城市群铁路网可靠性及规划策略研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2017.
WANG Yafeng. Study on reliability and planning strategy of railway network in Chengdu - Chongqing urban agglomeration[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2017.
[11] 中国铁路总公司运输局.全国铁路旅客列车时刻表[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2016.
[12] 黄宁,伍志韬.网络可靠性评估模型与算法综述[J].系统工程与电子技术,2013,35(12): 2 651-2 660.
HUANG Ning, WU Zhitao. Survey of network reliability evaluation models and algorithms [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35 (12): 2 651-2 660.
[13] ALBERT R, JEONG H, BARABASI A L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6794): 378-382.
[14] 王甲生,吴晓平,陈永强. 不同信息条件下加权复杂网络抗毁性仿真研究[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,44(5): 1 888-1 894.
WANG Jiasheng, WU Xiaoping, CHEN Yongqiang. Invulnerability simulation of weighted complex networks with different information [J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2013,44 (5): 1 888-1 894.
[15] LATORA V, MARCHIORI M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 87(19):198701.
[16] CRUCITTI P, LATORA V, MARCHIORI M, et al. Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance[J]. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2012, 320: 622-642.
[17] ALBERT R, BARABASI A. Statistical mechanics of complex networks[J]. Review of Modern Physics, 2002, 74(1): 47-97.
[18] 于宝,冯春,朱倩,等.中国高速铁路网络脆弱性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(9): 110-115.
YU Bao, FENG Chun, ZHU Qian, et al. Vulnerability analysis of China's high speed railway network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27 (9): 110-115.
[19] 江娟.中国铁路网的网络特性及脆弱性研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2013.
JIANG Juan. Network characteristics and vulnerability analysis of Chinese railway network[D].Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2013.

基于动态可靠性评价的区域铁路网规划优化:以成渝城市群为例

Regional railway network planning optimization based on dynamic reliability evaluation: a case study on Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李浩然, 王子恒, 杨起帆, 张亚君, 欧阳作林. 复杂网络下地铁灾害链演化模型与风险分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 141-147.
[2]	任乐峰, 孟祥坤, 陈国明. 滩海油气管道泄漏风险演化与评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 159-164.
[3]	张帆, 步兵, 赵骏逸. 列车运行控制系统信息安全风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 172-178.
[4]	陈文瑛, 李泳暾, 宋志光. 基于复杂网络的生产安全事故致因研究:以北京市某城区为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7): 7-12.
[5]	罗军华, 林孝松, 牟凤云, 李宏伟, 张莉. 山区暴雨-农业灾害链复杂网络静态风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 163-170.
[6]	牟能冶, 康秋萍, 贾程方. 突发事件影响下的城市快递网络脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 125-132.
[7]	花玲玲, 郑伟. 基于复杂网络理论的铁路事故致因分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S1): 114-119.
[8]	蒋代, 华敏, 潘旭海, 蒋军成. 化工园区储罐多米诺效应的脆弱性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 177-182.
[9]	薛锋, 何传磊, 黄倩. 成都地铁网络的关键节点识别方法及性能分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 93-99.
[10]	陈刘瑜, 李希建, 尹鑫, 毕娟. 复杂网络理论下燃气管网节点重要性分析方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 74-80.
[11]	李晓璐, 于昕明, 雷方舒, 郗艳红, 毛军, 朱广宇. 城市轨道交通系统灾害链网络模型构建与评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 179-184.
[12]	王红勇, 温瑞英. 基于复杂网络的空中交通态势风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 172-178.
[13]	王兴隆, 王宽, 赵末. 鱼骨式航路网络建模及抗毁性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 167-172.
[14]	于宝, 冯春, 朱倩, 张怡. 中国高速铁路网络脆弱性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 110-115.
[15]	岳希坚, 袁永博, 张明媛, 何祥. 基于复杂网络理论识别油库关键安全风险因素[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(5): 146-151.