HFACS与24Model不安全动作因素对应关系研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.01.002

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 7-12.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.01.002

HFACS与24Model不安全动作因素对应关系研究

傅贵¹ 教授, 薛宇敬阳¹, 佟瑞鹏¹ 副教授, 栗继祖² 教授

1 中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083
2 太原理工大学经济管理学院,山西太原 030024

收稿日期:2016-10-10 修回日期:2016-12-12 发布日期:2020-11-23
作者简介:傅贵 (1961—),男,吉林九台人,博士,教授,主要从事行为安全、安全管理方面的研究。E-mail: fugui66@ vip.126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51534008,51674268)。资助项目:太原理工大学煤炭产业科学发展研究中心开放课题合作项目(2017002)。

A comparison of HFACS and 24Model in categories of unsafe acts

FU Gui¹, XUE Yujingyang¹, TONG Ruipeng¹, LI Jizu²

1 School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
2 School of Economics & Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030024, China

Received:2016-10-10 Revised:2016-12-12 Published:2020-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不安全动作是导致事故发生的直接原因,为明确和统一不安全动作的定义及判定标准,采用对比分析的方法梳理人因分析与分类系统(HFACS)和24Model中不安全动作的定义和判定标准,建立HFACS与24Model不安全动作因素的对应关系,并以实际事故为例论述对应关系的应用过程。结果表明,HFACS定义的不安全动作可以通过对应关系与24Model定义的不安全动作相对应;所建立的对应关系统一了不安全动作的判定标准。

关键词: 人因分析与分类系统(HFACS), 对比分析, 事故致因“2-4”模型(24Model), 不安全动作, 事故致因模型, 案例分析

Abstract: Unsafe acts are the direct causes of the accidents. In order to clarify and unify the definitions and judgement criteria of unsafe acts in HFACS and 24Model, a comparative analysis was used and a corresponding relationship in unsafe acts between HFACS and 24Model was established and a case study was showed to describe the application of the corresponding approach. The results show that unsafe acts defined by HFACS can be associated with the unsafe acts defined by 24Model based on the corresponding relationship,and the judgement criteria are unified by the corresponding relationship.

Key words: human factors analysis and classification system(HFACS), comparative study, accident causation “2-4”model(24Model), unsafe acts, accident modelling approaches, case study

中图分类号:

X915.2

傅贵, 薛宇敬阳, 佟瑞鹏, 栗继祖. HFACS与24Model不安全动作因素对应关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 7-12.

FU Gui, XUE Yujingyang, TONG Ruipeng, LI Jizu. A comparison of HFACS and 24Model in categories of unsafe acts[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(1): 7-12.

参考文献

[1] SHAPPELL S A, WIEGMANN D A. The human factors analysis and classification system-HFACS[J]. American Libraries, 2000, 1(1):20-46.
[2] REASON J. Human errors[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990:9.
[3] WIEGMANN D A, SHAPPELL S A. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system[M]. Farnham:Ashgate Publishing, 2003:45-70.
[4] 李海燕.中国民航签派人误分类分析系统的研究[D].广汉:中国民用航空飞行学院,2009.
LI Haiyan. Study on human errors classification and analysis in flight dispatch of China civil aviation[D]. Guanghan:Civil Aviation Flight University of China,2009.
[5] 傅贵,殷文韬,董继业.行为安全24Model及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(9):1 123-1 129.
FU Gui, YIN Wentao, DONG Jiye. Behavior-based accident causation: the “2-4” model and its safety implications in coal mines [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(9):1 123-1 129.
[6] 樊运晓,卢明,李智,等.基于危险属性的事故致因理论综述[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(11):139-145.
FAN Yunxiao, LU Ming, LI Zhi, et al. A review of accident modelling approached based on components of hazards[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2014,24(11):139-145.
[7] 张正勋.HFACS在民航训练飞行人为差错分析中的应用[D].成都:电子科技大学,2010.
ZHANG Zhengxun. Application of HFACS in the analysis of human errors in civil aviation training[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2010.
[8] 李彦斌,金宁,洪梦琳.基于HFACS和灰色关联法电网企业人为事故隐性危险源的辨识与评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(2):158-161.
LI Yanbin,JIN Ning, HONG Menglin. Human accident hidden hazard identification and evaluation of power grid enterprise based on HFACS and grey correlation analysis method[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(2):158-161.
[9] 张凤,于广涛,李永娟,等.影响我国民航飞行安全的个体与组织因素[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(10):67-74.
ZHANG Feng, YU Guangtao, LI Yongjuan, et al. Individual and organizational factors affecting Chinese civil aviation safety event analysis based on HFACS framework[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2007,17(10):67-74.
[10] 李孟杰.飞行机组差错仿真模型研究[D].天津:中国民航大学,2014.
LI Mengjie. Flight crew error simulation model research[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2014.
[11] ERGAI A, COHEN T, SHARP J, et al. Assessment of the human factors analysis and classification system(HFACS): intra-rater and inter-rater reliability[J]. Safety Science,2013,82:393-398.
[12] 吕春玉,房春花.人为因素分析与分类系统(HFACS)及事故个例分析[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2009,20(2):37-40.
LYU Chunyu, FANG Chunhua. The human factors analysis and classification system and a case study[J]. Journal of Civil Flight University of China,2009,20(2):37-40.
[13] 董追.基于HFACS的煤矿安全事故人因分析和分类研究[D]太原:太原科技大学,2014.
DONG Zhui .Study on human factors analysis and classification of coal mine safety accidents based on HFASC[D].Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,2014.
[14] 傅贵,陆柏,陈秀珍.基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(9):21-27.
FU Gui,LU Bai, CHEN Xiuzhen. Behavior based model for organizational safety management[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2005,15(9):21-27.
[15] HEINRICH H W, PETERSON D, ROOS N. Industrial accident prevention: a safety management approach[M]. New York: McGRAW-Hill Book Company,1980:22.
[16] 傅贵,张苏,董继业.行为安全的理论实质与效果探讨[J].中国安全科学学报,2013,23(3):150-154.
FU Gui, ZHANG Su, DONG Jiye. Discussion on theoretical understanding and effects of behavior based safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2013,23(3):150-154.
[17] 傅贵.安全管理学-事故预防的行为控制方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:58.
FU Gui. Safety management-a behavior-based approach to accident prevention[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013:58.
[18] 傅贵.安全学科结构的研究[M].墨尔本:安全科学出版社,2015:31.
FU Gui. Studies on the structure of safety science[M]. Melbourne: Safety Science Publishing, 2015:31.
[19] 傅贵,樊运晓,佟瑞鹏,等.通用事故原因分析方法(第1版)[J].事故预防学报,2016,2(1):7-12.
FU Gui, FAN Yunxiao, TONG Ruipeng, et al. A universal methodology for the causation analysis of accidents (1^st Edition)[J]. Journal of Accident Prevention, 2016, 2(1):7-12.
[20] SHAPPELL S, DETWILER C, HOLCOMB K, et al. Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system[J]. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2007, 49(2):227-42.
[21] 中国民用航空局.民用航空器飞行事故汇编(八)2006—2010[Z],2012:113-164.
Civil Aviation Administration of China. Compilation of civil air craft accidents (eighth) 2006-2010[Z].Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2012:113-164.

HFACS与24Model不安全动作因素对应关系研究

A comparison of HFACS and 24Model in categories of unsafe acts

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	戢晓峰, 杨春丽, 郝京京, 覃文文. 国内外应急物流研究热点对比与展望^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 144-152.
[2]	孙世梅, 耿晓帅, 傅贵. 基于“2-4”模型的建筑电气火灾事故直接原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 93-99.
[3]	许素睿. 基于蒙特卡罗法的煤矿工人不安全行为风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 172-178.
[4]	傅贵, 吴亚丽, 章仕杰, 杨耀党. 危险源的实质内容分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 1-5.
[5]	安宇, 王袆, 李子琪, 张姜博南, 佟瑞鹏. 基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 20-26.
[6]	孙世梅, 赵金坤, 傅贵. 基于“2-4”模型的高处坠落事故行为原因研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 23-28.
[7]	许素睿. 基于HFACS的电梯事故人因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 70-75.
[8]	张伟, 朱双娜, 张潇, 赵挺生. 建筑施工安全事故致因系统模型与实证分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 56-62.
[9]	宋志红, 耿秀丽. 基于HFACS的民机总装过程人为失误风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 146-151.
[10]	成连华, 郑庆, 郭慧敏, 严瑾, 周瑞雪. 基于累积效应的事故进程研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 35-39.
[11]	傅贵, 贾清淞, 许素睿. 对《企业职工伤亡事故调查分析规则》若干问题的建议[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 7-12.
[12]	庙成, 丁明涛. 震区社会易损性对比分析:以芦山与鲁甸地震为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 169-174.
[13]	侯茜，秦洁璇，李翠平. 安全生产预警综合分析与研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 92-.
[14]	高敏，刘志强. 现代环形交叉口安全性分析和安全设计[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(4): 92-.
[15]	肖红飞，彭斌. 安全工程本科与研究生专业课创新教学中的对比分析与研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(6): 40-.