尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.004

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 21-27.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.004

尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析

卢飞¹ 讲师, 滕景杰^**1, 吴俊¹, 张兆宁¹ 教授, 张宗路²

1.中国民航大学空中交通管理学院,天津 300300;
2.山东航空股份有限公司运行控制中心,山东济南 250014

收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-03-12 出版日期:2020-04-28 发布日期:2021-01-27
通讯作者: **滕景杰(1997—),男,山东济宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为空中交通管理等。E-mail:1808848736@qq.com。
作者简介:卢飞(1984—),男,山东新泰人,硕士,讲师,主要从事空中交通管理等方面的研究。E-mail:lufei315@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金资助(71701202);中央高校基本科研业务费(3122014D037)。

Lateral collision dynamics of CSPRs paired approach under influence of wake vortex field

LU Fei¹, TENG Jingjie¹, WU Jun¹, ZHANG Zhaoning¹, ZHANG Zonglu²

1. School of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
2. Operation Control Center, Shandong Airlines Co., Ltd., Ji'nan Shandong 250014, China

Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-03-12 Online:2020-04-28 Published:2021-01-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究近距平行跑道(CSPRs)配对进近侧向碰撞风险,首先结合非配对进近飞机的运动过程,建立配对进近飞机对的间隔模型,确定任意时刻飞机对之间的理论间隔值;其次分析飞机的尾涡流场特性,建立前机尾流的强度计算模型和消散模型,并分析飞机遭遇尾流后的响应机制,建立后机在前机尾涡流场内的力矩平衡模型,从而确定前后机的尾流安全间隔;然后分析飞机的侧向定位误差,得出飞机对之间实际间隔的概率分布,并建立侧向碰撞风险计算模型;最后利用模型分析配对进近过程中前后机之间侧向碰撞风险的变化情况。结果表明:侧向碰撞风险随初始间隔值、正侧风值增大而增大,随后机副翼偏转角度增大而减小,配对飞机对在到达跑道口时碰撞风险值达到最大。

关键词: 尾涡流场, 近距平行跑道(CSPRs), 配对进近, 碰撞风险, 安全间隔, 定位误差

Abstract: In order to study lateral collision risk of CSPRS paired approach, firstly, considering traditional approach motion process, an interval model of paired approaching aircrafts was established to determine theoretical interval between them at any time. Secondly, characteristics of aircrafts' wake vortex field were analyzed to establish a strength calculation model and dissipation model for leading aircraft's wake flow. Rear aircraft's response mechanism after encountering wake flow was also studied, and a torque balance model of it in wake vortex field of leading aircraft was developed to determine safety spacing between them. Then, lateral positioning error of aircrafts was analyzed to obtain probability distribution of actual interval between paired aircrafts, and a risk calculation model was established, which was applied to analyze changes of lateral collision risk between leading and rear aircrafts during paired approach. The results show that lateral collision risk increases with the increase of initial interval and positive side wind, and then decreases with the increase of aileron's deflection angle. It rises to the maximum value when paired aircrafts reach the head of runway.

Key words: wake vortex field, closely spaced parallel runways (CSPRs), paired approach, collision risk, safety spacing, position error

中图分类号:

X913

卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊, 张兆宁, 张宗路. 尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 21-27.

LU Fei, TENG Jingjie, WU Jun, ZHANG Zhaoning, ZHANG Zonglu. Lateral collision dynamics of CSPRs paired approach under influence of wake vortex field[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 21-27.

参考文献

[1] HAMMER J. Case study of paired approach procedure to closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2000,8(3): 223-252.
[2] MILAN J. Modelling the capacity of closely-spaced parallel runways using innovative approach procedures[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2008,16(6): 704-730.
[3] LANDRY S J, LYNAM A. Safe zone for closely spaced parallel approaches[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011,34(2): 608-613.
[4] JOHNSON S C, ABBOTT T S. Simplified aircraft-based paired approach: concept definition and initial analysis[R].NASA, 2013.
[5] LEIDEN K, MILLER M E, KALER C, et al. Paired approach flight demonstration results[C]. Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS). IEEE, 2019: 1-16.
[6] 田勇,孙佳,万莉莉,等. 近距平行跑道间隔确定方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2013,13(1): 70-76.
TIAN Yong, SUN Jia, WAN Lili, et al. Separation determining method of closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2013,13(1): 70-76.
[7] 田勇,颜于杰,万莉莉,等.近距平行跑道配对进近运行间隔研究[J]. 航空计算技术,2015,45(5):11-14,19.
TIAN Yong, YAN Yujie, WAN Lili, et al. Research on separation of aircrafts for paired approachs to closely spaced parallel runways [J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2015,45(5):11-14,19.
[8] 卢飞, 张兆宁, 魏志强,等. 近距平行跑道配对进近纵向碰撞风险安全评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013,23(8): 108-113.
LU Fei, ZHANG Zhaoning, WEI Zhiqiang. Longitudinal collision risk safety assessment of paired approach to closed spaced parallel runways [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013,23(8): 108-113.
[9] 卢飞, 朱楠, 杨斯,等. 近距平行跑道配对进近侧向碰撞风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016,26(11): 87-92.
LU Fei, ZHU Nan, YANG Si, et al. Assessment of lateral collision risk in closed spaced parallel runways paired approach[J]. China Safety Sciences Journal, 2016,26(11): 87-92.
[10] 张兆宁, 王莉莉, 李冬宾,等. 飞行间隔安全评估引论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2009: 19-105.
[11] 卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊,等. 尾流影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2020,30(2):99-105.
LU Fei, TENG Jingjie, WU Jun, et al. Research on lateral collision risk of CSPRs paired approach based on wake impact intensity[J]. China Safety Sciences Journal,2020,30(2):99-105.
[12] SARPKAYA T. New model for vortex decay in the atmosphere[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2000,37(1): 53-61.
[13] HAN J, LIN Y, SCHOWALTER D G, et al. Large eddy simulation of aircraft wake vortices within homogeneous turbulence- Crow instability[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000,38(2): 292-300.
[14] 匡江红, 王秉良. 飞机飞行动力学[M].北京: 清华大学出版社, 2012: 102-115.
[15] 魏志强, 吴金栋, 刘馨泽,等.空中交通尾流间隔标准的安全性评估分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018,14(12): 180-185.
WEI Zhiqiang, WU Jindong, LIU Xinze, et al. Safety assessment and analysis on standard of wake separation for air traffic[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018,14(12): 180-185.

尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析

Lateral collision dynamics of CSPRs paired approach under influence of wake vortex field

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何昕, 马义龙. 基于计算流体力学的配对进近尾流安全间隔研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 77-83.
[2]	张兆宁, 陈子辰, 卢飞. 配对进近侧向位置误差QAR参数关联性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 47-52.
[3]	高扬, 武文涛, 贾晓珊, 许铭赫. 非合作大型UAVs飞行冲突预测方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 80-85.
[4]	卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊, 张兆宁, 张宗路. 尾流影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 99-105.
[5]	葛飞, 李娜, 魏志强. 针对高原机场障碍物补偿修正量的改进[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 183-188.
[6]	王莉莉, 鲁胜男. 平行进近偏航下Event碰撞风险模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 8-13.
[7]	魏志强, 葛飞, 王仲,, 李娜. 基于CRM的障碍物椭圆评价面的构建方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 135-140.
[8]	曲玉玲讲师, 霍志勤高级工程师, 李翀, 朱新平副教授, 陈彦丽, 曲艳伟. 空域规划中碰撞风险模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11): 67-72.
[9]	卢飞，张兆宁，魏志强，刘碧莲. 近距平行跑道配对进近纵向碰撞风险安全评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 108-.
[10]	翟文鹏，李亚飞. 飞行目标航迹生成及冲突探测算法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(10): 110-.
[11]	张兆宁，佐江丽. 基于布朗运动的自由飞行下碰撞风险研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(8): 43-.
[12]	张兆宁，王一明. 基于模糊随机微分方程的自由飞行下碰撞风险研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(10): 14-.