中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (S1): 43-47.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.S1.009

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

由一起诉讼案件谈对《铁路交通事故认定书》的认识

刘文龙 经济师   

  1. 沈阳铁路监督管理局, 辽宁 沈阳 110013
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-28 修回日期:2020-11-02 出版日期:2020-12-30 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 作者简介:刘文龙 (1977—),男,黑龙江巴彦人,本科,经济师,主要从事铁路行政执法、铁路安全监管方面的工作。E-mail:1456446718@qq.com。

Talk to ″railroad traffic accident identification book″ understanding by a lawsuit case

LIU Wenlong   

  1. Supervision and Administration of Shenyang Railway,Shenyang Liaoning 110013, China
  • Received:2020-09-28 Revised:2020-11-02 Online:2020-12-30 Published:2021-07-15

摘要: 针对《铁路交通事故认定书》作出主体多元、职责权限不清晰、当事人不服时缺少救济途径、法律法规修订不及时等问题,具体分析《铁路交通事故认定书》的设定依据、作出主体、主要内容、性质属性、救济途径等方面。结果表明:应进一步明确铁路交通事故调查的责任主体,加快铁路行业法律、法规、规章修订;明确不服《铁路交通事故认定书》的救济方式,加强铁路行政执法队伍建设。

关键词: 铁路交通事故, 责任认定, 诉讼案件, 安全监管, 救济方式

Abstract: In view of the problems such as the plurality of subjects, unclear responsibilities and powers, the lack of remedies when the parties disobey, and the delay in amending laws and regulations, etc., ″railway traffic accident identification book″ on the basis of the establishment of the subject, the main content, the nature of attributes, remedies and other aspects were analysed specifical .The results show that responsibility subject of railway traffic accident investigation should be further clarified, and the revision of laws, regulations and rules of railway industry should be accelerated.The remedy mode of refusing to accept the written confirmation of railway traffic accidents should be made clear, and the construction of railway administrative law enforcement team should be strengthened.

Key words: railway traffic accident, confirmation of responsibility, lawsuit case, safety supervision, remedy

中图分类号: