基于D-I的塔机作业物体打击事故致因分析*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.011

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 83-89.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.06.011

基于D-I的塔机作业物体打击事故致因分析^*

郑霞忠^1,2 教授, 周佳丽¹, 邵波^**1,2 讲师, 杨莹¹, 杨丘¹, 晋良海^1,2 副教授

1 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北宜昌 443002;
2 三峡大学安全生产标准化评审中心,湖北宜昌 443002

收稿日期:2021-03-10 修回日期:2021-05-12 出版日期:2021-06-28
作者简介:郑霞忠 (1963—),男,湖北鄂州人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事安全科学与工程方面的研究。E-mail:zhengxz@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51878385);宜昌市自然科学研究项目(A21-3-001);中国长江三峡集团有限公司员工科研项目(201903067)。

Causal analysis of strike accident of tower crane operating object based on D-I

ZHENG Xiazhong^1,2, ZHOU Jiali¹, SHAO Bo^1,2, YANG Ying¹, YANG Qiu¹, JIN Lianghai^1,2

1 College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China;
2 Center of Standardization Evaluation for Production Safety, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China

Received:2021-03-10 Revised:2021-05-12 Published:2021-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为预防塔机作业吊物坠落引发的物体打击(SFO)事故发生,剖析近5年塔机作业事故调查报告,提取19个高频致因因素,融合实验室决策评价(DEMATEL)和解释结构模型(ISM)方法,厘清致因因素间影响关系,构建致因因素多级递阶层次结构,找出关键致因因素。结果表明:19个高频致因因素分为9个层级,其中安全防护用品使用不当、违规进入或处于危险区、吊物坠落是最高层的表层因素,安全管理制度不完善是最底层的本质因素,现场监督管理不到位、无专项施工方案或不合格是较深层次的致因因素;现场监督管理不到位、安全技术交底不到位、安全管理制度不完善以及安全意识、技能或经验不强是塔机作业吊物坠落引发的SFO事故的关键致因因素。

关键词: 塔机, D-I, 吊物坠落, 物体打击(SFO), 事故致因, 影响关系

Abstract: To prevent SFO accident in tower crane operation, 19 high-frequency cause factors were extracted from investigation reports of tower crane accidents in the past five years.Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and interpretative structural modeling (ISM) were integrated to analyze mutual influence relationship between each cause, ladder level structure of causes were constructed, and key causes were found out. The results show that 19 high frequency causative factors are divided into 9 levels, among which improper use of safety protective equipment, illegal entry or in the danger zone and falling of hanging objects are apparent factors. Imperfection of safety management system is essential factor. Inadequate on-site supervision and management and missing or unqualified special construction scheme are deeper cause factors. And the key causing-factors of SFO accident are inadequate on-site supervision and management, inadequate safety technical disclosure, imperfect safety management system, insufficient safety awareness, skills or experience.

Key words: tower crane, D-I, falling object, struck-by-falling-object (SFO), accident causes, cause-effect relationship

中图分类号:

X952

郑霞忠, 周佳丽, 邵波, 杨莹, 杨丘, 晋良海. 基于D-I的塔机作业物体打击事故致因分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 83-89.

ZHENG Xiazhong, ZHOU Jiali, SHAO Bo, YANG Ying, YANG Qiu, JIN Lianghai. Causal analysis of strike accident of tower crane operating object based on D-I[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(6): 83-89.

参考文献

[1] 郑霞忠, 蔡莉莉, 陈述, 等. 塔机作业安全态势分析及趋势预测[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2018,48(9): 129-137.
ZHENG Xiazhong, CAI Lili, CHEN Shu, et al. Safety situation analysis and trend forecast of tower crane operation [J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(9):129-137.
[2] 郑霞忠, 郭雅薇, 石法起, 等. 塔机作业模糊认知可靠性与失误分析方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016,26(6): 98-103.
ZHENG Xiazhong, GUO Yawei, SHI Faqi, et al. Research on fuzzy CREAM of crane operation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(6):98-103.
[3] 陈新亮, 李珏. 基于拉夫堡ConAC模型的建筑业起重机械事故致因分析[J]. 工程管理学报, 2019,33(1): 117-122.
CHEN Xinliang, LI Jue. Cause analysis of crane accidents in construction industry based on Loughborough ConAC model [J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2019,33(1): 117-122.
[4] 郭寒竹, 彭文学. 655起建筑起重机械责任事故统计分析[J]. 建设机械技术与管理, 2013,26(5): 94-96.
GUO Hanzhu, PENG Wenxue. Statistical analysis of 655 liability accidents[J]. Construction Machinery Technology Management, 2013, 26(5): 94-96.
[5] 陈宝春, 陈建国, 黄素萍. 2007—2016年我国在役塔吊安全事故统计分析[J]. 浙江建筑, 2018,35(2): 32-36.
CHEN Baochun, CHEN Jianguo, HUANG Suping. A statistical analysis on safety accidents of existing tower canes in China from 2007 to 2016[J]. Zhejiang Construction, 2018, 35(2):32-36.
[6] 江苏省住房和城乡建设厅. 关于华阳建设工程有限公司的事故通报[EB/OL]. (2021-04-05). http://jsszfhcxjst.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2019/12/16/art_8712_8846822.html.
[7] 合肥市政务公开网. 安徽巢湖经开区鼓山安置小区项目“12·14”起重伤害事故调查报告[EB/OL]. (2021-04-05). http://zwgk.hefei.gov.cn/public/13811/104715603.html.
[8] 赵挺生, 周炜, 徐凯, 等. 复杂社会技术系统下的塔吊安全思考[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018,28(6): 153-159.
ZHAO Tingsheng, ZHOU Wei, XU Kai, et al. Thinking about tower crane safety from an angle of complex sociotechnical system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(6):153-159.
[9] 张伟, 廖阳新, 蒋灵, 等. 基于物联网的塔式起重机安全监控系统[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021,31(2): 55-62.
ZHANG Wei, LIAO Yangxin, JIANG Ling, et al. Safety monitoring system of tower crane based on internet of things[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021,31(2): 55-62.
[10] SHIN I J. Factors that affect safety of tower crane installation/dismantling in construction industry[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 72: 379-390.
[11] BAMFO-AGYEI E, ATEPOR L. Assessing the safety use of tower cranes on construction sites in central region of Ghana[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017:486-496.
[12] RAHIM A H A, AZHARI R, ZAKARIA R, et al. Causes of crane accidents at construction sites in Malaysia[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019,220(1): DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/220/1/012028.
[13] GHARAIE E, LINGARD H, COOKE T. Causes of fatal accidents involving cranes in the Australian construction industry[J]. Construction Economics and Building, 2015,15(2): 1-12.
[14] ZHOU Wei, ZHAO Tingsheng, LIU Wen, et al. Tower crane safety on construction sites: a complex sociotechnical system perspective[J]. Safety Science, 2018,109: 95-108.
[15] 赵挺生, 周炜, 徐凯, 等. 建筑工程塔吊安全影响因素分析[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2019,45(2): 17-22.
ZHAO Tingsheng, ZHOU Wei, XU Kai, et al. Analysis on the factors affecting the safety of tower crane in construction industry[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019,45(2): 17-22.
[16] 张伟, 张潇, 薛楠楠, 等. 塔吊安全事故致因网络模型构建与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020,30(12): 1-7.
ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Xiao, XUE Nannan, et al. Network model establishment and analysis of tower crane safety accident causes[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(12): 1-7.

基于D-I的塔机作业物体打击事故致因分析^*

Causal analysis of strike accident of tower crane operating object based on D-I

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于溪芮, 何旭, 孔得朋. 基于Apriori算法的氢安全事故统计分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 128-134.
[2]	郑霞忠, 刘奕成, 邵波, 王硕, 柯善钢. 基于文本挖掘的水电工程施工物体打击事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 50-57.
[3]	刘丹, 罗颜声, 李诗轩, 许钢焱, 李墨潇. 面向飞行全过程的民航事故致因关联网络分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3): 84-92.
[4]	袁晨辉, 傅贵, 吴治蓉, 赵金坤. 24Model与LCM原因因素定义对比研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 27-34.
[5]	郑彬彬, 冯婷婷, 王佳贺, 肖远, 孙文浩. 基于文本挖掘的城镇燃气事故致因及关联分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 190-195.
[6]	宋炜, 傅贵. STPA与24Model的对比分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(6): 1-10.
[7]	刘全龙, 张晓霖, 张悦倩, 邱尊相. 基于事故致因的标准化煤矿建筑规范库构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(5): 128-133.
[8]	周诗杰, 刘东海, 金睿. 水电工程施工安全事故致因重要性多证据融合综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(3): 103-110.
[9]	刘全龙, 彭雨蒙, 赵盼, 王警智. 基于HFACS模型的制造企业机械伤害事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(3): 51-59.
[10]	成连华, 曹东强, 李欣. 房屋建筑施工事故致因因素分类研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 16-22.
[11]	张江石, 李泳暾, 秦芳, 王慧超, 潘雨, 王梓伊. 煤矿事故因素的自组织映射分布研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 9-15.
[12]	陈述, 孙孟文, 陈云, 聂本武, 李智, 刘文濯. 基于无监督LDA的水电工程施工安全事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(10): 79-85.
[13]	李杰, 伊宏艳, 李乃文. 我国事故致因研究团队与热点主题研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 20-27.
[14]	郭海军, 唐寒露, 王凯, 于英杰, 吴昱辰, 徐超. 基于24Model的高校危化品实验室事故分析及对策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(11): 168-174.
[15]	杨利超, 刘敬贤, 刘钊, 刘轶伟. 价值衰减下水上交通事故致因关联规则挖掘[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 127-134.