基于量子思想描述的系统故障演化过程

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.0671

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1-7.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.0671

• 安全科学理论与安全系统科学 • 下一篇

基于量子思想描述的系统故障演化过程

崔铁军¹^,²(), 李莎莎¹^,²^,^**(), 邓文浩³

¹ 沈阳理工大学环境与化学工程学院,辽宁沈阳 110159
² 沈阳理工大学辽宁省现代安全工程产业学院,辽宁沈阳 110159
³ 太原理工大学安全与应急管理工程学院, 山西太原 030600

收稿日期:2025-01-20 修回日期:2025-03-22 出版日期:2025-05-28
通信作者:
^** 李莎莎(1988—),女,辽宁盘锦人,博士,副教授,主要从事系统可靠性和安全管理等方面的研究。E-mail:lsslntu@163.com。
作者简介:
崔铁军 (1983—),男,辽宁沈阳人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事系统故障演化理论等方面的研究。E-mail:ctj.159@163.com。
崔铁军, 教授
李莎莎, 副教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(52434007); 国家自然科学基金资助(52004120)

System fault evolution process based on quantum thought description

CUI Tiejun¹^,²(), LI Shasha¹^,²^,^**(), DENG Wenhao³

¹ School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang Liaoning 110159, China
² Liaoning Modern Safety Engineering Industry School, Shenyang Ligong University, Shenyang Liaoning 110159, China
³ College of Safety and Emergency Management Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan Shanxi 030600, China

Received:2025-01-20 Revised:2025-03-22 Published:2025-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究系统故障演化过程(SFEP)及其特性,提出使用量子思想描述SFEP的方法。首先,论述SFEP与事件功能状态的关系,探究利用量子思想描述SFEP的原理;然后,构建SFEP的量子描述的数学模型,以实现SFEP量子态的测量塌缩;最后,确定故障模式及其发生概率。结果表明:SFEP具有多样性和不确定性、事件量子态叠加性、测量塌缩性和两极态性,这是通过量子思想研究SFEP的基础。SFEP可分解为多个层次,不同层的对象及其量子态叠加方式不同;通过各层对象量子态的叠加可以得到SFEP量子态,SFEP量子态是各层对象的概率幅的积的多项式构成的,制定了各层对象量子态概率幅构成的限制条件;SFEP量子态向量的每个维度都是一种故障状态;对因素相值的测量使SFEP量子态塌缩,得到可能的各量子态(故障模式)发生概率。

关键词: 量子思想, 系统故障演化过程(SFEP), 故障模式, 量子态叠加, 测量塌缩

Abstract:

In order to study the SFEP and its characteristics, a method for describing SFEP using quantum concepts is proposed. The relationship between SFEP and event function states was discussed. The principle of describing SFEP by quantum thought was studied. The mathematical model of quantum description of SFEP was constructed. The measurement collapse of SFEP quantum states was realized, and the failure mode and its probability were finally determined. The results indicate that SFEP has diversity and uncertainty, event quantum state superposition, measurement collapse, bipolar state, which is the basis of studying SFEP through quantum thought. SFEP can be decomposed into multiple layers, with distinct objects and quantum state superposition modes in each layer. The SFEP quantum states are derived from the superposition of the quantum states of objects at each layer, which is composed of the polynomial product of the probability amplitude of the objects in each layer. The restriction conditions for the formation of the probability amplitude of quantum states of each layer are given. Each dimension of the SFEP quantum state vector is a fault state. The measurement of the factor phase value makes the SFEP quantum state collapse, and the possible failure mode and occurrence probability are obtained.

Key words: quantum thought, system fault evolution process (SFEP), failure mode, quantum state superposition, measurement collapse

中图分类号:

X913安全系统学

崔铁军, 李莎莎, 邓文浩. 基于量子思想描述的系统故障演化过程[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(5): 1-7.

CUI Tiejun, LI Shasha, DENG Wenhao. System fault evolution process based on quantum thought description[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 1-7.

图/表 3

参考文献 12

[1]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 系统故障演化过程最终事件状态及发生概率研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8):1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.001
	CUI Tiejun, LI Shasha. Study on target event state and occurrence probability of system fault evolution process[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.001
[2]	崔铁军. 空间故障网络理论与系统故障演化过程研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(4):1255-1262.
	CUI Tiejun. Profound trace and exploration into the space fault network theory and the system fault evolution process[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(4):1255-1262.
[3]	范博松, 邵春福, 赵丹, 等. 城市轨道交通运营突发事件风险动态演化模型[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42 (3): 122-130.
	FAN Bosong, SHAO Chunfu, ZHAO Dan, et al. Modelling on the risk dynamic evolution of urban rail transit operation emergency[J]. Journal of Transport information and Safety, 2024, 42 (3): 122-130.
[4]	时统宇, 马煜森, 曹宇杰, 等. 基于改进功能共振分析法的SPO风险演化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34 (6): 29-38.
	SHI Tongyu, MA Yusen, CAO Yujie, et al. SPO risk eyolution based on improved functional resonance analysis method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024. 34(6):29-38. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.06.1428
[5]	乔卫亮, 邓婉怡, 马晓雪, 等. 复杂网络下船舶碰撞风险传播演化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34 (5): 101-110. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.05.0684
	QIAO Weiliang, DENG Wanyi, MA Xiaoxue, et al. Evolutionary analysis of ship collision risk propagation under a complex network[J]. China Safety Seienee Journal, 2024, 34(5):101-110.
[6]	吴赋章, 杨军, 柯松, 等. 考虑电力-交通交互的配电网故障下电动汽车充电演化特性[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48 (5): 88-98.
	WU Fuzhang, YANG Jun, KE Song, et al. Evolution characteristics of electric vehicle charging under distribution network faults considering interactions between power and transportation[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2024, 48 (5): 88-98.
[7]	SONG Shuang, TANG Xisheng, SUN Yushu, et al. Fault evolution mechanism for lithium-ion battery energy storage system under multi-levels and multi-factors[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 80: DOI:10.1016/J.EST.2023.110226.
[8]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 基于集对分析的SFT特征函数重构及性质研究[J]. 智能系统学报, 2022, 17(1):131-136.
	CUI Tiejun, LI Shasha. Reconstruction of SFT characteristic function and its properties based on set pair analysis[J]. CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2022, 17(1): 131-136.
[9]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 系统可靠-失效模型的哲学意义与智能实现[J]. 智能系统学报, 2020, 15(6):1104-1112.
	CUI Tiejun, LI Shasha. Philosophical significance and implementation of an intelligent system based on the system reliability-failure model[J]. CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2020, 15(6): 1 104-1 112.
[10]	俞礼钧. 纯态、混合态及其纠缠态[J]. 江汉大学学报, 2002, 19(1):34-37.
	YU Lijun. Pure state, mixed state and entangled state[J]. Journal of Jianghan University, 2002, 19(1): 34-37.
[11]	费少明. 量子态的可分性与纠缠度量[J]. 现代物理知识, 2016, 28(6):9-13.
	FEI Shaoming. The divisibility and entanglement metrics of quantum states[J]. Modern Physics, 2016, 28(6): 9-13.
[12]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 量子态叠加的事件发生柔性逻辑统一表达式研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2024, 42(4):774-782.
	CUI Tiejun, LI Shasha. Study on unified expression of event occurrence flexible logic based on superposition quantum ststes[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2024, 42(4):774-782.

[1]	杨启帆, 康永哲. 基于模型融合的电池组电流传感器多故障模式综合诊断[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(4): 101-109.
[2]	刘新, 伍俊楠, 潘殿琦, 张以晨, 张继权, 柯楷. 基于改进FMEA的污水厂设备故障风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(8): 101-107.
[3]	王东营, 陈小平, 刘权, 赵天浩, 闫序. 基于改进的云模型-FMEA的油气管道风险排序[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 61-68.
[4]	杨天策, 武朝康, 蔡景, 王思源, 杨大成. LEAP-1A发动机PSS系统防结冰改装设计[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 243-248.
[5]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 系统故障演化过程最终事件状态及发生概率研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 1-7.
[6]	崔铁军, 李莎莎. 基于特征函数和联系数的系统故障模式识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 1-6.
[7]	吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[8]	任乐峰, 孟祥坤, 陈国明. 滩海油气管道泄漏风险演化与评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 159-164.
[9]	王睿, 朱江洪, 李延来. 基于共识模型与IN-TODIM的FMEA风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 125-131.
[10]	宋志红, 耿秀丽. 基于HFACS的民机总装过程人为失误风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 146-151.
[11]	苏晓倩, 庄越, 代华明. 新能源汽车燃爆风险与防控研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 92-98.
[12]	李磊, 施继忠, 张小强. 地铁车辆故障模式危害度评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(5): 43-48.
[13]	张兆宁, 李文雅. 终端区管制系统风险因素分析的DEMATEL-ISM模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 86-91.
[14]	游波，吴超，石东平. 深井环境物理模拟系统的可靠性分析及其应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 101-.
[15]	程敏，曹义敏. 基于模糊FMEA的长距离输水管线顶管施工风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 76-.

基于量子思想描述的系统故障演化过程

System fault evolution process based on quantum thought description

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 12

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价