China Safety Science Journal ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 7-12.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.002

• Safety Social Science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on shortcomings in rules for investigation and analysis of casualty accidents of enterprise staff and workers and suggestions for classification of accident causes

FU Gui1, JIA Qingsong1, XU Surui2   

  1. 1 School of Resources &Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
    2 School of Safety Engineering, China Institute of Industrial Relations, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2018-01-07 Revised:2018-03-11 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2020-09-28

Abstract: In order to clearly identify the causes of the accident, this article mainly uses the thoughts of independence and exhaustion in Mutually Exclusive Collectively Exhaustive (MECE) analysis to test the scientificalness of the classification of the direct and indirect causes of accident in GB6442-1986, and finally draws the shortcomings in the classification of accident causes in GB6442-1986 from three perspectives: independence and exhaustion, scope of application and origin of accident-causing theory. After that, this article introduces the 24Model which divides the causes of accident into organization and individual to redefine unsafe acts and unsafe conditions, uses the new definition and classification to reclassify the items of direct and indirect causes in GB6442-1986.The results show that the new definitions and classifications contain all the causes mentioned in GB6442-1986 and can disperse and locate them at various levels or stages in 24Model.

Key words: rules for accident investigation and analysis, unsafe act, unsafe condition, classification of accident caused, 24Model

CLC Number: