Research on airport safety performance evaluation index system based on criteria for performance excellence and G1 method

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.001

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore airport safety performance evaluation index system for the sake of improving airport safety management quality and level, evaluation index system of civil transportation airport was studied based on CPE. Then, key safety performance dimensions were established from a multicriteria perspective, and an index system, through filtered statistical analysis, was constructed, which consisted of 6 first-level indicators (category), 17 second-level indicators, and 81 third-level indicators. Finally, weights of each index were calculated through G1, and the system and weights were applied in an airport. The results show that customers and corresponding indicators play little role in the evaluation index system, and CPE can be combined with it. Multidimensional evaluation index system satisfies actual needs in safety management of civil aviation airports.

Key words: airport safety performance, criteria for performance excellence (CPE), nonlinear weighted synthesis, index system, G1 method

CLC Number:

X949

YANG Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Zhihua, JIANG Haoran, YANG Chenguang. Research on airport safety performance evaluation index system based on criteria for performance excellence and G1 method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3): 1-7.

References

[1] Federal Aviation Administration. Runway safety initiatives[C]. International Civil Aviation Organization High-Level Safety Conference, 2010.
[2] BEZERRA G C L, GOMES C F. Performance measurement practices in airports: multidimensionality and utilization patterns[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018, 70: 113-125.
[3] 谭克涛. 长沙机场安全管理体系的构建研究[D].长沙: 湖南大学,2006.
TAN Ketao. The research on the construction of the safety management system in changsha airport [D]. Changsha: Hunan University,2006.
[4] 王永刚,孙亚菲. 机场运行安全规划中安全指标体系的构建[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(6): 3-7.
WANG Yonggang, SUN Yafei. Establishing safety indicators system for aerodrome operational safety planning [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(6): 3-7.
[5] 董正亮,王方宁,郭启明,等. 以平衡记分卡为中心构建安全绩效管理系统[J].工业安全与环保,2007,33(11): 57-59.
DONG Zhengliang, WANG Fangning, GUO Qiming,et al. Construction of safety performance management system based on balanced scorecard [J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2007,33(11): 57-59.
[6] Doc 9859 AN/474,Safety management manual (SMM)[S].2013.
[7] 王长建,傅贵. 职业安全绩效指标研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(3): 79-82.
WANG Changjian, FU Gui. Study on safety performance indexes [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2008,18(3): 79-82.
[8] 王永刚,单方方,王灿敏. 基于平衡记分卡的机场运行安全绩效考核[J].中国民航大学学报,2013,31(5): 49-53.
WANG Yonggang, SHAN Fangfang, WANG Canmin. Appraisal of airport operation safety performance based-BSC [J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China,2013,31(5): 49-53.
[9] 陈骥. 基于平衡计分卡和数据包络法的某钢铁企业安全绩效研究[D].衡阳: 南华大学,2016.
CHEN Ji. Safety performance assessment of iron and steel enterprises based on balanced score card and data envelopment analysis [D]. Hengyang: University of South China,2016.
[10] 曲扬. 建筑企业安全绩效评估研究[D].重庆: 重庆大学,2017.
QU Yang. Research on safety performance evaluation in construction enterprises [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University,2017.
[11] 吴玉臣. 通过平衡计分卡导入卓越绩效模式方法分析[J].中国质量,2007(3): 14-16.
[12] 侯晓迪. 机场卓越安全绩效评价研究[D].天津: 中国民航大学,2015.
HOU Xiaodi. Research on evaluation of the airport excellent safety performance [D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China,2015.
[13] CCAR-140-R1, 运输机场运行安全管理规定[S].2019.1.
CCAR-140-R1, Regulations on operation safety management of transport airports[S].2019.1.
[14] AC-139/140-CA—2008, 机场安全管理体系建设指南[S].
AC-139/140-CA-2008, Regulations on operation safety management of transport airports[S].
[15] 郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007: 33-50.
[16] 吴迎新,张娟娟. 基于BSC和G1法的高校绩效预算评价研究[J].会计之友,2017(6): 72-75.
[17] 王学军,郭亚军. 基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3): 65-70.
WANG Xuejun,GUO Yajun. Analyzing the consistency of comparison matrix based on G1 method[J].China Management Science,2006,14(3): 65-70.