Optimal model for fair dispatch of emergency materials considering regional disaster classification

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.023

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to achieve fair dispatch of emergency materials at different disaster sites, inspired by the idea of accurate prevention and control in different regions and grades, a new fair scheduling model considering differentiated disaster classification was constructed with the aim of minimizing scheduling time and maximizing fairness of emergency materials distribution considering the minimum dissatisfaction of emergency materials at each disaster site at the same level as a benchmark to design fairness measurement index. Then, the model was solved by genetic algorithm, and simulation was conducted for the case of Hubei Province, the worst-hit area of the COVID-19 epidemic. The results show that this model can effectively solve the problem of fair material dispatch in differentiated disaster situations under the condition of material shortage. and while ensuring priority and focus of emergency materials distribution in worst-hit areas, it also takes into account the fairness of material dispatch at all levels of disaster areas.

Key words: disaster classification, emergency material dispatch, fairness, effectiveness, optimal model, emergency

SONG Yinghua, BAI Mingxuan, MA Yaping, LYU Wei, HUO Feizhou. Optimal model for fair dispatch of emergency materials considering regional disaster classification[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 172-179.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Tab.2

Tab.3

Classification of disaster risk levels

受灾点	编号	正理想解距离 $d +$	负理想解距离 $d -$	相对贴近度 $T k$	需求紧迫度排序结果	灾情风险等级
武汉	Y1	0	126 562.3	1	1	Ⅰ级
黄石	Y9	118 116.09	8 446.375	0.067	9	Ⅱ级
十堰	Y12	120 091.24	6 471.061	0.051	12	Ⅱ级
襄阳	Y4	112 502.69	14 059.616	0.111	4	Ⅱ级
宜昌	Y7	116 582.84	9 979.464	0.079	7	Ⅱ级
荆州	Y5	113 932.02	12 630.311	0.1	5	Ⅱ级
荆门	Y8	118 064.15	8 498.157	0.067	8	Ⅱ级
受灾点	编号	正理想解距离 $d +$	负理想解距离 $d -$	相对贴近度 $T k$	需求紧迫度排序结果	灾情风险等级
鄂州	Y11	119 181.6	7 381.038	0.058	11	Ⅱ级
孝感	Y3	103 250.89	23 311.442	0.184	3	Ⅱ级
黄冈	Y2	94 804.773	31 757.523	0.251	2	Ⅰ级
咸宁	Y10	119 051.7	7 510.625	0.059	10	Ⅱ级
随州	Y6	114 971.57	11 590.734	0.092	6	Ⅱ级
恩施	Y14	123 859.52	2 702.803	0.021	14	Ⅱ级
仙桃	Y13	122 430.13	4 132.436	0.033	13	Ⅱ级
天门	Y15	124 015.4	2 547.428	0.02	15	Ⅲ级
潜江	Y16	125 860.56	703.881	0.006	16	Ⅲ级
神农架	Y17	126 562.3	0	0	17	Ⅲ级

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Fig.3

References 14

[1]	吴建南. 区域分级分类:大国应急治理的关键一招[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(3):390-391.
[2]	BODAGHI B, PALANEESWARAN E, ABBASI B. Bi-objective multi-resource scheduling problem for emergency relief operations[J]. Production Planning & Control, 2019, 29(14):1191-1206.
[3]	ZHOU Yawen, LIU Jing, ZHANG Yutong, et al. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-period dynamic emergency resource scheduling problems[J]. Transportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 2017, 99:77-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.011
[4]	刘松, 邵毅明, 彭勇, 等. 应急救援物资多式联运路径优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12):152-157. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.024
	LIU Song, SHAO Yiming, PENG Yong, et al. Multi-modal transport route optimization of emergency relief materials[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29 (12): 152-157. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.024
[5]	赵建有, 韩万里, 郑文捷, 等. 重大突发公共卫生事件下城市应急医疗物资配送[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(3):168-177.
	ZHAO Jianyou, HAN Wanli, ZHENG Wenjie, et al. Distribution of emergency medical supplies in cities under major public health emergency[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20 (3): 168-177.
[6]	张力丹, 李超, 陈飙松, 等. 多级多受灾点连续消耗应急物资调度优化策略[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2017, 57(5):501-510.
	ZHANG Lidan, LI Chao, CHEN Biaosong, et al. Optimization strategy of emergency recourses scheduling of hierarchical multiple disaster sites during continuous consumption[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2017, 57 (5): 501-510.
[7]	李伟利. 考虑优先级的应急物流系统LRP问题研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2019.
	LI Weili,. Research on LRP problem of emergency logistics system considering priority[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019.
[8]	杜雪灵, 孟学雷, 杨贝, 等. 考虑公平性的面向多灾点需求应急资源调度[J]. 计算机应用, 2018, 38(7):2089-2094. doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2018010118
	DU Xueling, MENG Xuelei, YANG Bei, et al. Emergency resource assignment for requirements of multiple disaster sites in view of fairness[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 38 (7): 2089-2094. doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2018010118
[9]	张杏雯, 倪静. 公平约束下的应急物资配送模型及算法[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(7):179-182.
[10]	朱建明, 王瑞. 灾害救援中基于民众心理感知的应急物资多阶段分配问题研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(2):5-10.
	ZHU Jianming, WANG Rui. Study on multi-stage distribution of emergency materials in disaster rescue based on people's psychological perception[J]. Journal Safety of Science and Technology, 2020, 16 (2): 5-10.
[11]	陈刚, 付江月. 兼顾公平与效率的多目标应急物资分配问题研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(3):459-466.
	CHEN Gang, FU Jiangyue. Multi-objective emergency resources allocation with fairness and efficiency considerations[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018, 15 (3): 459-466.
[12]	吕伟, 李志红, 冯满满, 等. 考虑资源和时间窗约束的应急物资调配模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12):137-143. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.022
	LYU Wei, LI Zhihong, FENG Manman, et al. Emergency material allocation in consideration of resource and time window constraints[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29 (12): 137-143. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.022
[13]	王英, 苏柏林, 闫鹏, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS的受灾点需求紧迫性分级研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(1):140-146.
	WANG Ying, SU Bailin, YAN Peng, et al. Approach to the classification of thedemand urgency of the affected points based on the improved TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19(1):140-146.
[14]	湖北省物流协会. 湖北省5个进鄂应急物资中转站有序高效运转[EB/OL]. [2020-06-01].

物资供应点	编号	物资可供量/只
武汉捷利物流园	G1	90 000
武汉宝湾物流园	G2	85 000
武汉萃元物流园	G3	95 000
鄂州赤湾物流园	G4	70 000
襄阳光彩物流园	G5	60 000

受灾点	编号	评价指标
受灾点	编号	人口密度/ (人·km²)	受伤受困人数比例/%	老幼比例/%	应急物资需求量/只	基础设施损坏程度
武汉	Y1	1 308.44	46.005 2	31.41	292 620	0
黄石	Y9	540.13	2.988 3	34.28	19 920	0
十堰	Y12	143.58	2.290 4	31.37	15 360	0
襄阳	Y4	287.92	4.902 9	34.17	32 880	0
宜昌	Y7	194.91	3.507 2	33.38	23 460	0
荆州	Y5	391.10	4.464 5	32.69	29 580	0
荆门	Y8	233.59	3.086 7	29.07	20 040	0
鄂州	Y11	663.97	2.737 8	33.63	17 460	0
孝感	Y3	552.67	8.213 3	34.11	54 240	0
黄冈	Y2	362.78	11.147 9	34.31	73 740	0
咸宁	Y10	261.32	2.648 3	36.36	17 760	0
随州	Y6	231.02	4.097 7	32.60	27 180	0
恩施	Y14	140.60	0.993 1	36.79	6 660	0
仙桃	Y13	449.21	1.512 0	32.82	9 960	0
天门	Y15	475.74	1.028 9	32.58	6 300	0
潜江	Y16	482.09	0.313 1	27.95	2 040	0
神农架	Y17	23.39	0.062 6	35.94	420	0

需求点	风险等级	配送中心	调度量/只	物资满足率/%	配送路径	配送时间/h
Y1	Ⅰ级	G1	64 615	68.17	G₁→49→34→20→17→6→5→Y1	0.63
		G2	75 579		G2→50→35→21→20→17→6→5→Y1	0.83
		G3	59 292		G3→26→9→1→Y1	0.36
Y2	Ⅰ级	G3	100	68.17	G3→26→24→40→59→58→Y2	1.58
Y2	Ⅰ级	G4	50 171	68.17	G4→59→58→Y2	0.86
Y3	Ⅱ级	G3	28 771	53.04	G3→41→42→68→67→Y3	1.02
Y4	Ⅱ级	G5	17 441	53.04	G5→76→Y4	0.44
Y5	Ⅱ级	G1	15 691	53.04	G1→49→91→64→71→72→79→Y5	3.46
Y6	Ⅱ级	G3	6 838	53.04	G3→41→42→68→67→66→69→Y6	2.98
Y6	Ⅱ级	G5	7 580	53.04	G5→76→75→69→Y6	2.5
Y7	Ⅱ级	G5	12 445	53.04	G5→76→77→78→81→89→Y7	4.78
Y8	Ⅱ级	G5	10 630	53.04	G5→76→77→78→Y8	2.84
Y9	Ⅱ级	G4	10 567	53.04	G4→59→56→92→Y9	1.12
Y10	Ⅱ级	G2	9 421	53.04	G2→50→51→52→53→61→Y10	1.46
Y11	Ⅱ级	G4	9 262	53.04	G4→59→57→Y11	0.86
Y12	Ⅱ级	G5	8 148	53.04	G5→76→84→85→Y12	2.76
Y13	Ⅱ级	G1	5 284	53.04	G1→49→91→64→Y13	1.2
Y14	Ⅱ级	G5	3 533	53.04	G5→76→84→83→87→88→90→Y14	7.28
Y15	Ⅲ级	G1	3 331	52.87	G1→49→91→64→71→Y15	2.6
Y16	Ⅲ级	G1	1 079	52.89	G1→49→91→64→71→Y16	2.2
Y17	Ⅲ级	G5	222	52.85	G5→84→83→87→Y12	3.42

调度方案	编号	调度时间/h	公平性	各级灾点应急物资最小满意度/%
调度方案	编号	调度时间/h	公平性	Ⅰ级	Ⅱ级	Ⅲ级
考虑分级	方案1	45.18	0.001 2	68.17	53.04	52.85
未考虑分级	方案2	46.72	5.375 0	58.68	58.68	58.68

[1]	ZHU Anfeng, FAN Xiufang, DU Wenrui, SUN Wanxin, XU Gang. Comprehensive evaluation of disaster prevention and mitigation capacity of emergency shelters based on resilience perspective: a case study of Ouhai district in Wenzhou [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 223-230.
[2]	WANG Dan, GAO Wenwen. Emergency supply chain reliability evaluation based on combined empowerment-bias order set [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 231-237.
[3]	WU Jianjun, CHEN Yan, ZHU Qinghua, HU Shenping. Emergency ship maneuvering method for crossing encounter situation under immediate danger threat [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 238-246.
[4]	WANG Li, CHEN Wentao, GUAN Wenling, SUN Aijun. Research on talent development systems for emergency technology and management majors to meet national needs [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 9-16.
[5]	CHEN Weijiong, SU Ziwei, QIN Tingrong, HAN Weijia, WANG Kan, KANG Yutao. Evaluation of comprehensive emergency response capability for port ship oil spill with cloud gravity center evaluation method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 183-190.
[6]	SONG Yinghua, HAN Baoshuai, GUO Chen. Location selection model of emergency shelter considering risk of flood disaster in county [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 191-198.
[7]	WANG Yonggang, MA Wenting. Evaluation model of pilot emergency response capability [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 199-206.
[8]	BAI Pengfei, TAN Xiaohu, HOU ruifang. Geohazard emergency response partnerships from a social network perspective [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 207-216.
[9]	LI Kun, DING Jingxuan, LI Jiaojiao. Improved social force model considering information transmission mechanism [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 217-225.
[10]	ZHOU Qingchao, YE Chunming, GENG Xiuli. Evaluation of emergency logistics facility location plan based on IT2F-BWM-MABAC method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 226-231.
[11]	PEI Xiaodong, YAO Zhiyuan, WANG Liang, SHAO Hao, WANG Kai, WU Zhengyan. Virtual simulation experimental system for mine fire monitoring and prevention based on Unity3D [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 109-116.
[12]	LIU Xinnan, XUE Tingting, JI Yingbo. Networks robustness evaluation of urban flood emergency organizations from perspective of emergency plans [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 216-221.
[13]	GUO Qian, ZHOU Yike, WU Gang. Emergency rescue allocation decision-making based on three-sided matching theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 222-229.
[14]	ZHANG Shulin, WANG Lanning, LU Yi. Risk assessment of hydrogen peroxide production technology by using anthraquinone process based on dynamic Bayesian network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 110-116.
[15]	HUANG Guoping, LEI Haoxiang. Comprehensive evaluation of emergency logistics suppliers based on cloud TOPSIS method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 217-224.