Importance evaluation of organizational safety behavior in high-risk enterprises

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.2513

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the structure of organizational safety behavior in high-risk enterprises comprehensively and objectively, firstly, through literature review and enterprise survey, the safety behavior of enterprise organization was divided into five first-level indicators and eighteen second-level indicators. Secondly, from the external and internal environment of the enterprise, the factors affecting the organizational safety behavior were deeply analyzed, and the comprehensive action tree model of organizational safety behavior of the enterprise was established. Finally, the interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set combined with TOPSIS cross-entropy and VIKOR method was used to construct a multi-attribute security decision model to evaluate the importance of organizational security behavior decision indicators in high-risk enterprises under multi-factor conditions. The results show that the internal and external environmental factors of the enterprise have a comprehensive "photosynthesis" effect, which affects the decision-making level of the enterprise's organizational safety behavior. Enterprise safety performance occupies the primary position of organizational safety behavior, and regular occupational safety and health management is the primary task of enterprise safety performance. Enterprise safety culture takes the second place, and consolidating and strengthening the construction of enterprise spirit safety culture is its important goal. This provides reference for enterprise safety management.

Key words: high-risk, organizational safety behavior, importance evaluation, safety decision, interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set, technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution(TOPSIS)cross-entropy, vlsekriterijumska optimizacija i kompromisno resenje(VIKOR) method

GUO Jinping, ZHOU Guoyue, NIE Xingxin, YAN Chengyuan. Importance evaluation of organizational safety behavior in high-risk enterprises[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(11): 23-30.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Tab.2

Relative proximity of indicators

参数	A	B	C	D	E
$D i +$	0.837 1	0.756 6	0.821 7	0.766 4	1.116 4
$D i -$	0.052 0	0.026 2	0.057 8	0.369 8	0.075 7
$C i$	0.941 5	0.772 4	0.934 2	0.674 5	0.936 5

Tab.2

Tab.3

Weight allocation in decision policy

名称	贴近度C_i	群体效益值S_i	个体遗憾值R_i
变异系数c_v	0.143 5	0.039 3	0.097 1
权重 $ϕ$	0.512 7	0.140 4	0.346 9

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

References 35

[1]	安宇, 李建飞, 李虹伟, 等. 煤矿安全监管人员工作压力与行为作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020. 30(1):7-13. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.01.002
	AN Yu, LI Jianfei, LI Hongwei, et al. Relationship between work stress and behaviors of safety supervisors in mines[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(1):7-13. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.01.002
[2]	李书全, 董静. 基于贝叶斯网络的社会资本与组织安全行为概率评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(17):185-188.
[3]	佟瑞鹏, 陈策. 煤矿组织安全行为对个体不安全行为的作用机理研究[J] 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(12):40-45.
	TONG Ruipeng, CHEN Ce. Research on action mechanism of organizational safety behavior on individual unsafe behavior in coal mine[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(12):40-45.
[4]	张仕廉, 许海鸿. 建筑施工现场组织及员工安全行为评价[J]. 建筑经济, 2017, 38(1):53-57.
	ZHANG Shilian, XU Haihong. Research on organization and workers' safety behaviors evaluation for construction site[J]. Construction Economy, 2017, 38(1):53-57.
[5]	王琦玮, 梅强, 刘素霞, 等. 基于员工安全行为视角的企业安全生产影响元分析[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(3):226-237.
	WANG Qiwei, MEI Qiang, LIU Suxia, et al. Factors that affect enterprise safe production:a meta-analysis based on view of employees' safety behavior[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(3):226-237.
[6]	CHANG Yungyi, SHIH Chenghsiung, LIU ChiaJu. Decision-making of enterprise leaders from the perspective of organizational neuroscience[J]. Management Studies, 2019, 7(4):361-371.
[7]	LIU Suxia, ZHOU Ying, CHENG Yao, et al. Multiple mediating effects in the relationship between employees' trust in organizational safety and safety participation behavior[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 125(2):DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104611. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104611
[8]	谭章禄, 吴琦. 煤炭企业管理人员认知风格与管理行为探究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(6):293-296,300.
	TAN Zhanglu, WU Qi. Cognitive styles and management behavior of coal enterprise managers[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(6):293-296,300.
[9]	苏芳, 毛基业. 应对环境变化的战略路径转换过程:内外部正反馈和管理者刻意行为的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(10):172-185,220.
	SU Fang, MAO Jiye. Strategic path transformation in response to environmental changes:the influence of external and internal positive feedbacks and deliberate managerial actions[J]. Management World, 2019, 35(10):172-185,220.
[10]	禹敏, 栗继祖. 组织政治知觉中安全变革型领导调节作用对矿工安全行为的影响[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(11):239-243.
	YU Min, LI Jizu. Influence of moderating role of safety-specific transformational leadership on miners' safety behavior in organizational political perception[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(11):239-243.
[11]	BRILLO J, SILVA E. Tri-intersectional model of leadership by values:a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making open technology assessment system[J]. Chinese Business Review, 2020, 19(5):DOI:10.17265/1537-1506/2020.05.001. doi: 10.17265/1537-1506/2020.05.001
[12]	董静, 李书全. 施工企业社会资本与组织安全行为决策模型与实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(7):185-188.
[13]	KENIS P, RAAB J. Back to the future:using organization design theory for effective organizational networks[J]. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2020, 3(2) 109-123. doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa005
[14]	MAGALHAES R. The resurgence of organization design and its significance for management education[J]. She Ji:The Journal of Design,Economics and Innovation, 2020, 6(4):482-504. doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2020.09.002
[15]	PROKHOROVA V V, MUSHNYKOVA S A. Development safety culture-communication culture as the basis of management process intellectualization[J]. The Problems of Economy, 2019, 4(42):142-148.
[16]	陆柏, 傅贵, 付亮. 安全文化与安全氛围的理论比较[J]. 煤矿安全, 2006, 37(5):66-70.
	LU Bai, FU Gui, FU Liang. Theory compare between safety culture and safety climate[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2006, 37(5):66-70.
[17]	王秉, 吴超. 安全文化学的研究进展及其科学发展模式[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6):25-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.005
	WANG Bing, WU Chao. Research progress and scientific development model of safety culturology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(6):25-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.005
[18]	GAN K H, KEE D M H. Psychosocial safety climate, job resources, work engagement and organizational commitment:a study in Malaysian research universities[J]. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 2021, 7(2):179-182. doi: 10.31580/apss.v7i2.1824
[19]	KAO K Y, THOMAS C L, SPITZMUELLER C, et al. Being present in enhancing safety:examining the effects of workplace mindfulness, safety behaviors, and safety climate on safety outcomes[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2021, 36(2):DOI:10.1007/s10869-019-09658-3. doi: 10.1007/s10869-019-09658-3
[20]	OLCER F, DURMUSCELEBI C. The relationship amongst person-organization fit, safety consciousness, safety climate and safety behavior[J]. International Journal of Business and Management, 2018, 13(9):208-221.
[21]	HE Changquan, MCCABE B, JIA Guangshe, et al. Effects of safety climate and safety behavior on safety outcomes between supervisors and construction workers[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2020, 146(1):DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001735. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001735
[22]	康良国, 吴超. 大数据环境下企业安全绩效管理的基础性问题[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(10):5-11.
	KANG Liangguo, WU Chao. Basic problems of safety performance management in enterprises under big data environment[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(10):5-11.
[23]	SULIEMAN H A, ALFARAIDY F A. Impact of organization strategic decisions to organization performance in the Saudi construction industry[J]. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 2019, 6(8):77-81.
[24]	JIANG Fuchuan, LAI En, SHAN Yuxuan, et al. A set theory-based model for safety investment and accident control in coal mines[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 136(3):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.003
[25]	于晓燕, 姚庆国, 陈祺, 等. 基于三阶段DEA模型的煤矿企业安全投入产出效率研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(12):243-247.
	YU Xiaoyan, YAO Qingguo, CHEN Qi, et al. Research on safety input-output efficiency of coal mine enterprises based on three-stage DEA model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(12):243-247.
[26]	田一明, 陈雪波, 孙秋柏. 行为安全管理系统中员工不安全行为涌现性抑制的研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2016, 16(2):174-178.
	TIAN Yiming, CHEN Xuebo, SUN Qiubai. Study on the inhibitive tendency of the unsafe behavior inclination of the employees in the BBS management and control system[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(2):174-178.
[27]	戴娜娜, 杨力, 朱俊奇. 化工建筑从业人员安全行为影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10):41-46. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.006
	DAI Nana, YANG Li, ZHU Junqi. Research on influencing factors of chemical construction workers' safety behaviors[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(10):41-46. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.006
[28]	魏志杰, 殷腾飞, 王立杰. 安全诚信管理对安全行为的影响研究:以煤矿企业为例[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(7):119-123.
	WEI Zhijie, YIN Tengfei, WANG Lijie. Research on influence of safety integrity management on safety behavior-taking coal mine enterprises as example[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(7):119-123.
[29]	付净, 聂方超, 吕巍, 等. 安全从业人员职业认同测量模型的构建及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11):22-29. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.004
	FU Jing, NIE Fangchao, LYU Wei, et al. Development and application of professional identity measurement model for safety practitioners[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(11):22-29. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.11.004
[30]	林文豪, 陈梅倩, 周礼刚, 等. 一种区间Pythagorean模糊VIKOR多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3):57-64. doi: 10.12005/orms.2021.0075
	LIN Wenhao, CHEN Meiqian, ZHOU Ligang, et al. An approach to interval Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(3):57-64. doi: 10.12005/orms.2021.0075
[31]	YANG Zaoli, CHANG Jinping. Interval-valued Pythagorean normal fuzzy information aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision making[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8(99):51295-51 314.
[32]	杨扬, 彭定洪. 改进加权支持度的Pythagorean模糊交叉幂均群决策方法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2020, 37(4):1043-1048.
	YANG Yang, PENG Dinghong. Pythagorean fuzzy interaction average operator group decision making method with improved weighted support[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2020, 37(4):1043-1048.
[33]	范建平, 贾雪飞, 吴美琴. 单值三角Neutrosophic交叉熵的TOPSIS方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2020, 56(6):239-245. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.1811-0423
	FAN Jianping, JIA Xuefei, WU Meiqin. TOPSIS method based on single-valued triangular Neutrosophic cross entropy[J]. Computer Engineering and Application, 2020, 56(6):239-245.
[34]	YU Chunxia, SHAO Yifan, WANG Kun, et al. A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment-ScienceDirect[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 121(5):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.010
[35]	刘欣, 徐桂琼, 杨平乐. 基于组合赋权VIKOR方法的网络节点重要性评价[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2019, 36(8):2368-2371,2 377.
	LIU Xin, XU Guiqiong, YANG Pingle. Node importance evaluating of network based on combination weighting VIKOR method[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2019, 36(8):2368-2371,2 377.

一级指标	Z₁	Z₂	Z₃	Z₄	Z₅	Z₆
A	[0.6,0.7], [0.3,0.4]	[0.7,0.8], [0.3,0.4]	[0.5,0.7], [0.4,0.5]	[0.3,0.6], [0.6,0.8]	[0.3,0.5], [0.5,0.7]	[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5]
B	[0.5,0.6], [0.6,0.7]	[0.8,0.9], [0.3,0.5]	[0.7,0.8], [0.2,0.5]	[0.5,0.6], [0.4,0.5]	[0.6,0.8], [0.3,0.4]	[0.9,0.9], [0.1,0.2]
C	[0.7,0.8], [0.2,0.4]	[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5]	[0.8,0.9], [0.5,0.6]	[0.7,0.8], [0.2,0.4]	[0.5,0.7], [0.7,0.8]	[0.8,0.9], [0.2,0.4]
D	[0.4,0.6], [0.5,0.7]	[0.5,0.7], [0.3,0.6]	[0.4,0.6], [0.3,0.4]	[0.8,0.9], [0.3,0.5]	[0.7,0.8], [0.2,0.3]	[0.7,0.9], [0.3,0.5]
E	[0.8,0.9], [0.2,0.3]	[0.7,0.9], [0.2,0.3]	[0.5,0.6], [0.7,0.8]	[0.3,0.4], [0.6,0.8]	[0.5,0.6], [0.6,0.7]	[0.4,0.6], [0.5,0.6]

名称	A	B	C	D	E
指标贴近度C_i	A₃> A₂>A₁	B₃> B₂> B₁	C₃> C₁> C₂	D₄> D₁> D₃>D₂	E₃> E₄> E₅> E₂> E₁
群体效益值S_i	A₂> A₃> A₁	B₃> B₂> B₁	C₃> C₂> C₁	D₄> D₃> D₁>D₂	E₃> E₅> E₄> E₂> E₁
个体遗憾值R_i	A₂> A₃>A₁	B₃> B₁> B₂	C₃> C₂> C₁	D₃> D₄> D₁>D₂	E₃> E₄> E₁> E₂> E₅

二级指标	综合折衷值 K_i	重要度排序
组织结构A₁	0.182	A₂> A₃> A₁
组织安全目标A₂	0.527
组织管理A₃	0.515
物质安全文化B₁	0.200	B₃> B₂> B₁
制度安全文化B₂	0.351
精神安全文化B₃	0.445
安全法规学习及安全培训C₁	0.123	C₃> C₂> C₁
安全管理与监督C₂	0.231
安全交流咨询及反馈C₃	0.329
事故统计及损失D₁	0.730	D₄> D₃> D₁> D₂
隐患防御及校正D₂	0.593
安全检查及改进D₃	0.797
职业安全卫生管理D₄	0.804
二级指标	综合折衷值 K_i	重要度排序
安全教育培训活动投入E₁	0.389	E₃> E₄> E₅> E₂> E₁
安全设备及劳动防护投入E₂	0.438
事故应急救援投入E₃	0.787
安全生产技术及奖励投入E₄	0.583
职业健康及保险投入E₅	0.463