China Safety Science Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 10-17.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.09.1560
• Safety social science and safety management • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Haiying1(), CHU Lin1, XU Jian2
Received:
2023-03-08
Revised:
2023-06-11
Online:
2023-09-28
Published:
2024-03-28
WANG Haiying, CHU Lin, XU Jian. Construction safety risk analysis of bridge girder-erecting machine based on complex network integrating N-K model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 10-17.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.09.1560
Tab.1
Statistical data of construction accidents of bridge girder-erecting machine
代号 | 事故类型 | 事故 数量 | 事故占 比/% | 平均死 亡人数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 梁体坠落[ | 3 | 6.52 | 1.67 |
A2 | 架桥机失稳[ | 5 | 10.87 | 0 |
A3 | 架桥机侧翻[ | 14 | 30.43 | 2.43 |
A4 | 架桥机倒塌[ | 6 | 13.04 | 3 |
A5 | 架桥机坠落[ | 5 | 10.87 | 1.8 |
A6 | 架桥机故障[ | 3 | 6.52 | 0.33 |
A7 | 起重小车坠落 | 2 | 4.35 | 0 |
A8 | 架桥机脱轨 | 2 | 4.35 | 0 |
A9 | 人员坠落[ | 3 | 6.52 | 0 |
A10 | 钢丝绳脱落[ | 1 | 2.17 | 0 |
A11 | 高空坠物伤人[ | 1 | 2.17 | 0 |
Tab.2
Construction safety risk factors of bridge girder-erecting machine
一级风险因素 | 二级风险因素及代号 |
---|---|
管理 | 架桥机安全检查执法不严[ |
相关法律规范要求滞后[ | |
安拆单位管理不到位[ | |
施工单位管理不到位[ | |
监理单位失职[ | |
安全规章制度不规范[ | |
专项施工方案不完备P2 | |
安全技术交底不充分[ | |
安全生产检查不充分[ | |
安全教育培训不充分[ | |
人员 | 专业人员配备不足[ |
安全管理人员履职不充分[ | |
指挥人员违章指挥[ | |
工人无证上岗[ | |
工人违规作业[ | |
设备 | 架桥机安全装置失效或不全[ |
架桥机受力部件不合要求[ | |
架桥机装配质量不合要求[ | |
架桥机结构构件破坏或连接松动[ | |
架桥机机构与零部件损坏[ | |
架桥机不满足工程要求[ | |
架桥机未定期检修[ | |
环境 | 工期压力大[ |
恶劣天气[ |
Tab.3
Normalized centrality of risk factors of bridge girder-erecting machine%
风险 因素 | 亲近中心度 | 中介中 心度 | |
---|---|---|---|
出度 | 入度 | ||
G1 | 30.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
G2 | 30.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
U1 | 14.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
U2 | 40.00 | 11.43 | 7.49 |
U3 | 28.57 | 8.57 | 0.00 |
风险 因素 | 亲近中心度 | 中介中 心度 | |
出度 | 入度 | ||
P1 | 18.57 | 10.71 | 1.44 |
P2 | 23.65 | 8.16 | 1.04 |
P3 | 22.86 | 8.16 | 0.28 |
P4 | 40.00 | 8.16 | 3.34 |
P5 | 22.86 | 8.16 | 0.28 |
H1 | 19.43 | 8.16 | 0.05 |
H2 | 27.43 | 18.70 | 4.17 |
H3 | 16.51 | 24.76 | 0.19 |
H4 | 18.57 | 7.14 | 0.00 |
H5 | 25.14 | 26.09 | 7.75 |
M1 | 13.33 | 9.23 | 0.85 |
M2 | 5.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
M3 | 19.78 | 22.12 | 2.02 |
M4 | 17.78 | 15.09 | 0.87 |
M5 | 14.69 | 7.14 | 0.02 |
M6 | 9.52 | 7.14 | 0.11 |
M7 | 13.71 | 13.53 | 0.50 |
E1 | 5.71 | 7.14 | 0.08 |
E2 | 9.52 | 7.14 | 0.08 |
A1 | 9.52 | 25.25 | 0.45 |
A2 | 9.52 | 26.67 | 0.52 |
A3 | 11.43 | 42.21 | 3.30 |
A4 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 0.00 |
A5 | 5.71 | 32.35 | 0.29 |
A6 | 0.00 | 26.41 | 0.00 |
A7 | 5.71 | 21.86 | 1.52 |
A8 | 9.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
A9 | 0.00 | 30.42 | 0.00 |
A10 | 0.00 | 16.53 | 0.00 |
A11 | 0.00 | 16.85 | 0.00 |
Tab.4
T-values of coupling interactive information of bridge girder-erecting machine
耦合因素 | 耦合交互信息T | |
---|---|---|
人员-设备 | T21(a,b) | 0.048 4 |
人员-环境 | T22(a,c) | 0.004 4 |
人员-管理 | T23(a,d) | 0.325 0 |
设备-环境 | T24(b,c) | 0.000 1 |
设备-管理 | T25(b,d) | 0.066 9 |
环境-管理 | T26(c,d) | 0.009 7 |
人员-设备-环境 | T31(a,b,c) | 0.100 3 |
人员-设备-管理 | T32(a,b,d) | 0.608 8 |
人员-环境-管理 | T33(a,c,d) | 0.359 4 |
设备-环境-管理 | T34(b,c,d) | 0.131 5 |
人员-设备-环境-管理 | T4(a,b,c,d) | 0.762 4 |
[1] |
马建, 孙守增, 芮海田, 等. 中国筑路机械学术研究综述·2018[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(6):1-168.
|
|
|
[2] |
陈楠. 基于IOWA算子的地铁车站深基坑施工安全综合评价[J]. 隧道建设:中英文, 2020, 40(2):202-208.
|
|
|
[3] |
乔建刚, 程璨. 基于可拓学理论的简支梁桥安全评价模型研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(6):2096-2102.
|
|
|
[4] |
吴杰良. 大跨度钢箱梁斜拉桥施工安全风险评估体系建立与应用[J]. 世界桥梁, 2022, 50(3):59-65.
|
|
|
[5] |
谷鹏举, 于龙, 徐旭. 建筑施工现场安全管理问题分析及对策[J]. 建筑安全, 2020, 35(3):28-30.
|
[6] |
吕树胜, 童霖. 基于事故树理论的节段拼装架桥机事故致因分析[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2018, 44(7):50-53.
|
|
|
[7] |
李会勋. 高墩小半径桥T梁架设施工技术要点[J]. 交通世界, 2021(28):109-110.
|
[8] |
刘连雄, 郭宁潮, 郑新梅, 等. 架桥机安全管理中存在问题研究及对策[J]. 建筑机械化, 2020, 41(9):73-76.
|
[9] |
陈文强, 李艳飞, 于静. 基于社会网络分析的城市综合管廊安全风险网络构建及评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(5):1652-1660.
|
|
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.006 |
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
吴贤国, 吴克宝, 沈梅芳, 等. 基于N-K模型的地铁施工安全风险耦合研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(4):96-101.
|
|
|
[14] |
戴世伟, 刘鑫鑫, 万飞. 软岩隧道大变形事故致灾因素耦合分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8):119-124.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.017 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.017 |
|
[15] |
市场监管总局. 国家市场监督管理总局行政处罚决定书[EB/OL]. (2021-09-23). https://www.samr.gov.cn/tzsbj/qktb/gs/art/2020/art_961dd883df9145a0bb8e9ee882b8a21c.html.
|
[16] |
越城区应急管理局. 杭绍台铁路HSTZQ-1标段“8·27”起重伤害事故调查报告[EB/OL]. (2021-01-04). http://www.sxyc.gov.cn/art/2021/1/4/art_1229533670_3863450.html.
|
[17] |
福州在建桥梁倒塌致2死4伤, 原因初步查明[EB/OL]. (2020-03-04). https://www.sohu.com/a/377659182_260616.
|
[18] |
doi: 10.3846/jcem.2019.8652 |
[19] |
邯郸市政府办公室. 邯郸市人民政府关于对太行山高速邯郸五标段大洼村1#大桥“8·27”起重伤害事故调查处理意见的批复[EB/OL]. (2020-06-01). https://www.hd.gov.cn/hdzfxxgk/gszbm/auto23692/202006/t20200617_1342190.html.
|
[20] |
刘爱国. 桥梁建设的安全重心:架桥机安全运行探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(3):70-75.
|
|
|
[21] |
陈敢泽. 一起架桥机倾翻事故分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2008, 4(2):162-164.
|
|
|
[22] |
“4·28”事故调查组. 无锡至江阴城际轨道交通工程节段梁架设工程“4·28”一般物体打击事故调查报告[EB/OL]. (2022-08-08). http://www.wuxi.gov.cn/uploadfiles/202208/30/2022083015371094075855.pdf.
|
[1] | QIAO Weiliang, DENG Wanyi, MA Xiaoxue, HAN Bing. Evolutionary analysis of ship collision risk propagation under a complex network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 101-110. |
[2] | LI Zhuo, HE Ruichun, LI Wenxia. Robustness evaluation for high-speed railway network with spatiotemporal dynamic characteristics [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(4): 111-120. |
[3] | YUAN Leping, GU Zekun, LI Dongqi. Risk evolution analysis of eVTOL operation in UAM ecosystem based on complex networks [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 192-199. |
[4] | SHEN Ling, TANG Lingyi, LIAO Jie. Operational safety resilience measure for public transportation equipment and facility systems based on CN-FRAM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 45-54. |
[5] | LI Cong, XU Zixuan, ZHUANG Yufeng, YANG Rui, XU Yabo, CHEN Chen. DBN model of external corrosion accident in gas network system [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 227-236. |
[6] | SUN Yilin, ZHENG Xiaoqiang, LIU Xianfeng, HE Yanyan, WANG Ye. Analysis of gas pipeline leakage and explosion accident based on AcciMap model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 140-146. |
[7] | CHENG Lianhua, CAO Dongqiang, LI Xin. Research on cause factors classification of housing construction accidents [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 16-22. |
[8] | LI Lei, MA Mengge, SHE Yaya, WANG Yuqiu, FANG Zihao, WANG Fan. Risk analysis of rainstorm flood disaster chain and research on disaster mitigation of broken chain under complex network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(12): 192-197. |
[9] | CHENG Ming, MEI Aoran. Construction and analysis of evolution network of runway excursion events [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(12): 77-84. |
[10] | YANG Yingliu, JIN Lianghai, SHAO Bo, CHEN Shu, JIANG Xin, CHEN Ying. Research on causes of coal mine fire and explosion based on complex network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 145-151. |
[11] | YANG Jingfeng, ZHU Dapeng, ZHAO Ruilin. Evaluation of station importance and cascading failure resistance analysis of urban rail transit network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 161-167. |
[12] | CHEN Shu, ZHU Liping, CHEN Yun, ZHENG Xiazhong, JI Qin. Sequential characteristics of safety hazards in hydropower project construction based on complex networks [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 61-66. |
[13] | MA Liang, HU Chenhan, CHEN Guangwei. Analysis on topological characteristics and robustness of complex network of railway express freight transportation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 178-185. |
[14] | CUI Xin, LU Qingchang, LI Jianyu. Key station identification of urban rail transit based on network redundancy [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(12): 158-164. |
[15] | CHEN Guohua, LI Jialing, CHEN Xuexi, YANG Qin. A safety risk assessment model of urban areas under disaster chain network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(11): 146-153. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||