China Safety Science Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 133-141.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.11.2158
• Public safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Xiaofang1(), LIN Tao2, YU Qi1, CAO Xin2,3
Received:
2023-05-14
Revised:
2023-08-18
Online:
2023-11-28
Published:
2024-05-28
LIU Xiaofang, LIN Tao, YU Qi, CAO Xin. Quantitative simulation of pedestrian evacuation and collision risk in urban street space[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(11): 133-141.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.11.2158
Tab.1
Design types and photos of on-site street space experiments
试验类型 | 试验目的 | 变量设置 | 试验照片 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
固定的变量 | 变化的变量 | |||
瓶颈式街巷 空间布局试验 | 研究瓶颈式街巷空间布局与人 群通行疏散及碰撞风险的关系 | 街巷长度、通行速度、 无阻碍物 | 街巷宽度、 通行人数 | |
窄径式街巷 空间布局试验 | 研究窄径式街巷空间布局与人 群通行疏散及碰撞风险的关系 | 街巷宽度、通行速度、 无阻碍物 | 街巷长度、 通行人数 | |
窄径式街巷阻碍 物布局试验 | 研究窄径式街巷空间内设置阻 碍物对人群通行疏散的影响 | 街巷宽度、街巷长度、 通行人数、通行速度 | 阻碍物布局 | |
速度试验 | 研究街巷空间内人群通行速度 与疏散及碰撞风险的关系 | 街巷宽度、街巷长度、 通行人数、无阻碍物 | 通行速度 | |
Tab.2
Difference significance of collision partition number in bottleneck street space layout experiments
街巷宽 度/m | 街巷宽 度/m | 显著性 | 街巷宽 度/m | 街巷宽 度/m | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 | 1.5 | 0.105 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.031* |
2.0 | 0.031* | 1.5 | 0.921 | ||
3.0 | 0.011* | 3.0 | 0.520 | ||
5.0 | 0.006* | 5.0 | 0.045* | ||
1.5 | 1.0 | 0.105 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.011* |
2.0 | 0.921 | 1.5 | 0.145 | ||
3.0 | 0.145 | 2.0 | 0.520 | ||
5.0 | 0.029* | 5.0 | 0.440 |
Tab.4
Difference significance of passing time and collision partition number at various speeds
速度 | 1.5 m宽街巷试验 | 1 m宽街巷试验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
通行时间 差异显 著性 | 碰撞隔断 次数差异 显著性 | 通行时间 差异显著 性 | 碰撞隔断 次数差异 显著性 | ||
1 | 2 | 0.145 | 0.001* | 0.000* | 0.447 |
3 | 0.109 | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.244 | |
4 | 0.067 | 0.001* | 0.000* | 0.286 | |
2 | 1 | 0.145 | 0.001* | 0.000* | 0.447 |
3 | 0.133 | 0.111 | 0.000* | 0.660 | |
4 | 0.029* | 1.000 | 0.000* | 0.740 | |
3 | 1 | 0.109 | 0.000* | 0.000* | 0.244 |
2 | 0.133 | 0.111 | 0.000* | 0.660 | |
4 | 0.318 | 0.111 | 0.422 | 0.912 |
[1] |
香港22年前曾发生新年夜踩踏惨剧兰桂坊21死63伤[EB/OL].[2023-03-19]. https://www.guancha.cn/society/2015_01_01_305017.shtml.
|
[2] |
韩国警方公布首尔梨泰院踩踏事故调查结果[EB/OL].[2023-03-19]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1754917192755079595&wfr=spider&for=pc.
|
[3] |
魏雅琦, 古新仁, 王文婉, 等. 基于文献计量分析的国内外街道安全研究综述[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(6):92-100.
|
|
|
[4] |
邓一凌, 陈前虎, 过秀成. 街道环境对行人步行体验的影响[J]. 城市问题, 2018(6):43-50.
|
[5] |
刘晓芳, 吝涛, 郑千惠, 等. 城市街巷型公共空间人群聚集安全风险量化评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(12):134-139.
|
|
|
[6] |
谭少华, 李英侠. 住区街道步行安全影响因素实证研究[J]. 城市问题, 2014(8):50-54.
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1287/trsc.1040.0102 |
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.01.008 |
[11] |
谢春明, 肖露欣, 祝元仲. 人员踩踏事件中快速疏散复杂网络模型的研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2012, 29(12):409-412.
|
|
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.10.019 |
[13] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.020 |
[14] |
doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.09.027 |
[15] |
姜雪, 杨欢, 张培红. 基于蚁群算法的商业步行街应急疏散决策优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10):144-151.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.020 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.020 |
|
[16] |
谢启苗, 王焘, 王维莉. 考虑恐慌心理的人员疏散模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7):180-187.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.0585 |
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.0585 |
|
[17] |
王亚飞, 朱伟, 马英楠. 人员密集场所紧急疏散风险模型研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(增1):20-25.
|
|
|
[18] |
李俊梅, 胡成, 李炎锋, 等. 不同类型疏散通道人群密度对行走速度的影响研究[J]. 建筑科学, 2014, 30(8):122-129.
|
|
|
[19] |
王振, 刘茂. 人群疏散的动力学特征及疏散通道堵塞的恢复[J]. 自然科学进展, 2008, 18(2):179-185.
|
[20] |
莫乐群. 城市密集人群疏散算法设计研究[J]. 计算机与数字工程, 2019, 47(6):1303-1305,1337.
|
|
|
[21] |
金泽人, 阮欣, 李越. 基于元胞自动机的火灾场景行人流疏散仿真研究[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 46(8):1026-1034.
|
|
|
[22] |
徐方, 魏东, 魏星. 公众聚集场所人群疏散基础数据的分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(4):137-145.
|
|
|
[23] |
田玉敏. 人群疏散中“非适应性”行为的研究[J]. 灾害学, 2006, 21(2):114-120.
|
|
[1] | WU Jianjun, CHEN Yan, ZHU Qinghua, HU Shenping. Emergency ship maneuvering method for crossing encounter situation under immediate danger threat [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(5): 238-246. |
[2] | ZHAO Leitong, LIU Xin, YAN Huanhuan. Research on security risk of obstacle shielding based on CRM model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 150-155. |
[3] | DENG Qing, ZHOU Zheng, DENG Li, JIANG Huiling, ZHOU Liang, ZHOU Zhengqing. Construction and stability analysis of an evacuation model for contrary movement personnel [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 196-203. |
[4] | LU Fei, CHEN Haonan. Longitudinal collision risk control in land route based on PID [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 86-93. |
[5] | LU Fei, CHEN Haonan. Longitudinal collision risk of CSPRs paired approach under fuzzy PID control [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(11): 97-104. |
[6] | HUO Feizhou, LI Ying, MA Yaping, TU Wenhao, LIU Chang, YAN Yan. CA model considering environmental familiarity and evacuation strategy [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 94-99. |
[7] | WANG Guanning, CHEN Tao, ZHENG Huijie, JIANG Wenyu. Pedestrian evacuation model considering panic and wall-following guidance [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 111-117. |
[8] | LIN Zhiyang, LIU Zheng, FANG Zhiming, LIU Jialin, ZHANG Peng, JIANG Rui. Review of pedestrian and traffic evacuation simulation software [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 100-110. |
[9] | HUO Feizhou, LI Chao, LI Yufei, LYU Wei, TU Wenhao. Pedestrian evacuation model considering information transfer among individuals [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 151-157. |
[10] | SONG Yinghua, ZHANG Yue, MA Yaping, HUO Feizhou, DONG Qiancheng. Personnel evacuation model considering guiding role under artificial attack events [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(11): 140-145. |
[11] | HUANG Lidi, XU Xinxin, LIU Ying, ZHANG Qi, LUO Kaizhou, DONG Zhilong. Simulation and optimization of road network evacuation in communities for elderly people in Northeast China [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(7): 127-132. |
[12] | GAO Yang, WU Wentao, JIA Xiaoshan, XU Minghe. Research on flight conflict prediction method for non-cooperative large unmanned aerial vehicles [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 80-85. |
[13] | SONG Yinghua, TU Wenhao, HUO Feizhou, LYU Wei , FANG Danhui. Cellular automation model of pedestrian evacuation considering obstacle crossing behaviors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 74-79. |
[14] | LU Fei, TENG Jingjie, WU Jun, ZHANG Zhaoning, ZHANG Zonglu. Lateral collision dynamics of CSPRs paired approach under influence of wake vortex field [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 21-27. |
[15] | LU Fei, TENG Jingjie, WU Jun, ZHANG Zhaoning, ZHANG Zonglu. Lateral collision risk of CSPRs paired approach under wake impact [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2): 99-105. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||