Application of mine production system based on FRAM

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.06.1373

Abstract

Abstract:

A quantitative FRAM was proposed to solve the complex system problem caused by the interaction of human, organization and technology in the coal mine production system. Firstly, the FRAM method was improved, and the function variability probability was determined by the statistical results of accident investigation report data. The Apriori algorithm was used to mine the potential relationship between the data, so as to quantify the system variability. Then, with the coal mine production system as the research background, through the analysis of 96 cranes and a large coal mine accident investigation report and production characteristics, a coal mine production FRAM model with 14 functions was established. Finally, the improved FRAM method was used to find the nonlinear coupling resonance chain and its accident evolution path between functional modules of the coal mine production system. The results show that: the implementation of safety inspection before production is not in place, which has a bad impact on the system. The worse the scene performance conditions are, the more critical coupling is likely to occur, resulting in a resonance phenomenon.

Key words: coal mine production system, safety management, complex socio-technical system, association rules

GUO Jinping, MA Zhuoyuan, SUN Yinfeng, HAN Xinya. Application of mine production system based on FRAM[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(6): 73-79.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Tab.2

Scenario examples under different scenario performance conditions

场景	$S 1$	$S 2$	$S 3$	$S 4$
z₁	2	4	4	4
z₂	2	4	1	2
z₃	2	2	1	2
z₄	4	2	1	4
z₅	4	2	1	1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.5

References 22

[1]	ZHANG Jinjia, XU Kaili, RENIERS G, et al. Statistical analysis the characteristics of extraordinarily severe coal mine accidents (ESCMAs) in China from 1950 to 2018[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 133: 332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.014
[2]	LI Kaizhi, WANG Liguo, CHEN Xiangjun. An analysis of gas accidents in Chinese coal mines, 2009-2019[J]. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2022, 9: 1-10.
[3]	KUMAR P, GUPTA S, GUNDA Y R. Estimation of human error rate in underground coal mines through retrospective analysis of mining accident reports and some error reduction strategies[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 123:DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104555. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104555
[4]	FA Ziwei, LI Xinchun, QIU Zunxiang, et al. From correlation to causality: Path analysis of accident-causing factors in coal mines from the perspective of human, machinery, environment and management[J]. Resources Policy, 2021, 73(6):DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102157. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102157
[5]	沈中芹, 曾旺, 王瑞强, 等. 基于改进HFACS-MI模型的煤矿透水事故致因分析[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(3):178-184.
	SHEN Zhongqin, ZENG Wang, WANG Ruiqiang, et al. Cause analysis of water inrush accidents in coal mines based on improved HFACS-MI model[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 27(3):178-184.
[6]	CHENG Lianhua, GUO Huimin, LIN Haifei. Evolutionary model of coal mine safety system based on multi-agent modeling[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 147: 1193-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.046
[7]	VENKATASUBRAMANIAN V, LUO Y, ZHANG Z. Control of complex sociotechnical systems: importance of causal models and game theory[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 123:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.12.010
[8]	HOLLNAGEL E. FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method, modeling complex socio-technical systems[M]. London: CRC Press, 2012: 1-160.
[9]	STEEN R, FERREIRA P. Resilient flood-risk management at the municipal level through the lens of the functional resonance analysis model[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 204: DOI:1016/j.ress.2020.107150. doi: 1016/j.ress.2020.107150
[10]	FURNISS D, NELSON D, HABLI I, et al. Using FRAM to explore sources of performance variability in intravenous infusion administration in ICU: a non-normative approach to systems contradictions[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2020, 86:DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103113. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103113
[11]	尹德志, 帅斌, 黄文成, 等. Tropos-FRAM法在道路客运事故分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8):151-157. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.022
	YIN Dezhi, SHUAI Bin, HUANG Wencheng, et al. Application of Tropos-FRAM method in road passenger traffic accident analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(8):151-157. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.08.022
[12]	张玥, 帅斌, 黄文成, 等. 基于FRAM的铁路危险品运输事故演化机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2):171-176. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.027
	ZHANG Yue, SHUAI Bin, HUANG Wencheng, et al. Accident evolution mechanism of railway dangerous goods transportation based on FRAM[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2):171-176. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.027
[13]	甘旭升, 崔浩林, 吴亚荣. 基于功能共振事故模型的航空事故分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7):67-72.
	GAN Xusheng, CUI Haolin, WU Yarong. Analysis of aviation accident based on functional resonance accident model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(7):67-72.
[14]	QIAO Wanguan, LI Xinchun, LIU Quanlong. Systemic approaches to incident analysis in coal mines: comparison of the STAMP, FRAM and "2-4" models[J]. Resources Policy, 2019, 63:DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101453. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101453
[15]	PATRIARCA R, GRAVIO G D, COSTANTINO F. A Monte Carlo evolution of the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to assess performance variability in complex systems[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 91:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.016
[16]	PATRIARCA R, GRAVIO G D, COSTANTINO F, et al. The functional resonance analysis method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: a semi-quantitative approach[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2017, 63:72-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.12.002
[17]	KIM Y C, WAN C Y. Quantitative representation of the functional resonance analysis method for risk assessment[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 214: DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107745. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107745
[18]	HIROSE T, SAWARAGi T. Extended FRAM model based on cellular automaton to clarify complexity of socio-technical systems and improve their safety[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 123:DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104556. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104556
[19]	马军鹏, 段晓苏, 白晓航, 等. 基于灰色关联和Apriori算法的输气管道输差分析[J]. 石油管材与仪器, 2021, 7(5):90-93.
	MA Junpeng, DUAN Xiaosu, BAI Xiaohang, et al. Transimission difference analysis of gas pipeline baesd on grey correlation and Apriori algorithm[J]. Peroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments, 2021, 7(5):90-93.
[20]	况宇琦, 赵挺生, 蒋灵, 等. 塔式起重机事故案例关联规则挖掘与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7):137-142. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.019
	KUANG Yuqi, ZHAO Tingsheng, JIANG Ling, et al. Mining and analysis of association rules in tower crane accident cases[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7):137-142. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.019
[21]	陈述, 习俊博, 王建平, 等. 水电工程施工安全隐患关联规则挖掘[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8):75-82. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.011
	CHEN Shu, XI Junbo, WANG Jianping, et al. Mining association rules of near-misses of hydropower projects construction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8):75-82. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.011
[22]	LI Shuang, YOU Mengjie, LI Dingwei, et al. Identifying coal mine safety production risk factors by employing text mining and Bayesian network techniques[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 162:1067-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.054

编号	上下游功能	支持度	置信度	提升度	编号	下游	支持度	置信度	提升度
a₁	F₁→F₂	0.08	0.8	2.00	a₁₄	F₆→F₁₀	0.26	0.78	1.19
a₂	F₂→F₇	0.26	0.74	1.05	a₁₅	F₇→F₉	0.31	0.45	0.88
a₃	F₂→F₉	0.23	0.65	1.27	a₁₆	F₇→F₁₀	0.50	0.72	1.09
a₄	F₂→F₁₀	0.29	0.82	1.25	a₁₇	F₈→F₉	0.16	0.71	1.40
a₅	F₃→F₉	0.26	0.76	1.48	a₁₈	F₉→F₁₁	0.19	0.37	1.04
a₆	F₃→F₁₀	0.26	0.76	1.15	a₁₉	F₉→F₁₃	0.25	0.49	1.38
a₇	F₄→F₉	0.30	0.69	1.35	a₂₀	F₁₁→F₁₀	0.24	0.68	1.03
a₈	F₄→F₁₀	0.34	0.79	1.20	a₂₁	F₁₁→F₁₂	0.14	0.38	1.53
a₉	F₄→F₁₁	0.17	0.38	1.08	a₂₂	F₁₁→F₁₄	0.22	0.62	1.12
a₁₀	F₅→F₆	0.20	0.48	1.43	a₂₃	F₁₂→F₁₀	0.19	0.75	1.14
a₁₁	F₅→F₉	0.21	0.50	0.98	a₂₄	F₁₃→F₁₄	0.27	0.76	1.39

编号	上下游功能	支持度	置信度	提升度	编号	下游	支持度	置信度	提升度
a₁₂	F₅→F₁₀	0.29	0.70	1.07	a₂₅	F₁₄→F₁₀	0.43	0.77	1.18
a₁₃	F₅→F₁₄	0.25	0.60	1.09	a₂₆	F₁₄→F₁₂	0.20	0.36	1.43