China Safety Science Journal ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 173-180.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.09.2142
• Public safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
WEN Huiying(
), HUANG Kunhuo(
), ZHAO Sheng**(
)
Received:2023-03-13
Revised:2023-06-14
Online:2023-09-28
Published:2024-03-28
Contact:
ZHAO Sheng
WEN Huiying, HUANG Kunhuo, ZHAO Sheng. Prediction of rear-end collision risk of freeway trucks based on machine learning[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(9): 173-180.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.cssjj.com.cn/EN/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.09.2142
Tab.1
Pearson correlation test results for the characteristic variables
| 相关系数r | 交通量 pcu | 速度/ (m·s-1) | 加速度/ (m·s-2) | 车头间距/m | 车头时距/s | 交通密度 (pcu·m-1) | 车道 占有率 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均值 | 标准差 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 平均值 | 最小值 | 平均值 | 最小值 | |||||
| 交通量/pcu | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 速度/ (m·s-1) | 平均值 | -0.42 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 标准差 | -0.09 | -0.24 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 加速度/ (m·s-2) | 平均值 | -0.33 | -0.00 | 0.32 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 标准差 | 0.09 | -0.13 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 车头间 距/m | 平均值 | -0.44 | 0.65 | -0.05 | -0.03 | -0.07 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 最小值 | -0.56 | 0.60 | -0.09 | -0.01 | -0.09 | 0.62 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | |
| 车头时距 /s | 平均值 | 0.02 | -0.09 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.07 | 1.00 | — | — | — |
| 最小值 | -0.36 | 0.07 | -0.01 | -0.06 | -0.04 | 0.36 | 0.71 | -0.00 | 1.00 | — | — | |
| 交通密度(pcu·m-1) | 1.00 | -0.42 | -0.09 | -0.33 | 0.09 | -0.44 | -0.56 | 0.02 | -0.36 | 1.00 | — | |
| 车道占有率 | 0.97 | -0.39 | -0.17 | -0.41 | 0.05 | -0.42 | -0.51 | 0.02 | -0.32 | 0.97 | 1.00 | |
| 因变量 | ||||||||||||
| TTC | r | -0.13 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.15 | -0.01 | 0.07 | -0.13 | -0.12 |
| p | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Tab.5
Truck classification report
| 预测模型 分类报告 | RF模型 | SVM模型 | ANN模型 | 测试集样本 的总数量 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 精确度 | 召回率 | F1值 | 精确度 | 召回率 | F1值 | 精确度 | 召回率 | F1值 | ||
| 无冲突 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 139 |
| 严重冲突 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 121 |
| 一般冲突 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 121 |
| 准确率 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 381 | ||||||
| 宏平均值 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 381 |
| 加权平均值 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 381 |
| [1] |
张弛. 高速公路交通事故致因及预警[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2008.
|
|
|
|
| [2] |
吴芮. 基于BP神经网络的道路交通事故严重程度分析预测[D]. 成都: 西华大学, 2020.
|
|
|
|
| [3] |
何宇桐, 王勇, 朱西产. 基于道路交通事故深层调查的大型货车事故特征分析[J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2008(8):12-16.
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1 |
| [5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.01.011 |
| [6] |
王励旸. 我国道路交通事故影响因素统计回归分析[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2016.
|
|
|
|
| [7] |
黄西子, 黄淑萍. 高速道路追尾感知PC-Crash仿真与统计建模[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5):143-148.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.022 |
|
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.022 |
|
| [8] |
马壮林, 张宏璐, 杨杨. 高速公路追尾碰撞事故起数预测模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(4):58-62.
|
|
|
|
| [9] |
黎健侃, 李泽炜, 华汶雯, 等. 城市道路交通事故统计分析[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2021, 11(21):74-76.
|
| [10] |
杨文臣, 周燕宁, 田毕江, 等. 基于聚类分析和SVM的二级公路交通事故严重度预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5):163-169.
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.05.1263 |
|
doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.05.1263 |
|
| [11] |
李耘, 张生瑞, 茹渑博. 高速公路施工区车流跟驰追尾冲突风险[J]. 长安大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 37(2):81-88.
|
|
|
|
| [12] |
陆斯文, 张兰芳, 方守恩. 高速公路追尾机理概率分析及风险评价[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 39(8):1150-1154.
|
|
|
|
| [13] |
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.003 |
| [14] |
doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
朱顺应, 蒋若曦, 王红, 等. 机动车交通冲突技术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2) :15-33.
doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2020.02.002 |
|
doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2020.02.002 |
|
| [17] |
徐汉清. 高速公路典型区段交通冲突及安全性评价研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2013.
|
|
|
| [1] | Liu Changshi, Liu Tao, Ma Jingyi, Wang Feng, He Ming, Tang Ke. Routing for truck-drone collaborative distribution in epidemic areas: balancing risk and efficiency [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 260-269. |
| [2] | WU Fan, LAI Mimi, LI Mingyang. Influence mechanism of career resilience on safety performance of civil aviation pilots [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 1-8. |
| [3] | WANG Shuxian, YANG Yi, SHI Yulian, SHEN Yaxi. Prediction model of blasting fragmentation based on GA-QLightGBM quantile regression [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 163-171. |
| [4] | YU Zihao, ZHANG Yihai, TAN Mengxi, LI Jiang. Displacement prediction of open-pit mine slope based on optimized wavelet-LSTM method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 147-153. |
| [5] | ZANG Yanjie. Research on prediction method of coal spontaneous combustion degree based on IWOA-LightGBM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S1): 64-70. |
| [6] | DAI Mengfan, LI Lingzhi, QIAN Yuxin, YUAN Jingfeng, HAN Xiaojian, ZHAO Changhao. Decision-support model for safety evaluation of existing civil buildings and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 193-201. |
| [7] | QIN Yueping, TANG Fei, WANG Hairong, WANG Peng, GUO Mingyan, WANG Shibin. Prediction model and interpretability analysis of wind temperature in mine water-drenched shaft based on KOA-BiLSTM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(7): 40-47. |
| [8] | MA Fei, GUO Yaru, YANG Zhijie, ZHANG Yujie, MA Zhuanglin, XU Yufeng. Dynamic control for variable speed limit in merging zones considering rainfall intensity heterogeneity [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(7): 57-66. |
| [9] | YANG Fengzhan, GU Qinghua, LI Shaobo, YANG Jianchun. Multimodal fusion-based obstacle detection in low-visibility open-pit mines [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 195-203. |
| [10] | LIU Changshi, LIU Tao, LIU Guanghong, SUN Peng, LI Junyu, QIAO Rui. Dynamic path planning for truck-assault boat collaborative transportation in flood disaster scenario [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 204-212. |
| [11] | HU Liwei, LIU Bing, CHEN Chen, ZHANG Ruijie, HOU Zhi, HE Yu. Risk field model of freeway exit ramp weaving area [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(5): 213-220. |
| [12] | LIU Yadong, LIU Xian, HU Hesong, CHEN Hang, QIAO Shengfang. Analysis of feature importance to retaining wall deformation of excavation using interpretable machine learning model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 110-119. |
| [13] | LU Jiale, ZHANG Nian, NIU Mengmeng, WAN Fei. Hazard prediction model of tunnel water inrush based on stacking ensemble learning [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 137-144. |
| [14] | QI Yun, XUE Kailong, LI Xuping, WANG Wei, BAI Chenhao, JI Zhunze. Slope stability prediction model based on multi-strategy improved SSA for optimizing KELM [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(3): 92-98. |
| [15] | WANG Wei, CUI Xinchao, QI Yun, LI Xuping, WANG Huangrui, QI Qingjie. Improving SSA and optimizing BPNN for coal gas permeability prediction model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(2): 137-143. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||