Study on influence of initiation sequence on fragmentation of step rock and blasting vibration

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.02.0319

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the influence of initiation sequence on the crushing effect of open steps and the surrounding environment, the LS-DYNA simulation software was used to calculate the step blasting model under different initiation sequences. First, the physical and mechanical characteristics of the model under different initiation orders were analyzed. Then, the field test was conducted to verify the simulation results and study the influence of the initiation sequence on the blasting vibration strength and rock crushing degree. The results show that the stacking effect, which changes the stress wave, shows the breaking effect and blasting vibration strength. The hole-by-hole blasting technology can effectively reduce the blasting vibration so as to reduce the adverse effects on the surrounding environment, but the rock-crushing effect is not ideal; the rock passing rate is 81.52%. Compared with the hole-by-hole blasting, the passing rate of wave sequential blasting gravel is increased by 11.68%, and the amount of single-hole collapse is increased by 16.8% when the hole net parameter is increased to 3 m×7 m, which effectively reduces the explosive consumption and reduces the comprehensive cost. However, it produces a large blasting vibration strength, which needs to pay attention to the impact on the surrounding environment.

Key words: detonation sequence, bench blasting, fragmentation size, blasting vibration, numerical simulation

CLC Number:

X936

DUAN Jichao, ZONG Qi, WANG Haibo, WANG Hao. Study on influence of initiation sequence on fragmentation of step rock and blasting vibration[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(2): 192-199.

Figures/Tables 16

Tab.1

Sandstone HJC parameters

参数	取值	参数	取值	参数	取值	参数	取值
密度ρ₀/(kg·m^-3)	2 688	抗拉强度T/MPa	12.2	压力常数K₁/GPa	81	抗压强度f_c/MPa	157
特征化黏聚强度参数A	0.32	弹性极限压力P_c/MPa	51.33	压力常数K₂/GPa	-91	损伤常数D₁	0.041
压力强化参数B	1.76	弹性极限体积应变μ_c	2.76	压力常数K₃/GPa	89	损伤常数D₂	1.0
应变率敏感系数C	0.001 86	静水压力P_l/GPa	0.012	最小断裂应变ε_fmin/s^-1	0.01	剪切模量G/GPa	26.54
特征化最大强度 $S m a x$	7.0	塑性变形μ_l	0.012	压力硬化系数N	0.79	参考应变率 $ε ˙ 0$ /s^-1	1.0

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Tab.3

Fig.10

Fig.11

Tab.4

Tab.5

References 12

[1]	沈立晋, 刘颖, 汪旭光. 国内外露天矿山台阶爆破技术[J]. 工程爆破, 2004(2):54-58.
	SHEN Lijin, LIU Ying, WANG Xuguang. Bench blasting technology in open pit minesat home and abroad[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2004(2):54-58.
[2]	柯丽华, 陈魁香, 胡南燕, 等. 基于SNA的露天矿爆破安全风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10):48-56. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.2045
	KE Lihua, CHEN Kuixiang, HU Nanyan, et al. Safety risk assessment of blasting in open-pit mine based on SNA[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(10):48-56. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.10.2045
[3]	韩亮, 梁书锋, 刘殿书, 等. 深孔台阶爆破近区利用Anderson模型预测振动效应的修正方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(7):110-115.
	HAN Liang, LIANG Shufeng, LIU Dianshu, et al. Study on correction method of forecasting the effects of vibration using Anderson model in near field of deep hole bench blastin[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(7):110-115.
[4]	杨超. 露天矿山台阶深孔爆破大块成因及解决措施[J]. 工程爆破, 2019, 25(6):32-37,55.
	YANG Chao. Solved measures and causes of boulder in bench deep-hole blasting ofopen pit mines[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2019, 25(6): 32-37,55.
[5]	于江浩, 宋子岭. 逐孔起爆技术在露天煤矿深孔爆破中的应用[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 34(4):438-441.
	YU Jianghao, SONG Ziling. Application of deep hole blasting in open-pit coal mine with hole-by-hole blasting technique[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University:Natural Science, 2015, 34(4):438-441.
[6]	陈亚军, 蔺海洋, 董法, 等. 干旱区露天煤矿复杂岩体爆破技术方案设计研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2022, 39(1):200-205.
	CHEN Yajun, LIN Haiyang, DONG Fa, et al. Design of blasting technology for complex rockmassesin the arid openpit coal mine[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2022, 39(1):200-205.
[7]	陈运成, 谢守冬, 颜世留, 等. 露天超深孔大抵抗线爆破技术研究[J]. 爆破, 2023, 40(1):62-68.
	CHEN Yuncheng, XIE Shoudong, YAN Shiliu, et al. Open-pit blasting technology research on super deep hole and large resistance line[J]. Blasting, 2023, 40(1):62-68.
[8]	凌天龙, 吴帅峰, 刘殿书, 等. 砂岩Holmquist-Johnson-Cook模型参数确定[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(8):2211-2216.
	LING Tianlong, WU Shuifeng, LIU Dianshu, et al. Determination of Holmquist-Johnson-Cook model parameters for sandstone[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(8):2211-2216.
[9]	赵文博, 邓丽梅, 赵大凯, 等. 高应变率下花岗岩动态力学性能试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 爆破, 2022, 39(3):10-15.
	ZHAO Wenbo, DENG Limei, ZHAO Dakai, et al. Experimental research and numerical simulation on dynamic mechanical properties of granite under high strain rate[J]. Blasting, 2022, 39(3):10-15.
[10]	王志亮, 毕程程, 李鸿儒. 混凝土爆破损伤的SPH-FEM耦合法数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(6):1419-1428.
	WANG Zhiliang, BI Chengcheng, LI Hongru. Numerical simulation of blasting damage in concrete using a coupled SPH-FEM algorithm[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6):1419-1428.
[11]	魏晓刚, 麻凤海, 刘书贤. 爆破开采对采空区地面建筑抗震性能的影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(9):102-108.
	WEI Xiaogang, MA Fenghai, LIU Shuxian. Analysis of impact of blasting mining on seismic performance of ground buildings in coal mining area[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(9):102-108.
[12]	代树红, 王召, 王振伟, 等. 露天矿爆破地震波作用下框架建筑的安全性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(5):44-49.
	DAI Shuhong, WANG Zhao, WANG Zhenwei, et al. Study on safety of frame construction impacted by open-pit blasting seismic wave[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(5):44-49.

起爆方式	测点	测点位移/m	径向		切向		垂向
起爆方式	测点	测点位移/m	最大振速/ (cm·s^-1)	主频/ Hz	最大振速/ (cm·s^-1)	主频/ Hz	最大振速/ (cm·s^-1)	主频/ Hz
逐孔起爆	1	30	-25.796	17.700	-13.888	35.706	20.134	18.005
	2	60	-6.688	18.616	9.926	31.316	-10.72	37.537
	3	90	4.174	36.926	-3.232	37.537	4.334	37.231
奇偶式顺序起爆	1	30	-33.581	18.005	-15.233	19.836	-27.692	17.700
	2	60	-11.895	18.616	-13.460	18.92	-10.269	20.142
	3	90	-7.311	40.283	11.410	36.926	-6.354	19.531
波浪式顺序起爆	1	30	-35.708	49.4	30.475	18.005	-25.179	19.226
	2	60	-33.918	59.814	7.722	19.531	-15.416	19.836
	3	90	13.551	18.616	-10.365	21.362	12.408	18.616

起爆方式	孔网参数/m×m	占整体爆堆比例/%					单孔爆落矿量/t
起爆方式	孔网参数/m×m	≤ 250 mm	(250,300] mm	(300,350] mm	(350,400] mm	≥ 400 mm	单孔爆落矿量/t
逐孔起爆	3×6	81.52	3.94	7.51	2.26	4.76	572.4
波浪式顺序起爆		93.21	6.79	—	—	—
奇偶式顺序起爆		87.20	—	1.74	11.06	—

起爆方式	孔网参数/m×m	占整体爆堆比例/%					单孔爆落矿量/t
起爆方式	孔网参数/m×m	≤ 250 mm	(250,300] mm	(300,350] mm	(350,400] mm	≥ 400 mm	单孔爆落矿量/t
波浪式顺序起爆	3×7	80.33	5.33	1.74	10.9	1.70	667.8
奇偶式顺序起爆	3×7	73.6	8.56	2.22	5.66	9.96	667.8

[1]	Tan Luyao, Yao Yongzheng, Pan Aolan, Hu Maowei. Numerical simulation of hydrogen diffusion from hydrogen dispenser leakage [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 224-233.
[2]	WANG Jiyun, WANG Zichao, ZONG Ruowen, LIU Xuanya. Study on hazard characteristics and onset time of hazard escalation of leakage fires in diesel road tankers [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 194-202.
[3]	AN Xuexu, HU Zhiping, WANG Zhenlin, TIAN An'an, ZHANG Yonghui. Meso response mechanism of diorite under loading and unloading conditions [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(3): 221-228.
[4]	JIN Chenchen, DING Yong, LI Denghua. Equivalent permeation aperture identification method for geomembranes based on seepage-sensing structure [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 145-152.
[5]	SUN Wei, MENG Shuchi, DING Yonghong, SHI Anzhong. Comparative study on shear stress distribution characteristics of tension-dispersed anchors in rock support [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 103-109.
[6]	GUO Weiqiang, LAN Tianwei, LU Kaixiang, LI Zhu, YAO Xinyu, FENG Wei. Mechanism analysis of overburden rock damage law and disaster caused by sudden water surge of thick coal seams [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 110-117.
[7]	DU Wenxiu, YAN Lu. Stability of open-pit mining slope: a case study of Barun mine [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 196-202.
[8]	LI Lei, WU Di, YANG Guanding. Rheological properties and pipeline transportation of cemented waste rock backfill slurry [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 29-35.
[9]	LYU Jirui, CUI Ming, CAI Qingchi, ZHAO Yuanye, LI Qingwen. Influence of EPB construction sequence and soil chamber pressure on railway subgrade settlement [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 58-65.
[10]	WEN Jinglin, YIN Yongming, YU Zhengxing, WANG Yifan, LU Xin'ai. Force deformation and destructive features of mine slopes under varied conditions [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 66-72.
[11]	ZHANG Yu, ZHAO Meng, WANG Feiyu, WANG Ruixin. Study on distribution characteristics of wind flow in stopes of Haerwusu Open-Pit Coal Mine [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S1): 130-136.
[12]	CAO Weiping, XIAO Hannan, LUO Longping, LYU Pin, ZHAO Ming. On bracing mechanism and stability of two-row inclined-vertical retaining piles [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(6): 60-69.
[13]	LUAN Tingting, HUANG Jun, YANG Guoliang, REN Changxing, LYU Pengfei. Research progress on influencing factors of explosion limit and explosion pressure of mixed gases [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(6): 79-87.
[14]	WU Feiyang, CHEN Dongliang, YIN Caihong, LYU Tingwei, SHA Yanshan, CHEN Shibo. Study on medium conversion characteristics of tank boiling overflow process based on Fluent [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 158-164.
[15]	XUE Xilong, LI Jiale, WU Shuanjun, ZHANG Xiao, LIU Bin, ZHANG Qinli. Diffusion characteristics of blasting fumes in downward drift stope and determination of ventilation parameters [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 76-84.