中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 157-162.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.06.027

• 安全社会工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

7个标准中危险源的定义、内容和分类研究

傅贵 教授, 李亚   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-11 修回日期:2017-05-13 发布日期:2020-10-16
  • 作者简介:傅 贵 (1961—),男,吉林九台人,博士,教授,主要从事安全管理、行为安全、安全文化等方面的研究。E-mail:fugui66@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(51534008)。

Research on definition, content and classification of hazards in seven standards

FU Gui, LI Ya   

  1. School of Resource and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2017-03-11 Revised:2017-05-13 Published:2020-10-16

摘要: 为更有效地识别危险源和管理职业安全风险,有必要明确危险源的定义和内容。用对比分析的方法,梳理7个标准中危险源的定义及识别危险源时需要考虑的因素。借助分析结果,研究危险源的内容、分类及其与隐患的关系。结果表明:危险源的内容非常宽泛,有可能造成事故的因素或原因的能量、物质、人、人的行为、人所在组织、系统、空间等是危险源;危险源的分类严格依赖于分类所依据的事故致因模型,危险源和隐患的含义相同。

关键词: 危险源, 辨析, 事故致因, 行为, 隐患

Abstract: Both effective identification and management of occupational safety risks require an unambiguous definition and a complete description to the hazard. The comparative analysis method was used to comb the definitions of a hazard in 7 standards and the factors to be considered in identifying hazards. The results of the analysis were used to study the content, classification and the relationship between the hazard and the hidden danger. The results show that the contents of a hazard have a very wide range. Energy, materials, human, human behaviors, the organization of humans, system, space and so on,all of these might be hazard, its classification strictly relies on accidents causation models,and that the hazard and the hidden danger are identical in the meaning.

Key words: hazard, examination, accident causation, behavior, hidden danger

中图分类号: