危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.029

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 173-179.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.029

危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用

周荣义^1,2 副教授, 林金玉², 刘勇^1,2 讲师

1 湖南科技大学煤矿安全开采技术湖南省重点实验室,湖南湘潭 411201;
2 湖南科技大学资源环境与安全工程学院,湖南湘潭 411201

收稿日期:2018-10-19 修回日期:2018-12-10 出版日期:2019-01-28 发布日期:2020-11-23
作者简介:周荣义 (1973—),男,湖南汉寿人,硕士,副教授,主要从事危险货物道路运输安全、化工安全、系统安全工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:jackyzry@163.com。
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金资助(2017JJ2089);湖南省自然科学基金青年基金资助(2019JJ50152)。

A risk assessment model for hazmat road transportation based on set pair analysis and its application

ZHOU Rongyi^1,2, LIN Jinyu ², LIU Yong^1,2

1 Hunan Key Laboratory of Safe Mining Techniques for Coal Mines, Hunan University of Science & Technology, Xiangtan Hunan 411201, China;
2 School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering,Hunan University of Science & Technology, Xiangtan Hunan 411201, China

Received:2018-10-19 Revised:2018-12-10 Online:2019-01-28 Published:2020-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决现有危险货物道路运输风险评估方法的不足,在考虑危险货物道路运输风险的不确定性、随机性和动态性特征的基础上,建立基于区间层次分析法(IAHP)和集对分析法(SPA)的风险评估模型。首先给出危险货物道路运输风险评估模型及评估的基本步骤,根据危险品道路运输风险影响因素建立风险评估指标体系,利用区间层次分析法(IAHP)计算指标权重;然后采用SPA法研究危险品道路运输风险指标及其评估等级的同异反确定不确定特性,并利用联系度和集对势分析定量给出风险等级及风险因素的动态变化;最后以某企业近段的危险货物道路运输过程为例,利用所建模型评估风险并计算分析。结果表明:SPA可识别风险因素的变化趋势,风险评估结果与道路运输实际风险情况基本符合。

关键词: 区间层次分析法(IAHP), 集对分析法(SPA), 集对势, 危险货物, 道路运输, 风险评估

Abstract: The paper was aimed at overcoming the deficiencies of current risk assessment methods for hazmat road transportation. Typical characteristics of the risk in the transportation, including its uncertainty, randomness and dynamics,were examined. A novel risk assessment method for hazmat road transportation was worked out on the basis of both IAHP and SPA. A risk assessment model was built for this method and its calculation steps, being establishing a risk assessment index system according to the risk factors on hazmat road transportation, using IAHP to obtain the weights of assessment indexes, making a same-different-opposite analysis for the certainty-uncertainty system of hazmat road transportation, and studying the dynamic change of risk factors according to connection degree, were presented. The method was applied to assessment of risk in the recent hazmat road transportation of a certain enterprise taken as an example. The results show that the risk assessment grade is basically in accord with the reality, and that SPA can be used to assess the risk factors of hazmat road transportation and their change trends, which provides a solid foundation for the prevention and control of hazmat road transportation accidents.

Key words: interval analytic hierarchy process(IAHP), set pair analysis(SPA), set pair trend, hazardous materials, road transportation, risk assessment

中图分类号:

X951

周荣义, 林金玉, 刘勇. 危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 173-179.

ZHOU Rongyi, LIN Jinyu , LIU Yong. A risk assessment model for hazmat road transportation based on set pair analysis and its application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(1): 173-179.

参考文献

[1] “8·26” 包茂高速特大交通事故[OL].[2018-03-25].https://baike.so.com/doc/6980237-7202948.html.
[2] “7·19” 湖南高两车相速撞引发爆燃事件 [OL].[2018-03-26]. https://baike.so.com/doc/7890783-8164878.html.
[3] 2017年国内危化品管道输送与道路运输典型事故盘点！ [OL]. [2018-03-26]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/vxyG2plmYxykcGS9DNsOFQ.
[4] 刘海霞,徐明,唐璐.高速公路危险货物运输环境风险评价及防护应急对策[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2006, 13(2): 88-90.
LIU Haixia, XU Ming, TANG Lu. Environmental risk assessment of transporting dangerous articles on expressway and preventive and emergency countermeasures [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2006, 13(2): 88-90.
[5] 夏鹏飞,赵慕华,陆建.崇启大桥危化品运输风险分析及预防措施[J]. 交通标准化, 2011(10): 151-154.
XIA Pengfei, ZHAO Muhua, LU Jian. Risk analysis and preventive measures of dangerous chemicals transportation on Chongqi bridge [J]. Traffic Standardization, 2011(10): 151-154.
[6] 帅斌,黄丽霞. 危险货物运输风险评估研究动态[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(7): 50-56.
SHUAI Bin, HUANG Lixia. Developments in research on assessment of risk in hazardous materials transportation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(7): 50-56.
[7] 张锦荣,李平,王文璇. 液氯运输泄露事故扩散风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(7): 104-108.
ZHANG Jinrong, LI Ping, WANG Wenxuan. Analysis on diffusion risk of leakage accident for liquid chlorine in transportation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(7): 104-108.
[8] 任常兴,王婕,吕东,等. 易燃易爆危险货物道路运输风险指数评价法[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2012, 38(8): 17-19.
REN Changxing, WANG Jie, LYU Dong, et al. Study on the risk index assessment of flammable and explosive hazardous materials roadway transportation [J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2012, 38(8): 17-19.
[9] FABIANO B,CURR F,REVERBERI A P,et al. Dangerous good transportation by road: from risk analysis to emergency planning [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2005,18: 403-413.
[10] MARIA Francesca Milazzo, ROBERTO Lisi, GIUSEPPE Maschio, et al. A study of land transport of dangerous substances in Eastern Sicily [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2010,23: 393-403.
[11] 金国锋,黄智勇,王煊军. 液体推进剂公路运输泄露风险的模糊综合评价 [J].安全与环境学报, 2008, 8(3): 158-161.
JIN Guofeng, HUANG Zhiyong, WANG Xuanjun. An innovated fuzzy overall evaluation model for liquid-leakage risks in highway transportation [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2008, 8(3): 158-161.
[12] 刘越琪,肖心远,李怀俊,等. 基于层次分析和模糊综合评价法的危险品运输安全评价研究[J].广东交通职业技术学院学报,2011,10(4): 16-19.
LIU Yueqi, XIAO Xinyuan, LI Huaijun, et al. Research on the safety evaluation of dangerous goods transport based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, 2011,10(4): 16-19.
[13] 卢敏,张展羽,石月珍. 集对分析法在水安全评价中的应用研究[J]. 河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2006,34(5): 505-508.
LU Min, ZHANG Zhanyu, SHI Yuezhen. Application of set pair analysis to evaluation of water safety[J]. Journal of Hohai University:Natural Sciences,2006,34(5): 505-508.
[14] 赵克勤.集对分析及其初步应用(第3版)[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社, 2007: 8-10.
[15] 李同锁,何启林.集对分析在煤炭自然发火危险性评价上的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(8): 54-58.
LI Tongsuo, HE Qilin. Application of set pair analysis in the risk evaluation of coal spontaneous combustion [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(8): 54-58.
[16] 周毅,赵晓刚. 基于区间层次分析法的石油库防火防爆安全评价[J].中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(12): 58-63.
ZHOU Yi, ZHAO Xiaogang. Safety assessment for fire and explosion of petroleum depot based on IAHP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011,21(12): 58-63.
[17] TAN Chong, SONG Yi, CHE Heng. Application of set pair analysis method on occupational hazard of coal mining[J]. Safety Science, 2017,92: 10-16.

危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用

A risk assessment model for hazmat road transportation based on set pair analysis and its application

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘嘉豪, 余杨, 张振兴, 余建星, 王巍巍, 傅一钦. 二维云模型和贝叶斯网络的立管风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 147-154.
[2]	辛保泉, 喻健良, 党文义, 白永忠, 于安峰. 定量风险评估视域下的多组分混合物危险特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 80-85.
[3]	卢颖, 赵志攀, 姜学鹏, 吴锦东, 范小鹏. 大数据视域下体育场馆动态火灾风险指标研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 155-162.
[4]	鲁义, 伍江乐, 邵淑珍, 施式亮, 周荣义, 王伟. 基于贝叶斯网络的危化品道路运输事故推理模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 174-182.
[5]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[6]	张鸽. 基于累积接尘量的尘肺病风险评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 200-206.
[7]	韩鹏, 王军, 王启, 赵嶷飞. 基于飞行剖面的航空器试飞活动空管风险研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 149-156.
[8]	刘继川, 桂蕾. 城市公共安全风险评估与控制对策研究:以武汉市为例^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 164-171.
[9]	辛保泉, 党文义, 喻健良, 王溪舸, 闫兴清, 卢卫. 石化过程蒸气云爆炸抗爆设防荷载定量评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 113-118.
[10]	安宇, 李子琪, 王袆, 郭子萌, 张姜博南. 基于FBN的高校实验室不安全行为风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 160-167.
[11]	马润, 仇维斌 , 秦云, 欧红香. 模糊区间TOPSIS动车组塞拉门故障风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 177-183.
[12]	赵冬月, 陈长坤, 易亮. 灾害演化网络时序性风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 171-177.
[13]	鲁锦涛, 任利成, 戎丹, 郭昕曜. 基于灰色-物元模型的煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 99-105.
[14]	韩鹏, 张冰玉. 航迹误差对无人机坠地伤人风险评估的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 106-111.
[15]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.