危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.029

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 173-179.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.029

危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用

周荣义^1,2 副教授, 林金玉², 刘勇^1,2 讲师

1 湖南科技大学煤矿安全开采技术湖南省重点实验室,湖南湘潭 411201;
2 湖南科技大学资源环境与安全工程学院,湖南湘潭 411201

收稿日期:2018-10-19 修回日期:2018-12-10 出版日期:2019-01-28
作者简介:周荣义 (1973—),男,湖南汉寿人,硕士,副教授,主要从事危险货物道路运输安全、化工安全、系统安全工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:jackyzry@163.com。
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金资助(2017JJ2089);湖南省自然科学基金青年基金资助(2019JJ50152)。

A risk assessment model for hazmat road transportation based on set pair analysis and its application

ZHOU Rongyi^1,2, LIN Jinyu ², LIU Yong^1,2

1 Hunan Key Laboratory of Safe Mining Techniques for Coal Mines, Hunan University of Science & Technology, Xiangtan Hunan 411201, China;
2 School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering,Hunan University of Science & Technology, Xiangtan Hunan 411201, China

Received:2018-10-19 Revised:2018-12-10 Published:2019-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决现有危险货物道路运输风险评估方法的不足,在考虑危险货物道路运输风险的不确定性、随机性和动态性特征的基础上,建立基于区间层次分析法(IAHP)和集对分析法(SPA)的风险评估模型。首先给出危险货物道路运输风险评估模型及评估的基本步骤,根据危险品道路运输风险影响因素建立风险评估指标体系,利用区间层次分析法(IAHP)计算指标权重;然后采用SPA法研究危险品道路运输风险指标及其评估等级的同异反确定不确定特性,并利用联系度和集对势分析定量给出风险等级及风险因素的动态变化;最后以某企业近段的危险货物道路运输过程为例,利用所建模型评估风险并计算分析。结果表明:SPA可识别风险因素的变化趋势,风险评估结果与道路运输实际风险情况基本符合。

关键词: 区间层次分析法(IAHP), 集对分析法(SPA), 集对势, 危险货物, 道路运输, 风险评估

Abstract: The paper was aimed at overcoming the deficiencies of current risk assessment methods for hazmat road transportation. Typical characteristics of the risk in the transportation, including its uncertainty, randomness and dynamics,were examined. A novel risk assessment method for hazmat road transportation was worked out on the basis of both IAHP and SPA. A risk assessment model was built for this method and its calculation steps, being establishing a risk assessment index system according to the risk factors on hazmat road transportation, using IAHP to obtain the weights of assessment indexes, making a same-different-opposite analysis for the certainty-uncertainty system of hazmat road transportation, and studying the dynamic change of risk factors according to connection degree, were presented. The method was applied to assessment of risk in the recent hazmat road transportation of a certain enterprise taken as an example. The results show that the risk assessment grade is basically in accord with the reality, and that SPA can be used to assess the risk factors of hazmat road transportation and their change trends, which provides a solid foundation for the prevention and control of hazmat road transportation accidents.

Key words: interval analytic hierarchy process(IAHP), set pair analysis(SPA), set pair trend, hazardous materials, road transportation, risk assessment

中图分类号:

X951

周荣义, 林金玉, 刘勇. 危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 173-179.

ZHOU Rongyi, LIN Jinyu , LIU Yong. A risk assessment model for hazmat road transportation based on set pair analysis and its application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(1): 173-179.

参考文献

[1] “8·26” 包茂高速特大交通事故[OL].[2018-03-25].https://baike.so.com/doc/6980237-7202948.html.
[2] “7·19” 湖南高两车相速撞引发爆燃事件 [OL].[2018-03-26]. https://baike.so.com/doc/7890783-8164878.html.
[3] 2017年国内危化品管道输送与道路运输典型事故盘点！ [OL]. [2018-03-26]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/vxyG2plmYxykcGS9DNsOFQ.
[4] 刘海霞,徐明,唐璐.高速公路危险货物运输环境风险评价及防护应急对策[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2006, 13(2): 88-90.
LIU Haixia, XU Ming, TANG Lu. Environmental risk assessment of transporting dangerous articles on expressway and preventive and emergency countermeasures [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2006, 13(2): 88-90.
[5] 夏鹏飞,赵慕华,陆建.崇启大桥危化品运输风险分析及预防措施[J]. 交通标准化, 2011(10): 151-154.
XIA Pengfei, ZHAO Muhua, LU Jian. Risk analysis and preventive measures of dangerous chemicals transportation on Chongqi bridge [J]. Traffic Standardization, 2011(10): 151-154.
[6] 帅斌,黄丽霞. 危险货物运输风险评估研究动态[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(7): 50-56.
SHUAI Bin, HUANG Lixia. Developments in research on assessment of risk in hazardous materials transportation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(7): 50-56.
[7] 张锦荣,李平,王文璇. 液氯运输泄露事故扩散风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(7): 104-108.
ZHANG Jinrong, LI Ping, WANG Wenxuan. Analysis on diffusion risk of leakage accident for liquid chlorine in transportation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(7): 104-108.
[8] 任常兴,王婕,吕东,等. 易燃易爆危险货物道路运输风险指数评价法[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2012, 38(8): 17-19.
REN Changxing, WANG Jie, LYU Dong, et al. Study on the risk index assessment of flammable and explosive hazardous materials roadway transportation [J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2012, 38(8): 17-19.
[9] FABIANO B,CURR F,REVERBERI A P,et al. Dangerous good transportation by road: from risk analysis to emergency planning [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2005,18: 403-413.
[10] MARIA Francesca Milazzo, ROBERTO Lisi, GIUSEPPE Maschio, et al. A study of land transport of dangerous substances in Eastern Sicily [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2010,23: 393-403.
[11] 金国锋,黄智勇,王煊军. 液体推进剂公路运输泄露风险的模糊综合评价 [J].安全与环境学报, 2008, 8(3): 158-161.
JIN Guofeng, HUANG Zhiyong, WANG Xuanjun. An innovated fuzzy overall evaluation model for liquid-leakage risks in highway transportation [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2008, 8(3): 158-161.
[12] 刘越琪,肖心远,李怀俊,等. 基于层次分析和模糊综合评价法的危险品运输安全评价研究[J].广东交通职业技术学院学报,2011,10(4): 16-19.
LIU Yueqi, XIAO Xinyuan, LI Huaijun, et al. Research on the safety evaluation of dangerous goods transport based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal of Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, 2011,10(4): 16-19.
[13] 卢敏,张展羽,石月珍. 集对分析法在水安全评价中的应用研究[J]. 河海大学学报:自然科学版, 2006,34(5): 505-508.
LU Min, ZHANG Zhanyu, SHI Yuezhen. Application of set pair analysis to evaluation of water safety[J]. Journal of Hohai University:Natural Sciences,2006,34(5): 505-508.
[14] 赵克勤.集对分析及其初步应用(第3版)[M].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社, 2007: 8-10.
[15] 李同锁,何启林.集对分析在煤炭自然发火危险性评价上的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(8): 54-58.
LI Tongsuo, HE Qilin. Application of set pair analysis in the risk evaluation of coal spontaneous combustion [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(8): 54-58.
[16] 周毅,赵晓刚. 基于区间层次分析法的石油库防火防爆安全评价[J].中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(12): 58-63.
ZHOU Yi, ZHAO Xiaogang. Safety assessment for fire and explosion of petroleum depot based on IAHP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011,21(12): 58-63.
[17] TAN Chong, SONG Yi, CHE Heng. Application of set pair analysis method on occupational hazard of coal mining[J]. Safety Science, 2017,92: 10-16.

危险货物道路运输风险评估的集对模型及应用

A risk assessment model for hazmat road transportation based on set pair analysis and its application

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	齐庆杰, 刘英杰, 孙祚, 佟瑞鹏. 地震诱发煤矿次生灾害类型与评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 167-174.
[2]	陈娜, 胡毅彤, 袁英峰, 秦向南, 刘军. 基于博弈论组合赋权-云模型的消防员训练损伤风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(4): 232-238.
[3]	张术琳, 王澜凝, 鲁义. 基于动态贝叶斯网络的蒽醌法制备双氧水工艺风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 110-116.
[4]	佟瑞鹏, 胡向阳, 王乐瑶, 韩吉祥. 风险动物园(Ⅳ):基于复杂系统思维的风险隐喻事件识别与评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2): 53-59.
[5]	刘勇, 李肖, 施式亮, 鲁义, 王正武, 施星宇. 基于多项Logistic的危化品槽罐车火灾类型判别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 231-237.
[6]	李凤, 张来斌, 董绍华, 陈林, 张行. 基于EWM-AHP-云模型的站场法兰系统密封失效风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 150-156.
[7]	李新宏, 付雅倩, 刘亚洲, 韩子月, 张认认. 基于Copula-BN的海上船舶碰撞风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 204-213.
[8]	程瑞, 盘烨, 代军吉, 王涛, 解忠操. 公路路侧事故风险评估与路侧安全设计研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 214-226.
[9]	李思聪, 许涛. 药物粉尘的职业卫生风险评估与管理研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 219-230.
[10]	陈芳, 崔庆敏, 向千秋. 基于动态贝叶斯网络的民航空中停车事件安全风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 16-23.
[11]	张晖, 刘永杰, 吴超仲, 丁乃侃, 张琦, 肖逸影. 考虑行车安全事件严重程度和个体差异的驾驶行为风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 24-31.
[12]	杨校毅, 杨春雪, 朱俞臣, 杨雪松. 面向OSH的职业心理管控法律法规比较研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(5): 81-87.
[13]	南彦洲, 柯辉, 朱才华, 姚振兴, 李岩. 面向驾驶员心电数据的交叉口驾驶风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 185-193.
[14]	王轶宏, 翟越, 李艳, 屈璐. 城市燃气管网泄漏蒸气云爆炸事故风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 194-201.
[15]	柴获, 何瑞春, 韩伟, 贾晓燕, 代存杰. 带时间窗的危险货物车辆路径问题2阶段优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(12): 160-166.