耦合激励机制下多灾种综合风险评估方法

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.03.027

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 161-167.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.03.027

耦合激励机制下多灾种综合风险评估方法

王威^1,2 副研究员, 夏陈红^1,2, 马东辉^1,2 研究员, 苏经宇^1,2 研究员

1 北京工业大学建筑与城市规划学院,北京 100124;
2 北京工业大学抗震减灾研究所,北京 100124

收稿日期:2018-12-15 修回日期:2019-02-22 发布日期:2020-11-26
作者简介:王威(1981—),男,河南沈丘人,博士,副研究员,主要从事城乡安全与防灾减灾规划研究。E-mail:ieeww@bjut.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51678017);国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFD1100902);北京市教育委员会科技计划一般项目(KM201610005029)。

Multi-hazard comprehensive risk assessment based on coupling incentive mechanism

WANG Wei^1,2, XIA Chenhong^1,2, MA Donghui^1,2, SU Jingyu^1,2

1 College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2 Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2018-12-15 Revised:2019-02-22 Published:2020-11-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决区域多灾种综合风险评估中忽略多灾种间相互作用、对城市用地规划指导缺乏的问题,建立基于耦合激励机制的多灾种综合风险评估模型。以石家庄中心城区为研究对象,首先,利用地理信息系统(GIS)获取中心城区的地质、地震、火灾、洪水、内涝等典型灾害信息;然后,制定各单灾种之间的空间耦合激励规则;最后,利用有序分位加权集结算子评价多灾种的综合风险。结果表明:极高、高、中等、低、极低危险区的面积分别占26%、19%、31%、21%、3%;综合灾害危险性高的区域主要集中在滹沱河沿岸、重大危险源周边及石家庄断裂带区域,呈集群式分布特点;所得研究结果与实际情况高度吻合,激励模型能精确融合各灾种信息并克服众多不确定性问题,有效实现快速、灵活化的城市综合灾害风险的评估。

关键词: 多灾种风险, 地理信息系统(GIS), 耦合激励机制, 有序加权集结算子, 综合评价

Abstract: In order to solve the problems of neglecting the interaction between multiple disasters and lacking guidance for urban land use planning in regional comprehensive risk assessment of multiple disasters, a comprehensive risk assessment model was built for multiple disasters based on coupling incentive mechanism. The central area of Shijiazhuang city was taken as the research object. Firstly, GIS was used to obtain typical disaster information such as geology, earthquake, fire, flood, and waterlogging. Then, the spatial coupling incentive rules between disasters were constructed. Finally, the integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards was carried out by using the ordered weighted set of settlements. The results show that the areas of extremely high, high, medium, low and extremely low risk areas account for 26%, 19%, 31%, 21% and 3% respectively. Among them, the areas with high comprehensive disaster risks are mainly concentrated along Hutuo River, the periphery of major hazard sources and Shijiazhuang fault zone, which are distributed in clusters. The obtained research results are highly consistent with the actual situation, indicating that the incentive model can accurately integrate various disaster information and overcome many uncertain problems, thus effectively realizing rapid and flexible comprehensive disaster risk assessment for cities.

Key words: multi-hazard risk, geographic information system(GIS), coupling incentive mechanism, ordered weighted aggregation operator, comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

X913.4

王威, 夏陈红, 马东辉, 苏经宇. 耦合激励机制下多灾种综合风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 161-167.

WANG Wei, XIA Chenhong, MA Donghui, SU Jingyu. Multi-hazard comprehensive risk assessment based on coupling incentive mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(3): 161-167.

参考文献

[1] 王威,苏经宇,马东辉,等. 复杂灾害系统风险综合评价的非线性信息动力学模型[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2013,43(1): 71-78.
WANG Wei, SU Jingyu, MA Donghui, et al. Integrated risk assessment of complex disaster system based on a non-linear information dynamics model[J]. Science China: Technology Science, 2013,43(1): 71-78.
[2] International Council of Scientific Unions. A science plan for integrated research on disaster risk: addressing the challenge of natural and human-induced environmental hazards[R], 2008.
[3] 王威,田杰,王志涛,等. 城市综合承灾能力评价的分形模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(5): 171-176.
WANG Wei, TIAN Jie, WANG Zhitao, et al. Fractal model for evaluating urban comprehensive disaster-carrying capability[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2011,21(5): 171-176.
[4] ARMENAKIS C, NIRUPAMA N. Prioritization of disaster risk in a community using GIS [J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 66(1): 15-29.
[5] REMO JONATHAN W F,PINTER R N. Hazus-MH earthquake modeling in the central USA [J]. Natural Hazards, 2012,63(2): 1 055-1 081.
[6] THIERRY P, STIELTJES L, KOUOKAM E, et al. Multi-hazard risk mapping and assessment on an active volcano: the GRINP project at mount cameroon [J]. Natural Hazards, 2008, 45(3): 429-456.
[7] 高庆华. 中国自然灾害风险与区域安全性分析[M]. 北京:气象出版社, 2005: 80-171.
[8] 倪晓娇,南颖,朱卫红,等.基于多灾种自然灾害风险的长白山地区生态安全综合评价[J].地理研究,2014,33(7): 1 348-1 360.
NI Xiaojiao, NAN Ying, ZHU Weihong, et al. Study on comprehensive assessment of ecological security in Changbai mountain region based on multi-hazard natural disasters risk [J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33 (7): 1 348-1 360.
[9] 冯浩,张方,戴慎志. 综合防灾规划灾害风险评估方法体系研究[J].现代城市研究,2017(8): 93-98.
FENG Hao, ZHANG Fang, DAI Shenzhi. The research on the method system of risk assessment in multi-hazard mitigation plan [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2017(8): 93-98.
[10] DELUCA C, BALAJI V. The earth system modeling framework [J].Springerbriefs in Earth System Sciences, 2013, 6(1):43-54.
[11] WESTEN V C, KAPPES M S, LUNA B Q, et al. Medium-scale multi-hazard risk assessment of gravitational processes [J]. Natural Hazards, 2013,34(1): 201-231.
[12] 卢颖,郭良杰,侯云玥,等.多灾种耦合综合风险评估方法在城市用地规划中的应用[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2015,49(3): 538-546.
LU Ying, GUO Liangjie, HOU Yunyue, et al. Comprehensive multi-disaster risk assessment method applicated in urban land-use planning [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Engineering Science, 2015,49 (3): 538-546.
[13] 盖程程,翁文国,袁宏永.基于GIS的多灾种耦合综合风险评估[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2011,51(5): 627 -631.
GAI Chengcheng, WENG Wenguo, YUAN Hongyong. Multi-hazard risk assessment using GIS in urban areas [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science and Technology,2011,51(5): 627-631.
[14] 王述红,张泽,侯文帅,等.综合管廊多灾种耦合致灾风险评价方法[J].东北大学学报:自然科学版,2018, 39(6): 902-906.
WANG Shuhong, ZHANG Ze, HOU Wenshuai, et al. Risk assessment method on multi-disaster coupled hazard for urban utility tunnel [J]. Journal of Northeastern University: Natural Science, 2018, 39(6): 902-906.
[15] 李伟伟,易平涛,郭亚军.有序分位加权集结算子及在激励评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2017, 37(2): 452-459.
LI Weiwei, YI Pingtao, GUO Yajun. Ordered fractile weighted aggregation operators and the application in incentive evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017,37(2): 452-459.

耦合激励机制下多灾种综合风险评估方法

Multi-hazard comprehensive risk assessment based on coupling incentive mechanism

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊钰, 孔德中, 杨胜利, 吴桂义, 左宇军, 程占博. 大倾角工作面煤壁稳定性的云模型综合辨识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 144-151.
[2]	龙腾腾, 殷继艳, 欧朝蓉, 杨强, 李勇, 王秋华. 云南省森林火灾风险综合评价及空间格局研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 167-173.
[3]	吴维讲师, 罗欣然, 魏明. 基于SD模型的跑道侵入风控网络脆弱性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 41-48.
[4]	杨天姿, 王铁骊, 彭恒明, 段海林. 小微企业生产安全事故应急脆弱性评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[5]	姜涛, 张玉龙, 李士博, 李政, 邱海良. 大型多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 102-108.
[6]	朱冠吉, 刘迪, 孙强, 周子超. 铁路机车驾驶员职业安全适应性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 64-70.
[7]	贾宝峰, 阎美好. 铁路快运货物安全预警系统研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 121-127.
[8]	杨越, 黄贻刚, 宋祥波, 王建忠. 基于运行数据的管制员工作效能测评方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 8-14.
[9]	宋英华, 张哲, 方丹辉. 城市洪涝下承灾体暴露性及行人失稳风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 105-111.
[10]	周俊. 铁路客运站客流安全态势评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 126-133.
[11]	李程睿, 赵明, 尹盼盼, 刘美池, 马乐陶. 高速铁路客运站安全评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 149-153.
[12]	刘文斌, 李聪旭, 魏小娟, 熊维平, 王虎. GIS技术在铁路应急救援智能决策中的应用研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 195-200.
[13]	王永刚, 张迪, 刘晓璐. 航空安全员安全保障能力评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 10-16.
[14]	雷云, 余建星, 吴朝晖, 陈海成, 刘俊雄. 基于模糊ANP的海底管道失效风险综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 178-184.
[15]	刘美池, 尹盼盼, 荣文竽. 基于模糊模式识别的高铁快运安全综合评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 149-154.