含瓦斯腔体及内置ABC干粉对瓦斯爆炸影响研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.016

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 102-108.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.016

含瓦斯腔体及内置ABC干粉对瓦斯爆炸影响研究

黄强^1,2, 穆朝民^1,2 教授, 周辉^1,2, 李重情^1,2 副教授, 时本军^1,2, 王金来^1,2

1.安徽理工大学能源与安全学院,安徽淮南 232001;
2.煤矿安全高效开采省部共建教育部重点试验室,安徽淮南 232001

收稿日期:2019-12-24 修回日期:2020-02-26 出版日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2021-01-26
作者简介:黄强(1994—),男,安徽淮南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为安全防护工程。E-mail:2608700294@qq.com。
基金资助:
安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2017A092);2019年研究生创新基金资助(2019CX2009)。

Effect of gas-containing cavity and its built-in ABC dry powder on gas explosion

HUANG Qiang^1,2, MU Chaomin^1,2, ZHOU Hui^1,2, LI Zhongqing^1,2, Shi Benjun^1,2, WANG Jinlai^1,2

1. School of Energy Resources and Safety, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Safe and Efficient Coal Mining Constructed by Anhui Province and Ministry of Education, Huainan Anhui 232001, China

Received:2019-12-24 Revised:2020-02-26 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2021-01-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索一种瓦斯泄漏至硐室结构后发生爆炸的抑制方法,自行搭建管径为200 mm、总长为 17 500 mm 并含500 mm×500 mm×200 mm(长×宽×高)腔体的大型圆管爆炸试验系统,测试该尺寸腔体内含瓦斯和其内置ABC干粉的抑爆效果;利用数值模拟方法,分析上述尺寸腔体内含瓦斯时的爆炸传播特征。结果表明:无瓦斯腔体结构对瓦斯爆炸有较好抑制效果,而含瓦斯腔体结构则相反,其腔体后较腔体前爆炸火焰及冲击波峰值超压分别增大1.68倍和1.45倍;含瓦斯腔体结构内置ABC干粉量分别为400和300 g时,腔体后较腔体前的爆炸火焰大小及冲击波峰值超压由增加变为减小,当内置ABC干粉量为600 g时,火焰及冲击波抑制率较无内置ABC干粉时抑制率分别提高108.4%和77.46%。

关键词: 瓦斯爆炸, 冲击波, 火焰, ABC干粉, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to explore a method for explosion suppression after gas leakage into chamber structure, a large-scale round tube explosion test system, 200 mm wide and 17 500 mm long with a 500 mm×500 mm×200 mm (length×width×height) cavity, was built. Then, explosion suppression effect of gas-containing cavity and its ABC dry powder was tested. And explosion propagation characteristics in the above-mentioned cavity was analyzed with numerical simulation. The results show that while gas-free cavity structure has a better suppression effect on gas explosion, gas-containing cavity structure is the opposite, and explosion flame and shock wave peak overpressure in the back of it increase by 1.68 and 1.45 times respectively compared to its front. When mass of ABC dry powder in gas-containing cavity structure is 400 g and 300 g, explosion flame and shock wave peak overpressure in its back change from increase to decrease compared to its front. When dry power is 600 g, suppression rates of flame and shock wave are increase by 108.4% and 77.46% respectively compared to those without ABC dry powder.

Key words: gas explosion, shock wave, flame, ABC dry powder, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

X932

黄强, 穆朝民, 周辉, 李重情, 时本军, 王金来. 含瓦斯腔体及内置ABC干粉对瓦斯爆炸影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 102-108.

HUANG Qiang, MU Chaomin, ZHOU Hui, LI Zhongqing, Shi Benjun, WANG Jinlai. Effect of gas-containing cavity and its built-in ABC dry powder on gas explosion[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3): 102-108.

参考文献

[1] FAIRWEATHER M, HARGRAVE G K, IBRAHIM S S, et al. Studies of premixed flame propagation in explosion tubes[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 116(4): 504-518.
[2] HELMUTH S, ALBERT, NIU D W. A new dimension in coal mine safety:explospot, active explosion suppression technology[J]. Procedia Engineering,2011,26(10): 2 191-2 198.
[3] SHAO Hao, JIANG Shuguang, HE Xinjian, et al. Numerical analysis of factors influencing explosion suppression of a vacuum chamber[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 45:255-263.
[4] SHAO Hao, JIANG Shuguang, WU Zhengyan, et al. Influence of vacuum degree on the effect of gas explosion suppression by vacuum chamber[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 38:214-223.
[5] SHAO Hao, JIANG Shuguang, LI Qinhua, et al. Suppression of gas explosion using vacuum chamber at different break-up times of diaphragm[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 31:1-9.
[6] BUNDY M, HAMINS A, LEE K Y. Suppression limits of low strain rate non-premixed methane flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 133(3): 299-310.
[7] SALZANO E, MARRA F S, RUSSO G, et al. Numerical simulation of turbulent gas flames in tubes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2002, 95(3): 233-247.
[8] 李重情,穆朝民,许登科,等.空腔长度对瓦斯爆炸冲击波传播影响研究 [J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2018,35(6): 1 293-1 300.
LI Chongqing, MU Chaomin, XU Dengke, et al. Influence of cavity length on shock wave propagation of gas explosion [J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2018, 35 (6): 1 293-1 300.
[9] 赵凯,高光发,王肖钧.柱壳结构抗冲击性能量纲分析与数值模拟研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2014,33(11):12-16.
ZHAO Kai, GAO Guangfa, WANG Xiaojun. Dimensional analysis and numerical simulation for impact-resistance performance of cylindrical shell structures [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(11):12-16.
[10] 程方明,邓军,罗振敏,等.硅藻土粉体抑制瓦斯爆炸的实验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2010,27(4):604-607.
CHENG Fangming, DENG Jun, LUO Zhenmin, et al. Experimental study on inhibiting gas explosion using diatomite powder [J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2010, 27 (4): 604-607.
[11] 文虎,王秋红,邓军,等.超细Al(OH)₃粉体浓度对甲烷爆炸压力的影响[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(11): 1 479-1 482.
WEN Hu, WANG Qiuhong, DENG Jun, et al. Effect of the concentration of Al(OH)₃ ultrafine powder on the pressure of methane explosion [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34 (11): 1 479-1 482.
[12] 张涛,刘土光,肖汉林,等.高速冲击下薄壁组合结构吸能特性研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击,2006,26(5):395-403.
ZHANG Tao, LIU Tuguang, XIAO Hanlin, et al. Energy absorption performance of thin-walled structures with triggering holes subjected to high-speed axial impact [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006,26(5):395-403.
[13] YE Q, LIN B Q, JIAN C G, et al. Propagation characteristics of gas explosion in duct with sharp change of cross sections[J]. Disaster Advances, 2012, 5(4): 999-1 003.
[14] 宫广东, 刘庆明, 白春华. 管道中瓦斯爆炸特性的数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2010,31(增1):17-21.
GONG Guangdong, LIU Qingming, BAI Chunhua. Numerical simulation for gas explosion in tubes [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2010,31(S1): 17-21.
[15] 王雪. 腔体内置水、粉对瓦斯爆炸冲击波消减机制数值模拟研究[D]. 淮南:安徽理工大学,2019.
WANG Xue. Numerical simulation of shock wave reduction mechanism in water and powder built in cavity [D]. Huainan:Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2019.
[16] 周辉,穆朝民,刘伟,等.空腔体长度对抑制瓦斯爆炸性能的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2019,29(9):107-112.
ZHOU Hui, MU Chaomin, LIU Wei, et al. Influence of cavity length on gas explosion suppression [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29 (9): 107-112.

含瓦斯腔体及内置ABC干粉对瓦斯爆炸影响研究

Effect of gas-containing cavity and its built-in ABC dry powder on gas explosion

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李刚, 刘海振, 杨庆贺, 牛伟锋. 带压开采煤层底板破坏特征与突水风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 68-76.
[2]	郑艾辰, 向晋扬, 黄锋, 金成昊, 刘星辰. 空洞对隧道结构安全影响试验与模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 119-126.
[3]	游波, 毛聪, 施式亮, 刘何清, 鲁义, 李敏. 矿用通风服微空间环境变化特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 185-193.
[4]	成连华, 郭阿娟, 郭慧敏, 曹东强. 煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险耦合演化路径研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 59-64.
[5]	孙玉佳. 基于大涡模拟的油池火焰瞬态辐射传热研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 65-71.
[6]	冯巩, 夏元友, 王智德, 严敏嘉. 基于位移信息融合的露天矿边坡动态预警方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 116-122.
[7]	姜桦, 刘长春, 黄林远, 吴鹏志, 邓天刁. 含水雾横向风作用下双喷口射流扩散火焰特性^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 157-163.
[8]	鲁义, 杨帆, 刘欢, 陈健, 王金鹏, 李文辉. 气凝胶消防救援服内衬的热阻计算^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 201-207.
[9]	袁必和, 张玉铎, 员亚龙, 黄楚原, 陈先锋, 陈公轻. 多孔聚丙烯复合材料的抑爆性能研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 91-96.
[10]	张钧祥, 刘彦伟, 任培良, 韩红凯, 左伟芹. 基于蠕变效应的穿层钻孔封孔参数优化与试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 97-104.
[11]	丁厚成, 连志虚, 邓权龙, 蒋仲安, 杨利炜, 葛梦圆. 振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 106-112.
[12]	荆德吉, 贾鑫, 张天, 孟祥曦, 马明星, 王志恒. 落煤过程中涡旋吹吸式除尘技术数值模拟及试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 121-127.
[13]	李继超, 郭聖煜, 孔刘林, 原毅璨, 孙阳. 施工现场火焰检测和预警机器人设计及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 141-146.
[14]	邢朝亮, 黄咸家, 何乐, 祝赫, 郑泽铭. 火焰撞击障碍物形成的溢流火焰融合行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 171-176.
[15]	王磊. 球形障碍物对瓦斯爆燃火焰影响试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 54-59.