隧道至互通小间距路段车辆换道博弈行为研究*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.010

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 68-75.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.010

隧道至互通小间距路段车辆换道博弈行为研究^*

尚婷¹ 副教授, 吴鹏¹, 唐伯明² 教授, 白婧荣², 周亮宇¹

1 重庆交通大学交通运输学院,重庆 400074;
2 重庆交通大学土木工程学院,重庆 400074

收稿日期:2021-07-02 修回日期:2021-09-16 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2022-04-28
作者简介:尚婷 (1983—),女,重庆人,博士,副教授,主要从事道路交通安全、驾驶行为特性、公路景观与文化等方面的研究。E-mail:335304854@qq.com。
基金资助:
重庆市科技局基础与前沿面上项目(cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0695);重庆市教育委员会青年科技项目(KJQN201900722);重庆市中小学创新人才培养工程项目计划(CY200704);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB20181)。

Study on lane-changing game behavior of vehicles in small spacing section between tunnel and interchange

SHANG Ting¹, WU Peng¹, TANG Boming², BAI Jingrong², ZHOU Liangyu¹

1 School of Traffic & Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China;
2 School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, China

Received:2021-07-02 Revised:2021-09-16 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2022-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为定量研究山区高速公路隧道至互通式立交出口小间距路段车辆强制性换道行为,提出符合强制换道行为特性的换道博弈模型。首先,分析匝车辆的换道流程以及换道决策特性;然后,考虑驾驶风格因素对换道行为的影响,引入不完全信息动态博弈理论,建立出匝车辆与目标车道后随车辆交互的换道博弈模型,在考虑换道博弈过程中博弈主体时间性以及安全性收益的基础上,建立换道博弈收益矩阵,并求得混同于强制换道策略的精炼贝叶斯均衡;最后,通过Netlogo仿真平台验证换道博弈模型有效性。研究结果表明:不同驾驶风格出匝车辆驾驶人强制换道、目标车道后方车辆驾驶人减速让行是最优换道策略;不同驾驶风格驾驶人换道完成点距互通出口的距离有显著差异,激进型驾驶人换道完成点距出口的距离普遍大于谨慎型驾驶人。

关键词: 隧道至互通, 小间距, 驾驶行为, 强制换道, 信号博弈

Abstract: In order to quantitatively study mandatory lane-changing behavior of vehicles in a small section between mountainous expressway tunnel and interchange exit, a game model was proposed in conformity with characteristics of mandatory lane-changing behaviors. Firstly, lane-changing process of off-ramp vehicles and characteristics of such a decision were analyzed. Secondly, considering influences of driving style on such behaviors, a game model was put forward between these vehicles and following ones on target lanes by using dynamic game theories of incomplete information, and a game payoff matrix was established in consideration of the time and security benefits of game players. Then, refining Bayesian Nash equilibrium under forced lane-changing strategy was calculated. Finally, the validity of lane-changing game model was verified through Netlogo simulation platform. The results show that the optimal lane-changing strategy is that off-ramp vehicles, in spite of different driving styles, should choose forced lane change, while those following ones on target lanes should slow down to give way to them. Drivers with different styles vary significantly in terms of distance between lane-changing completion point and interchange exit, and that distance for aggressive drivers is generally greater than that for cautious ones.

Key words: tunnel to interchange, small spacing, driving behavior, mandatory lane-changing, signal game

中图分类号:

X910

尚婷, 吴鹏, 唐伯明, 白婧荣, 周亮宇. 隧道至互通小间距路段车辆换道博弈行为研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 68-75.

SHANG Ting, WU Peng, TANG Boming, BAI Jingrong, ZHOU Liangyu. Study on lane-changing game behavior of vehicles in small spacing section between tunnel and interchange[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 68-75.

参考文献

[1] 李涵. 高速公路互通立交分流区交通冲突预测模型[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2017.
LI Han. Prediction model of traffic conflict in diverging area on expressway[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2017.
[2] 杨晓芳, 张盛, 付强. 基于博弈论的完全信息下的驾驶行为研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2015,32(7):105-111.
YANG Xiaofang, ZHANG Sheng, FU Qiang. Research of driving behavior under condition of complete information based on game theory[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2015,32(7):105-111.
[3] 李梦琦, 张敬磊. 考虑愤怒情绪的驾驶员换道行为博弈分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020,30(2):165-170.
LI Mengqi, ZHANG Jinglei. Game analysis of car drivers' lane-changing behaviors considering angry feelings[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(2):165-170.
[4] 陈慧, 王洁新. 基于驾驶人不满度的高速公路自动驾驶换道决策[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019,32(12):1-9,45.
CHEN Hui, WANG Jiexin. A decision-making method for lane changes of automated vehicles on freeways based on drivers' dissatisfaction[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019,32(12):1-9,45.
[5] HIDAS P. Modelling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2002,10(5):351-371.
[6] TALEBPOUR A, MAHMASSANI H S, HAMDAR S H. Modeling lane-changeing behavior in a connected environment: a game theory approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015,59:216-232.
[7] XIE Dongfan, FANG Zhezhe, JIA Bin, et.al. A data-driven lane-changing model based on deep learning[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2019,106:41-60.
[8] 乔建刚, 李瑞, 周荣贵. 高速公路小客车驾驶员变道行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015,25(11):92-98.
QIAO Jian'gang, LI Rui, ZHOU Ronggui. Study on freeway car driver lane change behavior[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015,25(11):92-98.
[9] 彭金栓, 付锐, 石磊磊. 驾驶人车道变换决策分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2011, 33(12):46-50.
PENG Jinshuan, FU Rui, SHI Leilei. Research of driver's lane change decision making mechanism[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2011, 33(12):46-50.
[10] JTG D20—2017, 公路路线设计规范[S].
JTG D20—2017, Design specification for highway alignment[S].
[11] 赵一飞, 陈敏, 潘兵宏. 隧道与互通式立交出口最小间距需求分析[J]. 长安大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,31(5):69-71.
ZHAO Yifei, CHEN Min, PAN Binghong. Minimum spacing demand analysis between tunnel and exit of interchange[J]. Journal of Chang'an University:Natural Science Edition,2011,31(5):69-71.
[12] 姚晶. 主线分合流与隧道及主线出入口最小间距研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2017.
YAO Jing. Research on minimum spacing between the mainline shunt or confluence and the tunnel or the main access[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2017.
[13] 崔洪军, 马新卫, 李霞,等. 高速公路出口前置指示标志安全距离计算模型[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33(4):120-126.
CUI Hongjun, MA Xinwei, LI Xia, et al. A model for calculating advance guide signs reasonable setting location at expressway exit[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33(4):120-126.
[14] 薛春铭, 谭国真, 丁男,等. 基于博弈论的人类驾驶与无人驾驶协作换道模型[J]. 计算机工程, 2017, 43(12):261-266.
XUE Chunming, TAN Guozhen, DING Nan, et al. Cooperative lane-changing model of human driving and unmanned driving based on game theory[J]. Computer Engineeing, 2017, 43(12):261-266.
[15] 许伦辉, 倪艳明, 罗强,等. 基于最小安全距离的车辆换道模型研究[J]. 广西师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,29(4):1-6.
XU Lunhui. NI Yanming, LUO Qiang, et al. Lane-changing model based on minimum safety distance[J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University:Natura Science Edition, 2011,29(4):1-6.
[16] 范如国, 韩民春. 博弈论[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006:308-340.
[17] 刘通, 付锐, 张名芳,等. 融合K-means与高斯混合模型的驾驶风格聚类研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12):40-45.
LIU Tong, FU Rui, ZHANG Mingfang. Study on driving style clustering based on K-means and Gaussian mixture model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(12):20-25.
[18] 史雪莹, 孙智诚, 朱彤. 基于异质性驾驶行为与碰撞的中观交通流仿真[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9):64-69.
SHI Xueying, SUN Zhicheng, ZHU Tong. Mesoscopic traffic flow simulation based on heterogeneous driving behaviors and collision[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(9):64-69.

隧道至互通小间距路段车辆换道博弈行为研究^*

Study on lane-changing game behavior of vehicles in small spacing section between tunnel and interchange

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	秦雅琴, 李秋谷, 赵鹏燕, 宝发旺, 谢济铭. 基于多分类Adaboost算法的驾驶人风险感知倾向研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 141-147.
[2]	赵小平, 马有才, 万平, 莫振龙. 情绪对新手驾驶员视觉特性的影响研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 34-40.
[3]	郭子慧, 郭伟伟, 谭墍元. 驾驶员接管自动驾驶车辆的眼动特性和行为分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 65-71.
[4]	史雪莹, 孙智诚, 朱彤. 基于异质性驾驶行为与碰撞的中观交通流仿真[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 64-69.
[5]	刘玲莉, 田东东, 王子越. 私家车驾驶员驾驶行为与人格特质的关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 13-18.
[6]	吕爱红, 马勇, 李腾飞, 张雅丽. 认知分心时驾驶人应激反应特征分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 7-12.
[7]	楚文慧, 吴超仲, 张晖, 杨曼, 李思瑶. 基于个性化行为模型的驾驶疲劳识别方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 43-48.
[8]	林庆丰, 邓院昌, 张圆, 史晨军. 公交驾驶员驾驶愤怒量表的编制及初步应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 49-54.
[9]	张殿业, 程静, 张艺. 情绪对驾驶行为影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 19-24.
[10]	孙一帆, 张敬磊, 王丝丝. 因子分析与多层神经网络组合的酒驾辨识模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(7): 127-132.
[11]	吕能超, 任泽远, 段至诚, 罗毅. Near-crash事件中驾驶人行为特征分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 19-24.
[12]	刘通, 付锐, 张士伟, 邓明阳. 车辆典型危险行驶状态识别与检测研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 32-37.
[13]	张卫华, 胡喆, 冯忠祥, 王锟, 张旭欣, 刘晓峰. 低能见度环境中驾驶人危险驾驶行为影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 13-18.
[14]	刘清，李胜，?煨±?. 船员视觉特征与疲劳驾驶行为的关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 20-.
[15]	郭洪洋，韩雪松，刘澜，马亚峰. 驾驶员交通安全行为可靠性风险度量研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 103-.