安全文化定量分析系统的研发与应用*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.1918

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 29-36.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.1918

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

安全文化定量分析系统的研发与应用*

时照¹(), 傅贵¹, 解学才²^,³, 童文清⁴, 袁晨辉¹, 陈奕燃¹

¹ 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083
² 清华大学工程物理系,北京 100084
³ 清华大学公共安全研究院,北京 100084
⁴ 深圳市龙岗区应急管理局,广东深圳 518172

收稿日期:2022-02-15 修回日期:2022-05-27 出版日期:2022-09-05 发布日期:2023-02-28
作者简介:
时照 (1996—),女,山东泰安人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全文化、事故致因理论、行为安全、安全管理。E-mail: shizhao.miyad@foxmail.com。
傅贵,教授。解学才,助理研究员。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51534008); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2021YJSAQ26); 中国矿业大学(北京)本科教育教学改革与研究重点项目(J20ZD03)

Development and application of SCAP

SHI Zhao¹(), FU Gui¹, XIE Xuecai²^,³, TONG Wenqing⁴, YUAN Chenhui¹, CHEN Yiran¹

¹ School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
² Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
³ Institute of Public Safety Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
⁴ Emergency Management Bureau of Longgang District, Shenzhen Guangdong 518172, China

Received:2022-02-15 Revised:2022-05-27 Online:2022-09-05 Published:2023-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为更好地进行安全文化测评和安全文化建设,通过简述安全文化的发展及作用,综述安全文化评价工具的研究现状,研发和改进安全文化定量分析系统(SCAP);该系统以事故致因“2-4”模型(24Model)为理论依据,根据安全文化32元素设定量表,结合互联网技术研发而成;系统提供Web浏览器和微信小程序2种登录方式,适用任何想了解安全文化状况的企业、高校或个人;测评后,系统可清晰展示测评人员基本信息,按总体水平、不同类型员工、各安全文化元素、个体测评人员等要求输出测评结果,还可与以往测评结果对比,生成对策建议报告。应用结果表明:该系统适用全行业,可通过线上问卷测量,即刻获取安全文化水平测定结果及分析反馈,从而服务于安全文化建设。

关键词: 安全文化定量分析系统(SCAP), “2-4”模型(24Model), 安全文化元素, 系统功能, 事故预防

Abstract:

In order to assess and develop safety culture in a better way, research status of safety culture evaluation tools was reviewed by briefly introducing evolution of safety culture and the role it played, and SCAP was designed and developed. Based on 24Model theoretically, SCAP was developed with a scale set according to 32 elements of safety culture and using Internet technology. Two login methods, web browser and wechat mini program, were provided by the system, which could be applied to any enterprise, university or individual who wanted to learn about state of security culture. After the assessment, basic information of evaluators could be clearly displayed, and results be output according to requirements of overall level, different types of employees, various safety culture elements, individual evaluation personnel. Finally, countermeasures and suggestions report could be generated through comparison with previous evaluation results. The application results show that SCAP is suitable for the whole industry, evaluation results, analysis and feedback can be immediately obtained after online questionnaire measurement, which could serve the development of safety culture.

Key words: safety culture analysis program (SCAP), 24Model, safety culture elements, system function, accident prevention

时照, 傅贵, 解学才, 童文清, 袁晨辉, 陈奕燃. 安全文化定量分析系统的研发与应用*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8): 29-36.

SHI Zhao, FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, TONG Wenqing, YUAN Chenhui, CHEN Yiran. Development and application of SCAP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8): 29-36.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

表2

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 25

[1]	傅贵, 何冬云, 张苏, 等. 再论安全文化的定义及建设水平评估指标[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(4):140-145.
	FU Gui, HE Dongyun, ZHANG Su, et al. Further discussion on definition of safety culture and its assessment indicators[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(4):140-145.
[2]	ZANIN L M, LUNING P A, CUNHA D T D, et al. Influence of educational actions on transitioning of food safety culture in a food service context: part 1-triangulation and data interpretation of food safety culture elements[J]. Food Control, 2021, 119: DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107447. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107447
[3]	MCKENZIE L, SHAW L, JOANNE E, et al. Factors influencing the implementation of a hospital-wide intervention to promote professionalism and build a safety culture: a qualitative study[J]. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2019, 45(10):694-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.07.005
[4]	ZWETSLOOT G, KAMPEN J V, STEIJN W, et al. Ranking of process safety cultures for risk-based inspections using indicative safety culture assessments[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 64: DOI : 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104065. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104065
[5]	何昌原, 张鹏, 李驰原, 等. 中国安全文化学研究热点与演进:基于2010—2019年中国知网数据库的知识图谱分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5):152-159. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.023
	HE Changyuan, ZHANG Peng, LI Chiyuan, et al. Research hotspot and evolution of safety culturology in China: knowledge mapping analysis based on CNKI database from 2010 to 2019[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(5):152-159. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.05.023
[6]	王秉, 吴超. 安全文化学的研究进展及其科学发展模式[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6):25-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.005
	WANG Bing, WU Chao. Research progress and scientific development model of safety culturology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(6):25-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.06.005
[7]	OSTROM L, WILHELMSEN C, KAPLAN B. Assessing safety culture[J]. Nuclear Safety, 1993, 34(2):163-172.
[8]	COX S, COX T. The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example[J]. Work & Stress, 1991, 5(2):93-106. doi: 10.1080/02678379108257007
[9]	READER T W, NOORT M C, SHORROCK S, et al. Safety sans frontieres: an international safety culture model[J]. Risk Analysis, 2015, 35(5):770-789. doi: 10.1111/risa.12327
[10]	傅贵. 安全管理学:事故预防的行为控制方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013:133-135.
[11]	JIANG Wei, FU Gui, LIANG Chunyang, et al. Study on quantitative measurement result of safety culture[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 128: DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104751. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104751
[12]	ATTWOOD D, KHAN F, VEITCH B. Occupational accident models: where have we been and where are we going?[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19: 664-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.02.001
[13]	FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, JIA Qingsong, et al. The development history of accident causation models in the past 100 years: 24Model, a more modern accident causation model[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 134:47-82. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.027
[14]	付净, 傅贵, 张江石, 等. 基于24Model的煤矿企业安全文化缺欠表征研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(6):2033-2040.
	FU Jing, FU Gui, ZHANG Jiangshi, et al. Approach to the production safety culture deficiencies in the coal mine enterprises based on the 24Model[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2019, 19(6):2033-2040.
[15]	傅贵, 索晓, 王春雪. 24Model的系统特性研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(1):263-272. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2018)01-0263-10
	FU Gui, SUO Xiao, WANG Chunxue. Study on the systematic characteristics of 24Model[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(1):263-272.
[16]	SCHWATKA N V, HECKER S, GOLDENHAR L M. Defining and measuring safety climate: a review of the construction industry literature[J]. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 2016, 60(5):537-550. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew020
[17]	THADEN T, GIBBONS A. The safety culture indicator scale measurement system (SCISMS): NRC-000029[R]. Office of Aviation Research and Development, 2008.
[18]	SCHöBEL M, KLOSTERMAN A, LASSALLE R, et al. Digging deeper! Insights from a multi-method assessment of safety culture in nuclear power plants based on Schein’s culture model[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 95: 38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.012
[19]	PROBST T M, GOLDENHAR L M, GYRD J L, et al. The safety climate assessment tool(S-CAT): a rubric-based approach to measuring construction safety climate[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2019, 69:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.004
[20]	郭俊琦. 安全文化定量分析系统的设计研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2007.
	GUO Junqi. The development and application of the safety culture analysis system[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), 2007.
[21]	王祥尧. 安全文化定量测量的理论与实证研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2011.
	WANG Xiangyao. Theoretical and empirical research of safety culture quantitative measurement[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), 2011.
[22]	马跃. 企业安全文化建设方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2017.
	MA Yue. Study on the construction method of enterprise safety culture[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), 2017.
[23]	陈松明, 邓宇宏, 王晶鑫, 等. 高校安全文化水平测量与分析:以某工科院校为例[J]. 安全, 2020, 41(10):39-45.
	CHEN Songming, DENG Hongyu, WANG Jingxin, et al. Measurement and analysis of safety culture level in colleges and universities taking a polytechnic college for example[J]. Safety & Security, 2020, 41(10):39-45.
[24]	胡典顺, 朱展霖. 基于SPSS与AMOS的问卷信度效度检验:以数学焦虑、数学态度和数学效能的关系研究为例[J]. 教育测量与评价, 2020(11):3-7.
	HU Dianshun, ZHU Zhanlin. The Reliability and validity test of the questionnaire based on SPSS and AMOS: a case study on the relationship among mathematical anxiety, mathematical attitude and mathematical self-efficiency[J]. Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2020(11):3-7.
[25]	童文清, 傅贵, 解学才, 等. 我国煤矿安全文化建设现状研究:来自60家煤矿的证据[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(12):85-91.
	TONG Wenqing, FU Gui, XIE Xuecai, et al. Research on construction status of coal mine safety culture in China: evidence from 60 coal mines[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(12):85-91.

KMO取样适切性量数	0.704
Bartlett球形度检验	近似卡方	1 121.723
	自由度	496
	显著性	0.000

序号	试验名称	试验目的	试验设备	试验基本过程
1	安全文化概念	安全文化概念发展进程及相关概念的学习	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	学生点开小程序首页,点击按钮“安全文化”进行学习
2	个体测量	加强对安全文化的认知	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序	学生点开小程序首页,点击按钮“个人测量”进行自主测量
3	团体测量	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.教师从客户端进入,新建问卷; 2.学生从小程序进入,扫码答题
4	组织测量	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.教师从客户端进入,圈定组织; 2.学生从小程序进入,选择组织答题
5	角色转换	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.教师从客户端进入,设定不同角色; 2.学生从小程序进入,选择角色答题
6	安全文化元素	增强对安全文化元素学习	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序教师端:网页版SCAP	1.学生自主学习32个安全文化元素; 2.教师从客户端进入,随机新建问卷; 3.学生从小程序进入,识别对应元素
7	试验课程效果检验	提高安全文化重要性认识	学生端:“全安泰和”微信小程序	1.学生从小程序进入,自主进行测评; 2.本次结果与以往测量作对比; 3.分析自身安全文化水平变化原因

安全文化定量分析系统的研发与应用*

Development and application of SCAP

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李杰, 伊宏艳, 李乃文. 我国事故致因研究团队与热点主题研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 20-27.
[2]	袁晨辉, 时雅倩, 麻勇, 赵祎豪, 傅贵. 基于24Model的事故原因系统分析与调查报告对比:以响水爆炸事故为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 48-55.
[3]	傅贵, 陈奕燃, 许素睿, 陈萍, 袁晨辉, 吴亚丽. 事故致因“2-4”模型的内涵解析及第6版的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 12-19.
[4]	傅贵, 杨晓雨, 刘卓栩, 佟瑞鹏, 孔庆端, 郭丽娟. 安全科学的学科基本问题研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(5): 18-24.
[5]	周乃锋, 蒋帅. 海外城市轨道交通运营技术条件安全评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 152-157.
[6]	尹德志, 帅斌, 黄文成, 张玥, 张锐, 左博睿. Tropos-FRAM法在道路客运事故分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 151-157.
[7]	巫诚诚, 陈大伟. 基于视域分析的高速施工交通组织安全性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 122-128.
[8]	王列妮, 牟瑞芳, 赖杰, 阳建明, 苟志波. 基于S-O-R的城市有轨电车相撞事故机制研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(S2): 104-110.
[9]	罗聪, 徐克, 刘潜, 赵云胜. 安全风险分级管控相关概念辨析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 43-50.
[10]	郭聖煜, 郭文会, 宫培松. 地铁施工工人不安全行为统计过程控制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 153-158.
[11]	李杰, 陈伟炯. 海因里希安全理论的学术影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 1-7.
[12]	傅贵, 李亚, 王秀明. 基于24Model的制造业企业安全管理模式架构[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10): 117-122.
[13]	宋扬，金来，张艳琴，赵俊贤，唐毅，郭凯，虞济龙. 高铁驾驶员安全适应性类型的聚类与判别分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 9-.
[14]	黄丽蒂，刘德明，郝进锋，张天宇. 基于人体安全的栏杆设计荷载试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 22-.
[15]	徐鑫. 我国道路交通事故规律特点及预防对策分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 120-.