中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 234-240.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.07.0228

• 公共安全与应急管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

EasyEnsemble与指标体系法耦合的高层住宅火灾风险评估

付思菡1,2(), 王顾儒1, 崔华莹1, 黄弘3, 赵金龙1,**()   

  1. 1 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全学院, 北京 100083
    2 浙江大学 能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 浙江 杭州 310027
    3 清华大学 安全科学学院, 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-18 修回日期:2026-05-20 出版日期:2026-07-28
  • 通信作者:
    **赵金龙(1988—),男,河北承德人,博士,教授,主要从事火灾动力学、火灾防控技术及风险评估等方面的研究。E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    付思菡 (2005—),女,四川广元人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为火灾风险评估、气体传感器与机器嗅觉、多传感融合感知识别。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    民航联合基金重点项目资助(U2333210)

Fire risk assessment of high-rise residential buildings using a combination of EasyEnsemble and indicator system method

Fu Sihan1,2(), Wang Guru1, Cui Huaying1, Huang Hong3, Zhao Jinlong1,**()   

  1. 1 School of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310027, China
    3 School of Safety Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2026-03-18 Revised:2026-05-20 Published:2026-07-28

摘要:

为加强高层住宅火灾防控,破解评估维度单一、专家依赖性强及主观性突出的问题,构建融合机器学习与指标体系的火灾风险评估方法。首先,基于历史火灾与公开数据集,对比EasyEnsemble、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)等机器学习算法预测火灾发生概率;其次,从“人-建-环-管”4个维度构建火灾后果评估指标体系,融合机器学习模型与结构熵权法确定指标权重并量化火灾后果;最后,耦合量化结果判定火灾风险等级,并以J市为例,验证方法的可行性和有效性。结果表明:EasyEnsemble算法的曲线下面积(AUC)值与召回率优于随机森林(RF)、XGBoost、支持向量机(SVM)、轻量级梯度提升机Light GBm 4种算法;XGBoost计算的权重区分度更高,更能客观反映指标相对重要性;融合机器学习与指标体系的高层住宅火灾风险评估方法,弱化专家主观性,实现火灾风险的多维度综合量化。

关键词: EasyEnsemble, 指标体系, 高层住宅, 火灾风险评估, 极端梯度提升(XGBoost), 结构熵权法

Abstract:

To objectively and comprehensively assess fire risks in high-rise residential buildings, and to address that traditional assessment methods were over-reliant on expert experience and had a high degree of subjectivity in their results. First, various machine learning algorithms, including EasyEnsemble and XGBoost, were compared based on historical fire and publicly available datasets. The optimal algorithm was selected to predict the probability of fire occurrence. Second, a fire consequence assessment indicator system was constructed from four aspects, including human, building, environment and management. Machine learning models were integrated with the structural entropy weighting method to determine indicator weights, and fire consequences were quantified based on scoring criteria. Then, the results of both approaches were coupled to quantify fire risk levels. Finally, the method's feasibility and effectiveness were validated using City J as a case study. The results indicate that the EasyEnsemble algorithm exhibits higher area under curve (AUC) values and recall rates, outperforming the Random Forest(RF), XGBoost, Support Vector Machine(SVM) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine(LightGBM) algorithms in predicting the probability of fire occurrence. The weights calculated by the XGBoost algorithm demonstrate greater discriminative power, better reflecting the relative importance of indicators. The high-rise residential fire risk assessment method proposed in this paper, which integrates machine learning with an indicator system, enables a comprehensive quantitative assessment of fire risk. It provides a reference for fire departments in formulating fire risk prevention and control strategies.

Key words: EasyEnsemble, indicator system, high-rise residential buildings, fire risk assessment, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), structure entropy weight method

中图分类号: