中国安全科学自主知识体系建构研究:学科、学术与话语

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.08.0188

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为回应中国自主知识体系建设的时代命题,探索中国安全科学自主知识体系的建构路径。采用文献分析与理论建构方法,阐释学科体系内涵与发展脉络,凝练学术体系理论积淀与范式演进,解析话语体系生成逻辑与层次结构,提出自主知识体系的建构维度与运作方式。结果表明:学科体系方面,安全科学具有横断交叉属性,历经萌芽探索、体系初建、快速发展、交叉创新4阶段演进,形成“源-防-控-救-管”全链条谱系;学术体系方面,学与术的有机统一构成理论根基,学术范式实现从被动应对到主动预防、从人防物防到智能防控的双重跃迁,呈现纵向贯通、横向融合、动态演进的框架特征;话语体系方面,遵循文化、学理、实践三重生成逻辑,形成价值性、理论性、制度性、实践性4层结构,本土引领与国际表达有效衔接。基于上述分析,从知识维、实践维、主体维提出自主知识体系建构路径。学科体系提供面状支撑,学术体系贯穿理论主线,话语体系形成主体触点,三者在点、线、面结构中相辅相成,共同构成中国安全科学自主知识体系的立体架构。

关键词: 安全科学, 自主知识体系, 学科体系, 学术体系, 话语体系

Abstract:

To address the construction of China's independent knowledge system in safety science, this study employed literature analysis and theoretical construction methods to interpret the connotation and development context of the discipline system, refined the theoretical accumulation and paradigm evolution of the academic system, and analyzed the generation logic and hierarchical structure of the discourse system. The results indicate that the discipline system exhibits interdisciplinary characteristics, evolving through four stages—embryonic exploration, initial establishment, rapid development, and cross-disciplinary innovation—forming a full-chain spectrum of source-prevention-control-rescue-management. The academic system is rooted in the organic unity of theory and practice, with paradigm shifts from passive response to proactive prevention, and from human-physical defense to intelligent protection. It features vertical coherence, horizontal integration and dynamic evolution. The discourse system follows cultural, theoretical, and practical generation logic, forming a four-tier structure of value, theory, institution, and practice, with effective integration between local leading theories and international academic expression. Based on the above analysis, the construction path of the independent knowledge system is proposed from the knowledge, practice and subject dimensions. The discipline system provides comprehensive planar support, the academic system runs through the theoretical mainline, and the discourse system forms subject-oriented communication carriers. The three parts complement each other in a point-line-plane structure and jointly build the three-dimensional architecture of China's independent knowledge system of safety science.

Key words: safety science, independent knowledge system, discipline system, academic system, discourse system

中图分类号:

X941

佟瑞鹏, 李鑫, 王乐瑶, 赵云昊, 许素睿. 中国安全科学自主知识体系建构研究:学科、学术与话语[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2026, 36(8): 1-10.

Tong Ruipeng, Li Xin, Wang Leyao, Zhao Yunhao, Xu Surui. Constructing an independent knowledge system of safety science in China: discipline, academia, and discourse[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(8): 1-10.

图/表 4

参考文献 28

[1]	张雷声, 韩喜平, 肖贵清, 等. 建构中国特色哲学社会科学自主知识体系[J]. 马克思主义理论学科研究, 2022, 8(7): 4-16.
	Zhang Leisheng, Han Xiping, Xiao Guiqing, et al. Constructing the independent knowledge system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics[J]. Studies on Marxist Theory, 2022, 8(7): 4-16.
[2]	范维澄, 苗鸿雁, 袁亮, 等. 我国安全科学与工程学科“十四五”发展战略研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2021, 35(6): 864-870.
	Fan Weicheng, Miao Hongyan, Yuan Liang, et al. Development strategy of safety discipline in China during the 14^th Five-Year Plan Period[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2021, 35(6): 864-870.
[3]	郁建兴, 黄飚. 建构中国自主知识体系及其世界意义[J]. 政治学研究, 2023(3): 14-24,167-168.
	Yu Jianxing, Huang Biao. Constructing China's independent knowledge system and its world significance[J]. CASS Journal of Political Science, 2023(3): 14-24, 167-168.
[4]	李文良. 学科、学术与话语: 国家安全学自主知识体系建构研究[J]. 国际安全研究, 2026, 44(1): 20-41,157-158.
	Li Wenliang. Research on the construction of an autonomous knowledge system in national security studies[J]. Journal of International Security Studies, 2026, 44(1): 20-41, 157-158.
[5]	钟开斌, 薛澜. 中国特色应急管理理论研究的基本图谱[J]. 中国社会科学, 2025(1): 47-67,205.
	Zhong Kaibin, Xue Lan. The roadmap of emergency management theory research with Chinese characteristics[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2025(1): 47-67, 205.
[6]	盛昭瀚. 工程管理基础理论:建构管理学中国自主知识体系的学理表征[J]. 管理世界, 2026, 42(5):59-79.
	Sheng Zhaohan. Fundamental theory of engineering management: the theoretical representation of building a Chinese intellectual system in management[J]. Journal of Management World, 2026, 42(5): 59-79.
[7]	张文显. 论建构中国自主法学知识体系[J]. 法学家, 2023(2): 1-15,191.
	Zhang Wenxian. On the construction of China's self-independent knowledge system of legal science[J]. The Jurist, 2023(2): 1-15, 191.
[8]	吴超. 近10年我国安全科学基础理论的研究进展[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2016, 26(8): 1675-1692.
	Wu Chao. Some advanced of safety science fundamental theories of China in recent ten years[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2016, 26(8): 1675-1692.
[9]	佟瑞鹏, 王乐瑶, 韩吉祥, 等. 安全学科协同育人体系构建与实践:从四维融合到四链并举[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(10): 1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.10.1026
	Tong Ruipeng, Wang Leyao, Han Jixiang, et al. Construction and practice of collaborative education system for safety disciplines: from "Four-dimensional integration" to "Four-chain parallel"[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(10): 1-7. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.10.1026
[10]	佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 胡向阳, 等. 安全软科学研究追溯与展望: 内涵、外延与挑战[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 1-8. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1894
	Tong Ruipeng, Wang Lulu, Hu Xiangyang, et al. Review and prospect of safety soft science research: connotation, extension and challenge[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 1-8. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1894
[11]	谢伏瞻. 加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019(5): 4-22,204.
	Xie Fuzhan. Accelerating the construction of the disciplinary system, academic system, and discourse system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2019(5): 4-22, 204.
[12]	Swuste P, Van Gulijk C, Zwaard W. Safety metaphors and theories, a review of the occupational safety literature of the US, UK and the Netherlands, till the first part of the 20^th century[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(8): 1000-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.020
[13]	Jiang Chuansheng, Zeng Mingrong, Cao Yiming, et al. The history, logic and trends of the discipline of safety science in China[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 116: 137-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.005
[14]	傅贵. 安全科学学及其应用探讨[J]. 安全, 2019, 40(2): 1-10.
	Fu Gui. The science of safety science and its practical implications[J]. Safety & Security, 2019, 40(2): 1-10.
[15]	Mao Haifeng. Discipline construction and knowledge system of "safety science and engineering"[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 43: 506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.087
[16]	刘潜. 一个发展中的交叉科学领域:安全科学[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 1991, 1(2): 57-65.
	Liu Qian. A developing cross science field: safety science[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 1991, 1(2): 57-65.
[17]	Swuste P, Groeneweg J, Van Gulijk C, et al. The future of safety science[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 125: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104593.
[18]	李杰. 安全科学结构及主题演进特征研究:基于Web of Science科技文本知识单元共现分析的探索[D]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2016.
	Li Jie. Science structure and topics evolution of safety: based on co-occurrence of knowledge unit in Web of Science literature[D]. Beijing: Capital University of Economics and business, 2016.
[19]	刘潜. 安全科学学科理论创建的历史回顾[J]. 安全与健康, 2002 (9): 32-35.
[20]	Hale A R, Hovden J. Management and culture: the third age of safety:a review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health and environment[M]. London: Taylor & Francis, 1998: 145-182.
[21]	Ge Ji, Zhang Yuyuan, Chen Shoukun, et al. Accident causation models developed in China between 1978 and 2018: review and comparison[J]. Safety Science, 2022, 148: DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105653.
[22]	佟瑞鹏, 王乾, 安宇, 等. 基于灰犀牛理论的安全生产三道防线内涵解析与体系构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(9):52-59. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.09.1334
	Tong Ruipeng, Wang Qian, An Yu, et al. Connotation analysis and system construction of three lines of defense for work safety based on grey rhino theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 52-59. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.09.1334
[23]	佟瑞鹏, 王益艳, 武琪, 等. 安全科学范式运演机制:基于安全-Ⅰ、安全-Ⅱ、安全-Ⅲ的思维辨析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2026, 36(1):7-16. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.01.0564
	Tong Ruipeng, Wang Yiyan, Wu Qi, et al. Research on operational mechanism of safety science paradigms: a conceptual analysis based on safety-Ⅰ, safety-Ⅱ, and safety-Ⅲ[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(1): 7-16. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.01.0564
[24]	国家自然科学基金委员会工程与材料科学部. 安全科学与工程学科发展战略研究报告(2015—2030)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 35-40.
[25]	傅贵, 袁晨辉, 时照, 等. 安全科学名词含义的研究方法及“安全”的含义解析[J]. 安全, 2021, 42(7): 1-5.
	Fu Gui, Yuan Chenhui, Shi Zhao, et al. Research methods of safety science terms and analysis of the meaning of "safety"[J]. Safety & Security, 2021, 42(7): 1-5.
[26]	Almklov P G, Rosness R, Størkersen K. When safety science meets the practitioners: does safety science contribute to marginalization of practical knowledge?[J]. Safety Science, 2014, 67: 25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.025
[27]	孟现飞, 丁恩杰, 刘全龙, 等. 危险源概念的重新界定及与隐患关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 55-59. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.04.010
	Meng Xianfei, Ding Enjie, Liu Quanlong, et al. Study on redefinition of hazard and its relationship with latent danger[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(4): 55-59. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.04.010
[28]	雷长群. 安全生产领域基本概念辨析及双重预防机制研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(2): 17-21.
	Lei Changqun. Study on basic concepts discrimination and double prevention mechanism in the field of work safety[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(2): 17-21.