尾矿材料渗透系数序贯概率反演分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.023

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 158-165.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.023

尾矿材料渗透系数序贯概率反演分析

蒋水华^1,2 副教授, 曾绍慧^1,2, 黄劲松^1,2 教授, 姚池^1,2 副教授

1.南昌大学建筑工程学院,江西南昌 330031;
2.江西省尾矿库工程安全重点实验室,江西南昌 330031

收稿日期:2020-03-02 修回日期:2020-05-16 出版日期:2020-06-28 发布日期:2021-01-28
作者简介:蒋水华(1987—),男,江西九江人,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险分析方面的研究工作。E-mail:sjiangaa@ncu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
江西省自然科学基金资助(20181ACB20008,2018ACB21017,20192BBG70078,20181BCD40003);江西省研究生创新专项基金资助(CX2018061)。

Sequential probabilistic back analysis on hydraulic conductivity of tailings materials

JIANG Shuihua^1,2, ZENG Shaohui^1,2, HUANG Jinsong^1,2, YAO Chi^1,2

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330031, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Tailings Reservoir Engineering Safety of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang Jiangxi 330031, China

Received:2020-03-02 Revised:2020-05-16 Online:2020-06-28 Published:2021-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为保证尾矿库坝体渗流分析的准确性,推断尾矿材料渗透系数概率分布并减少其不确定性,提出基于贝叶斯更新的尾矿材料参数序贯概率反演方法,建立尾矿坝水位代理模型及似然函数,并以大黑山尾矿坝为工程背景,利用不同时刻从不同监测点测得的尾矿坝水位值,对多层尾矿材料的渗透系数进行序贯概率反演分析。结果表明:提出的基于贝叶斯更新的序贯概率反演方法能够有效推断大黑山尾矿材料渗透系数及概率分布,降低渗透系数变异系数,与水位监测点位置距离较近土层渗透系数的变异系数缩减了18.25%;单独利用尾矿坝水位监测值不能准确推断尾矿材料渗透系数及表征其真实不确定性,需要进一步收集多源监测信息并融合到参数概率反演分析中。

关键词: 尾矿坝, 渗透系数, 序贯概率反演, 贝叶斯更新, 不确定性

Abstract: In order to ensure seepage analysis accuracy of tailings dam, deduce hydraulic conductivity probability distribution of tailings material and to reduce its uncertainty, sequential probabilistic back analysis method of material parameters based on Bayesian updating was proposed. Then, a surrogate model of water table and likelihood function were constructed. Finally, with Daheishan tailings dam taken as an example, sequential probabilistic back analysis of hydraulic conductivity of multi-layered tailings materials was conducted based on monitoring data of water tables. The results show that the proposed approach can effectively infer hydraulic conductivity and probability distributions as well as reduce their variation coefficients which is reduced by 18.25% for soil layer closer to monitoring points. Realistic uncertainties of hydraulic conductivity and representation cannot be well deduced only from monitoring information of water levels, and it is necessary to further collect field information of multiple sources and incorporate it into probabilistic back analysis

Key words: tailings dam, hydraulic conductivity, sequential probabilistic back analysis, Bayesian updating, uncertainty

中图分类号:

X936

蒋水华, 曾绍慧, 黄劲松, 姚池. 尾矿材料渗透系数序贯概率反演分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 158-165.

JIANG Shuihua, ZENG Shaohui, HUANG Jinsong, YAO Chi. Sequential probabilistic back analysis on hydraulic conductivity of tailings materials[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6): 158-165.

参考文献

[1] 张媛媛, 杨凯. 尾矿库生命周期溃坝风险演化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(7): 1-6.
ZHANG Yuanyuan, YANG Kai. Research on evolution of risk of tailings dam break in lifecycle[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(7): 1-6.
[2] 梁萱. 尾矿库逐渐溃坝三维数值模拟研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2019.
LIANG Xuan. Three dimensional numerical simulation study on gradual dam failure of tailings pond[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang Unersity, 2019.
[3] 李康宏, 邓祥辉, 何萌, 等. 基于钻孔资料的某尾矿坝渗透系数反演分析有限元模型建立[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(增1): 4 329-4 332.
LI Kanghong, DEGN Xianghui, HE Meng. et al. The finite element model of permeability inversion analysis for a tailings dam based on borehole data is established[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(S1): 4 329-4 332.
[4] 蒋卫东, 李夕兵. 尾矿坝浸润线时空混沌模型及反分析[J]. 中南工业大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 34(6): 704-707.
JIANG Weidong, LI Xibing. Spatiotemporal chaos model of seepage linein tailings dam and its back analysis [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology:Natural Science, 2003, 34(6): 704-707.
[5] 徐维生, 柴军瑞, 陈兴周, 等. 东沟尾矿坝渗透系数反演分析[J]. 工程勘察, 2009,37(12): 66-69.
XU Weisheng, CHAI Junrui, CHEN Xingzhou, et al. Inversion analysis of seepage parameters for Donggou tailing filling dam[J]. Geotechnical Investigation and Surveying, 2009,37 (12): 66-69.
[6] 徐维生, 柴军瑞, 李娟娟, 等. 尾矿库坝体加高方案排水分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2010, 30(5): 226-228.
XU Weisheng, CHAI Junrui, LI Juanjuan, et al. Drainage analysis of dam body elevation scheme for tailings pond [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 30(5): 226-228.
[7] BHARAT T V, SHARMA J. Prediction of compression and permeability characteristics of mine tailings using natural computation and largestrain consolidation framework[C]. Geo Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, 2011: 3 868-3 877.
[8] ELRAMLY H, MORGENSTERN N R, CRUDEN D M. Probabilistic stability analysis of a tailings dyke on presheared clay shale[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(1): 192-208.
[9] 蒋水华, 李典庆. 边坡可靠度更新的贝叶斯方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 45-49.
[10] STRAUB D, PAPAIOANNOU I. Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 141(3) 04014134.
[11] DIAZDELAO F A, GARBUNOINIGO A, AU S K, et al. Bayesian updating and model class selection with subset simulation[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 317: 1 102-1 121.
[12] AU S K, BECK J L. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 16(4): 263-277.
[13] 吕鹏, 王晓玲, 吴斌平, 等. 基于熵-盲数的贝叶斯渗流参数反演分析研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2019, 38(4): 108-118.
LYU Peng, WANG Xiaoling, WU Binping, et al. The inverse analysis of Bayesian seepage parameters based on entropy blind number[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2019, 38(4): 108-118.
[14] 蒋水华, 李典庆, 周创兵. 基于拉丁超立方抽样的边坡可靠度分析非侵入式随机有限元法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增2): 70-76.
JIANG Shuihua, LI Dianqing, ZHOU Chuangbing. Non invasive stochastic finite element method for slope reliability analysis based on Latin hypercube sampling [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(S2): 70-76.
[15] 曹荣国. 大黑山尾矿坝渗流与稳定性分析研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2017.
CAO Rongguo. The study and analysis of seepage and stability about tailings dam in Daheishan[D]. Changchun:Jilin Unersity, 2017.
[16] 郑欣, 李全明, 许开立, 等. 考虑变量相关性的尾矿坝坡失稳溃坝概率计算方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(2): 23-27.
ZHENG Xin, LI Quanming, XU Kaili, et al. A method for calculating the probability of landslide failure of tailings dam considering the correlation of variable [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11(2): 23-27.
[17] DUNCAN J M. Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(4): 307-316.

尾矿材料渗透系数序贯概率反演分析

Sequential probabilistic back analysis on hydraulic conductivity of tailings materials

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曾纪涵, 章光, 吴浩, 胡少华. 改进POT模型下尾矿坝综合预警值确定方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 134-139.
[2]	张鸽. 基于累积接尘量的尘肺病风险评估方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 200-206.
[3]	蔡玫, 王秋寒. Natech风险管理中的承灾体脆弱性评估方法综述^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 9-17.
[4]	金智新, 刘倩, 邓存宝, 王延生. 生产安全事件随机-模糊耦合的危险性度量[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 1-7.
[5]	武立功, 肖利兴, 刘晓峰, 姚池, 姜清辉, 周创兵. 尾砂粒径对尾矿坝漫顶溃坝的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 160-165.
[6]	戴健非, 杨鹏, 诸利一, 郭攀, 贯怀光. 集成PCA和LSTM神经网络的浸润线预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 94-101.
[7]	刘克辉, 吴冬明, 蔡海, 敬小非, 李开放, 康钦容. 沟槽弯度对尾矿库溃决矿浆运动特性影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 54-59.
[8]	李辉, 易富, 张佳. 基于因素空间的尾矿坝稳定性综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 28-34.
[9]	佟瑞鹏, 程蒙召, 马晓飞, 许素睿. 不确定性条件下煤尘职业健康损害评价方法及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 139-144.
[10]	牟能冶, 仇戈. 语义ELECTRE-TRI风险评估模型构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 44-49.
[11]	段永胜, 赵继广, 陈鹏, 赵蓓蕾. 一种考虑认知不确定性的风险矩阵分析方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(2): 70-74.
[12]	杜艳强, 王新武, 张坤, 王晓强, 杨春和. 细粒尾矿坝漫顶溃坝机制及灾变过程[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(2): 104-108.
[13]	吴贤国, 覃亚伟, 沈梅芳, 张立茂, 张伟. 基于云推理的运营隧道结构健康安全风险评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(2): 133-138.
[14]	敬小非，蔡治勇，刘克辉. 拦挡坝对尾矿库溃决泥沙缓冲效应试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 98-.
[15]	邹铁方，彭海涛，刘雨. 计算事故再现结果区间的支持向量回归-子区间法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 48-.