大型多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.015

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 102-108.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.015

大型多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系

姜涛¹ 副教授, 张玉龙¹, 李士博¹, 李政² 工程师, 邱海良² 高级工程师

1 同济大学机械与能源工程学院,上海 201804;
2 烟台艾迪精密机械股份有限公司,山东烟台 264006

收稿日期:2020-10-28 修回日期:2020-12-02 出版日期:2021-01-28 发布日期:2021-07-28
作者简介:姜涛 (1969—),男,河南郑州人,博士,副教授,主要从事机械电子、机械设计等方面的研究。E-mail: jiangtao@tongji.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0810203)。

Research on comprehensive performance evaluation system of large multi-functional rescue attachments

JIANG Tao¹, ZHANG Yulong¹, LI Shibo¹, LI Zheng², QIU Hailiang²

1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;
2 Yantai Eddie Precision Machinery Co., Ltd, Yantai Shandong 264006, China

Received:2020-10-28 Revised:2020-12-02 Online:2021-01-28 Published:2021-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高工程机械的救援效率,首先,总结多功能救援属具性能评价存在的指标多样化、矛盾化等问题;然后,面向大震巨灾环境下的救援需求,建立以安全高效为原则,以目标层、准则层、指标层3层体系为框架、以生产性能、基本功能、运输性能、安全性能、操作性能为关键要素的多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系,并采用改进的层次分析法(AHP)-模糊综合评价法作为评估工具;最后,综合评价3种新型多功能救援属具的性能。结果表明:3种多功能救援属具的综合性能由高到低依次为剪切破碎扩张救援属具、抓取起吊救援属具、破拆开孔救援属具;综合评价体系评价后的结果与基于经验的判断结果基本一致。

关键词: 多功能救援属具, 综合性能, 评价体系, 层次分析法(AHP), 模糊综合评价法

Abstract: In order to improve rescue efficiency of construction machinery, firstly, existing problems and difficulties were analyzed, including multiple indicators and conflicts in evaluation of multi-functional rescue attachments' performance. Then, a comprehensive evaluation system of their performance based on principle of “safety and efficiency” was established from three levels, objective, standard and indicator levels and five aspects including production, basic function, transportation capacity, safety and operational ability. Finally, the improved AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate performance of three kinds of multi-functional rescue attachments. The results show that their comprehensive performance ranks from high to low asbreaking-opening rescue attachment, shearing-expanding rescue attachment, and grabbing-lifting rescue attachment.Moreover, evaluation results based on the above system are basically consistent with judgment results based on experience.

Key words: multi-functional rescue attachments, comprehensive performance, evaluation system, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

中图分类号:

X948

姜涛, 张玉龙, 李士博, 李政, 邱海良. 大型多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 102-108.

JIANG Tao, ZHANG Yulong, LI Shibo, LI Zheng, QIU Hailiang. Research on comprehensive performance evaluation system of large multi-functional rescue attachments[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(1): 102-108.

参考文献

[1] 胡卫建, 尚红, 司洪波, 等. 我国应对大震巨灾应急救援装备的技术需求研究[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 46(5): 844-850.
HU Weijian, SHANG Hong, SI Hongbo, et al. The demand study of the technological equipments for disposal to the emergency rescue of a great earthquake in China[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universtatis Pekinensis, 2010, 46(5): 844-850.
[2] 谢明武, 康敬东, 潘晓军, 等. 工程机械应急救援现状及需求分析[J]. 建筑机械化, 2013, 34 (4): 41-42, 59.
XIE Mingwu, KANG Jingdong, PAN Xiaojun, et al. Discussion on the development status and demand for construction machinery in emergency rescue[J]. Construction Mechanization, 2013, 34 (4): 41-42, 59.
[3] 张利. 从抗震救灾看工程机械产品的抢险功能[J]. 工程机械, 2008, 45(7): 68-70.
[4] 吴佳尉. 开孔取芯一体破拆救援属具的设计[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2017.
WU Jiawei. Design of a hole opening and coring rescue subsidiary tool[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2017.
[5] 宋伯宸. 钳剪抓一体多功能救援属具的设计[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2017.
SONG Bochen. Research of a kind of multifunction rescue accessorie with 6-bar mechanism[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2017.
[6] WANG Chunrong, ZHAO Jing, XIA Erdong. Multi-objective optimal design of a novel multi-function rescue attachment based on improved NSGA-II[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40(7): 344-358.
[7] GB/T 32799—2016, 液压破碎锤[S].
GB/T 32799-2016, Hydraulic breaking hammers [S].
[8] GB/T 17906—1999, 液压破拆工具通用技术条件[S].
GB/T 17906-1999, General specification for hydraulically operated rescue tools[S].
[9] FANG Cheng, DING Xilun. A novel movementbased operation method for dual-arm rescue construction machinery[J]. Robotica, 2016, 34(5): 1 090-1 112.
[10] SHANG Hong, ZHANG Guowei, HU Weijian, et al. The technology of assistant rescue accessory for city earthquake disaster based on the large construction machinery [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(12): 122-128.
[11] LI Yutan, ZHU Hua. A simple optimization method for the design of a lightweight, explosion-proof housing for a coal mine rescue robot[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40(7): 340-349.
[12] YAN Shirong, XU Jian. Study on dynamic characteristics of a hydraulic hammer[C]. Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA), 2010 International Conference on. 2011: 459-462.
[13] 浅谈应急救援装备配备的要求[OL].(2013-11-19). http://www.chinajyzb.com.cn/news_detail-5-4148.html.
[14] GB 32460—2015, 消防应急救援装备破拆机具通用技术条件[S].
GB 32460-2015, Fire emergency rescue equipments:general technical specification for forcible entry tools [S].
[15] GB/T 29178—2012, 消防应急救援装备配备指南[S].
GB/T 29178-2012, Fire emergency rescue:guidelines for equipment allocation[S].
[16] SAATY T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 1990, 48: 9-26.
[17] 陈刘瑜, 李希建, 毕娟, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的冲击型煤与瓦斯突出倾向性预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 47-52.
CHEN Liuyu, LI Xijian, BI juan, et al. Prediction of coal-gas outburst induced by rock-burst tendency based on AHP-TOPSIS[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 47-52.
[18] 熊文泽, 靳江红, 唐军梅. SCADA系统信息安全定量风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(8): 157-163.
XIONG Wenze, JIN Jianghong, TANG Junmei. Quantitative risk assessment method for information security of SCADA systems[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(8): 157-163.
[19] HUANG Wenxi, CHENG Xinwen. Fuzzy evaluation of arable land suitability based on three scale AHP method[C]. International Conference on Geoinformatics. IEEE, 2016: 1-4.

大型多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系

Research on comprehensive performance evaluation system of large multi-functional rescue attachments

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊钰, 孔德中, 杨胜利, 吴桂义, 左宇军, 程占博. 大倾角工作面煤壁稳定性的云模型综合辨识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 144-151.
[2]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[3]	王新丰, 何毅, 陆明远, 高毓浩, 李珊. 开挖卸荷扰动深部巷道围岩变形破坏特征研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 83-90.
[4]	王刚, 商荦真, 刘学麟, 唐礼, 程前. 采用AHP-熵权法的巷道启封中毒窒息致因研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 187-192.
[5]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[6]	杨天姿, 王铁骊, 彭恒明, 段海林. 小微企业生产安全事故应急脆弱性评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[7]	吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[8]	吴仁彪, 何宇翔, 贾云飞. 基于改进层次分析法的重点人员风险评价方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 112-118.
[9]	朱冠吉, 刘迪, 孙强, 周子超. 铁路机车驾驶员职业安全适应性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 64-70.
[10]	郑晓波. 基于AHP的铁路信息系统风险评价指标体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 139-145.
[11]	周雪, 左忠义, 程伟. 基于组合赋权云模型的铁路旅客运输安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 158-164.
[12]	田睿, 孟海东, 陈世江, 王创业, 石磊. RF-AHP-云模型下岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7): 166-172.
[13]	邓伟, 夏正洪. 高原机场应急保障能力评价方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 172-177.
[14]	陈刘瑜, 李希建, 毕娟, 华攸金, 魏泽云. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的冲击型煤与瓦斯突出倾向性预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 47-52.
[15]	孙威, 韦善阳, 田筱, 许石青, 石美. 贵州少数民族村寨火灾风险综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 126-133.